Skip to main content
PMC home page
Age logoLink to Age
. 2005 May 2;27(1):59–67. doi: 10.1007/s11357-005-4005-8

Accommodative function in rhesus monkeys: effects of aging and calorie restriction

J A Mattison 1,✉, M A Croft 2, D B Dahl 3, G S Roth 1, M A Lane 1, D K Ingram 1, P L Kaufman 2
PMCID: PMC3456094  PMID: 23598604

Abstract

Numerous degenerative changes in the visual system occur with age, including a loss of accommodative function possibly related to hardening of the lens or loss of ciliary muscle mobility. The rhesus monkey is a reliable animal model for studying age-related changes in ocular function, including loss of accommodation. Calorie restriction (CR) is the only consistent intervention to slow aging and extend lifespan in rodents, and more recently the beneficial effects of CR have been reported in nonhuman primates. The goal of the present study was to evaluate age-related changes in ocular accommodation and the potential effect of long-term (>8 years) CR on accommodation in male and female rhesus monkeys. Refraction, accommodation (Hartinger coincidence refractometer), and lens thickness (A-scan ultrasound) were measured in 97 male and female rhesus monkeys age 8–36 years under Telazol/acepromazine anesthesia. Refraction and accommodation measurements were taken before and after 40% carbachol corneal iontophoresis to induce maximum accommodation. Half the animals were in the control (CON) group and were fed ad libitum. The CR group received 30% fewer calories than age- and weight-matched controls. Males were on CR for 12 years and females for eight years. With increasing age, accommodative ability declined in both CON and CR monkeys by 1.03 ± 0.12 (P = 0.001) and 1.18 ± 0.12 (P = 0.001) diopters/year, respectively. The age-related decline did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.374). Baseline lens thickness increased with age in both groups by 0.03 ± 0.005 mm/year (P = 0.001) and 0.02 ± 0.005 mm/year (P = 0.001) for the CON and CR groups, respectively. The tendency for the for the lens to thicken with age occurred at a slower rate in the CR group vs. the CON group but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.086). Baseline refraction was −2.8 ± 0.55 and −3.0 ± 0.62 diopters for CON and CR, respectively. Baseline refraction tended to become slightly more negative with age (P = 0.070), but this trend did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.587). In summary, there was no difference in the slope of the age-related changes in accommodation, lens thickness, or refraction in the carbachol-treated eyes due to diet. These data are consistent with previous findings of decreased accommodative ability in aging rhesus monkeys, comparable to the age-dependent decrease in accommodative ability in humans. This study is the first to indicate that the accommodative system may not benefit from calorie restriction.

Key words: accommodation, diet, Macaca mulatta, refraction, vision

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (603.9 KB).

References

  1. Bito LZ, DeRousseau CJ, Kaufman PL, et al. Age-dependent loss of accommodative amplitude in rhesus monkeys: an animal model for presbyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982;23:23–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Crawford K, Terasawa E, Kaufman PL. Reproducible stimulation of ciliary muscle contraction in the cynomolgus monkey via a permanent indwelling midbrain electrode. Brain Res. 1989;503:265–272. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)91673-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crawford K, Gabelt BT, Kaufman PL, et al. Effect of various anesthetic and autonomic drugs on refraction in monkeys. Curr Eye Res. 1990;9:525–532. doi: 10.3109/02713689008999592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Croft MA, Kaufman PL, Crawford KS, et al. Accommodation dynamics in aging rhesus monkeys. Am J Phys. 1998;44:R1885–R1897. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1998.275.6.R1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Duane A. Studies in monocular and binocular accommodation with their clinical applications. Am J Ophthalmol. 1922;5:867–877. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fincham E. The mechanism of accommodation. Br J Ophthalmol. 1937;8:7–80. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fisher RF. Elastic constants of the human lens capsule. J Phys (London) 1969;201:1–19. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fisher RF. Presbyopia and the changes with age in the human crystalline lens. J Phys (London) 1973;228:765–779. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Glasser A, Campbell MCW. Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age. Vis Res. 1998;38(2):209–229. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00102-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ingram DK, Cutler RG, Weindruch R, et al. Dietary restriction and aging: the initiation of a primate study. J Gerontol. 1990;45(5):B148–B163. doi: 10.1093/geronj/45.5.b148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaufman PL. Accommodation and presbyopia: neuromuscular and biophysical aspects. In: Hart WM Jr, editor. Adler’s Physiology of the Eye: Clinical Application. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1992. pp. 391–411. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaufman PL, Bito LZ. The occurrence of senile cataracts, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma in rhesus monkeys: an animal model for presbyopia. Exp Eye Res. 1982;34:287–291. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(82)90061-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaufman PL, Davis GE. “Minified” Goldmann applanating prism for tonometry in monkeys and humans. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:542–546. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020030538022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaufman PL, Bito LZ, DeRousseau CJ. The development of presbyopia in primates. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1982;102:323–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kawai S-I, Vora S, Das S, et al. Modeling of risk factors for the degeneration of retinal ganglion cells following ischemia/reperfusion in rats: effects of age, caloric restriction, diabetes, pigmentation and glaucoma. FASEB j. 2001;15:1285–1287. doi: 10.1096/fj.00-0666fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kemnitz JW, Weindruch R, Roecker EB, et al. Dietary restriction of adult male rhesus monkeys: design, methodology, and preliminary findings from the first year of study. J Gerontol. 1993;48:B17–B26. doi: 10.1093/geronj/48.1.b17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koretz JF, Bertasso AM, Neider MW, et al. Slit-lamp studies of the rhesus monkey eye. II. Changes in crystalline lens shape, thickness and position during accommodation and aging. Exp Eye Res. 1987;45:317–326. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(87)80153-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lane MA, Ingram DK, Ball SS, et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate: a biomarker of primate aging slowed by calorie restriction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:2093–2096. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.7.4038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lane MA, Black A, Ingram DK, et al. Calorie restriction in nonhuman primates: implications for age-related disease risk. J Anti-Aging Med. 1998;1:315–325. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mattison JA, Black A, Huck J, et al. Age-related decline in caloric intake and motivation for food in rhesus monkeys. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26:1117–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Neufeld AH, Gachie EN. The inherent, age-dependent loss of retinal ganglion cells is related to the lifespan of the species. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24:167–172. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Obin M, Halbleib M, Lipman R, et al. Calorie restriction increases light-dependent photoreceptor cell loss in the neural retina of Fischer 344 rats. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21:639–645. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00165-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Obin M, Pike A, Halbleib M, et al. Calorie restriction modulates age-dependent changes in the retinas of Brown Norway rats. Mech Ageing Dev. 2000;114:133–147. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(00)00096-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. O’Steen WK, Landfield PW. Dietary restriction does not alter retinal aging in the Fischer 344 rat. Neurobiol Aging. 1991;12:455–462. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(91)90073-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Owens DA, Liebowitz HW. The intermediate resting point of accommodation: recent evidence and applications. Proc Int Soc Eye Res. 1980;1:71. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pau H, Krantz J. The increasing sclerosis of the human lens with age and its relevance to accommodation and presbyopia. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229:294–296. doi: 10.1007/BF00167888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roth GS, Lesnikov V, Lesnikov M, et al. Dietary caloric restriction prevents the age-related decline in plasma melatonin levels of rhesus monkeys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3292–3295. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.7.7655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tamm E, Lutjen-Drecoll E, Jungkunz W, et al. Posterior attachment of ciliary muscle in young, accommodating old, presbyopic monkeys. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32(5):1678–1692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tamm E, Croft MA, Jungkunz W, et al. Age-related loss of ciliary muscle mobility in the rhesus monkey: role of the choroid. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:871–876. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080180143043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Undie AS, Friedman E. Diet restriction prevents aging-induced deficits in brain phosphoinositide metabolism. J Gerontol. 1993;48:B62–B67. doi: 10.1093/geronj/48.2.b62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Warren MA, Freestone T, Thomas AJ. Undernutrition during early adult life significantly affects neuronal connectivity in rat visual cortex. Exp Neurol. 1989;103:290–292. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(89)90053-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Westheimer G, Blair SM. Accommodation of the eye during sleep and anesthesia. Vis Res. 1973;13:1035–1036. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90142-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Age are provided here courtesy of American Aging Association

RESOURCES