Skip to main content
International Orthopaedics logoLink to International Orthopaedics
. 2005 Apr 2;29(3):149–151. doi: 10.1007/s00264-005-0642-x

Anterior thigh pain after cementless total hip arthroplasty

A A Faraj 1, Mehmood Yousuf 2,3,
PMCID: PMC3456876  PMID: 15806360

Abstract

We compared the incidence of anterior thigh pain retrospectively following primary uncemented total hip replacement in 70 patients (78 hips) with osteoarthritis. In one group (38 hips), an Endoplus porous-coated, canal-filling prosthesis was inserted through an anterolateral approach. In the other group (40 hips), a Furlong hydroxyapatite-coated prosthesis was inserted through a posterior approach. The latter prosthesis has a relatively longer femoral stem and does not achieve diaphyseal press-fit contact. Three patients in the Furlong group had anterior thigh pain, which eventually resolved in two patients. In the Endoplus group, two patients developed anterior thigh pain; in both cases, there was an underlying cause, which had to be treated. Idiopathic anterior thigh pain is more common in non-canal-filling prostheses. When anterior thigh pain is noticed in canal-filling prosthesis, a search for and treatment of the cause will cure the pain. The hydroxyapatite coating did not prevent thigh pain in the Furlong group.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (62.6 KB).

References

  • 1.Bands R, Pelker RR, Shine J, Bradburn H, Margolis R, Leach J. The noncemented porous-coated hip prosthesis. A three-year clinical follow-up study and roentgenographic analysis. Clin Orthop. 1991;269:209–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brown TE, Larson B, Shen F, Moskal JT. Thigh pain after cementless total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:385–392. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200211000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burkart BC, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Kirk PG. Thigh pain in cementless total hip arthroplasty. A comparison of two systems at 2 years follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:645–653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Campbell AC, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Chess D, Nott L. Thigh pain after cementless arthroplasty. Annoyance or ill omen. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:63–66. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B1.1732268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hernandez Cortes P, Najera Sagastume OO, Mesa Ramos F, Pajares Lopez M, Hernandez Hernandez MA. Hydroxyapatite-coated stems with metaphyseal and diaphyseal press-fit. Eleven-year follow-up results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2002;68:24–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jaffe WL, Scott DF. Rationale and clinical application of hydroxyapatite coating in press fit total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1993;4:159–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim YH, Kim JS, Oh SH, Kim JM. Comparison of porous-coated titanium femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite coating. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2003;85:1682–1688. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200309000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Merle d’Aubigné R, Postel M. Functional hip score—D’Aubigne & Postel. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 1954;36:451–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Petrou G, Garvras M, Diamantopoulos A, Kapetsis T, Kremmdyas N, Kouzoupis A. Uncemented total hip replacements and thigh pain. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1994;113:322–326. doi: 10.1007/BF00426180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES