Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
. 2005 Mar;82(Suppl 1):i79–i88. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jti027

Surfing new territory: Club-drug use and risky sex among hispanic men who have sex with men recruited on the internet

M Isabel Fernández 1,✉, Tatiana Perrino 1, Jose B Collazo 1, Leah M Varga 1, David Marsh 1, Nilda Hernandez 1, Alfredo Rehbein 1, G Stephen Bowen 1
PMCID: PMC3456161  PMID: 15738317

Abstract

The Internet presents unique and growing opportunities for conducting HIV/STD research. This article reports on the first 171 participants enrolled in an ongoing study examining use of the Internet to recruit Hispanic men who have sex with men (HMSM) living in an AIDS epicenter to participate in community-based studies. First, it descibes initial success with chatroom recruitment. Second, it compares the demographic, psychosocial, and sexual risk practices among HMSM recruited through the Internet who had used club drugs in the last 6 months and those who had not. In 2 months, 211 hours were spent recruiting in chatrooms; 735 chatroom users were engaged. Researchers used a scripted dialogue to describe the study and to invite chatroom users to visit the study’s community sites for screening and enrollment. One bundred and seventy-six men came to the community sites; 172 (98%) were eligible and completed an audio-computer assisted self-interview. In the last 6 months, 48.5% of the sample had used club drugs [defined as cocaine, crystal methamphetamines (crystal), amyl nitrites (poppers), Ecstasy, gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB), ketamine (Special K), and Viagra]. The proportion of men reporting use of each drug was: cocaine (15.8%), crystal (11.7%), poppers (31.6%), Ecstasy (14%), GHB (3.5%), Special K (3.5%), and Viagra (19.3%). In multivariate analyses, having higher number of sex partners, having higher social isolation scores, and having engaged in unprotected receptive anal intercourse were significantly associated with club-drug use. These initial findings suggest that high-risk HMSM can be successfully recruited through chatroom dialogues to participate in community-based HIV studies. The alarmingly high rates of club-drug use and risky sexual practices among HMSM underscore the need for effective HIV preventive interventions for this population.

Keywords: Club drugs, Hispanic MSM, Internet, Sexual risk behavior

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (89.5 KB).

References

  • 1.Ross MW, Tikkanen R, Mansson S. Differences between Internet samples and conventional samples of men who have sex with men: implications for research and HIV interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:749–758. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00493-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Elford J, Bolding G, Sherr L. Seeking sex on the Internet and sexual risk behavior among gay men using London gyms. AIDS. 2001;77:224–225. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200107270-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rietmeijer CA, Bull SS, McFarlane M, Patnaik JL, Douglas JM. Risks and benefits of the Internet for populations at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Results of an STI Clinic Survey. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:15–19. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200301000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Halkitis PN, Parsons JT, Wilton L. An exploratory study of contextual and situational factors related to methamphetamine use among gay and bisexual men in New York City. J Drug Issues. 2003;33:413–432. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bull SS, McFarlane M. Soliciting sex on the Internet. What are the risks for sexually transmitted diseases and HIV? Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27:545–550. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200010000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim AA, Kent C, McFarland W, Klausner JD. Cruising on the Internet highway. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;28:89–93. doi: 10.1097/00042560-200109010-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Benotsch EG, Kalichman S, Cage M. Men who have met sex partners via the internet: prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV prevention. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31:177–183. doi: 10.1023/A:1014739203657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tikkanen R, Ross MW. Technological tearoom trade: characteristics of Swedish men visiting gay Internet chat rooms. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15:122–132. doi: 10.1521/aeap.15.3.122.23833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Klausner JD, Wolf W, Fischer-Ponce L, Zolt I. Tracing a syphilis outbreak through cyberspace. JAMA. 2000;284:447–449. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.4.447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tashima KT, Alt EN, Harwell JI, Fiebich-Perez DK, Flanigan TP. Internet sex-seeking leads to acute HIV infection: a report of two cases. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14:285–286. doi: 10.1258/095646203321264926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bialer PA. Designer drugs in the general hospital. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2002;25:231–243. doi: 10.1016/S0193-953X(03)00060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Freese TE, Miotto K, Reback CJ. The effects and consequences of selected club drugs. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;23:151–156. doi: 10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00267-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stall R, Purcell DW. Intertwining epidemics: a review of research on substance use among men who have sex with men and its connection to the AIDS epidemic. AIDS Behav. 2000;4:181–192. doi: 10.1023/A:1009516608672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stall R, Paul JP, Greenwood G, et al. Alcohol use, drug use and alcohol-related problems among men who have sex with men: the Urban Men’s Health Study. Addiction. 2001;96:1589–1601. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961115896.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bochow M. The importance of contextualizing research: an analysis of data from the German gay press survey. J Psychol Human Sex. 1998;10:37–58. doi: 10.1300/J056v10n03_04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lewis L, Ross MW. A Select Body: The Gay Dance Party Subculture and the HIV/AIDS Pandemic. New York, NY: Cassell; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Waldo CR, McFarland W, Katz MH, Mackellar D, Valleroy LA. Very young gay and bisexual men are at risk for HIV infection: the San Francisco bay area young men’s survey II. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000;24:168–174. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200006010-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Toomey KE, Rothenberg RB. Sex and cyberspace-virtual networks leading to high-risk sex. JAMA. 2000;284:485–487. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.4.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elford J, Bolding G, Davis M, Sherr L, Hart G. Web-based behavioral surveillance among men who have sex with men: a comparison of online and offine samples in London, UK. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35:421–426. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200404010-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rhodes S, Bowie D, Hergenrather K. Collecting behavioural data using the World Wide Web: considerations for researchers. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:68–73. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bull SS, McFarlane M, King D. Barriers to STD/HIV prevention on the Internet. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:661–670. doi: 10.1093/her/16.6.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bull SS, McFarlane M, Rietmeijer CA. HIV and sexually transmitted infection risk behaviors among men seeking sex on-line. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:988–989. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.6.988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Center for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. Atlanta, GA: Mid-year (13)1; 2002.
  • 24.Miami-Dade County Public Health Department. 2003 HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. Miami, FL: January; 2004.
  • 25.Stueve A, O’Donnell LN, Duran R, Doval A, Blome J. Time-space sampling in minority communities: results with young Latino men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:922–926. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.6.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Valleroy LA, MacKellar DA, Karon JM, et al. HIV prevalence and associated risks in young men who have sex with men. Young Men’s Survey Study Group. JAMA. 2000;284:198–204. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.2.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fernandez MI, Varga LM, Perrino T, et al. The Internet as recruitment tool for HIV studies: viable strategy for reaching at-risk Hispanic MSM in Miami. AIDS Care. 2004;16:953–963. doi: 10.1080/09540120412331292480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Diaz RM, Carrillo H, Williams A, Bein E. Study Survey: Drug Use and HIV Risk Among Latino Gay Men. Unpublished manuscript.
  • 29.Stall R, Paul JP, Greenwood G, et al. Alcohol use, drug use and alcohol-related problems among men who have sex with men: the Urban Men’s Health Study. Addiction. 2001;96:1589–1601. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961115896.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fernández MI, Bowen GS, Varga LM, et al. High rates of club drug use and risky sexual practices among Hispanic men ho have sex with men in Miami, Florida. Substance Use and Misuse. In press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: Wiley; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Phillips KA, Paul J, Kegeles S, Stall R, Hoff C, Coates TJ. Predictors of repeat HIV testing among gay and bisexual men. AIDS. 1995;9:769–775. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199507000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hospers HJ, Harterink P, Hoek K, Veenstra J. Chatters on the Internet: a special target group for HIV prevention. AIDS Care. 2002;14:539–544. doi: 10.1080/09540120220133053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Loue S, Cooper M, Fiedler J. HIV risk among a sample of Mexican and Puerto Rican men and women. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2003;14:550–565. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Diaz RM, Ayala G, Bein E, Henne J, Marin BV. The impact of homophobia, poverty, and racism on the mental health of gay and bisexual Latino men: findings from 3 US cities. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:927–932. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.6.927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, Kiesler S, Mukophadhyay T, Scherlis W. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological wellbeing? Am Psychol. 1998;53:1017–1031. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kraut R, Kiesler S, Boneva B, Cummings JN, Helgeson V, Crawford AM. Internet paradox revisited. J Soc Issues. 2002;58:49–74. doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00248. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.U.S. Census Bureau. 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Washington, DC: April 2004.

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES