Skip to main content
PMC home page
Age logoLink to Age
. 2005 Dec 31;27(3):201–212. doi: 10.1007/s11357-005-2914-1

Stem cell aging in the Drosophila ovary

Morris Waskar 1, Yishi Li 1, John Tower 1,✉
PMCID: PMC3458490  PMID: 23598653

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that with time human stem cells may become defective or depleted, thereby contributing to aging and aging-related diseases. Drosophila provides a convenient model system in which to study stem cell aging. The adult Drosophila ovary contains two types of stem cells: the germ-line stem cells give rise to the oocyte and its supporting nurse cells, while the somatic stem cells give rise to the follicular epithelium—a highly differentiated tissue that surrounds each oocyte as it develops. Genetic and transgenic analyses have identified several conserved signaling pathways that function in the ovary to regulate stem cell maintenance, division and differentiation, including the wingless, hedgehog, JAK/STAT, insulin and TGF-β pathways. During Drosophila aging the division of the stem cells decreases dramatically, coincident with reduced egg production. It is unknown if this reproductive senescence is due to a defect in the stem cells themselves, or due to the lack of signals normally sent to the stem cells from elsewhere in the animal, such as from the central nervous system or the stem cell niche. Methods are being developed to genetically mark stem cells in adult Drosophila and measure their survival, division rate and function during aging.

Key words: aging, chorion, Drosophila, oogenesis, senescence, stem cells, telomeres

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (488.0 KB).

References

  1. Akiyama T. Mutations of stonewall disrupt the maintenance of female germline stem cells in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Growth Differ. 2002;44(2):97–102. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-169x.2002.00625.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arking R, Dudas SP. Review of genetic investigations into the aging process of Drosophila. JAGS. 1989;37:757–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb02240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker GT, Jacobsen M, Mokrynski G. Aging in Drosophila. In: Crisotfalo V, editor. Cell Biology Handbook in Aging. Boca Raton: CRC; 1989. pp. 511–578. [Google Scholar]
  4. Beausejour CM, Krtolica A, Galimi F, Narita M, Lowe SW, Yaswen P, et al. Reversal of human cellular senescence: roles of the p53 and p16 pathways. EMBO J. 2003;22(16):4212–4222. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhat KM. The posterior determinant gene nanos is required for the maintenance of the adult germline stem cells during Drosophila oogenesis. Genetics. 1999;151(4):1479–1492. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biessmann H, Mason JM. Progressive loss of DNA sequences from terminal chromosome deficiencies in Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 1988;7(4):1081–1086. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02916.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Biessmann H, Mason JM, Ferry K, d'Hulst M, Valgeirsdottir K, Traverse KL, et al. Addition of telomere-associated HeT DNA sequences ‘heals’ broken chromosome ends in Drosophila. Cell. 1990;61(4):663–673. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90478-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Biessmann H, Valgeirsdottir K, Lofsky A, Chin C, Ginther B, Levis RW, et al. HeT-A, a transposable element specifically involved in ‘healing’ broken chromosome ends in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12(9):3910–3918. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.9.3910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blackburn EH. The end of the (DNA) line. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7(10):847–850. doi: 10.1038/79594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bodnar AG, Ouellette M, Frolkis M, Holt SE, Chiu CP, Morin GB. Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science. 1998;279(5349):349–352. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5349.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brummel TJ, Twombly V, Marques G, Wrana JL, Newfeld SJ, Attisano L, et al. Characterization and relationship of Dpp receptors encoded by the saxophone and thick veins genes in Drosophila. Cell. 1994;78(2):251–261. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90295-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Campisi J. Senescent cells, tumor suppression, and organismal aging: good citizens, bad neighbors. Cell. 2005;120(4):513–522. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Campisi J, Kim SH, Lim CS, Rubio M. Cellular senescence, cancer and aging: the telomere connection. Exp Gerontol. 2001;36(10):1619–1637. doi: 10.1016/S0531-5565(01)00160-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Charlesworth B. Evolution in Age Structured Populations. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen D, McKearin D. Dpp signaling silences bam transcription directly to establish asymmetric divisions of germline stem cells. Curr Biol. 2003;13(20):1786–1791. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen D, McKearin DM. A discrete transcriptional silencer in the bam gene determines asymmetric division of the Drosophila germline stem cell. Development. 2003;130(6):1159–1170. doi: 10.1242/dev.00325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen QM, Bartholomew JC, Campisi J, Acosta M, Reagan JD, Ames BN. Molecular analysis of H2O2-induced senescent-like growth arrest in normal human fibroblasts: p53 and Rb control G1 arrest but not cell replication. Biochem J. 1998;332(Pt 1):43–50. doi: 10.1042/bj3320043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cox DN, Chao A, Baker J, Chang L, Qiao D, Lin H. A novel class of evolutionarily conserved genes defined by piwi are essential for stem cell self-renewal. Genes Dev. 1998;12(23):3715–3727. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.23.3715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cox DN, Chao A, Lin H. Piwi encodes a nucleoplasmic factor whose activity modulates the number and division rate of germline stem cells. Development. 2000;127(3):503–514. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.3.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cristofalo VJ, Pignolo RJ. Replicative senescence of human fibroblast-like cells in culture. Physiol Rev. 1993;73(3):617–638. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1993.73.3.617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Das P, Maduzia LL, Wang H, Finelli AL, Cho SH, Smith MM, et al. The Drosophila gene Medea demonstrates the requirement for different classes of Smads in dpp signaling. Development. 1998;125(8):1519–1528. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.8.1519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cuevas M, Lee JK, Spradling AC. Alpha-spectrin is required for germline cell division and differentiation in the Drosophila ovary. Development. 1996;122(12):3959–3968. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.12.3959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cuevas M, Lilly MA, Spradling AC. Germline cyst formation in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet. 1997;31:405–428. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.31.1.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Deng W, Lin H. Spectrosomes and fusomes anchor mitotic spindles during asymmetric germ cell divisions and facilitate the formation of a polarized microtubule array for oocyte specification in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1997;189(1):79–94. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Deng W, Lin H. Asymmetric germ cell division and oocyte determination during Drosophila oogenesis. Int Rev Cytol. 2001;203:93–138. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(01)03005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. DePinho RA, Polyak K. Cancer chromosomes in crisis. Nat Genet. 2004;36(9):932–934. doi: 10.1038/ng0904-932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Leonardo A, Linke SP, Clarkin K, Wahl GM. DNA damage triggers a prolonged p53-dependent G1 arrest and long-term induction of Cip1 in normal human fibroblasts. Genes Dev. 1994;8(21):2540–2551. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.21.2540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dimri GP, Itahana K, Acosta M, Campisi J. Regulation of a senescence checkpoint response by the E2F1 transcription factor and p14(ARF) tumor suppressor. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(1):273–285. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.1.273-285.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Drummond-Barbosa D, Spradling AC. Stem cells and their progeny respond to nutritional changes during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev Biol. 2001;231(1):265–278. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.0135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Drummond-Barbosa D, Spradling AC. Alpha-endosulfine, a potential regulator of insulin secretion, is required for adult tissue growth control in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 2004;266(2):310–321. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Effros RB. From Hayflick to Walford: the role of T cell replicative senescence in human aging. Exp Gerontol. 2004;39(6):885–890. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2004.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Forbes A, Lehmann R. Nanos and Pumilio have critical roles in the development and function of Drosophila germline stem cells. Development. 1998;125(4):679–690. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.4.679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Forbes AJ, Spradling AC, Ingham PW, Lin H. The role of segment polarity genes during early oogenesis in Drosophila. Development. 1996;122(10):3283–3294. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.10.3283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Forbes AJ, Lin H, Ingham PW, Spradling AC. Hedgehog is required for the proliferation and specification of ovarian somatic cells prior to egg chamber formation in Drosophila. Development. 1996;122(4):1125–1135. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.4.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gateff E. Gonial cell neoplasm of genetic origin affecting both sexes of Drosophila melanogaster. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;85(Pt B):621–632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Godt D, Tepass U. Drosophila oocyte localization is mediated by differential cadherin-based adhesion. Nature. 1998;395(6700):387–391. doi: 10.1038/26493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gonzalez-Reyes A. Stem cells, niches and cadherins: a view from Drosophila. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(Pt 6):949–954. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gonzalez-Reyes A, St Johnston D. The Drosophila AP axis is polarised by the cadherin-mediated positioning of the oocyte. Development. 1998;125(18):3635–3644. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.18.3635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Griffith JD, Comeau L, Rosenfield S, Stansel RM, Bianchi A, Moss H, et al. Mammalian telomeres end in a large duplex loop. Cell. 1999;97(4):503–514. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80760-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hawley RS. Human meiosis: model organisms address the maternal age effect. Curr Biol. 2003;13(8):R305–R307. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00232-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hayflick L. The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res. 1965;37:614–636. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90211-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Heifetz Y, Vandenberg LN, Cohn HI, Wolfner MF. Two cleavage products of the Drosophila accessory gland protein ovulin can independently induce ovulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(3):743–748. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407692102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Helfand SL, Rogina B. Genetics of aging in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Genet. 2003;37:329–348. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.040103.095211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Howard BH. Replicative senescence: considerations relating to the stability of heterochromatin domains. Exp Gerontol. 1996;31(1-2):281–293. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(95)00022-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hudson JB, Podos SD, Keith K, Simpson SL, Ferguson EL. The Drosophila Medea gene is required downstream of dpp and encodes a functional homolog of human Smad4. Development. 1998;125(8):1407–1420. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.8.1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Itahana K, Zou Y, Itahana Y, Martinez JL, Beausejour C, Jacobs JJ, et al. Control of the replicative life span of human fibroblasts by p16 and the polycomb protein Bmi-1. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(1):389–401. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.1.389-401.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Jones L. Stem cells: so what's in a niche? Curr Biol. 2001;11(12):R484–R486. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00288-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kahn T, Savitsky M, Georgiev P. Attachment of HeT-A sequences to chromosomal termini in Drosophila melanogaster may occur by different mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(20):7634–7642. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.20.7634-7642.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kai T, Spradling A. An empty Drosophila stem cell niche reactivates the proliferation of ectopic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(8):4633–4638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0830856100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kenyon C. The plasticity of aging: insights from long-lived mutants. Cell. 2005;120(4):449–460. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kern S, Ackermann M, Stearns SC, Kawecki TJ. Decline in offspring viability as a manifestation of aging in Drosophila melianogaster. Evolution Int J Org Evolution. 2001;55(9):1822–1831. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00831.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kim NW, Piatyszek MA, Prowse KR, Harley CB, West MD, Ho PL, et al. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science. 1994;266(5193):2011–2015. doi: 10.1126/science.7605428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. King FJ, Lin H. Somatic signaling mediated by fs(1)Yb is essential for germline stem cell maintenance during Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 1999;126(9):1833–1844. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.9.1833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. King FJ, Szakmary A, Cox DN, Lin H. Yb modulates the divisions of both germline and somatic stem cells through piwi- and hh-mediated mechanisms in the Drosophila ovary. Mol Cell. 2001;7(3):497–508. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00197-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kirkwood TBL. The evolution of aging. Rev Clin Gerontol. 1995;5:3–9. doi: 10.1017/S0959259800003932. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kirkwood TB. Intrinsic ageing of gut epithelial stem cells. Mech Ageing Dev. 2004;125(12):911–915. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2004.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Landis GN, Tower J. Superoxide dismutase evolution and life span regulation. Mech Ageing Dev. 2005;126(3):365–679. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2004.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lavoie CA, Ohlstein B, McKearin DM. Localization and function of Bam protein require the benign gonial cell neoplasm gene product. Dev Biol. 1999;212(2):405–413. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Leon A, McKearin D. Identification of TER94, an AAA ATPase protein, as a Bam-dependent component of the Drosophila fusome. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10(11):3825–3834. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.11.3825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Letsou A, Arora K, Wrana JL, Simin K, Twombly V, Jamal J, et al. Drosophila Dpp signaling is mediated by the punt gene product: a dual ligand-binding type II receptor of the TGF beta receptor family. Cell. 1995;80(6):899–908. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90293-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Levis RW. Viable deletions of a telomere from a Drosophila chromosome. Cell. 1989;58(4):791–801. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90112-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Levy MZ, Allsopp RC, Futcher AB, Greider CW, Harley CB. Telomere end-replication problem and cell aging. J Mol Biol. 1992;225(4):951–960. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90096-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lin AW, Barradas M, Stone JC, Aelst L, Serrano M, Lowe SW. Premature senescence involving p53 and p16 is activated in response to constitutive MEK/MAPK mitogenic signaling. Genes Dev. 1998;12(19):3008–3019. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.19.3008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lin H, Spradling AC. Fusome asymmetry and oocyte determination in Drosophila. Dev Genet. 1995;16(1):6–12. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020160104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lin H, Spradling AC. A novel group of pumilio mutations affects the asymmetric division of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development. 1997;124(12):2463–2476. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.12.2463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Lin H, Yue L, Spradling AC. The Drosophila fusome, a germline-specific organelle, contains membrane skeletal proteins and functions in cyst formation. Development. 1994;120(4):947–956. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.4.947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Margolis J, Spradling AC. Identification and behavior of epithelial stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development. 1995;121:3797–3807. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.11.3797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Margolis J, Spradling A. Identification and behavior of epithelial stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development. 1995;121(11):3797–3807. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.11.3797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Maser RS, DePinho RA. Connecting chromosomes, crisis, and cancer. Science. 2002;297(5581):565–569. doi: 10.1126/science.297.5581.565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Massague J, Wotton D. Transcriptional control by the TGF-beta/Smad signaling system. EMBO J. 2000;19(8):1745–1754. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.8.1745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. McKearin D, Ohlstein B. A role for the Drosophila bag-of-marbles protein in the differentiation of cystoblasts from germline stem cells. Development. 1995;121(9):2937–2947. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.9.2937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. McKearin DM, Spradling AC. Bag-of-marbles: a Drosophila gene required to initiate both male and female gametogenesis. Genes Dev. 1990;4(12B):2242–2251. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.12b.2242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. McMurray MA, Gottschling DE. Aging and genetic instability in yeast. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004;7(6):673–679. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2004.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Melnikova L, Biessmann H, Georgiev P. The ku protein complex is involved in length regulation of Drosophila telomeres. Genetics. 2005;170(1):221–235. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.034538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Miquel J, Economos AC, Bensch KG, Atlan H, Johnson JJE. Review of cell aging in Drosophila and mouse. Age. 1979;2:78–88. [Google Scholar]
  76. Morrison SJ, Shah NM, Anderson DJ. Regulatory mechanisms in stem cell biology. Cell. 1997;88(3):287–298. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81867-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Munoz-Jordan JL, Cross GA, Lange T, Griffith JD. t-loops at trypanosome telomeres. EMBO J. 2001;20(3):579–588. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.3.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nellen D, Affolter M, Basler K. Receptor serine/threonine kinases implicated in the control of Drosophila body pattern by decapentaplegic. Cell. 1994;78(2):225–237. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90293-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Ohlstein B, McKearin D. Ectopic expression of the Drosophila Bam protein eliminates oogenic germline stem cells. Development. 1997;124(18):3651–3662. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.18.3651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Padgett RW, Johnston RD, Gelbart WM. A transcript from a Drosophila pattern gene predicts a protein homologous to the transforming growth factor-beta family. Nature. 1987;325(6099):81–84. doi: 10.1038/325081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Pardue ML, DeBaryshe PG. Retrotransposons provide an evolutionarily robust non-telomerase mechanism to maintain telomeres. Annu Rev Genet. 2003;37:485–511. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.093115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Parisi M, Lin H. The Drosophila pumilio gene encodes two functional protein isoforms that play multiple roles in germline development, gonadogenesis, oogenesis and embryogenesis. Genetics. 1999;153(1):235–250. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Partridge L, Barton NH. Optimality, mutation and the evolution of aging. Nature. 1993;362:305–311. doi: 10.1038/362305a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Partridge L, Gems D, Withers DJ. Sex and death: what is the connection? Cell. 2005;120(4):461–472. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Peeper DS, Dannenberg JH, Douma S, Riele H, Bernards R. Escape from premature senescence is not sufficient for oncogenic transformation by Ras. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(2):198–203. doi: 10.1038/35055110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Peifer M, Polakis P. Wnt signaling in oncogenesis and embryogenesis—a look outside the nucleus. Science. 2000;287(5458):1606–1609. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5458.1606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Penton A, Chen Y, Staehling-Hampton K, Wrana JL, Attisano L, Szidonya J, et al. Identification of two bone morphogenetic protein type I receptors in Drosophila and evidence that Brk25D is a decapentaplegic receptor. Cell. 1994;78(2):239–250. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90294-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Priest NK, Mackowiak B, Promislow DE. The role of parental age effects on the evolution of aging. Evolution Int J Org Evolution. 2002;56(5):927–935. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01405.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Raftery LA, Sutherland DJ. TGF-beta family signal transduction in Drosophila development: from Mad to Smads. Dev Biol. 1999;210(2):251–268. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Riggleman B, Wieschaus E, Schedl P. Molecular analysis of the armadillo locus: uniformly distributed transcripts and a protein with novel internal repeats are associated with a Drosophila segment polarity gene. Genes Dev. 1989;3(1):96–113. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.1.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Rose M, Charlesworth B. A test of evolutionary theories of senescence. Nature. 1980;287:141–142. doi: 10.1038/287141a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Rose MR. Evolutionary Biology of Aging. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  93. Ruberte E, Marty T, Nellen D, Affolter M, Basler K. An absolute requirement for both the type II and type I receptors, punt and thick veins, for dpp signaling in vivo. Cell. 1995;80(6):889–897. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90292-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Rubin GM, Spradling AC. Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science. 1982;218:348–353. doi: 10.1126/science.6289436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Rubio MA, Kim SH, Campisi J. Reversible manipulation of telomerase expression and telomere length. Implications for the ionizing radiation response and replicative senescence of human cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(32):28609–28617. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203747200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Samper E, Goytisolo FA, Slijepcevic P, Buul PP, Blasco MA. Mammalian Ku86 protein prevents telomeric fusions independently of the length of TTAGGG repeats and the G-strand overhang. EMBO Rep. 2000;1(3):244–252. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvd051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Sekelsky JJ, Newfeld SJ, Raftery LA, Chartoff EH, Gelbart WM. Genetic characterization and cloning of mothers against dpp, a gene required for decapentaplegic function in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995;139(3):1347–1358. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Sekelsky JJ, Brodsky MH, Burtis KC. DNA repair in Drosophila: insights from the Drosophila genome sequence. Journal of Cell Biology. 2000;150:F31–F36. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.2.F31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Serrano M, Blasco MA. Putting the stress on senescence. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001;13(6):748–753. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00278-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Shay JW, Wright WE. Telomeres and telomerase: implications for cancer and aging. Radiat Res. 2001;155(1 Pt 2):188–193. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0188:tatifc]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Sheen FM, Levis RW. Transposition of the LINE-like retrotransposon TART to Drosophila chromosome termini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91(26):12510–12514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Smulders-Srinivasan TK, Lin H. Screens for piwi suppressors in Drosophila identify dosage-dependent regulators of germline stem cell division. Genetics. 2003;165(4):1971–1991. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Song X, Xie T. DE-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion is essential for maintaining somatic stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(23):14813–14818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.232389399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Song X, Xie T. Wingless signaling regulates the maintenance of ovarian somatic stem cells in Drosophila. Development. 2003;130(14):3259–3268. doi: 10.1242/dev.00524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Song X, Zhu CH, Doan C, Xie T. Germline stem cells anchored by adherens junctions in the Drosophila ovary niches. Science. 2002;296(5574):1855–1857. doi: 10.1126/science.1069871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Spradling AC, Stern DM, Kiss I, Roote J, Laverty T, Rubin GM. Gene disruptions using P transposable elements: an integral component of the Drosophila genome project. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 1995;92:10824–10830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.24.10824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Spradling AC, Cuevas M, Drummond-Barbosa D, Keyes L, Lilly M, Pepling M, et al. The Drosophila germarium: stem cells, germ line cysts, and oocytes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1997;62:25–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Spradling A, Drummond-Barbosa D, Kai T. Stem cells find their niche. Nature. 2001;414(6859):98–104. doi: 10.1038/35102160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Stanulis-Praeger BM. Cellular senescence revisited: a review. Mech Ageing Dev. 1987;38(1):1–48. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(87)90109-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Tatar M. The neuroendocrine regulation of Drosophila aging. Exp Gerontol. 2004;39(11-12):1745–1750. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2004.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Tatar M, Bartke A, Antebi A. The endocrine regulation of aging by insulin-like signals. Science. 2003;299(5611):1346–1351. doi: 10.1126/science.1081447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Tepass U, Gruszynski-DeFeo E, Haag TA, Omatyar L, Torok T, Hartenstein V. Shotgun encodes Drosophila E-cadherin and is preferentially required during cell rearrangement in the neurectoderm and other morphogenetically active epithelia. Genes Dev. 1996;10(6):672–685. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.6.672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Tominaga K, Olgun A, Smith JR, Pereira-Smith OM. Genetics of cellular senescence. Mech Ageing Dev. 2002;123(8):927–936. doi: 10.1016/S0047-6374(02)00030-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Tower J. Transgenic methods for increasing Drosophila life span. Mech Ageing Dev. 2000;118(1-2):1–14. doi: 10.1016/S0047-6374(00)00152-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Tsuneizumi K, Nakayama T, Kamoshida Y, Kornberg TB, Christian JL, Tabata T. Daughters against dpp modulates dpp organizing activity in Drosophila wing development. Nature. 1997;389(6651):627–631. doi: 10.1038/39362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Uemura T, Oda H, Kraut R, Hayashi S, Kotaoka Y, Takeichi M. Zygotic Drosophila E-cadherin expression is required for processes of dynamic epithelial cell rearrangement in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 1996;10(6):659–671. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.6.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Wisotzkey RG, Mehra A, Sutherland DJ, Dobens LL, Liu X, Dohrmann C, et al. Medea is a Drosophila Smad4 homolog that is differentially required to potentiate DPP responses. Development. 1998;125(8):1433–1445. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.8.1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Wolfner MF. The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila. Heredity. 2002;88(2):85–93. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Wright WE, Piatyszek MA, Rainey WE, Byrd W, Shay JW. Telomerase activity in human germline and embryonic tissues and cells. Dev Genet. 1996;18(2):173–179. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1996)18:2<173::AID-DVG10>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Xie T, Spradling AC. Decapentaplegic is essential for the maintenance and division of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Cell. 1998;94(2):251–260. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81424-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Xie T, Spradling AC. A niche maintaining germ line stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Science. 2000;290(5490):328–330. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5490.328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Xie T, Finelli AL, Padgett RW. The Drosophila saxophone gene: a serine–threonine kinase receptor of the TGF-beta superfamily. Science. 1994;263(5154):1756–1759. doi: 10.1126/science.8134837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Zhang Y, Kalderon D. Regulation of cell proliferation and patterning in Drosophila oogenesis by Hedgehog signaling. Development. 2000;127(10):2165–2176. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.10.2165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhang Y, Kalderon D. Hedgehog acts as a somatic stem cell factor in the Drosophila ovary. Nature. 2001;410(6828):599–604. doi: 10.1038/35069099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Age are provided here courtesy of American Aging Association

RESOURCES