Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Biological Physics logoLink to Journal of Biological Physics
. 2002 Jun;28(2):95–113. doi: 10.1023/A:1019978119707

On the Charge and Molecule Based Summations of Solvent Electrostatic Potentials and the Validity of Electrostatic Linear Response in Water

C Satheesan Babu 1, Pei-Kun Yang 2, Carmay Lim 1,3
PMCID: PMC3456659  PMID: 23345760

Abstract

Solvent-induced electrostatic potentials and field components at thesolute sites of model Na+q–Cs-q molecules were computed bysumming over either solvent charges (q-summation) or solventmolecular centers (M-summation) from molecular dynamics simulations.These were compared with values obtained by solving Poisson equation withthe dielectric boundary defined by Reff = (Ratom+Rgmax )/2.q-summation using cut-offs that are ≤ 10 Å generallyunderestimates or overestimates the magnitude of (a) the potentials and field components atNa+q and Cs-q relative to the theoretical values and (b)electrostatic solvation free energies of the dipolar solutes assuminglinear solvent response relative to the respective values from free energysimulations. Furthermore, the q-summed electric potentials showedsignificant oscillations even beyond the second hydration shell. Incontrast, the corresponding M-summed potentials plateaued after thefirst hydration shell. Although the different water molecular centersyielded different converged potential values, the dipole center producedvalues in remarkable agreement with the theoretical values for solutecharges ranging from 1 to 0.1e, indicating the existence of an a convenient molecular center for computing these quantities. In contrast to theM-summed potentials, the electrostatic field components andelectrostatic solvation free energies from linear response relationshipswere found not to be sensitive to the choice of the molecular centerfor typical cut-off distances (8 to 12 Å) used in most simulations.

Keywords: continuum dielectic theory, electrostatic potentials, linear response, M-summation, Poisson equation, q-summation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (231.0 KB).

References

  • 1.Levy R.M., Belhadj M., Kitchen D.B. Gaussian fluctuation formula for electrostatic free energy changes in solution. J. Chem. Phys. 1991;95:3627–3633. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hummer G., Pratt L.R., Garcia A.E. Free energy of ionic hydratrion. J. Phys. Chem. 1996;100:1206–1215. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Åqvist J., Hansson T. On the validity of electrostatic linear response in polar solvents. J. Phys. Chem. 1996;100:9512–9521. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ashbaugh H.S. Convergence of molecular and macroscopic continuum descriptions of ion hydration. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000;104:7235–7238. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yelle R.B., Ichiye T. Solvation free energy curves for electron transfer in aqueous solution: Theory and simulation. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997;101:4127–4135. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee F.S., Chu Z.-T., Bolger M.B., Warshel A. Calculations of antigen-antibody in-teractions: Microscopic and semi-microscopic evaluation of the free energies of binding of phosphorylcholine analogs to McPC603. Prot. Engng. 1992;5:215—228. doi: 10.1093/protein/5.3.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Åqvist J., Medina C., Samuelson J.-E. A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. Prot. Engng. 1994;7:385–391. doi: 10.1093/protein/7.3.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carlson H.A., Jorgensen W.L. An extended linear response method for determining free energies of hydration. J. Phys. Chem. 1995;99:10667–10673. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wilson M.A., Pohorille A., Pratt L.R. Comment on 'study on the liquid-vapor interface of water. I. Simulation results of thermodynamic properties and orientational structure. J. Chem. Phys. 1989;90:5211–5213. doi: 10.1063/1.456536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rick S.W., Berne B.J. The aqueous solvation of water: A comparison of continuum methods with molecular dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116:3949–3954. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hummer G., Pratt L.R., Garcia A.E., Berne B.J., Rick S.W. Electrostatic potentials and free energies of solvation of polar and charged molecules. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997;101:3017–3020. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hansen, J.P. and McDonald, I.R.: Theory of simple liquids, Academic Press, 1986.
  • 13.Åqvist J., Hansson T. Analysis of electrostatic potential truncation schemes in simulations of polar solvents. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102:3837–3840. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ashbaugh H.S., Sakane S., Wood R. R. t. c. o. Electrostatic potentials and free energies of solvation of polar and charged molecules. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102:3844–3845. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Darden T., Pearlman D., Pedersen L.G. Ionic charging free energies: Spherical versus periodic boundary conditions. J. Chem. Phys. 1998;109:10921–10935. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hummer G., Pratt L.R., Garcia A.E., Garde S., Berne B.J., Rick S. R. t. c. o. electrostatic potentials and free energies of solvation of polar and charged molecules. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102:3841–3843. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Allen M.P., Tildesley D.J. Computer Simulation of Liquids. NY: Oxford University Press; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vorobjev Y.N., Hermans J. A critical analysis of methods of calculation of a potential in simulated polar liquids: Strong arguments in favor of 'molecule-based' summation and of vacuum boundary conditions in Ewald summation. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1999;103:10234–10242. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Babu C.S., Lim C. Theory of ionic hydration: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations and experiment. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1999;103:7958–7968. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Madhusoodanan, M. and Lim, C.: 2002, in preparation.
  • 21.Babu C.S., Lim C. Solvation free energies of polar molecular solutes: Application of the two-sphere Born radius in continuum models of solvation. J. Chem. Phys. 2001;114:889–899. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Babu C.S., Lim C. Incorporating nonlinear solvent response in continuum dielectric models using a two-sphere description of the Born radius. J. Phys. Chem. 2001;105:5030–5036. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jorgensen W.L., Chandrasekhar J., Madura J.D., Impey R.W., Klein M.L. Comparison of simple potentials for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983;79:926–923. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Åqvist J. Ion-water potentials derived from free energy perturbation simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 1990;94:8021–8024. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brooks B.R., Bruccoleri R.E., Olafson B.D., States D.J., Swaminathan S., Karplus M. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 1983;4:187–217. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Steinbach P.J., Brooks B.R. New spherical-cut-off methods for long-range forces in macromolecular simulation. J. Comp. Chem. 1994;15:667–683. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang, P.-K., Liaw, S.-H. and Lim, C.: Representing an infinite solvent system by a rectangular finite system using image charges, J. Phys. Chem. B (2002). in press.
  • 28.Sharp K.A., Honig B. Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: Theory and applica-tions. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 1990;19:310–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.001505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nicholls A., Honig B. A rapid finite difference algorithm utilizing successive over-relaxation to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. J. Comp. Chem. 1991;12:435–445. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Warshel A., Russell S.T. Calculation of electrostatic interactions in biological systems and in solution. Quart. Rev. Biophys. 1984;17:283–422. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500005333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Roux B., Yu H.-A., Karplus M. Molecular basis for the Born model of ion solvation. J. Phys. Chem. 1990;94:4683–4688. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hyun J.-K., Babu C.S., Ichiye T. Apparent local dielectric response around ions in water: A method for its determination and its applications. J. Phys. Chem. 1995;99:5187–5195. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Biological Physics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

RESOURCES