Skip to main content
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
. 2003 Sep;80(3):482–493. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jtg049

Gender differences in street economy and social network correlates of arrest among heroin injectors in Baltimore, Maryland

Aaron D Curry 1,, Carl A Latkin 1
PMCID: PMC3455980  PMID: 12930885

Abstract

In a sample of 761 heroin injectors in Baltimore, Maryland, correlates of arrest for drug-related and non-drug-related criminal offenses, by gender, were examined. This investigation examined gender differences in involvement in the drug economy and correlates of arrest. Correlates included roles in the street drug economy, social network attributes, and economic and demographic variables. Gender differences were found. Selling drugs was strongly associated with drug-related arrests for males. Steering (i.e., publicizing drug brands) was highly associated with drug-related arrests for females. Level of heroin addiction was associated with drug-related arrests for males, but not for females. The associations of social network variables with arrests also differed by gender. For females but not males, a higher number of females in one’s network was associated with a lower frequency of arrests. For males, having at least one heroin injector in the personal network was associated with a decreased frequency of arrest, while for females the direction of the association was reversed. These findings suggest the importance of modeling drug behaviors by gender.

Keywords: Arrest, Drug economy, Gender, Injection drug use, Social networks

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (82.4 KB).

References

  • 1.Baltimore District Report. Washington, DC: US Drug Enforcement Agency; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Simon D. The Corner: A Year in the Life of an Inner-City Neighborhood. New York, NY: Broadway Books; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sherman SG, Latkin CA. Drug users’ involvement in the drug economy: implications for harm reduction and HIV prevention programs. J Urban Health. 2002;79:266–277. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.2.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Grogger J. Arrests, persistent youth joblessness, and black/white employment differentials. Rev Econ Stat. 1992;74:100–106. doi: 10.3201/eid0802.010164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nagin D, Waldfogel J. The effect of conviction on income through the life cycle. Int Rev Law Econ. 1993;18:25–40. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8188(97)00055-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Weatherburn D, Lind B. Street-level drug law enforcement and entry into methadone maintenance treatment. Addiction. 2001;96:577–587. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.9645776.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schutz CG, Rapiti E, Vlahov D, Anthony JC. Suspected determinants of enrollment into detoxification and methadone maintenance treatment among injecting drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1994;36:129–138. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(94)90095-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chitwood DD, Morningstar PC. Factors which differentiate cocaine users in treatment from nontreatment users. Int J Addict. 1985;20:449–459. doi: 10.3109/10826088509044925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rounsaville BJ, Kleber HD. Untreated opiate addicts. How do they differ from those seeking treatment? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42:1072–1077. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790340050008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ. Contrast of treatment-seeking and untreated cocaine abusers. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:464–471. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820060044007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mauer M, Potler C, Wolf R. Gender and Justice: Women, Drugs and Sentencing Policy. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Greenfeld LA, Snell TL. Women Offenders. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice; 1999. pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ball JC, Rosen L, Friedman EG, Nurco DN. The impact of heroin addiction upon criminality. NIDA Res Monogr. 1979;27:163–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hser YI, Anglin MD, Booth MW. Sex differences in addict careers. 3. Addiction. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1987;13:231–251. doi: 10.3109/00952998709001512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Anglin MD, Hser YI, McGlothlin WH. Sex differences in addict careers. 2. Becoming addicted. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1987;13:59–71. doi: 10.3109/00952998709001500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Darke S. Self-report among injecting drug users: a review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998;51:253–263. doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(98)00028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES