Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Orthopaedics logoLink to International Orthopaedics
. 2004 Apr 22;28(4):244–251. doi: 10.1007/s00264-004-0557-y

Sacral fractures with neurological injury: is early decompression beneficial?

B A Zelle 1,✉, G S Gruen 1, T Hunt 1, S R Speth 1
PMCID: PMC3456939  PMID: 15103503

Abstract

During a 6-year period, 177 patients with a displaced sacral fracture were treated at our level-one trauma centre. At the initial presentation, 13 patients demonstrated a neurological deficit as a result of their sacral fracture. Six patients underwent surgical decompression, and seven patients were managed without surgical decompression. All patients were re-assessed at an average follow-up of 27.1 (range 12–84) months using the modified SOFCOT Index and the SF-36. Patients undergoing surgical decompression had a significantly better neurological improvement as measured by the modified SOFCOT Index (p=0.014). Moreover, patients undergoing surgical decompression had a significantly better physical function than the patients that were managed without surgical decompression, as measured by the SF-36 (p=0.044). We therefore believe that patients undergoing surgical decompression achieve better neurological improvement and better functional results.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (162.8 KB).

References

  • 1.Baker J Trauma. 1976;16:882. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197611000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bellarba J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:32. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200301000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Denis Clin Orthop. 1988;277:67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ebraheim Spine. 1996;21:2390. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199610150-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fountain SS, Hamilton RD, Jameson RM (1977) Transverse fractures of the sacrum. A report of six cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 59:486–489 [PubMed]
  • 6.Gibbons J Neurosurg. 1990;72:889. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.6.0889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hersche Unfallchirurg. 1993;96:311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.KimCan J Surg 20014435911603749 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lassale B, Garcon P. Etude Clinic de la stenose lombaire (1989) Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 75 [Suppl 1]:40–44
  • 10.Nork J Orthop Trauma. 2001;4:238. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200105000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Phelan ST, Jones DA, Bishay M (1991) Conservative management of transverse fractures of the sacrum with neurological features. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73:969–971 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Pohlemann Orthopade. 1992;21:400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Roy-Camille Spine. 1985;10:838. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198511000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sabiston J Trauma. 1986;26:1113. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198612000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schmidek Neurosurg. 1984;15:735. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Seddon H. Surgical disorders of the peripheral nerves. Edinburgh and London: Churchill Livingstone. 1972:299
  • 17.Taguchi J Orthop Sci. 2001;4:347. doi: 10.1007/s007760050115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tile M (1988) Pelvic ring fractures: should they be fixed? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:1–12 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.Ware Med Care. 1992;30:473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES