Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
. 2001 Jun;78(2):313–326. doi: 10.1007/BF02410362

Relationships and diseases among drug users and nonusers

David C Bell 1,✉, Doohee Lee 1, Su-Jau Yang 1, Victoria Health 1
PMCID: PMC3456370  PMID: 11421249

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and syphilis are relationship-based diseases that are typically transmitted by the cooperative activities (sex or drug injection) of two persons. A sample of 215 drug users and 52 sociodemographically matched nonusers was collected to examine the behaviors and relationships related to HIV and syphilis transmission. Results showed that, although drug users had more risk opportunities (more sex partners and, of course, more injection partners) than nonusers, actual sex risk behaviors (never using condoms) did not differ appreciably among drug users and nonusers or with opposite-sex partners and same-sex partners. The similarity of sexual risk was supported by the similar levels of syphilis between drug users and nonusers. The unique risk to drug users was drug injection, although drug users were found to engage in fewer risky injection behaviors (sharing of drug injection equipment) than the risky sexual behaviors in which all participants engaged. Although drug users interacted as frequently with partners as nonusers, nonuser relationships were longer lasting and emotionally closer.

Keywords: Drug Use, HIV/AIDS Risk, Injection Risk, Sex Risk, Social Relationship, Syphilis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (114.9 KB).

