Skip to main content
Journal of Biological Physics logoLink to Journal of Biological Physics
. 2001 Mar;27(1):59–71. doi: 10.1023/A:1011826525684

Size of Unfolded and Dissociated Subunits versus that of Native Multimeric Proteins

Samrajnee Dutta 1, Debasish Bhattacharyya 1
PMCID: PMC3456399  PMID: 23345733

Abstract

Two factors, unfolding and dissociation, act in opposition indetermining the size of the unfolded state of multimeric proteins. Ananalysis has been presented to correlate relative expansion of the unfoldedmonomers in absence of disulfide bridges over the native state of differenthomomultimeric proteins of varying molecular weights. The Stoke's radii ofabout 70 proteins of Mw between 6 kDa to 4000 kDa and ranging frommonomers to dodecamers were calculated both under native anddenatured condition induced by 8 M urea or 6 M guanidinium,HClaccording to relations derived by Uversky [Biochemistry32 (1993), 13288–13298]. Stoke's radii of monomeric proteins were foundto increase by 1.6–2.2 times after denaturation as compared with the nativestate while that of the subunits of dimeric and tetrameric proteins wereincreased by factors 1.1–2.2 under the same conditions. For hexamericproteins this factor lies between 0.96–1.2. In each set the relativeincrement of the Stoke's radii followed a logarithmic relation with molecularweight and reached a minimum limiting value when Stoke's radii of nativeprotein became almost equal to that of the unfolded monomer.

Keywords: Denaturation, dissociation, molecular weight, multimeric proteins, Stoke's radius, subunits

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (89.8 KB).

References

  • 1.Tanford C. Protein Denaturation. Adv. Prot. Chem. 1968;23:121–282. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60401-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dill K.A., Shortle D. Denatured States of Proteins. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 1991;60:795–826. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.004051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dobson C.M. Unfolded Proteins, Compact States and Molten Globules. Curr. Opinion Struct. Biol. 1992;2:6–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Richards F.M. Folded and Unfolded Proteins: An Introduction. In: Creighton T.E., editor. Protein Folding. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1992. pp. 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Uversky V.N. Use of Fast Protein Size Exclusion Liquid Chromatography to Study the Unfolding of Proteins Which Denature Through the Molten Globule. Biochemistry. 1993;32:13288–13298. doi: 10.1021/bi00211a042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Laskowski, M. (Jr) and Sealock, R.W.: Protein Proteinase Inhibitors-Molecular Aspects, In: P.D. Boyer (ed.), Enzymes, Vol-III, Academic Press, 1970, pp. 375–473.
  • 7.Ghelis C., Yon J. Protein Folding. New York: Academic Press; 1982. Folding Unfolding of Oligomeric proteins; pp. 470–497. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dutta, S. Maity, N.R. Bhattacharyya, D. Reversible Folding of UDP-Galactose 4-Epimerase from Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997;244:407–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.t01-1-00407.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ackers G.K. Molecular Sieve Methods of Analysis. In: Neurath, Hill, editors. The Proteins. London: Academic Press; 1975. pp. 2–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wilson D.B., Hogness D.S. The Enzymes of Galactose Operon in Escherichia coli.: I. Purification and Characterization of Uridine Diphosphate Galactose 4-Epimerase. J. Biol. Chem. 1964;239:2469–2481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Darrow R.A., Rodstrom R. Purification and Properties of Uridine Diphosphate Galactose 4-Epimerase from Yeast. Biochemistry. 1968;7:1645–1654. doi: 10.1021/bi00845a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pace C.N. Determination and Analysis of Urea and Guanidinum Hydrochloride Denaturation Curves. Methods Enzymol. 1986;131:266–280. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)31045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Neir D., Billeter M., Wider G., Wuthrich K. NMR Determination of Residual Structure in a Urea Denatured Protein, the 434 Repressor. Science. 1992;257:1559–1561. doi: 10.1126/science.1523410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ptitsyn O.B., Pain R.H., Semisotnov G.V., Zerovnik E., Razgulyaev O.I. Evidence for a Molten Globule State as a General Intermediate in Protein Folding. FEBS Lett. 1990;262:20–24. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80143-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hlodan, R. and Hartl, F.U.: How the Protein Folds in the Cell, In: R.H. Pain (ed.), Mechanisms of Protein Folding, Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 194–228.
  • 16.Fischer G., Schmid F.X. The Mechanism of Protein Folding: Implications of In Vitro Refolding Models for De Novo Protein Folding and Translocation in the Cell. Biochemistry. 1990;29:2205–2212. doi: 10.1021/bi00461a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peptides and Proteins, In: Handbook of Biochemistry 2nd. edition CRC Press, 1970, pp. C62–C74.
  • 18.Bhattacharyya D. Reversible Folding of UDP-Galactose 4-Epimerase from Yeast. Kluyveromysis fragilis, Biochemistry. 1993;32:9726–9734. doi: 10.1021/bi00088a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reynolds J.A., Tanford C. The Gross Conformation of Protein-Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 1970;245:5161–5165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Laurent T.C., Killander J. A Theory of Gel Filtration and its Experimental Verification. J. Chromat. 1964;14:317–330. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fish W.W., Reynolds J.A., Tanford C. Gel Chromatography in Denaturing Solvents. J. Biol. Chem. 1970;245:5166–5168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zabel U., Hausler C., Weeger M., Schmidt H.H.H.W. Homodimerization of Soluble Guanyl Cyclase Subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:18149–18152. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wong P., Barbeau A., Roses A.D. Gel Chromatography on a Sepharose 4B Column: Earlier Elution of Protein-Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Complexes of Low Stokes Radii. Anal. Biochem. 1985;146:191–198. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(85)90415-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wilkins D.K., Grimshaw S.B., Receveur V., Dobson C.M., Jones J.A., Smith L.J. Hydrodynamic Radii of Native and Denatured Proteins Measured by Pulse Field Gradient NMR Techniques. Biochemistry. 1999;38:16424–16431. doi: 10.1021/bi991765q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Biological Physics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

RESOURCES