Abstract
Phagocytosis and oxidative burst are two major effector arms of innate immunity. Although it is known that both are activated by Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and Rac GTPases, how their strengths are controlled in quiescent and TLR-activated cells is not clear. We report here that TIPE2 (TNFAIP8L2) serves as a negative regulator of innate immunity by linking TLRs to Rac. TLRs control the expression levels of TIPE2, which in turn dictates the strengths of phagocytosis and oxidative burst by binding to and blocking Rac GTPases. Consequently, TIPE2 knockout cells have enhanced phagocytic and bactericidal activities and TIPE2 knockout mice are resistant to bacterial infection. Thus, TIPE2 sets the strengths of phagocytosis and oxidative burst and may be targeted to effectively control infections.
Phagocytosis and oxidative burst (or respiratory burst) are two fundamental effector mechanisms of innate immunity that work in concert to eliminate infectious microbes (1, 2). Phagocytosis allows the phagocytes of the immune system (monocytes and granulocytes) to engulf infectious microbes and to contain them in a special vacuole called a phagosome. Oxidative burst in turn injects into the vacuole reactive oxygen species (ROS) (e.g., superoxide radical and hydrogen peroxide) that kill the microbes. Deficiency in either of these innate immune mechanisms leads to immune deficiency and uncontrolled infections (3–6).
Both phagocytosis and oxidative burst are controlled by the Rac proteins of the Ras small GTPase superfamily (1–4). There are three mammalian Rac GTPases, which are designated as Rac1, Rac2, and Rac3. Small GTPases are enzymes that hydrolyze GTP. They are active when bound to GTP and inactive when bound to GDP and serve as molecular “on-and-off” switches of signaling pathways that control a wide variety of cellular processes including growth, motility, vesicle trafficking, and death (7). Rac GTPases control phagocytosis by promoting actin polymerization through their effector proteins such as p21-activated kinases (PAKs), WASP family Verprolin homology domain-containing protein (WAVE), and IQ motif containing GTPase-activating protein-1 (IQGAP1) (1). Rac GTPases also mediate ROS production by binding and activating the NADPH oxidase complex through the p67(Phox) protein (1). Rac GTPase deficiency in mice and humans leads to an immune-deficient syndrome, which is characterized by defective phagocytosis and oxidative burst, recurrent infection, and granulomas (3–6).
Although quiescent phagocytes are capable of phagocytosis and ROS production, their levels are low. Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation or microbial infection significantly up-regulates these innate immune processes (8–11). However, the mechanisms whereby microbes promote them are not well understood. TIPE2, or tumor necrosis factor-α–induced protein 8 (TNFAIP8)-like 2 (TNFAIP8L2), is a member of the TNFAIP8 family, which is preferentially expressed in hematopoietic cells (12–18). It is significantly down-regulated in patients with infectious or autoimmune disorders (15, 19). The mammalian TNFAIP8 family consists of four members: TNFAIP8, TIPE1, TIPE2, and TIPE3, whose functions are largely unknown (14, 20). We recently generated TIPE2-deficient mice and discovered that TIPE2 plays a crucial role in immune homeostasis (14). We report here that TIPE2 controls innate immunity by targeting the Rac GTPases.
Results and Discussion
TLR Stimulation and Bacterial Infection Markedly Diminish TIPE2 Expression.
TIPE2 is constitutively expressed at high levels in myeloid cells (14). To explore the relationship between TIPE2 and innate immunity, we examined its expression in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) before and after stimulation with different TLR ligands/agonists. Upon stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (the TLR4 ligand), Poly(I:C) (the TLR3 agonist), and Zymosan A (the TLR2 ligand), the expression of cytokine genes (IL-6, TNFα, and IFNβ1) significantly increased; by contrast, TIPE2 expression was significantly diminished (Fig. 1A). Because TLRs play essential roles in pathogen recognition and innate immunity to microbes, we next challenged the BMDMs with the bacteria Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes. Both bacteria significantly augmented cytokine gene expression, but inhibited that of TIPE2 (Fig. 1B). Similar effects were observed in the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 (Fig. 1C). However, unlike the RAW cell line that exhibited transient TIPE2 down-regulation (21), primary BMDMs expressed markedly reduced TIPE2 mRNA (Fig. 1D) and protein (Fig. 1 E and F) even 16 h after LPS or bacterial challenge. These results indicate that TIPE2 may regulate the early phase of innate immune responses.
TIPE2 Binds to Rac GTPases Through Their C-Terminal CAAX Motif.
To identify TIPE2-interacting proteins, we performed large-scale coimmunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry screenings using RAW 264.7 cells. Among the peptides identified, three were shared by the small GTPases Rac1 and Rac2, members of the Rho family. Both Rac1 and Rac2 are expressed in neutrophils and macrophages. They share 92% identity in primary sequences and perform crucial functions in innate immune responses (2).
To determine whether TIPE2 indeed interacts with the Rac GTPases in mammalian cells, we undertook four complementary approaches. First, we expressed Flag-tagged TIPE2 and Myc-tagged Rac1 or Rac2 in 293T cells and, by coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) analyses, we found that TIPE2 interacted with both Rac1 and Rac2 (Fig. 2A). Second, we determined whether endogenous TIPE2 interacts with endogenous Rac. Murine RAW 264.7 macrophage extracts were used to immunoprecipitate Rac-binding proteins with anti-Rac1/2/3 polyclonal antibodies. Upon blotting with anti-TIPE2 antibody, a strong TIPE2 signal was detected in the precipitates (Fig. 2B), indicating that TIPE2 is constitutively associated with Rac proteins in nonstimulated immune cells. By contrast, in the same RAW cells, we did not detect any interaction between endogenous TIPE2 and several other GTPases, including Cdc42, RhoA, RalA, and HRas, suggesting that the TIPE2−Rac interaction is specific. Third, we tested whether TIPE2 and Rac might directly interact with each other. TIPE2 and Rac1 proteins were synthesized separately, using an in vitro transcription–translation system. After mixing them together, we found that TIPE2 physically associated with Rac1, indicating that the two proteins might directly bind to each other (Fig. 2 C and D). Finally, using both GDP and GTP forms of Rac1 (22, 23), we showed that TIPE2−Rac interaction was not affected by the Rac1-activating status; i.e., TIPE2 binds to both GDP and GTP forms of Rac1 (Fig. 2E).
To map the region within Rac that is responsible for TIPE2 interaction, we generated full-length Rac1 (amino acids 1–192) and a series of deletion constructs in frame with an HA tag (Fig. 3A). Among five deletion Rac1 mutants we generated, two (with amino acids 48–123 deletion and amino acids 136–161 deletion) were unstable in cells and could not be further studied. By contrast, Rac1 mutants without the N terminus (amino acids 1–47), the insert region (amino acids 124–135), or the C terminus (amino acids 162–192) were stable and therefore were used in this study. By co-IP, we found that the C terminus, but not the N terminus or the insert region, was required for TIPE2 interaction (Fig. 3B).
The C terminus of Rac contains a polybasic region (PBR) and a CAAX motif. To determine which of these elements is involved in TIPE2 binding, we made two additional Rac1 mutants, one without the PBR and one without the CAAX motif. By co-IP, we found that the CAAX motif, but not the PBR, was required for TIPE2 interaction (Fig. 3C). The cysteine residue, Cys-189, in the C-terminal CAAX motif is crucial for the posttranslational modification and function of Rac (23). Using a point mutant form of Rac1, Rac1C189S, in which Cys-189 is replaced by serine, we found that TIPE2 binding required Cys-189 (Fig. 3D).
TIPE2 Inhibits Rac Membrane Translocation, Rac Activation, and Downstream Rac Signaling.
The hydrophobic C-terminal region of Rac is responsible for targeting and anchoring Rac to the plasma membrane. Our finding that TIPE2 binds to the C terminus of Rac suggests that it may regulate membrane translocation of Rac. To test this possibility, we transiently expressed increasing amounts of TIPE2 in 293T cells. At 8 h after transfection, TIPE2 did not induce a significant amount of cell death (Fig. S1), but reduced the membrane-bound, not the cytosolic, endogenous Rac in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3E). The TIPE2 N-terminal lysine or arginine residues, Lys-15, Lys-16, and Arg-24, are important for TIPE2–Rac1 interaction because replacing them with glutamine or alanine markedly reduced the Rac1 binding (Fig. 3F). By contrast, Lys-20 mutation did not affect the binding. As a consequence, the TIPE2 K15/16Q and R24A mutants were not as effective as wild-type TIPE2 in inhibiting Rac membrane translocation (Fig. 3G). As stated above, LPS markedly reduced TIPE2 levels in macrophages. This reduction was associated with increased Rac1 membrane translocation in LPS-treated cells (Fig. 3H), indicating that TIPE2 regulates Rac membrane translocation.
Because plasma membrane translocation of small GTPases is required for their activation, these results indicate that TIPE2 may regulate Rac activation. To test this hypothesis, we undertook three complementary approaches. First, using confocal microscopy and an antibody that recognized GTP-Rac but not GDP-Rac, we examined the levels of membrane-bound GTP-Rac in 293T cells that did or did not receive TIPE2 transfection. We found that 293T cells exhibited prominent endogenous GTP-Rac staining on the plasma membrane, which was significantly blocked in cells transfected with TIPE2, but not in cells transfected with a control GFP plasmid (Fig. 4A). Second, using a GST pull-down assay that specifically recognized active GTP-bound Rac, we tested the TIPE2 effect in 293T cells that did or did not express a constitutive active form of HRas (HRas12V). We found that TIPE2 transfection decreased the Rac-GTP levels in both cell types (Fig. 4B). Third, we tested the effect of TIPE2 deficiency on Rac activation in macrophages. We found that resting TIPE2-deficient murine macrophages exhibited an increase in active Rac levels over wild-type controls. The difference was more dramatic upon the activation of the Rac pathway with fibronectin (Fig. 4C). The total Rac levels were not affected by TIPE2 overexpression or deficiency, indicating that TIPE2 may not regulate Rac activity through protein expression or degradation.
A number of studies have demonstrated that Rac can activate both the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and the PAK pathways (24). In 293T cells, we found that constitutively active Rac expression did induce JNK and PAK activation as reflected by increased phosphorylation; this effect was blocked by TIPE2 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4D). Active Rac1 can induce the assembly of a filamentous (F)-actin structure through PAK-dependent and -independent signals (24). Because polymerization of F-actin can be induced by LPS, we next examined the effect of TIPE2 deficiency on LPS-induced F-actin polymerization. We found that in TIPE2-deficient BMDMs, the F-actin polymerization rate was significantly enhanced compared with that in wild-type cells (Fig. 4E). A similar phenotype was observed in TIPE2-deficient splenocytes (21).
TIPE2 Inhibits the Basal Level of Phagocytosis Through Rac, and TIPE2 Down-Regulation Contributes to TLR-Induced Augmentation of Phagocytosis.
Rac proteins are key molecular switches of phagocytosis (2). To determine the roles of TIPE2 in phagocytosis, we used both TIPE2 loss-of-function and gain-of-function approaches. Thus, macrophages were first generated from WT and Tipe2-deficient murine bone marrow. They showed no differences in surface marker expression (Fig. S2). They were then fed with apoptotic thymocytes from GFP transgenic mice. Thirty minutes later, the engulfment of GFP-positive cells was measured by flow cytometry. Remarkably, TIPE2 deficiency increased the basal phagocytosis rate by approximately twofold (Fig. 5A). Moreover, the mean fluorescence intensity of Tipe2-deficient GFP-positive cells was also significantly increased. Addition of the actin polymerization inhibitor, cytochalasin B, markedly reduced phagocytosis in both WT and Tipe2−/− groups, indicating that actin remodeling is required and that TIPE2 may regulate internalization rather than adherence (Fig. 5A). The increased phagocytic activity of Tipe2-deficient cells was not restricted to apoptotic cells, because Tipe2-deficient macrophages were significantly more active in engulfing fluorescently labeled 2-μm beads (Fig. 5B) and live or dead bacteria (Fig. 5C). The increase in phagocytosis of Tipe2-deficient cells was not affected by the culture media used [with or without 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine sera or freshly prepared murine sera that contain different amounts of Ig and/or complements], indicating that the TIPE2 effect on phagocytosis may not be dependent on Fc or complement receptor use (Fig. S3). In contrast to phagocytosis, endocytosis of fluorescence-labeled dextran was not affected by TIPE2 deficiency (Fig. S4).
To directly test the effect of TIPE2 on phagocytosis, we overexpressed TIPE2 in WT and Tipe2−/− macrophages. In Tipe2−/− cells, ectopic TIPE2 reduced phagocytosis by more than fourfold, whereas in WT cells that constitutively expressed high levels of TIPE2 it had a much smaller effect (Fig. 5D and Fig. S5). Importantly, ectopic TIPE2 completely eliminated the augmented phagocytic activity of Tipe2−/− cells compared with WT cells.
To determine whether TIPE2 regulates phagocytosis through Rac, we manipulated the Rac activity using Rac mutants and chemical blockers. Expression of a constitutively active Rac (61L) dramatically increased phagocytosis in both WT and Tipe2−/− macrophages and abolished the difference between them. On the other hand, dominant-negative Rac1 (17N) significantly reduced phagocytosis in Tipe2−/− cells and eliminated the difference between WT and Tipe2−/− cells (Fig. 5E and Fig. S6). Similarly, the Rac1 antagonist NSC23766 depressed the ability of macrophages to uptake apoptotic cells and reduced the difference between WT and Tipe2−/− groups in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5F).
The basal level of phagocytosis is significantly increased upon TLR activation (8, 9). Because TLRs down-regulate TIPE2 expression, we asked whether TLRs augment phagocytosis through TIPE2. WT and Tipe2−/− macrophages were therefore stimulated with LPS and their phagocytic ability was tested. As reported, LPS stimulation enhanced phagocytosis of WT cells in a time-dependent manner. However, this enhancement was significantly reduced in Tipe2−/− cells (Fig. 5G and Fig. S7). These results indicate that TIPE2 down-regulation contributes to the TLR-induced increase in phagocytosis.
TIPE2 Inhibits Oxidative Burst, and Its Down-Regulation Contributes to TLR-Induced Augmentation of Bactericidal Activity.
Because Rac proteins are crucial for assembling the NADPH complex and for producing ROS, we next investigated whether TIPE2 regulates ROS production and bacterial killing. We found that Tipe2−/− macrophages exhibited enhanced bacterial clearance within 2 h of bacterial infection. They killed L. monocytogenes and E. coli more efficiently than WT macrophages. Similar differences were observed between Tipe2−/− and WT neutrophils (Fig. 6A).
We then assessed ROS production in bone marrow neutrophils of WT and Tipe2−/− mice, using a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-dependent chemiluminescence assay. N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP), a bacterial peptide, and L. monocytogenes were used to induce ROS production. Compared with WT cells, Tipe2−/− neutrophils exhibited significantly enhanced ROS production after stimulation (Fig. 6B). Intracellular ROS levels were then measured in the dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) assay (Fig. 6C). GM-CSF priming and fMLP stimulation triggered significantly more ROS production in Tipe2−/− cells than in WT cells. Similarly, when cells were challenged with Listeria, more ROS were detected in Tipe2−/− neutrophils than in WT neutrophils. Intracellular ROS production was also tested by luminol-dependent luminescence assay in the absence of HRP. Again, significant differences in the ROS production between Tipe2−/− and WT neutrophils were observed (Fig. S8).
TLR activation increases the bactericidal activity of macrophages (25, 26). We next investigated whether TIPE2 down-regulation contributes to LPS-induced enhancement of bacterial killing. We found that LPS stimulation significantly enhanced the killing ability of WT macrophages. By contrast, the LPS effect was markedly reduced in Tipe2−/− cells, indicating that TIPE2 is involved in the LPS-induced regulation of bacterial killing (Fig. 6D).
TIPE2-Deficient Mice Are Resistant to Bacterial Infection.
In vitro, down-regulation of TIPE2 is associated with increased phagocytosis and bacterial killing. To assess the in vivo relevance of these findings, we infected Tipe2−/− and WT mice with a lethal dose of L. monocytogenes (Fig. 7A). More than 80% of WT mice succumbed within 7 d after infection, whereas all Tipe2−/− mice survived (P < 0.01). The increased mortality of WT mice was associated with enhanced bacteria growth, tissue damage, and cytokine production. At day 3 postinfection, the Listeria titer in the liver and spleen of WT mice was significantly higher than that in Tipe2−/− mice (Fig. 7B). The blood alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels are indicators of hepatic injury. After Listeria infection, the blood ALT and AST levels were significantly higher in WT than in Tipe2−/− mice (Fig. 7C). Fewer serum inflammatory cytokines were detected in Tipe2−/− mice compared with WT mice (Fig. 7D). Additionally, we also challenged the Tipe2−/− and WT mice with Staphylococcus aureus. Consistent with the Listeria experiment, Tipe2−/− mice survived for a longer time and carried significantly fewer bacteria in their liver and spleen (Fig. 7 E and F). Taken together, these results demonstrate that TIPE2 inhibits immunity to bacteria.
Methods
Mice.
C57BL/6 mice that carry a Tipe2 gene null mutation were generated by backcrossing Tipe2−/− 129 mice to C57BL/6 (B6) mice for 12 generations.
Methods.
The following methods are described in SI Methods: plasmid constructs; cell culture and transfection; macrophage generation and neutrophil isolation; gene transfer in primary macrophages; microbial strains and infection; real-time quantitative PCR; protein extraction, cell subcellular fractionation, and immunoblotting; cell lysate preparation, protein in vitro translation, and immunoprecipitation; loading of Rac1 with GDP and GTP; immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy; PBD pull-down assay; F-actin determination; phagocytosis assay; determination of bactericidal activity; detection of ROS; ELISA; and statistical analyses.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Drs. H. Shen and Y. Paterson (University of Pennsylvania) for providing L. monocytogenes and Dr. Y. Fan (Shandong University) for rabbit anti-TIPE2. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI-077533, AI-050059, and GM-085112.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. M.J.L. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1204525109/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Diebold BA, Bokoch GM. Rho GTPases and the control of the oxidative burst in polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2005;291:91–111. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27511-8_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Niedergang F, Chavrier P. Regulation of phagocytosis by Rho GTPases. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2005;291:43–60. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27511-8_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ambruso DR, et al. Human neutrophil immunodeficiency syndrome is associated with an inhibitory Rac2 mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:4654–4659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.080074897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Roberts AW, et al. Deficiency of the hematopoietic cell-specific Rho family GTPase Rac2 is characterized by abnormalities in neutrophil function and host defense. Immunity. 1999;10:183–196. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heyworth PG, Cross AR, Curnutte JT. Chronic granulomatous disease. Curr Opin Immunol. 2003;15:578–584. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(03)00109-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Assari T. Chronic granulomatous disease; fundamental stages in our understanding of CGD. Med Immunol. 2006;5:4. doi: 10.1186/1476-9433-5-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Colicelli J. Human RAS superfamily proteins and related GTPases. Sci STKE. 2004;2004:RE13. doi: 10.1126/stke.2502004re13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Blander JM, Medzhitov R. Regulation of phagosome maturation by signals from toll-like receptors. Science. 2004;304:1014–1018. doi: 10.1126/science.1096158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Takeda K, Akira S. Toll-like receptors in innate immunity. Int Immunol. 2005;17:1–14. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kong L, Ge BX. MyD88-independent activation of a novel actin-Cdc42/Rac pathway is required for Toll-like receptor-stimulated phagocytosis. Cell Res. 2008;18:745–755. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tricker E, Cheng G. With a little help from my friends: Modulation of phagocytosis through TLR activation. Cell Res. 2008;18:711–712. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ahn SH, et al. Two genes on A/J chromosome 18 are associated with susceptibility to Staphylococcus aureus infection by combined microarray and QTL analyses. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001088. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Laliberté B, et al. TNFAIP8: A new effector for Galpha(i) coupling to reduce cell death and induce cell transformation. J Cell Physiol. 2010;225:865–874. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sun H, et al. TIPE2, a negative regulator of innate and adaptive immunity that maintains immune homeostasis. Cell. 2008;133:415–426. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li D, et al. Down-regulation of TIPE2 mRNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Immunol. 2009;133:422–427. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2009.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang X, et al. Crystal structure of TIPE2 provides insights into immune homeostasis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:89–90. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang G, et al. Tissue-specific expression of TIPE2 provides insights into its function. Mol Immunol. 2010;47:2435–2442. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang S, et al. Expression and regulation of a novel identified TNFAIP8 family is associated with diabetic nephropathy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1802:1078–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xi W, et al. Roles of TIPE2 in hepatitis B virus-induced hepatic inflammation in humans and mice. Mol Immunol. 2011;48:1203–1208. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang C, et al. Role of SCC-S2 in experimental metastasis and modulation of VEGFR-2, MMP-1, and MMP-9 expression. Mol Ther. 2006;13:947–955. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gus-Brautbar Y, et al. The anti-inflammatory TIPE2 is an inhibitor of the oncogenic Ras. Mol Cell. 2012;45:610–618. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hirshberg M, Stockley RW, Dodson G, Webb MR. The crystal structure of human rac1, a member of the rho-family complexed with a GTP analogue. Nat Struct Biol. 1997;4:147–152. doi: 10.1038/nsb0297-147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kreck ML, Uhlinger DJ, Tyagi SR, Inge KL, Lambeth JD. Participation of the small molecular weight GTP-binding protein Rac1 in cell-free activation and assembly of the respiratory burst oxidase. Inhibition by a carboxyl-terminal Rac peptide. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:4161–4168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kreis P, Barnier JV. PAK signalling in neuronal physiology. Cell Signal. 2009;21:384–393. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.West AP, et al. 2011. TLR signalling augments macrophage bactericidal activity through mitochondrial ROS. Nature 472:476–480.
- 26.Henneke P, et al. Cellular activation, phagocytosis, and bactericidal activity against group B streptococcus involve parallel myeloid differentiation factor 88-dependent and independent signaling pathways. J Immunol. 2002;169:3970–3977. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.