References

  • 1.Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Broadhead RS, Heckathorn DD, Grund J-PC, Stern LS, Anthony DL. Drug users versus outreach workers in combating AIDS: preliminary results of a peer-driven intervention. J Drug Issues. 1995;25(3):531–564. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Donoghoe MC, Stimson GV, Dolan K. Sexual behavior of injecting drug users and associated risks of HIV infection for non-injecting sexual partners. AIDS Care. 1988;1:51–58. doi: 10.1080/09540128908260235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Friedman SR, Curtis R, Neaigus A, Jose B, DesJarlais DC. Social Networks, Drug Injectors' Lives, and HIV/AIDS. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Friedman SR, DesJarlais DC, Sterk CE. AIDS and the social relations of intravenous drug users. Milbank Q. 1990;68:85–110. doi: 10.2307/3350177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Klee H, Faugier J, Hayes C, Boulton T, Morris J. Sexual partners of injecting drug users: the risk of HIV infection. Br J Addict. 1990;85:413–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb00658.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Neaigus A, Friedman SR, Curtis R, et al. The relevance of drug injectors' social and risk networks for understanding and preventing HIV infection. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(1):67–78. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90301-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rhodes T, Stimson GV, Quirk A. Sex, drugs, intervention, and research: from the individual to the social. Subst Use Misuse. 1996;31(3):375–407. doi: 10.3109/10826089609045817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Walker ME, Wasserman S, Wellman B. Statistical models for social support networks. In: Wasserman S, Galaskiewicz J, editors. Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994. pp. 53–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Klovdahl AS. Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: the AIDS example. Soc Sci Med. 1985;21:11–11. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90269-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hyman JM, Stanley EA. Using Mathematical Models to Understand the AIDS Epidemic. Los Alamos, NM: Centers for Nonlinear Studies Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. US HIV and AIDS Cases Reported Through December 31, 1998. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.DesJarlais DC, Friedman SR, Sotheran JL, Stoneburner R. The sharing of drug injection equipment and the AIDS epidemic in New York City: the first decade. NIDA Res Monogr. 1988;80:160–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jarlais DC, Friedman SR, Perlis T, et al. Risk behavior and HIV infection among New York drug injectors in the era of AIDS in New York City. JAIDS. 1999;20:67–72. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199901010-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huebert K, James D. High-risk behaviors for transmission of HIV among clients in treatment for substance abuse. J Drug Issues. 1992;22(4):885–901. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abrams D. AIDS update—1987. Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse. 1987;7:29–45. doi: 10.1300/j251v07n02_05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Trapido EJ, Lewis N, Comerford M. HIV-1-related and nonrelated diseases among IV drug users and sex partners. J Drug Issues. 1990;20:245–266. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health. Fact sheet: Sexually transmitted disease statistics. Available at: http://www.niaid.nih. gov/factsheet.stdstats.htm. Accessed December 16, 1998.
  • 19.Williams ML, Elwood WN, Weatherby NL, et al. An assessment of the risks of syphilis and HIV infection among a sample of not-in-treatment drug users in Houston, Texas. AIDS Care. 1996;8(6):671–682. doi: 10.1080/09540129650125380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Quinn T, Glasser D, Cannon R, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus among patients attending clinics for sexually transmitted diseases. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:197–203. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198801283180401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Edlin BR, Irwin KL, Faruque S, et al. Intersecting epidemics—crack cocaine use and HIV infection among inner-city young adults. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(21):1422–1427. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199411243312106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pages H. STDs: AIDS is not the only threat. Available at: http://www.thehealthpages. com. Accessed: December 16, 1998.
  • 23.McCoy CB, Shapshak P, Metsch LR, et al. HIV-1 prevention: interdisciplinary studies on the efficacy of bleach and development of prevention protocols. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 1995;43:1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Watters JK. Meaning and context: the social facts of intravenous drug use and HIV Transmission in the inner city. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1988;20:173–177. doi: 10.1080/02791072.1988.10524491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hahn RA, Magder LS, Aral SO, Johnson RE, Larsen SA. Prevalence of HIV infection among intravenous drug users in the United States. JAMA. 1989;261(18):2677–2684. doi: 10.1001/jama.261.18.2677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fullilove RE, Fullilove MT, Bowser BP, Gross SA. Risk of sexually transmitted disease among black adolescent crack users in Oakland and San Francisco, California. JAMA. 1990;263:851–855. doi: 10.1001/jama.263.6.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fullilove RE, Fullilove MT, Golden E, et al. Drug use and sexual behaviors in a probability sample of single adults in “high risk” neighborhoods of San Francisco. Paper presented at: Sixth International Conference on AIDS; San Francisco; June 19–23, 1990.
