Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
letter
. 2012 Oct;50(10):3412–3413. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01663-12

Emergence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST239 with High-Level Mupirocin and Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in a Tertiary Care Center in Chennai, South India

Nagarajan Abimanyu 1, Saravanan Murugesan 1, Padma Krishnan 1,
PMCID: PMC3457429  PMID: 22855516

LETTER

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST239 is probably the most predominant clone of MRSA causing hospital-acquired infections (4). Different clones of MRSA ST239 have been reported: Hungarian, Brazilian, Portuguese, and Viennese clones (4). MRSA ST239 is an invasive clone of multidrug-resistant (MDR) MRSA producing potential exotoxins, causing a wide range of life-threatening infections. It is reported that MRSA ST239 strains from Asian countries are resistant to additional antibiotics compared to their counterparts in Western countries. MRSA ST239 strains with varying resistances and susceptibilities to mupirocin, amikacin, and cotrimoxazole have been reported from different parts of the world (4). There is paucity of data on MRSA ST239 from India, where the prevalence of MRSA is high (6). We studied the prevalence, antibiotic resistance, and virulence of MRSA ST239 among clinical isolates of MRSA causing skin and soft tissue infections in a tertiary-care hospital in Chennai, South India.

A total of 50 nonrepetitive isolates of MRSA causing various skin and soft tissue infections (cellulitis [n = 18], infected wound [n = 12], furuncle and carbuncle [n = 9], abscess [n = 9], and impetigo [n = 2]) collected between January and March 2011 were included in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee. High-level mupirocin resistance was detected by using mupirocin (200 μg) disc diffusion test, the agar dilution MIC method, and ileS2 gene PCR (9). Inducible clindamycin resistance was detected by the disc approximation test (D-test). Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec element (SCCmec) typing (1) and spa typing (5) were done for all MRSA isolates. MRSA isolates with SCCmec III and spa type t037 were tested for multilocus sequence type (MLST) (3). MRSA ST239 isolates were further tested for an array of virulence genes (8). Standard strains of S. aureus (ATCC 43300, ATCC 25923, COL, N315, JCSC2724, MW2, and WIS) were used as controls for detection of SCCmec types and virulence genes.

The major SCCmec type was found to be SCCmec V-25 (50%), followed by the SCCmec III-16 (32%), SCCmec I-8 (16%), and SCCmec IV-1 (2%). All the MRSA isolates tested were sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid. Resistance was observed for other classes of antibiotics, including tetracycline (78%), cotrimoxazole (66%), ofloxacin (38%), rifampin (34%), and amikacin (32%). All the 16 MRSA isolates with SCCmec III were found to be t037 and ST-239. The other major spa types found in this study were t064 (n = 16) and t657 (n = 9). All MRSA ST239 isolates showed high-level mupirocin resistance (MIC > 512 mg/liter/mupA+), inducible clindamycin resistance, and high-level methicillin resistance (MIC = 256 mg/liter). The AST results of MRSA ST239 isolates revealed that they were MDR (Table 1). They were found to cause all kinds of skin infections included in this study, except abscesses, and were positive for an array of virulence genes (Table 1). Although there have been individual reports of mupirocin resistance (7) and inducible clindamycin resistance (2) among MRSA, this is the first report on emergence of hospital-acquired MRSA with both mupirocin and inducible clindamycin resistance. The increasing efficacy of MRSA in extending its resistance to the effective antibiotics makes treatment challenging and expensive.

Table 1.

Characteristics of mupirocin-resistant MRSA ST239 isolates (n = 16) in this study

Characteristic Description
Clinical manifestations Skin and soft tissue infections: wound infection (n = 6), carbuncle (n = 3), furuncle (n = 3), impetigo (n = 2), and cellulitis (n = 2)
Patient age and category All ages, inpatients (HAMRSA)
Antibiotic resistance profile Sensitive to vancomycin, fusidic acid, and linezolid; resistant to amikacin, cotrimoxazole, erythromycin, mupirocin, netilmicin, ofloxacin, oxacillin, rifampin, and tetracycline; erythromycin induced clindamycin resistance (iMLSB); oxacillin MIC, 256 mg/liter; mupirocin MIC, ≥512 mg/litera
Virulence gene profile Enterotoxins: sea and sek; hemolysins: hla, hld, and hlg; leucocidins: none; innate immune evasions: chp, scn, and sak
Resistant determinants mecA; SCCmec type III (HAMRSA); ileS2a (mupA) gene, mupirocin-resistant gene; ermA, erythromycin resistance and inducible clindamycin resistance
Molecular typing Accessory gene regulator (agr), type I; spa type, t037; MLST, ST239
a

High-level mupirocin resistance.

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, HAMRSA with both mupirocin and inducible clindamycin resistance has not been reported elsewhere. The emergence of such invasive MDR MRSA with extended antibiotic resistance has to be addressed to prevent increasing morbidity and mortality.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We do not have any conflicts of interest in the subject area of the research discussed.

This work was supported by an Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR–BMBF Indo-German Collaborative project) grant provided by the government of India (grant no. INDO/FRC/610/09-IHD).

We thank G. Sivakumar, Department of General Surgery, MMC, and GH, Chennai, for his support in collecting the clinical samples.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 1 August 2012

REFERENCES

  • 1. Boye K, et al. 2007. A new multiplex PCR for easy screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SCCmec types I–V. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 13:725–727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Drinkovic D, et al. 2001. Clindamycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48:315–316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Enright MC, et al. 2000. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1008–1015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Feil EJ, et al. 2008. Rapid detection of the pandemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone ST239, a dominant strain in Asian hospitals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:1520–1522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Harmsen D, et al. 2003. Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a University hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5442–5448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Nagarajan A, et al. 2010. Emergence of Panton-Valentine leucocidin among community- and hospital-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Chennai, South India. J. Hosp. Infect. 76:269–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Patel JB, et al. 2009. Mupirocin resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:935–941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Shukla SK, et al. 2010. Virulence genes and genotypic associations in nasal carriage, community-associated methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant USA400 Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:3582–3592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yun HJ, et al. 2003. Prevalence and mechanisms of low- and high-level mupirocin resistance in staphylococci isolated from a Korean hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:619–623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES