Abstract
Biological weapons have the potential to inflict deliberate, potentially devastating epidemics of infectious disease on populations. The science and technology exist to create deliberate outbreaks of human disease, as well as disease among plants and animals, crops, and livestock. A new awareness among policymakers of the link between public health and national security requires the attention of public health professionals. The issues posed by biological weapons are likely to challenge the political assumptions of many progressive public health professionals and will demand new coalitions. The prospect of bioterrorism may offer new opportunities for improving the public health infrastructure and its capabilities.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (64.8 KB).
References
- 1.US Commission National Security for the 21st Century, Seeking a natural strategy: a concert for preserving security and promoting freedom. April 2000. Available at: www. nssg.gov. Accessed: April 15, 2001.
- 2.Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Assessing the Risks. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Turner S. Caging the Genies: a Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Weapons. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1999. pp. 47–47. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Haselkorn A. The Continuing Storm—Iraq, Poisonous Weapons, and Deterence. New York: Yale University Press; 1999. pp. 10–11. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Alibek K, Handelman S. Biohazard. New York: Random House; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miller J, Brood W. Germ weapons: in Soviet past or in the new Russia's future?New York Times. December 28, 1998:A11.
- 7.Bracken P. Fire in the East. New York: Harper Collins; 1999. pp. 41–45. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cole LA. The specter of biological weapons.Sci Am. December 1996:60–65. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 9.Enriquez J, Goldberg RA. Transforming life, transforming business: the life science revolution.Harvard Bus. Rev. March–April 2000:96–104.
- 10.Henderson DA, Inglesby TV, Bartlett JG, et al. Smallpox as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA. 1999;281(22):2127–2137. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.22.2127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Inglesby TV, Dennis DT, Henderson DA, et al. Plague as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA. 2000;283(17):2281–2290. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.17.2281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moodie M, Taylor WJ. Contagion and Conflict—Health as a Global Security Challenge. Report of the Chemical and Biological Arms Control Institute and the CSIS International Security Programs. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic Defense and International Studies; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 13.O'Toole T. Testimony Before Committee on Government Oversight, US House of Representatives, Medical and Public Health Consequences of Bioterrorism; September 22, 1999. Available at: www.hopkins-biodefense.org. Accessed: May 1, 2001.
- 14.Henderson DA. The looming threat of bioterrorism. Science. 1999;283:1279–1282. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5406.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hutchinson R.Improving Local and State Agency Response to Terrorist Incidents Involving Biological Weapons. US Dept of Defense, US Army Solider and Biological Chemical Command, Domestic Preparedness Office; September 12, 2000.
- 16.Inglesby TV, Grossman R, O'Toole T. A plague on your city: observations from TOPOFF.Biodefense Q. September 2000:4. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17.Henderson DA. CDC releases close to $41 million for biodefense.Biodefense Q. September 1999:1.
- 18.Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act of 2000, S.52731.