  • 28.Coleman RM, Curtis D. Distribution of risk behaviors for HIV infection amongst intravenous drug users. Br J Addict. 1988;83:1331–1334. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1988.tb03045.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. US HIV and AIDS Cases Reported Through June 1999. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rugpao S, Pruithithada N, Yutabootr Y, Prasertwitayakij W, Tovanabutra S. Condom breakage during commercial sex in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Contraception. 1993;48(6):537–547. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90116-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Richters J, Donovan B, Gerofi J. How often do condoms break or slip off in use? Int J STD AIDS. 1993;4(2):90–94. doi: 10.1177/095646249300400206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sparrow JJ, Lavill K. Breakage and slippage of condoms in family planning clients. Contraception. 1994;50(2):117–129. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(94)90048-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dorfman LE, Derish PA, Cohen JB. Hey girlfriend: an evaluation of AIDS prevention among women in the sex industry. Health Educ Q. 1992;19(1):25–40. doi: 10.1177/109019819201900103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.DeGraaf R, Zessen G, Vanwesenbeeck I, Straver CJ, Visser JH. Condom use by Dutch men with commercial heterosexual contacts: determinants and considerations. AIDS Educ Prev. 1997;9(5):411–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hospers HJ, Kok G. Determinants of safe and risk-taking sexual behavior among gay men: a review. AIDS Educ Prev. 1995;7(1):74–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ross MW. Reasons for non-use of condoms by homosexually active men during anal intercourse. Int J STD AIDS. 1990;1(6):432–434. doi: 10.1177/095646249000100608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Day D. The injection-related AIDS epidemic in the United States: states and metro areas with the highest rates. Report from the Dogwood Center, November 1999. Available at: http://www.dogwoodcenter.org/top/narrative.html. Accessed: February 10, 2000.
  • 38.HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Plichta SB, Weisman CS, Nathanson CA, Ensminger ME, Robinson JC. Partner-specific condom use among adolescent women clients of a family planning clinic. J Adolesc Health. 1992;13(6):506–511. doi: 10.1016/1054-139X(92)90015-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Poppen PJ, Reisen CA. Perception of risk and sexual self-protective behavior: a methodological critique. AIDS Educ Prev. 1997;9(4):373–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Neaigus A, Friedman SR, Jose B, Goldstein M, Curtis R, Des Jarlais DC. Risk factors for HIV infection among new drug injectors. Paper presented at: IXth Conference on AIDS; Berlin; June 6–11, 1993.
  • 42.Latkin C, Mandell W, Oziemkowska M, et al. Using social network analysis to study patterns of drug use among urban drug users at high risk for HIV/AIDS. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995;38:1–9. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(94)01082-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Westermeyer J, Neider J. Social networks and psychopathology among substance users. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145(10):1265–1269. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.10.1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Erickson GD. A framework and themes for social network intervention. Fam Process. 1984;23:187–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.00187.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mueller DP. Social networks: a promising direction for social research on the relationship of the social environment to psychiatric disorder. Soc Sci Med. 1980;14A:147–161. doi: 10.1016/0160-7979(80)90028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Preble E, Casey JJ., Jr Taking care of business—the heroin user's life on the street. Int J Addict. 1969;4(1):1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Agar MI. Ripping and Running. New York: Seminar Press; 1973. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Williams ML, Johnson J. Social network structures: an ethnographic analysis of intravenous drug use in Houston, Texas. Drugs and Society. 1993;7:65–90. doi: 10.1300/J023v07n03_06. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fullilove RE, Fullilove MT, Bowser BP, Gross SA. Risk of sexually transmitted disease among black adolescent crack users in Oakland and San Francisco, California. JAMA. 1990;263(6):851–855. doi: 10.1001/jama.263.6.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Klovdahl AS. Urban social networks: some methodological problems and possibilities. In: Kochen M, editor. The Small World. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation; 1989. pp. 176–210. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liebow E, McGrady G, Branch K, et al. Eliciting social network data and ecological model-building: focus on choice of name generators and administration of random-walk study procedures. Soc Networks. 1995;17:257–272. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(95)00266-Q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Problems. 1997;44(2):174–199. doi: 10.1525/sp.1997.44.2.03x0221m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Coyle SL. The NIDA Standard Intervention Model for Injection Drug Users Not in Treatment. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sarndal CE, Swensson B, Wretman J. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shah BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler GS. SUDAAN User's Manual. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Booth RE, Watters JK. How effective are risk-reduction interventions targeting injecting drug users? AIDS. 1994;8(11):1515–1524. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199411000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Friedman SR, Jarlais DC, Ward T, Jose B, Neaigus A, Goldstein M. Drug injectors and heterosexual AIDS. In: Sherr L, editor. AIDS and the Heterosexual Population. Langhorne, PA: Harwood; 1994. pp. 41–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stephens RC, Simpson DD, Coyle SL, McCoy CB. Comparative effectiveness of NADR intervention. In: Brown BS, Beschner GM, editors. Handbook on Risk of AIDS: Injection Drug Users and Sexual Partners. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; 1993. pp. 519–556. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Liebman J, Mulia N, McIlvaine D. Risk behavior for HIV infection of intravenous drug users and their sexual partners recruited from street settings in Philadelphia. J Drug Issues. 1992;22(4):867–884. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wellman B, Wong RY-L, Tindall D, Nazer N. A decade of network change: turnover, persistence, and stability in personal communications. Soc Networks. 1997;19(1):27–50. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00289-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Neaigus A, Friedman SR, Goldsmith DS, Ildefonso G, Curtis R, Jose B. Using dyadic data for a network analysis of HIV infection and risk behaviors among injecting drug users. In: Needle R, editor. Social Networks, Drug Abuse, and HIV Transmission. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1995. pp. 20–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Marsden PV. Network data and measurement. Annu Rev Sociol. 1990;16:435–463. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.002251. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.McPherson JM, Popielarz PA, Drobnic S. Social networks and organizational dynamics. Am Sociol Rev. 1992;57:153–170. doi: 10.2307/2096202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Male and female adult/adolescent HIV infection cases by exposure/category and race/ethnicity. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats/hasr1201.htm. Accessed: March 15, 2001.

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES