Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
. 2000 Sep;77(3):383–395. doi: 10.1007/BF02386748

Pretest assessment as a component of safer sex intervention: A pilot study of brief one-session interventions for women partners of male injection druc users in New York city

Beatrice J Krauss 1,✉, Lloyd Goldsmat 1, Edna Bula 1, Christopher Godfrey 1, Dorline S Yee 1, Michael Palij 1
PMCID: PMC3456038  PMID: 10976612

Abstract

This pilot study evaluated whether brief safer sex interventions for women partners of male injection drug users significantly influenced perceptions of partner risk, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) knowledge, correct condom usage, and self-reported consistent safer sex (abstinence or 100% of vaginal-penile intercourse acts protected by male or female condoms). The study also examined the impact of pretest assessment on those variables since pretest assessment may challenge participants' current knowledge, safer sex practices, and partner communication techniques. The study randomly assigned participants to pretest or no pretest assessment. Each group was also assigned randomly to a presentation modality: (1) safer sex pamphlet review only, (2) pamphlet review with demonstration of several safer sex alternatives, or (3) pamphlet review with skills practice to mastery with one safer sex alternative of the woman's choice. For the last two conditions, a 35-minute interactive session covered prevention efficacy of safer sex methods for HIV, sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy, correct use, eroticization, local cost and availability, and partner objections. At 7 weeks postintervention, a higher proportion of women who took pretest assessment reported consistent safer sex (66.7%) compared to those without pretests (55.6%). Assignment to the interactive interventions (skills or demonstration) had little additional impact over pretest assessment for these women. Among women who did not take pretests, the interactive interventions had strong effects; 76.9% reported consistent safer sex versus 33.3% in the pamphlet review group. There were additional specific effects for pretest assessment on HIV knowledge and partner risk perception and for interactive intervention on correct condom usage. Brief interventions appear to have some positive short-term effects. Pretest assessment may be an important component of brief interventions.

Key words: Assessment, Evaluation, Heterosexual Partners of IDUs, HIV, Intervention, Women

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (813.3 KB).

Footnotes

Ms. Bula, Mr. Godfrey, Ms. Yee

References

  • 1.HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Estimates of Persons Living with AIDS in New York City. New York: New York City Department of Health Office of AIDS Surveillance; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Friedman SR, Jarlais DC, Ward TP, Jose B, Neaigus A, Goldstein MF. Drug injectors and heterosexual AIDS. In: Sherr L, editor. Heterosexual AIDS. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic; 1993. pp. 41–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Morrill AC, Ickovics JR, Golubchikov VV, Beren SE, Rodin J. Safer sex: social and psychological predictors of behavioral maintenance and change among heterosexual women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64:819–828. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.4.819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sikkema KJ, Koob JJ, Cargill VC, et al. Levels and predictors of HIV risk behavior among women in low-income public housing developments. Public Health Rep. 1995;110:707–713. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tross S, Krauss B, Andia J, Sanchez M, Long S. Condom use intention and behavior among female sexual partners of injection drug users in New York City: findings from a community-level intervention. Paper presented at: National Institute on Drug Abuse Second Science Symposium on Drugs, Sex and AIDS: Prevention Research, 1995–2000; August 1994; Flagstaff, AZ.
  • 7.National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Multisite HIV Prevention Trial Group The NIMH multisite HIV prevention trial: reducing HIV sexual risk behavior. Science. 1998;80:1889–1894. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5371.1889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Deren S, Davis WR, Beardsley M, Tortu S, Clatts M. Outcomes of a risk-reduction intervention with high-risk populations: the Harlem AIDS Project. AIDS Educ Prev. 1995;7:379–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kalichman SC, Kelly JA, Stevenson LY. Priming effects of HIV risk assessments on related perceptions and behavior: an experimental field study. AIDS Behav. 1997;1:3–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM. A randomized controlled trial of and HIV sexual risk-reduction intervention for young African-American women. JAMA. 1995;274:1271–1275. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.16.1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bandura A. Social Foundations of Throught and Action: a Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kanfer FH, Gaelick L. Self-management methods. In: Kanfer F, Goldstein H, editors. Helping People Change: a Textbook of Methods. New York: Pergamon; 1986. pp. 283–345. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Campbell DT, Stanley J. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1963. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hintze JL. PASS User's Guide: Power Analysis and Sample Size for Windows. Kaysville, UT: NCSS; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155–159. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention AIDS Community Demonstration Projects Research Group Community-level HIV intervention in 5 cities: final outcome data from the CDC AIDS Community Demonstration Projects. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:336–345. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.3.336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Krauss B, Goldsamt L, Bula E. Final Report to the New York State Department of Health: Evaluating Two Strategies to Teach Safer Sex (ESSEX) to Women Who Are Sexual Partners of Men Who Have Injected Drugs. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute; 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kann L, Nelson G, Jones J. Establishing a system of complementary school-based surveys to annually assess HIV-related knowledge, beliefs and behaviors among adolescents. J. Sch Health. 1989;59:55–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1989.tb05392.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tiffany J, Tobias D, Raqib A, Ziegler J. Talking with Kids About AIDS: a Program for Parents and Other Adults Who Care: Teaching Guide. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Peguegnat W, Bauman LJ, Bray JH, et al. Measures relevant to the role of families in prevention and adaptation to HIV/AIDS.AIDS and Behav. In press.
  • 21.Krauss BJ, Wolitski RJ, Tross S, Corby N, Fishbein M. Getting the message: HIV information sources of women who have sex with injecting drug users—a two site study. Appl Psychol: Int Rev. 1999;48:153–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lindman HR. Analysis of Variance in Complex Experimental Designs. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman; 1974. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Simpson DD, Camacho LM, Vogtsberger KN, et al. Reducing AIDS risk through community outreach interventions for drug injectors. Psychol Addict Behav. 1994;8:86–101. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.8.2.86. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES