Abstract
The concentration dependence of the diffusion coefficient of particles suspended in solution depends primarily on the occupied volume fraction and on repulsive and attractive forces. This dependency is expressed by the interaction parameter, which can be assessed experimentally by light scattering measurements and have been determined for the diffusion coefficient of BSA under different salt concentration conditions in the present work. The result shows that the diffusion coefficient of protein grows up with increasing protein concentration, and when the ionic strength turns up gradually the diffusion coefficient decreases with protein concentration’s increasing. The concentration dependence of BSA diffusion coefficients is interpreted in the context of a two-body potential of mean force, which includes repulsive hard-sphere and Coulombic interactions and attractive dispersion. With the increase of ionic strength, Debye screening decreases, protein interaction changes from repulsion to attraction, and protein begins to aggregate. By means of the concentration dependence of BSA diffusion coefficients, one can obtain the parameters of protein interactions and can find that protein bears a net effective charge of −9.0 e and has a Hamaker constant of 2.8kBT. This work demonstrates that DLS is an effective technique of studying protein interactions.
Key words: protein interactions, diffusion coefficient, dynamic light scattering
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (129.9 KB).
References
- 1.Janaky N., Liu X.Y. Protein Interactions in Undersaturated and Supersaturated Solutions: A Study Using Light and X-Ray Scattering. Biophys. J. 2003;84:523–532. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74871-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Daniel E.K., Christiane R., et al. Interactions of Lysozyme in Concentrated Electrolyte Solutions from Dynamic Light Scattering Measurements. Biophys. J. 1997;73:3211–3322. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78346-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Martin M., Franz R. Interactions in Undersaturated and Supersaturated Lysozyme Solutions: Static and Dynamic Light Scattering Results. J. Chem. Phys. 1995;103:10424–10432. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Malkin A., Yu J., Kuznetsov G., Mcpherson A. In Situ Atomic Force Microscopy Studies of Surface Morphology, Growth Kinetics, Defect Structure and Dissolution in Macromolecular Crystallization. J. Crystal Growth. 1999;196:471–488. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Neal B.L., Aathagiri D., Velev O.D., Lenhoff A.M., Kaler E.W. Why is the Osmitic Second Virial Coefficient Related to Protein Crystallization. J. Crystal Growth. 1999;196:377–387. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tardieu A., Verge A.L., Malfois M., Bonnete F., Finet S., Kautt M.R., Belloni L. Proteins in Solution: From X-Ray Scattering Intensities to Interaction Potentials. J. Crystal Growth. 1999;196:193–203. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wu J.Z., John M.P. Osmotic Pressures of Aqueous Bovine Serum Albumin Solutions at High Ionic Strength. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 1999;155:139–154. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chu B. Laser Light Scattering. New York: Academic Press; 1974. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nispa M., Alex M.J., John B. Translational Diffusion Coefficients of Bovine Serum Albumin in Aqueous Solution at High Ionic Strength. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999;218:167–175. doi: 10.1006/jcis.1999.6401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kalpand M.K., Gary D.F., Lvan L.C. A Study of the Molecular Sources of Nonideal Osmotic Pressure of Bovine Serum Albumin Solutions as a Function of pH. Biophys. J. 1994;66:153–160. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80773-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bar Z.R., et al. Localized Dynamic Light Scattering: Probing Single Particle Dynamics at the Nanoscale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997;78:154–157. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pencer J., et al. Osmotically Induced Shape Changes of Large Unilamellar Vesicles Measured by Dynamic Light Scattering. Biophys. J. 2001;81:2716–2728. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75914-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhou S.Q., Christian B., Benjamin C. Spherical Bilayer Vesicles of Fullerene-Based Surfactants in Water: A Laser Light Scattering Study. Science. 2001;291:1944–1947. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5510.1944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Andriyka L.P., Leslie W.T., Hans J.V. Dynamic Light Scattering Study of Calmodulin-Target Peptide Complexes. Biophys. J. 2002;83:1455–1464. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73916-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Petsev D.N., Denkov N.D., Nagayama K. Diffusion and Light Scattering in Dispersions of Charged Particles with Thin Electrical Double Layers. Chem. Phys. 1993;175:265–270. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Batchelor G.K. Brownian Diffusion of Particles with Hydrodynamic Interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 1976;74:1–29. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Felderhof B.U. Diffusion of Interacting Brownian Particles. J. Phys. A.:Math. Gen. 1978;11:929–937. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Philies G.D. Dynamics of Brownian Probes in the Presence of Mobile or Static Obstacles. J. Phys. Chem. 1995;99:4265–4272. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gaigalas A.K., Hubbard J.B., McCurley M., Sam W. Diffusion of Bovine Serum Albumin in Aqueous Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 1992;96:2355–2359. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Charies M.R., Brian L.N., Abraham M.L. Van der Waals Interactions Involving Proteins. Biophys. J. 1996;70:977–987. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79641-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vilker V.L., Colton C.K., Smith K.A. The Osmotic Pressure of Concentrated Protein Solutions: Effect of Concentration and pH in Saline Solutions of Bovine Serum Albumin. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1981;79:548–566. [Google Scholar]