Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
. 2002 Dec 1;79(4):445. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.4.445

The world cities project: Rationale, organization, and design for comparison of megacity health systems

Victor G Rodwin 1,✉, Michael K Gusmano 2
PMCID: PMC3456716  PMID: 12468666

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the World Cities Project (WCP), our rationale for it, our framework for comparative analysis, and an overview of current studies in progress. The WCP uses New York, London, Paris, and Tokyo as a laboratory in which to study urban health, particularly the evolution and current organization of public health infrastructure, as well as the health status and quality of life in these cities. Comparing world cities in wealthier nations is important because of (1) global trends in urbanization, emerging health risks, and population aging; (2) the dominant influence of these cities on “megacities” of developing nations; and (3) the existence of data and scholarship about these world cities, which provides a foundation for comparing their health systems and health. We argue that, in contrast to nation-states, world cities provide opportunities for more refined comparisons and cross-national learning. To provide a framework for WCP, we define an urban core for each city and examine the similarities and differences among them. Our current studies shed light on inequalities in health care use and health status, the importance of neighborhoods in protecting population health, and quality of life in diverse urban communities.

Keywords: Health Care, Health Status, Health System, Health Risk, Population Aging

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (226.1 KB).

References

  • 1.Scott A. Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sassen S. Global financial centers. Foreign Aff. 1999;78:75–87. doi: 10.2307/20020240. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Whiteis D. Third world medicine in first world cities: capital accumulation, uneven development and public health. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:795–808. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00137-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Roper WL, Baker EL, Jr, Dyal WW, Nicola RM. Strengthening the public health system. Public Health Rep. 1992;107:609–615. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fielding J, Garrett L. Betrayal of Trust: the Collapse of Global Public Health. New York: Hyperion; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fielding J, Halton N. Where is the health in health systems reform? JAMA. 1994;272:1292–1297. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03520160076047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sandman D, Schoen C, Des Roches C, Makonnen M. The Commonwealth, Fund Survey of Health Care in New York City. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.O'Meara M. Reinventing Cities for People and the Planet. Washington, DC: World-watch Institute; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.United Nations Population Division. World Urbanization, Prospects: the 1999 Revision. 2001. Available at: www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wup1999/urbanization.pdf.
  • 10.Bugliarello G. Megacities and the developing world. The Bridge. 1999;29:19–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sassen S. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kaplan F. Could this be the New World? New York Times. December 27, 1999:A23.
  • 13.Butler RN, Jasmin C. Longevity and Quality of Life: Opportunities and Challenges. New York: International Longevity, Center-USA; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Butler RN, Grossman LK, Oberlink M. Life in an Older America. New York: The Century Foundation Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hall P. The World Cities. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson; 1966. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sassen S. Cities in the World Economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Department of Environment and Government Office for London, United Kingdom . Four World Cities. London: Llewelvn-Davies; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Short J, Kim M, Wells H. The dirty little secret of world cities research: data problems in comparative analysis. Int J Urban Reg Res. 1996;20:697–717. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1996.tb00343.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harpman T, Tanner M. Urban Health in Developing Countries. London: Earthscan Publications; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rodwin V. Comparative analysis of health systems: an international perspective. In: Kovner A, Jonas S, editors. Health Care Delivery. New York: Springer; 2001. pp. 107–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.World Health Organization . World Health Report 2000. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Andrulis D, Goodman N. The Social and Health Landscape of Urban and Suburban America. Chicago, IL: AHA Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilensky H. Rich Democracies: Political Economy, Public Policy, and Performance. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Abel-Smith B. Who is the odd man out? The experience of Western Europe in containing the cost of health care. Milbank Q. Winter 1985:1–17. [PubMed]
  • 25.Marmor T, Bridges A, Hoffman W. Comparative politics and health policies: notes on benefits, costs, limits. In: Ashford D, editor. Comparing Public Policies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1978. pp. 50–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Morone J. American political culture and the search for lessons from abroad. J Health Polit Policy Law. Spring 1991:129–154. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 27.Brown L. Exceptionalism as the rule? US health policy innovation and cross-national learning. Int J Urban Reg Res. 1998;23:36–51. doi: 10.1215/03616878-23-1-35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rodwin V. American exceptionalism in the health sector: the advantages of “backwardness” in learning from abroad. Med Care Rev. 1987;44:119–153. doi: 10.1177/107755878704400106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.White J. Competing Solutions: American Health Proposal and International Experience. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Available at: www. who.int/whr/2000/en/report.htm.
  • 31.The World Bank . Investing in Health. Washington DC: The World Bank; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Anderson G, Hussey P. Comparing health system performance, in OECD countries. Health Aff. 2001;20:219–232. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Reinhardt U, Hussey P, Anderson G. Cross-national comparisons of health systems using OECD data. Health Aff. 1999;21:169–181. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ginsberg P. The RWJF Community Snapshots Study: introduction and overview. Health Aff. 1996;15:7–15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.2.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Coyne J, Hilsenrath P. The World Health Report 2000: can health care systems be compared using a single measure of performance? Am J Public Health. 1992;92(30):32–33. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.1.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Navarro V. The World Health Report 2000: can health care systems be compared using a single measure of performance? Am J Public Health. 1992;92(31):33–34. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.The Technological Change in Health Care Research Network Technological change around the world: evidence from heart attack care. Health Aff. 2001;20:25–42. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gusmano MK, Rodwin V, Weisz D. Ischemic heart, disease, angioplasty and bypass surgery in Paris and Manhattan: a comparative analysis of two world cities. 2002. Under review.
  • 39.Aaron H, Schwartz W. The Painful Prescription. Washington, DC: Brookings, Institute; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rodwin V. Urban health: is the city infected? In: Mariner M, editor. Medicine and Humanity. London: King's Fund; 2001. pp. 141–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Andrulis DP. Inner City Health Care. Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians; 1997. The urban health penalty: new dimensions and directions in inner-city health care; pp. 1–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Benbow N, Wang Y, Whitman S. Big Cities Health Inventory, 1997: the Health of Urban USA. Chicago, IL: Department of Health; 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ellen I, Mijanovich T, Dillman K. Neighborhood effects on health: exploring the links and assessing the evidence. J Urban Aff. 2001;23:391–408. doi: 10.1111/0735-2166.00096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Billings J, Zeitel L, Lukomnik J, Carey T, Blandk A, Newman L. Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Aff. Spring 1993:162–173. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 45.Bindman A, Grumbach K, Osmond D, et al. Preventable hospitalizations and access to health care. JAMA. 1995;271:305–311. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530040033037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cooper P, Schone B. More offers, fewer takers for employment-based health insurance: 1987 and 1996. Health Aff. 1997;16:142–148. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.6.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schoen C, Lyons B, Rowland D, Davis K, Puleo E. Insurance matters for low-income adults: results from a five-state survey. Health Aff. 1997;16:163–171. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.5.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schoen C, Puleo E. Low-income working families at risk: uninsured and underserved. J Urban Health. 1998;75:30–49. doi: 10.1007/BF02344923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Netzer D, Conoscenti T. Effective Real Property Rates for the New York Metropolitan Area. New York: Taub Urban Research Center, New York University; 2002. pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions. Indices of Deprivation 2000. Accessed at: www.neighborhood.statistics.gov.uk/catalogue.asp. Date accessed: October 1, 2000.
  • 51.Berry B. Central Place Studies. Philadelphia, PA: Regional Science Research Institute; 1961. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.King LJ. Central Place Theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hamnett C. Social polarization in global cites: theory and evidence. Int J Res Urban Reg Stud. 1994;31:401–423. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mollenkopf J, ed. Fragile Giants. New York: Routledge, in press.
  • 55.Body-Gendrot S. Paris: a “soft” global city? New Community. 1996;22:595–605. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Logan J, Taylor-Gooby P, Reuter M. Poverty and income inequality. In: Fainstein S, Gordon I, Harloe M, editors. Divided Cities: New York and London in the Contemporary World. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Neuberg L, Rodwin V. Infant Mortality in Four World Cities. New York: International Longevity Center-USA; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Billings J, Anderson GM, Newman LS. Recent findings on preventable hospitalizations. Health Aff. 1996;15:239–249. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.3.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Weissman JC, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM. Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA. 1992;268:2388–2394. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170060026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES