Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Orthopaedics logoLink to International Orthopaedics
. 2005 Jan 13;29(1):59–64. doi: 10.1007/s00264-004-0617-3

Pathways to evidence-based knowledge in orthopaedic surgery: an international survey of AO course participants

Sabine Goldhahn 3,✉, Laurent Audigé 3, David L Helfet 2, Beate Hanson 1
PMCID: PMC3456943  PMID: 15647916

Abstract

The aim of this study was to gain information about how orthopaedic surgeons use evidence-based literature and how this is influenced by their knowledge of evidence-based medicine. We administered a questionnaire to participants at courses of the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO-ASIF) in Davos, Switzerland, in December 2003. Special attention was paid to the surgeons’ educational level, affiliations, and the infrastructure and evidence sources they used. In addition, we tested participants on their knowledge and attitude to evidence-based orthopaedic surgery (EBOS). Of 1,274 course participants, 456 completed the questionnaire. Of 446 respondents, 300 had heard of EBOS, but only 45% could define it correctly. Nearly two thirds identified scientific publications as their main source of scientific knowledge. The respondents’ attitudes to and awareness of EBOS principles was high, but it did not influence their manner of searching for scientific information or their trust in various sources of recommendations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (160.4 KB).

References

  • 1.Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gotzsche PC, Lang T. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–694. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aronson B. Improving online access to medical information for low-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:966–968. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Audigé L, Bhandari M, Griffin D, Middleton P, Reeves BC. Systematic reviews of non-randomised clinical studies in the orthopaedic literature. Clin Orthop. 2004;427:249–257. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000137558.97346.fb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Austin MA, Criqui MH, Barrett-Connor E, Holdbrook MJ. The effect of response bias on the odds ratio. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;114:137–143. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Swiontkowski MF, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:615–621. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.12532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF. User’s guide to the orthopaedic literature: how to use an article about a surgical therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1555–1564. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.83B1.10986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bhandari M, Richards RR, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. The quality of reporting of randomized trials in the journal of bone and joint surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:388–396. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.12532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bhandari M, Tornetta P, III, Guyatt GH. Glossary of evidence-based orthopaedic terminology. Clin Orthop. 2003;413:158–163. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000079321.41006.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Buchanan J, Dahlen K, Matucheski M. Finding the evidence. WMJ. 1999;98:29–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Garcia-Berthou E, Alcaraz C. Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ. Finding current evidence: search strategies and common databases. Clin Orthop. 2003;413:133–145. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000079324.41006.dc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hamlet WP, Fletcher A, Meals RA. Publication patterns of papers presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1138–1143. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199708000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hanson BP, Bhandari M, Audige L, Helfet D. The need for education in evidence-based orthopaedics: an international survey AO course participants. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:328–333. doi: 10.1080/00016470410001277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kiter E, Karatosun V, Gunal I. Do orthopaedic journals provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123:82–85. doi: 10.1007/s00402-003-0501-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nguyen V, Tornetta P, III, Bkaric M. Publication rates for the scientific sessions of the OTA. Orthopaedic Trauma Association. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:457–459. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199809000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saloojee Y, Dagli E. Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health. Bull WHO. 2000;78:902–910. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shojania KG, Bero LA. Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4:157–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Suarez-Almazor ME, Belseck E, Homik J, Dorgan M, Ramos-Remus C. Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:476–487. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00067-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yudkin JS, Swai AB. Access to medical information in developing countries. Lancet. 2000;355:2248. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02417-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES