Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
. 2003 Mar;80(1):61–80. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jtg061

Community participation in a multisectoral intervention to address health determinants in an inner-city community in central Havana

Annalee Yassi 1,✉, Niurys Fernandez 2, Ariadna Fernandez 3, Mariano Bonet 2, Robert B Tate 4, Jerry Spiegel 5
PMCID: PMC3456101  PMID: 12612097

Abstract

It is increasingly acknowledged that the process of community involvement is critical to the successful implementation of community-based health interventions. Between 1995 and 1999, a multisectoral intervention called Plan Cayo Hueso was launched in the inner-city community of Cayo Hueso in Havana, Cuba, to address a variety of health determinants. To provide a better understanding of the political structures and processes involved, the Cuban context is described briefly. The interventions included improvements in housing, municipal infrastructure, and social and cultural activities. A qualitative study, consisting of interviews of key informants as well as community members, was conducted to evaluate the community participatory process. Questions from an extensive household survey pre-and postintervention that had been conducted in Cayo Hueso and a comparison community to asses the effectiveness of the intervention also informed the analysis of community participation, as did three community workshops held to choose indicators for evaluating effectiveness and to discuss findings. It was found that formal leaders led the interventions, providing the institutional driving force behind the plan. However, extensive community involvement occurred as the project took advantage of the existing community-based organizations, which played an active role in mobilizing community members and enhanced linkage systems critical to the project's success. Women played fairly traditional, roles in interventions outside their households, but had equivalent roles to men in interventions within their household units. Most impressive about this project was the extent of mobilization to participate and the multidimensional ecosystem approach adopted. Indeed, Plan Cayo Hueso involved a massive mobilization of international, national, and community resources to address the needs of this community. This, as well as the involvement of community residents in the evaluation process, was seen as resulting in improved social interactions and community well-being and enhanced, capacity for future action. While Cuba is unique in many respects, the lessons, learned about enhancing community participation in urban health intervention projects, as well as in their evaluation, are applicable worldwide.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (179.5 KB).

References

  • 1.Strategic Plan. Urban Health/Healthy Cities Program (1998–2002). Phase II of the WHO Healthy Cities Project. Copenhagen, Denmark: Centre for Urban Health, WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schulz AJ, Krieger J, Galea S. Addressing social determinants of health: community-based participatory approaches to research and practice. Health Educ Behav. 2002;29:287–295. doi: 10.1177/109019810202900302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Woelk GB. Cultural and structural influences in the creation and participation in community health programmes. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35:419–424. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90334-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promotion. 1996;10:282–298. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yassi A, Mas P, Bonet M, et al. Applying an ecosystem approach to the determinants of health in Centro Habana. Ecosystem Health. 1999;5(1):3–19. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-0992.1999.09902.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Forget G, Lebel J. An ecosystem approach to human health. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2001;7(2, suppl):S33–S38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gaudet CL, Wong MP, Brady A, Kent R. The transition from environmental quality to ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health. 1997;3(1):3–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-0992.1997.00702.pp.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kubisch AC, Weiss CH, Schorr LB, Connell JP. Introduction. In: Connell J, Kubisch AC, Schorr LB, Weiss CN, editors. New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. Volume 1: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lantz PM, Viruell-Fuentes E, Israel BA, Softley D, Guzman R. Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership in Detroit. J Urban Health. 2001;78:495–507. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hawe P, Noort M, King L, Jordens C. Multiplying health gains: the critical role of capacity building within health promotion programs. Health Policy. 1997;39:29–42. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(96)00847-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Green L. The theory of participation: a qualitative analysis of its expression in national and international health policies. Adv Health Educ Promotion. 1986;1:211–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Frankish CJ, Kwan B, Ratner PA, Higgins JW, Larsen C. Challenges of citizen participation in regional health authorities. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1471–1480. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00135-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.O'Neill M, Lemieux V, Groleau G, Fortin J, Lamarch P. Coalition theory as a frame-work for understanding and implementing intersectoral health-related interventions. Health Promotion Int. 1997;12:79–87. doi: 10.1093/heapro/12.1.79. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Educ Q. 1996;23(1):65–79. doi: 10.1177/109019819602300105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mansergh G, Rohrbach LA, Montgomery SB, Pentz MA, Johnson AA. Process evaluation of community coalitions for alcohol and other drug abuse prevention: a case study comparison of researcher-and community-initiated models. J Community Psychol. 1996;24:118–135. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199604)24:2<118::AID-JCOP4>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Puentes-Markides C, Garrett MJ. Application of “futures” in the community-level health promotion with special reference to Latin America. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1996;11:317–338. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199610)11:4<317::AID-HPM444>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McLeroy K, Kegler M, Steckler A, Burdine J, Wisotzky W. Community coalitions for health promotion: summary and further reflections. Health Educ Res. 1994;9:1–12. doi: 10.1093/her/9.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hays CE, Hays SP, DeVille JO, Mulhall PF. Capacity for effectiveness: the relationship between coalition structure and community impact. Eval Prog Plann. 2002;23:373–379. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00026-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dunn JR. Housing, and health inequalities review and prospects for research. Housing Stud. 2000;15:341–366. doi: 10.1080/02673030050009221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dunn JR. Housing and inequalities in health: a study of socioeconomic dimensions of housing and self reported health from a survey of Vancouver residents. J. Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:671–681. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.9.671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Howden-Chapman P. Editorial: housing and inequalities in health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:645–646. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.9.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Farmer P. The consumption of the poor: tuberculosis in the 21st century. Ethnography. 2000;1(2):183–216. doi: 10.1177/14661380022230732. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tinker I. Global policies regarding shelter for women: experiences of the UNC Center for Human Settlements. In: Dandekar H, editor. Shelter, Women and Development: First and Third World Experiences. Ann Arbor, MI: George Wahr; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moser C, Peake L. Women, Human Settlements and Housing. London: Tavistock Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moser C, Holland J. Urban Poverty and Violence in Jamaica. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Young AH, editor. Comparative Urbanization. New Orleans, LA: University of New Orleans; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garfield R, Santana S. The impact of the economic crisis and the US embargo on health in Cuba. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(1):15–20. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.87.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kirkpatrick AF. The US attack on Cuba's health. Can Med Assoc J. 1997;157:281–284. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ministry of Public Health in Cuba/for American Health Organization/World Health Organization, 1995 MINSAP/PAHO/WHO.Analysis of the Public Health Sector in Cuba. Report of the Progress. Havana, Cuba: November 1995.
  • 31.United Nations Development Programme.Human Development Report, United Nations Development Programme. 2000.
  • 32.Garfield R. The public health impact of sanctions: contrasting responses of Iraq and Cuba. Middle East Rep. 2000;215:16–19. doi: 10.2307/1520149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ministry of Public Health in Cuba.The Objectives of the National Public Health System for 1996. Havana, Cuba: January 1996.
  • 34.Mas P, Yassi A, Bonet M, Spiegel JM. Addressing the determinants of health: the Cuban context. Paper presented at: 129th American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; October 21–25, 2001; Atlanta, GA.
  • 35.Jackson T. A way of working: participatory research and the aboriginal movement in Canada. In: Park P, Brydon-Miller M, Hall B, Jackson T, editors. Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto, (OISE/UT); 1993. pp. 47–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cernea MM. The building blocks of participation: testing bottom-up planning. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Park P. What is participatory research? A theoretical and methodological approach. In: Park P, Brydon-Miller M, Hall B, Jackson T, editors. Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: OISE/UT; 1993. pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jackson ET, Kassam Y, editors. Knowledge Shared: Participatory Evaluation in Development Cooperation. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: International Development Research Centre (IDRC); 1998. pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Freedman J. Simplicities and complexities in participatory evaluation. In: Jackson ET, Kassam Y, editors. Knowledge Shared: Participatory Evaluation, in Development Cooperation. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: IDRC; 1998. pp. 16–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bhasin K. Are we on the right track? Report of a workshop on participatory evaluation. In: Jackson ET, Kassam Y, editors. Knowledge Shared: Participatory Evaluation in Development Cooperation. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: IDRC; 1998. pp. 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Study of Participatory Research in Health Promotion in Canada/Recherche participative et promotion de la santé. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Royal Society of Canada/La Société royale du Canada; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stringer ET. Action Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Domíngue RD, editor. Desarrollo, Local y Descentralización en el Contexto Urbano. Havana, Cuba: Universidad de La Habana; 1998. El taller de transformación integral. Una alternativa más de desarrollo comunitario en Cuba; pp. 105–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Brigos JPG. La sociedad cubana y sus fundamentos económicos ante el siglo XXI. Los consejos populares. In: Domíngue RD, editor. Desarrollo, Local y Descentralización en el Contexto Urbano. Havana, Cuba: Universidad de La Habana; 1998. pp. 141–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rio Hernández M. Consejos populares; entorno comunitario de la participación política en Cuba. In: Domíngue RD, editor. Desarrollo Local y Descentralización en el Contexto Urbano. Havana, Cuba: Universidad de La Habana; 1998. pp. 153–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Municipal Department of Health Report 1995. Cuba: Centro Habana; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Plan de Medidas Ejecutadas por el Gobierno y la Comunidad (PMGC) en Cayo Hueso, 1996–1999. Havana, Cuba: National Institute of Hygiene, Epidemiology, and Microbiology; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Spiegel JM, Bonet M, Yassi A, Molina E, Concepcion M, Mas P. Developing ecosystem health indicators in Centro Habana: a community-based approach. Ecosystem Health. 2001;7(1):16–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fernandez N, Tate R, Bonet M, Canizares M, Mas P, Yassi A. Health-risk perception in the inner city community of Centro Habana, Cuba. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2000;6:34–43. doi: 10.1179/oeh.2000.6.1.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tate R, Fernandez N, Canizares M, Bonet M, Yassi A, Mas P. Relationship between perception of community change and changes in health risk perception following community interventions in Central Havana. Paper presented at: 129th American Public Health Association Annual Meeting: October 21–25, 2001; Atlanta, GA.
  • 51.Tate RB, Fernandez N, Yassi A, Canizares M Spiegel J, Bonet M. Change in health risk perception following community intervention in Centro Habana.Health Promotion Int. In press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 52.Spiegel JM, Yassi A, Bonet M, Conception M, Tate RB, Canizares M. Evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to improve health in the inner city community of Cayo Hueso. Paper presented at: 129th American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; October 21–25, 2001; Atlanta, GA.
  • 53.Spiegel JM, Yassi A, Bonet M, Concepcion M, Tate RB, Canizares M. Evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to improve health in the inner city community of Cayo Hueso.Int J Occup Environ Health. In Press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 54.Spiegel JM, Bonet M, Yassi A, Mas P, Tate R. Social capital and health at a neighborhood level in Cuba. Paper presented at: 129th American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; October 21–25, 2001; Atlanta, GA.
  • 55.Kvale S. Inter Views: an Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wallerstein N. A participatory evaluation model for healthier communities. Public Health Rep. 2000;115(2/3):199–204. doi: 10.1093/phr/115.2.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Briggs D. Environmental Health Indicators: Frameworks and Methodologies. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tinker I. Beyond economics: sheltering the whole woman. In: Blumberg RL, Rakowski C, Tinker I, Monteón M, editors. Engendering Wealth and Well-Being: Empowerment for Global Change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1995. pp. 261–283. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Moving Toward a Framework of Public Involvement for the Calgary Regional Health Authority. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Praxis; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cernea MM. Using knowledge from social science in development projects.World Bank Discuss Papers. 1991;114.
  • 61.Spiegel JM, Yassi A, Tate R. Dengue in Cuba: mobilization againstAedes aegypti. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:204–205. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00238-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Higgins DL, Metzler M. Implementing community-based participatory research centers in diverse urban settings. J Urban Health. 2001;78:488–494. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Macauley AC, Commanda LE, Freeman WL, et al. Participatory research maximizes community and lay involvement. North American Primary Care Research Group. Br. Med J. 1999;319(7212):774–778. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Schnoes C, Murphy-Berman V, Chambers JM. Empowerment evaluation applied: experiences, analysis and recommendations from a case study. Am J Eval. 2000;21(1):53–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Green LW. From research to “best practices” in other settings and populations. Am J Health Behav. 2001;25(3):165–178. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.25.3.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES