Skip to main content
Journal of Biological Physics logoLink to Journal of Biological Physics
. 2000 Dec;26(4):273–294. doi: 10.1023/A:1010359024559

Scaling of Folding Properties in Go Models of Proteins

Marek Cieplak 1, Trinh Xuan Hoang 1
PMCID: PMC3456313  PMID: 23345727

Abstract

Insights about scaling of folding properties of proteins are obtained bystudying folding in heteropolymers described by Go-like Hamiltonians. Bothlattice and continuum space models are considered. In the latter case, themonomer-monomer interactions correspond to the Lennard-Jones potential.Several statistical ensembles of the two- and three-dimensional targetnative conformations are considered. Among them are maximally compactconformations which are confined to a lattice and those which are obtainedeither through quenching or annealing of homopolymers to their compactlocal energy minima. Characteristic folding times are found to grow aspower laws with the system size. The corresponding exponents are notuniversal. The size related deterioration of foldability is found to beconsistent with the scaling behavior of the characteristic temperatures:asymptotically, the folding temperature becomes much lower than thetemperature at which glassy kinetics become important. The helicalconformations are found to have the lowest overall scaling exponent andthe best foldability among the classes of conformations studied. Thescaling properties of the Go-like models of the protein conformationsstored in the Protein Data Bank suggest that proteins are not optimizedkinetically.

Keywords: Go model, molecular dynamics, protein folding, scaling properties

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (173.3 KB).

References

  • 1.Bairoch A., Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:45–48. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thirumalai D. From minimal models to real proteins: timescales for protein folding. J. Phys. I (France) 1995;5:1457–1467. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gutin A.M., Abkevich V.I., Shakhnovich E.I. Chain length scaling of protein folding time. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77:5433–5436. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.5433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhdanov V.P. Folding time of ideal β sheets vs. chain length. Europhys. Lett. 1998;42:577–581. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cieplak M., Hoang T.X., Li M.S. Scaling of folding properties in simple models of proteins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999;83:1684–1687. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Socci N.D., Onuchie J.N. Folding kinetics of protein-like heteropolymers. J. Chem. Phys. 1994;101:1519–1528. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cieplak M., Henkel M., Karbowski J., Banavar J.R. Master equation approach to protein folding and kinetic traps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998;80:3654–3657. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cieplak M., Henkel M., Banavar J.R. Master equation approach to protein folding. J. Cond. Mat. 1999;2:369–378. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Takada S., Wolynes P.G. Microscopic theory of critical folding nuelei and reconfiguration activation barriers in folding proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 1997;107:9585–9598. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoang T.X., Sushko N., Li M.S., Cieplak M. Spin analogs of proteins: scaling of ‘folding’ properties. J. Phys. A. 2000;33:3977–3988. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hoang T.X., Cieplak M. Molecular dynamics of folding of secondary structures in Golike models of proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 2000;15:6851–6862. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abe H., Go N. Noninteracting local-structure model of folding and unfolding transition in globular proteins. II. Application to two-dimensional lattice proteins. Biopolymers. 1981;20:1013–1031. doi: 10.1002/bip.1981.360200512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bernstein F.C., Koetzle T.F., Williams G.J.B., Meyer E.F., Jr., Brice M.D., Rodgers J.R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1977;112:535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cieplak, M. and Hoang, T.X.: Kinetic non-optimality and vibrational stability of proteins, submitted for publication. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Plaxco K.W., Simons K.T., Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1998;277:985–994. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Micheletti C., Banavar J.R., Maritan A., Seno F. Protein Structures and optimal folding from a geometrical variational principle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999;82:3372–3375. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Takada S. Going for the prediction of protein folding mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1999;96:11698–11700. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.21.11698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhou Y., Karplus M. Interpreting the folding kinetics of helical proteins. Nature. 1999;401:400–403. doi: 10.1038/43937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dokholyan N.V., Buldyrev S.V., Stanley H.E., Shakhnovich E.I. Discrete molecular dynamics studies of the folding of a protein-like model. Folding Des. 1998;3:577–587. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0278(98)00072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hardin C., Luthey-Schulten Z., Wolynes P.G. Backbone dynamics, fast folding, and secondary structure formation in helical proteins and peptides. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 1999;34:281–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Clementi C., Nymeyer H., Onuchic J.N. Topological and energetic factors: what determine the structural details of the transition state ensemble and ‘n-route’ intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2000;298:937–953. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li M.S., Cieplak M. Folding in two-dimensional off-lattice models of proteins. Phys. Rev. E. 1999;59:970–976. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Klimov D.K., Thirumalai D. Mechanisms and kinetics of β-hairpin formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:2544–2549. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.6.2544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Iori G., Marinari E., Parisi G. Random self-interacting chains: a mechanism for protein folding. J. Phys. A. 1991;24:5349–3562. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Clementi C., Maritan A., Banavar J.R. Folding, design and determination of interaction potentials using off-lattice dynamics of model heteropolymers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998;81:3287–3290. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Veitshans T., Klimov D., Thirumalai D. Protein folding kinetics: time scales, pathways and energy landscapes in terms of sequence-dependent properties. Folding Des. 1997;2:1–22. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grest G.S., Kremer K. Molecular dynamics simulation for polymers in the presence of a heat bath. Phys. Rev. A. 1986;33:3628–3631. doi: 10.1103/physreva.33.3628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Allen M.P., Tildesley D.J. Computer simulation of liquids. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Thirumalai D., Klimov D.K. Deciphering the timescales and mechanisms of protein folding using minimal off-lattice models. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1999;9:197–207. doi: 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80028-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Finkelstein A.V., Badredtinov A.Y. Rate of protein folding near the point of thermodynamic equilibrium between the coil and the most stable chain fold. Fold. Des. 1997;2:115–121. doi: 10.1016/s1359-0278(97)00016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wolynes P.G. Folding funnels and energy landscapes of larger proteins within the capillarity approximation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:6170–6175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bryngelson J.D., Wolynes P.G. Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1987;84:7524–7528. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.21.7524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Miyazawa S., Jernigan R.L. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energy from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules. 1985;18:534–552. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Camacho C.J. Entropic barriers, frustration, and order: basic ingredients in protein folding. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77:2324–2327. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hoang T.X., Cieplak M. Protein folding and models of dynamics on the lattice. J. Chem. Phys. 1998;109:9192–9196. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.de Gennes P.G. Kinetics of collapse for a flexible coil. J. Phys. Lett. 1985;46:L639–L642. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Maritan A., Micheletti C., Banavar J.R. Role of secondary motifs in fast folding polymers: a dynamical variational principle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000;84:3009–3012. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Derrida B. Random-energy model: limit of a family of disordered models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980;45:79–82. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Biological Physics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

RESOURCES