Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
. 2002 Jun;79(2):211–218. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.2.211

Survival of breast cancer patients in Connecticut in relation to socioeconomic and health care access indicators

Anthony P Polednak 1,✉
PMCID: PMC3456806  PMID: 12023496

Abstract

The purpose of this study of 16,931 black and white Connecticut women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 1988–1995 was to examine survival in relation to surrogate or proxy indicators of both socioeconomic status (SES) and access to primary care. Patients were followed through 1998, and the risk of death was elevated for the lowest (vs. highest) SES category independent of stage at diagnosis and other characteristics, especially among patients diagnosed before age 65 years. The health care access indicator was not associated with risk of death when other patient characteristics (including the SES variable and stage at diagnosis) were taken into account. Unexplained elevations, relative to the rest of the state, in risk of death were found for patients diagnosed while living in two of the state’s four largest cities.

Keywords: Breast Cancer, Medically Underserved, Poverty, Survival

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74.0 KB).

References

  • 1.Kogevinas M, Marmot MG, Fox AJ, Goldblatt PO. Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991;45:216–219. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.3.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Auvinen A, Karjalainen S, Pukkala E. Social class and cancer patient survival in Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:1089–1102. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Greenwald HP, Borgatta EF, McCorkle R, Polissar N. Explaining reduced survival among the disadvantaged. Milbank Q. 1996;74:215–238. doi: 10.2307/3350247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schrijvers CTM, Mackenbach JP, Lutaz JM, Quinn MJ, Coleman MP. Deprivation, stage at diagnosis and cancer survival. Int J Cancer. 1995;63:324–329. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910630303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krieger N. Socioeconomic data in cancer registries. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:156–156. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fish EB, Chapman JW, Link MA. Competing causes of death for primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:368–375. doi: 10.1007/BF02303502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wright RA, Andres TL, Davidson AJ. Finding the medically underserved: a need to revise the federal definition. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1996;7:296–307. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bureau of Primary Health Care. Guidelines for MUA/MUP designation. Available at: www.bphc.hrsa.gov. Accessed June 7, 2000.
  • 9.Zippin C, Lum D, Hankey BF. Completeness of hospital cancer case reporting from the SEER Program of the NCI. Cancer. 1995;76:2343–2350. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19951201)76:11<2343::AID-CNCR2820761124>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ries LAG, Wingo PA, Miller DS, et al. The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2000;88:2398–2424. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000515)88:10<2398::AID-CNCR26>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:703–710. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.82.5.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Norusis MJ. SPSS Advanced Statistics. Chicago, IL: SPSS; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mayberry RM, Coates RJ, Hill HA, et al. Determinants of black/white differences in colon cancer survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1686–1693. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.22.1686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Geronimus AT, Bound J. Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: evidence from national samples. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:475–486. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yen IH, Kaplan GA. Neighborhood social environment and risk of death: multilevel evidence from the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149:898–907. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Fehringer G, Laukkanen E, Richter NL, Meyer CM. An international comparison of cancer survival: metropolitan Toronto, Ontario, and Honolulu, Hawaii. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1866–1872. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.90.12.1866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kravdal O. The impact of marital status on cancer survival. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:357–368. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00139-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ragland KE, Selvin S, Merrill DW. Black-white differences in stage-specific cancer survival: analysis of seven selected sites. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133:672–682. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mandelblatt JS, Yabroff KR, Kerner JF. Equitable access to cancer services: a review of barriers to quality care. Cancer. 1999;86:2378–2390. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991201)86:11<2378::AID-CNCR28>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brinkley D, Haybittle IL, Anderson MR. Death certification in cancer of the breast. Br Med J. 1984;289:465–467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6443.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Polednak AP. Later-stage cancer in relation to medically underserved areas in Connecticut. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2000;11:301–309. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Culler SD, Parchman ML, Przybylski M. Factors related to potentially preventable hospitalizations among the elderly. Med Care. 1998;36:804–817. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199806000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grumbach K, Vranizan K, Bindman AB. Physician supply and access to care in urban communities. Health Aff. 1997;16:71–88. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282:583–589. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.6.583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Laukkanen E, Fehringer G, Richter NL. An international comparison of cancer survival: adyantage of Canada’s poor over the near poor of the United States. Can J Public Health. 1998;89:102–104. doi: 10.1007/BF03404398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Fehringer G, Laukkanen E, Richter NL, Meyer CM. An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario and three relatively resourceful United States metropolitan areas. J Public Health Med. 2000;22:343–348. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.3.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES