Abstract
Tumor hypoxia induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which induces invasion and metastasis, and is linked to cancer stem cells (CSCs). Whether EMT generates CSCs de novo, enhances migration of existing CSCs or both is unclear. We examined patient tissue of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) along with carcinomas of breast, lung, kidney, prostate and ovary. For in vitro studies, five established PDA cell lines classified as less (CSClow) and highly aggressive CSC-like cells (CSChigh) were examined by single and double immunofluorescence microscopy, wound-, transwell-, and time-lapse microscopy. HIF-1α and Slug, as well as HIF-2α and CD133 were co-expressed pointing to a putative co-existence of hypoxia, EMT and CSCs in vivo. CSChigh cells exhibited high basal expression of the mesenchymal Vimentin protein but low or absent expression of the epithelial marker E-cadherin, with the opposite result in CSClow cells. Hypoxia triggered altering of cell morphology from an epithelial to a mesenchymal phenotype, which was more pronounced in CSChigh cells. Concomitantly, E-cadherin expression was reduced and expression of Vimentin, Slug, Twist2 and Zeb1 enhanced. While hypoxia caused migration in all cell lines, velocity along with the percentage of migrating, polarized and pseudopodia-forming cells was significantly higher in CSChigh cells. These data indicate that hypoxia-induced EMT occurs in PDA and several other tumor entities. However although hypoxia-induced EMT signaling occurs in all tumor cell populations, only the stem-like cells acquire high migratory potential and thus may be responsible for invasion and metastasis.
Introduction
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by an extensive local invasion, early systemic dissemination and marked resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy [1]. In addition, most PDA possess a pronounced hypoxic tumor-microenvironment [2]. Tumor hypoxia occurs when the consumption of oxygen exceeds its delivery by the vascular system [3]. This leads to induction of hypoxia-inducible transcription factors, e.g. HIF-1α and HIF-2α, which regulate the hypoxic response by induction of target genes like VEGF [4]. The oxygen pressure in solid tumors is generally lower than in the surrounding non-malignant tissues, and tumors exhibiting extensive hypoxia have been shown to be more aggressive than corresponding tumors that are better oxygenized [5], [6], [7]. This includes pancreatic cancer where high expression of the hypoxia marker HIF-1α in patient tissue has been demonstrated to be a predictor of poor clinical outcome [8]. In experimental studies, hypoxia predicts aggressive growth and spontaneous metastasis formation in pancreatic cancer xenografts [9]. Accordingly, relapsed tumors show a higher hypoxic fraction compared to the primary tumors [10], [11] suggesting a role of hypoxia in enrichment of cancer cells with stem cell characteristics (CSC).
The small CSC population is suggested to possess self-renewal potential and the ability to differentiate and thereby generating the heterogenous cell population of the originating tumor [12], [13], [14]. These findings have been also demonstrated for pancreatic cancer [15], [16]. In addition CSC are proposed to mediate uncontrolled growth, therapy resistance, invasion and metastasis [17]. However, whether CSCs are truly the only cells with de facto tumorigenic potential remains controversial [18], [19], [20], [21]. Recent reports indicate that the emergence of CSCs occurs in part as a result of epithelial-mesenchymal-transition (EMT) [21]. Therefore the question arises whether EMT affects the CSC population only or also the more differentiated progenitors
EMT is an evolutionarily conserved development process during that cells lose epithelial characteristics and gain mesenchymal properties [22]. This is accompanied by the dissolution of cell-cell junctions and loss of apico-basolateral polarity, resulting in the formation of migratory mesenchymal cells with invasive properties [21]. Therefore, EMT is implicated in tumor progression and metastasis [23]. EMT-inducers, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) or hypoxia, trigger changes in gene expression by complex signaling pathways. A basic mechanism involved in progression of EMT is upregulation of the mesenchymal marker Vimentin and downregulation of the epithelial marker E-cadherin - the main transmembrane adhesion molecule responsible for cell-to-cell interactions and tissue organization in epithelial cells [24]. E-cadherin is transcriptionally repressed by Twist, Snail, Slug and Zeb proteins. Reduced E-cadherin expression causes adherens junction breakdown, and along with other signaling events promotes robust gene expression changes [21]. The loss of polarity and gain of motile characteristics of mesenchymal cells during embryonic development has prompted comparisons with metastatic cancer cells during malignant progression [25]. Notably, recent data demonstrate that EMT is indeed involved in generating cells with properties of stem cells as shown in cancer of the breast [25], [26], colorectum [27] and pancreas [28], [29].
According to the CSC hypothesis solely the CSC population is responsible for early systemic dissemination and metastasis formation. This implies that hypoxia-induced EMT either affects CSCs only or activates more differentiated progenitors to stem-like cells or both together. Since this issue is not examined so far, we addressed this question. By focusing to pancreatic cancer we found co-expression of hypoxia-, EMT and CSC markers in patient-derived tissue. By the use of established cell lines with high or low stem cells characteristics (CSChigh or CSClow) we induced hypoxia by a gas mixture of low oxygen. This led to changes in cell morphology resulting in a more fibroblastoid-phenotype and EMT-related protein expression in both tumor cell populations. However the more aggressive cells had a higher basal EMT-signature and this was associated with faster and higher hypoxia-mediated induction of migratory activity. Our findings may have implication for several tumor entities, since we found expression of the hypoxia marker CA IX and of the EMT marker Twist2 not only in PDA but also in patient-derived cancer tissue of breast, kidney, prostate, lung and ovary.
Materials and Methods
Tumor cell lines
BxPc-3, Capan-2, MIA-PaCa2, AsPC-1 and Capan-1 PDA cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and authenticated throughout the culture by the typical morphology. Mycoplasma negative cultures were ensured by weekly tests. Cells were cultured in DMEM (PAA, Pasching, Austria) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 25 mmol/L HEPES (PAA, Pasching, Austria).
Ethics Statement + Tumor tissue samples
Patient-derived tumor tissue from pancreatic, breast, renal, lung, prostate and ovarian cancer was obtained under the approval of the ethical committee of the University of Heidelberg. The tissue was analyzed anonymously and is derived from a 30-year-old tissue bank. Therefore a patient consent form is not applicable. Diagnoses were established by conventional clinical and histological criteria according to the World Health Organization (WHO). All clinical investigation have been conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
In vitro hypoxia model
For induction of hypoxia 80% confluent cells were put in a hypoxia chamber (self-made), which was flushed by a gas mixture of 1% O2, 5% CO2, 94% N2 (Grandpair, Heidelberg, Germany) for about 4 min. Cells were incubated in the hypoxic environment for 24, 48 or 72 h at 37°C. The chamber was refilled with the gas mixture after 24 h to ensure constant gas concentrations.
Immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry
Immunohistochemistry on 6 µm frozen or paraffin-embedded tissue sections was performed as described previously [30]. Antibodies used for immunohistochemistry were rabbit polyclonal anti-human CA IX (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and mouse mAbs anti-human Twist2 and Vimentin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). For double immunocytofluorescence stainings mouse mAbs directed towards HIF-1α (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK), HIF-2α (Novus Biologicals, Cambridge, United Kingdom), and rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human Slug, CD133 (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), E-cadherin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) and Zeb1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany). Secondary antibodies were goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to Alexa 488 or goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa 594 (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany).
Wound healing assay
Tumor cells (6×105) were seeded in 6-well plates and grown to confluence overnight. Twenty-four hours after incubation under hypoxic or normoxic conditions a line was scratched within the confluent cell layer using the fine end of a 10 µl pipette tip (time 0). Images of migrating cells were sequentially taken during closure of the wounded region.
Time-lapse video microscopy
BxPc-3 or AsPC-1 cells (5×105) exposed to hypoxia or normoxia for 48 h were mixed with a collagen type I solution. A POCmini microscope chamber (LaCon GbR, Ulm, Germany) was filled with tumor cells in collagen solution and the gel was polymerized at 37°C in a CO2 incubator for 1.5 hours. The POCmini chamber with the polymerized three-dimensional (3D) collagen gel was then placed on a heating plate (36.6°C, LaCon, Ulm, Germany) under the microscope (Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany). Cells in 3D collagen gels were focused under 50x magnification. Images were recorded using a Kappa digital videocamera (DX2, Kappa GmbH, Gleichen, Germany) and were taken consequently with a 15 minutes interval during a period of 24 hours. Sequential TIFF images were transferred into the AVI-video format using Animation Shop software. The analyses of cell movements were performed with CapImage 8.4 software (Dr. Zeintl Biomedical Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Migration of single cells was analyzed under 2∶1 zoom using a “frame to frame” method. Percentage of migrating cells, type of movement and velocity were evaluated.
Transwell migration assay
To analyze cell invasive potential we used a standard transwell assay described elsewhere. Transwell polycarbonate filter (8 μm pore size) (Corning Inc, Lowell, MA) were used. Hypoxia pre-treated (48 h) or normoxia-treated control cells were seeded at a concentration of 105 cells per cm2 of 24-well plates. Afterwards the cells were exposed to hypoxia (Migration measured under Hypoxia) or normoxia (Migration measured under Hypoxia) for additional 48 h and the number of transmigrated cells was counted. The percentage of transmigrated cells was normalized to the percentage of cell vitality evaluated by an MTT assay at the endpoint of the experiment.
Statistical analysis
Quantitative data are presented as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using the Student's t test for statistical significance. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Expression of hypoxia-, EMT- and CSC-markers in pancreatic cancer tissue
To study co-expression of hypoxia- and EMT-markers we performed double immunofluorescence staining of patient-derived frozen tissue samples of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In HIF-1α positive regions E-cadherin was down-regulated and Slug up-regulated revealing tumor-hypoxia-induced EMT (Fig. 1A). In some tumor areas, cells with either Vimentin or E-cadherin expression were observed in close proximity (Fig. 1B). This indicates that surrounding stromal cells are positive for Vimentin and negative for E-cadherin. Most interestingly, hypoxic regions positive for the hypoxia marker HIF-2α showed co-staining with CD133, suggesting that tumor hypoxia is associated with expression of CSC markers (Fig. 1C). These data confirm that hypoxia-driven EMT occurs in tumor tissue of patients with pancreatic cancer and CSC-positive tumor cells are present in hypoxic tumor microenvironments.
Hypoxia induces HIF-1α signaling and morphological changes in vitro
For more detailed evaluation of hypoxia-induced EMT and the influence to differentiated and CSC-like pancreatic cancer cells we used five established human cell lines of PDA. According to the degree of differentiation of the primary tumor, mutations in K-ras or p53, colony- and spheroid-forming capacity, ALDH activity, tumorigenicity in mice and expression of E-cadherin and Vimentin we classified these cell lines as CSChigh or CSClow (Table 1). Hypoxia was induced by incubation of cells in a gas mixture of 1% O2, 5% CO2 and 94% N2. This resulted in fast up-regulation of HIF-
Table 1. Characterization of CSC marker characteristics in established human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell lines.
More aggressive CSChigh cells | Less aggressive CSClow cells | References | ||||
MIA-PaCa2 | AsPC-1 | Capan-1 | BxPc-3 | Capan-2 | ||
ATCC No. | CRL-1420 | CRL-1682 | HRB 79 | CRL-1687 | HTB-80 | ATCC |
Source | Primary tumor | Ascites | Liver Metastasis | Primary tumor | Primary tumor | ATCC |
Differentiation of primary tumor | Poor | Moderate-poor | Moderate | Well | Well | ATCC |
p53 Mutation | MT | MT | MT | MT | WT | [31] |
K-ras Mutation | MT | MT | MT | WT | MT | [31] |
Colony-forming capacity | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | + | [32], UOD |
Spheroid-forming capacity | +++ | + | ++ | − | − | [32], UOD |
ALDH activity | +++ | ++ | + | + | + | [32], UOD |
Tumorigenic in mice | +++ | +++ | Yes | + | Yes | [32], UOD |
E-cadherin Expression | − | ++ | + | +++ | +++ | [33],[23] UOD |
Vimentin Expression | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | − | [31] |
ATCC: American Tissue Culture Collection; PDAC: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma; UOD: unpublished own data; NE: not examined; −: none; +: weak; ++: median; +++: strong; MT: mutated; WT: wild type; Yes: present, but no quantification in relation to the other cell lines available.
1α and its target gene VEGF within 2 hours in both, CSClow and CSChigh cells as examined by Western blot analysis. In contrast, cells cultured under normoxic conditions did not up-regulate these proteins (Fig. 2A, Data not shown). CSClow cells had an expression peak between 6 and 12 hours, which gradually declined over time but was still visible at 72 h. In contrast, CSChigh cells had an earlier peak between 4 and 6 h, which was diminished to very low levels already at 24 hours and was undetectable at 72 h in both cell lines. In contrast, VEGF expression was steadily enhanced during a period of 72 h. In line with the observed hypoxia-related signaling the number of cells with a fibroblastoid-like phenotype increased within 72 h from 20 to 28% in CSClow cells and from 28 to 33% in CSChigh cells (Fig. 2C). Induction of the percentage of spindle-shaped cells was even more pronounced and higher in CSChigh cells upon TGF-β, a well known-inducer of EMT, which was used as positive control. Similar morphological changes upon exposure to hypoxia were observed in Capan-1, Capan-2 and AsPC-1 cancer cells (Figure S1). These data suggest that in vitro induction of hypoxia induces EMT in both cell populations - more differentiated and CSC-like pancreatic cancer cells, but the effect is faster and stronger in CSChigh cells.
Hypoxia up-regulates EMT-related protein expression
For further evaluation of cell-type specific effects of hypoxia-induced EMT we examined expression of proteins involved in EMT in the two CSClow cell lines BxPc-3 and Capan-2 and in the three CSChigh cell lines MIA-PaCa2, AsPC-1 and Capan-1. After exposure to normoxia or hypoxia for 48 h we labeled the cells with specific antibodies and analyzed fluorescence by double immunofluorescence microscopy. While both CSClow cell lines had strong basal expression of E-cadherin but low expression of Vimentin, as expected, hypoxia induces downregulation of E-cadherin and upregulation of Vimentin (Fig. 3). This was associated with upregulation of the EMT-markers Twist2, Slug and Zeb1. In contrast, CSChigh cells exhibited no (MIA-PaCa2) or a very low basal expression (AsPC-1, Capan-1) of E-cadherin but higher basal expression of Vimentin compared to CSClow cells. Upon exposure to hypoxia a typical-EMT-like protein expression occurred similar as observed in CSClow cells. Immunofluorescence data were confirmed by Western blot analysis (Data not shown). These data suggest that both, CSClow and CSChigh cells exhibit the typical hypoxia-induced EMT-related gene expression but basal EMT-related protein expression under normoxic conditions is higher in CSChigh cells.
Hypoxia stimulates migratory properties of pancreatic CSCs
To investigate hypoxia-induced differences, we analyzed cancer cell migration in three different migration assays. First, we used a standard in vitro wounding assay. BxPc-3, Capan-2, MIA-PaCa2, AsPC-1 or Capan-1 cells were exposed to hypoxia or normoxia for 24 h followed by scratching of the confluent cell layer and further incubation at normoxic conditions. Images of migrating cells in the same area are shown 12 and 24 h after scratching. In all cell lines we found that the wounded region was closed faster by cells which had been exposed to hypoxia compared to cells exposed to normoxia. However, we could not detect any major differences in cell migration between CSChigh and CSClow cell lines in this non-quantitative assay (Data not shown). Representative data for Capan-1 are shown (Fig. 4A). Therefore we used a more sensitive migration assay performed in 3D extracellular matrix. Migration of single cells was documented by time-lapse video microscopy. In line with the data obtained by Wound healing assay we found that 48 h exposure of CSChigh AsPC-1 or CSClow BxPc-3 cells to hypoxia induced faster locomotion and a higher percentage of polarized, migrating and pseudopodia-forming cells than normoxia in both cell lines (Fig. 4B). Similar to our former results CSChigh cells migrated more rapidly than CSClow cells. The mean velocity of AsPC-1 CSChigh cells exposed to hypoxia was 7.8 μm/h in contrast to 5.1 μm/h of CSClow BxPc-3 cells. Also, the percentage of basal migrating cells as well as cells forming pseudopodia or exhibiting a polarized phenotype was higher in the CSChigh compared to CSClow cells. These data were confirmed in a standard transwell assay. CSChigh MIA-PaCa2, AsPC-1, Capan-1 and CSClow BxPc-3 and Capan-2 cells were pre-incubated under hypoxic conditions for 48 h in normal cell culture medium containing 10% FCS. Migration towards a gradient of 1%, 10% and 20% FCS under normoxia was measured by evaluating the number of transmigrated cells within 48 h (Fig. 4C). We found that pre-incubation of cells under hypoxic conditions increased the percentage of transmigrated cells in all cell lines. The most evident effects were obtained with cells moving towards a gradient of 1% FCS. At a gradient of 10% FCS basal migration of the CSChigh cells was already at the highest level as evident from the positive control with 20% FCS. Thus, hypoxia could not further induce basal migration of MIA-PaCa2 and Capan-1 cells towards a gradient of 10% FCS. Quite similar results were obtained when migration of hypoxia pre-treated cells was analyzed under hypoxic conditions (Fig. 4D). These results suggest that although hypoxia induces migration in more differentiated and CSC-like cells, basal and hypoxia-induced migratory potential is higher in CSChigh cells. Therefore hypoxia-induced EMT induces high migratory potential mainly in CSC-like cells, which may be responsible for invasion and metastasis.
Co-expression of hypoxia- and EMT-markers is common in several tumor entities
Hypoxia-induced EMT was studied in paraffin-embedded patient-derived tissue samples of pancreatic, breast, kidney, lung, prostate and ovarian cancer. In all these tissues we identified expression of carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX), a protein up-regulated by hypoxia [6], along with expression of Vimentin and the EMT-related transcription factor Twist2 (Fig. 5). In contrast, expression of CA IX, Vimentin and Twist2 was absent in non-malignant tissue as exemplified in normal lung tissue derived from the same patient from whom stainings of the corresponding malignant tissue are presented (Figure S2). These data demonstrate that hypoxia-driven EMT is a common feature of several tumor entities, which may be followed by enhanced migratory potential of the CSC population.
Discussion
In the present study we evaluated the question whether hypoxia-induced EMT affects CSC-like cells of PDA only or also the more differentiated tumor cells. In patient tumor tissue of PDA we identified co-localization of the hypoxia marker HIF-1α and of the EMT marker Slug. Tissue regions of pancreatic cancer positive for the hypoxia marker HIF-2α were highly positive for the CSC marker CD133. In vitro both CSChigh and CSClow pancreatic cancer cells responded to hypoxia by altering cell morphology from an epithelial to a more fibroblastoid or mesenchymal phenotype with a higher percentage in CSChigh cells. Morphological changes induced by hypoxia were associated with down-regulated E-cadherin expression and up-regulated expression of Vimentin, and EMT-related transcription factors Slug, Twist2 and Zeb1 in CSClow cells. CSChigh cells had an protein expression signature of mesenchymal cells almost under normoxic conditions, as exemplified by low or absent E-cadherin levels along with high Vimentin expression, which was only marginally increased by hypoxia. This higher basal EMT status of CSChigh cells might be the reason for the observed increased migratory capacity in normoxic and hypoxic conditions. We assume that pancreatic stem-like tumor cells may have a survival advantage under unfavorable hypoxic conditions, since EMT has been demonstrated to contribute to drug resistance in pancreatic cancer [34]. In line with this assumption, MIA-PaCa2 and AsPC-1 with high basal EMT characteristics have been shown to be much more resistant toward Gemcitabine than BxPC-3 cells with low basal EMT features [34], which is also in agreement with the CSC-like phenotype of MIA-PaCa2 and AsPC-1.
Recent immunohistochemistry data confirm our results from double immunofluorescence staining of HIF-1α/Slug co-expression, since 87% of human PDA tissues out of 36 examined were found to express Snail and 50% of patients displayed positive expression of Slug, while Twist showed no or only weak expression [35]. However, Twist was strongly induced upon hypoxia in MIA-PaCa2, AsPC-1 and Capan-1 cells as detected by RT-PCR [35]. This matches to our findings of Twist2 expression in established and primary PDA cells, which was stronger upon induction of hypoxia in vitro. Another interesting report significantly strengthens these data since Twist RNA expression was found to be significantly higher in invasive PDAs compared to matched non-tumorous and IPMN samples [36].
The question is which molecular mechanisms are behind the enhanced EMT features and migratory capacities of CSChigh cells. In particular, EMT has been described to be dependent on NF-κB signaling in pancreatic cancer cells [37]. Since we recently identified enhanced NF-κB activity in CSChigh compared to CSClow cells [32], NF-κB may be involved in mediating increased migratory properties of CSChigh cells. Another well known underlying reason for the very invasive growth pattern of e.g. MIA-PaCa2 cells seems to be that invasion is clearly dependent on CXCR4 [16]. Since pancreatic CSCs preferentially express CXCR4 receptor and metastasize using the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis [16] this may facilitate enhanced migratory potential. Furthermore, p53 is suggested to regulate EMT and stem cell properties and this may have contributed to the observed enhanced migratory potential of CSChigh cell lines, since MIA-PaCa2, AsPC-1, Capan-1 and BxPc-3, but not Capan-2 have mutated p53 [31]. Thus, loss of p53 correlates with an miR-200c-dependent increase in the expression of EMT, stemness markers and high tumor grade as described recently in a cohort of breast tumors [38]. Quite similarly, inhibition of p53 represses E-cadherin by promoter methylation as shown in ovarian tumor cells [39]. This observation is in agreement with the observed low E-cadherin expression in CSChigh cell lines with mutated p53.
We assume that the observed faster response of stem-like pancreatic tumor cells to hypoxia with upregulated EMT signaling and higher migratory potential may be even more pronounced in the in vivo tumor microenvironment. This may be due to the fact that in solid tumors repeated episodes of hypoxia followed by re-oxygenation is a common phenomenon. This so called “intermittent hypoxia” is described to regulate stem-like characteristics [40]. The occurrence of intermittent hypoxic episodes varies significantly in rapidly growing malignant tumors [41]. In phases of normoxia when EMT-inducing signals are removed CSClow cells that have been induced to EMT may revert to the epithelial state similar by undergoing mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) as has been reported to occur in some carcinoma cells [20], [42]. Additional new data provide insights into how dynamic interactions among epithelial, self-renewal, and mesenchymal gene programs determine the plasticity of CSC in switching between epithelial and mesenchymal states [43]. These findings suggest that CSClow cells may differentiate to CSC-like cells upon induction of EMT by hypoxia and dedifferentiate upon withdrawal of hypoxia. In contrast, CSChigh cells with already basal enhanced EMT features may only partially undergo MET upon reversal of hypoxia. As a result the cells keep their high migratory potential in a normoxic tumor microenvironment and upon a new cycle of hypoxia they upregulate EMT signaling along with enhanced migratory activity faster. A higher basal EMT signaling and the ability to respond faster to EMT may provide a survival advantage to CSChigh cells. In consequence, this may lead to enrichment of CSCs during intermittent hypoxia in tumor progression and subsequently to enhanced invasion and metastasis.
In conclusion, we show that a hypoxic environment predominantly increases the migratory capacity of PDA cells with elevated stem cell characteristics. This is of important clinical relevance with respect to the pronounced hypoxic tumor-microenvironment of PDA [2]. Another contributing factor may be induction of hypoxia by anti-angiogenic medicaments like Sunitinib, Bevacizumab or Avastin and the observed pro-invasive adaption to such anti-angiogenic therapy [44], [45]. The results of the present study together with recent findings of other authors suggest the development of new treatment protocols to target tumor hypoxia.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. G. Mickisch (Urological Clinic, University of Heidelberg), Prof. Dr. M. Kaufmann (Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Heidelberg) and Prof. Dr. P. Drings (Thorax Clinic, Heidelberg-Rohrbach) for kindly providing the human tumor material.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by grants from the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe 109362), German Research Community (DFG HE 3186/11-1) and German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF 1058-7.11/2008). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Gukovskaya AS, Pandol SJ (2004) Cell death pathways in pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 4: 567–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Brown JM, Giaccia AJ (1998) The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy. Cancer Res 58: 1408–1416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hockel M, Vaupel P (2001) Tumor hypoxia: definitions and current clinical, biologic, and molecular aspects. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 266–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Semenza GL, Agani F, Feldser D, Iyer N, Kotch L, et al. (2000) Hypoxia, HIF-1, and the pathophysiology of common human diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol 475: 123–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Vaupel P (2004) The role of hypoxia-induced factors in tumor progression. Oncologist 9 (Suppl 5) 10–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chia SK, Wykoff CC, Watson PH, Han C, Leek RD, et al. (2001) Prognostic significance of a novel hypoxia-regulated marker, carbonic anhydrase IX, in invasive breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 19: 3660–3668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Semenza GL (2010) Defining the role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in cancer biology and therapeutics. Oncogene 29: 625–634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hoffmann AC, Mori R, Vallbohmer D, Brabender J, Klein E, et al. (2008) High expression of HIF1a is a predictor of clinical outcome in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and correlated to PDGFA, VEGF, and bFGF. Neoplasia 10: 674–679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Chang Q, Jurisica I, Do T, Hedley DW (2011) Hypoxia predicts aggressive growth and spontaneous metastasis formation from orthotopically grown primary xenografts of human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 71: 3110–3120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Helmlinger G, Yuan F, Dellian M, Jain RK (1997) Interstitial pH and pO2 gradients in solid tumors in vivo: high-resolution measurements reveal a lack of correlation. Nat Med 3: 177–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Vaupel P, Briest S, Hockel M (2002) Hypoxia in breast cancer: pathogenesis, characterization and biological/therapeutic implications. Wien Med Wochenschr 152: 334–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lapidot T, Sirard C, Vormoor J, Murdoch B, Hoang T, et al. (1994) A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature 367: 645–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF (2003) Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 3983–3988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, Squire JA, Bayani J, et al. (2004) Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature 432: 396–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Li C, Heidt DG, Dalerba P, Burant CF, Zhang L, et al. (2007) Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 67: 1030–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hermann PC, Huber SL, Herrler T, Aicher A, Ellwart JW, et al. (2007) Distinct populations of cancer stem cells determine tumor growth and metastatic activity in human pancreatic cancer. Cell Stem Cell 1: 313–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Simeone DM (2008) Pancreatic cancer stem cells: implications for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14: 5646–5648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kelly PN, Dakic A, Adams JM, Nutt SL, Strasser A (2007) Tumor growth need not be driven by rare cancer stem cells. Science 317: 337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Quintana E, Shackleton M, Sabel MS, Fullen DR, Johnson TM, et al. (2008) Efficient tumour formation by single human melanoma cells. Nature 456: 593–598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gupta PB, Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA (2009) Cancer stem cells: mirage or reality? Nat Med 15: 1010–1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Singh A, Settleman J (2010) EMT, cancer stem cells and drug resistance: an emerging axis of evil in the war on cancer. Oncogene 29: 4741–4751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Thiery JP (2003) Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and pathologies. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15: 740–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Song Y, Washington MK, Crawford HC (2010) Loss of FOXA1/2 is essential for the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 70: 2115–2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Huber MA, Kraut N, Beug H (2005) Molecular requirements for epithelial-mesenchymal transition during tumor progression. Curr Opin Cell Biol 17: 548–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, et al. (2008) The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell 133: 704–715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Fang X, Cai Y, Liu J, Wang Z, Wu Q, et al. (2011) Twist2 contributes to breast cancer progression by promoting an epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem-like cell self-renewal. Oncogene 30: 4707–4720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hwang WL, Yang MH, Tsai ML, Lan HY, Su SH, et al. (2011) SNAIL regulates interleukin-8 expression, stem cell-like activity, and tumorigenicity of human colorectal carcinoma cells. Gastroenterology 141: : 279–291, 291 e271–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kabashima A, Higuchi H, Takaishi H, Matsuzaki Y, Suzuki S, et al. (2009) Side population of pancreatic cancer cells predominates in TGF-beta-mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition and invasion. Int J Cancer 124: 2771–2779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhang Y, Wei J, Wang H, Xue X, An Y, et al. (2012) Epithelial mesenchymal transition correlates with CD24+CD44+ and CD133+ cells in pancreatic cancer. Oncol Rep 27: 1599–1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Salnikov AV, Gladkich J, Moldenhauer G, Volm M, Mattern J, et al. (2009) CD133 is indicative for a resistance phenotype but does not represent a prognostic marker for survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Int J Cancer 126: 950–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sipos B, Moser S, Kalthoff H, Torok V, Lohr M, et al. (2003) A comprehensive characterization of pancreatic ductal carcinoma cell lines: towards the establishment of an in vitro research platform. Virchows Arch 442: 444–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kallifatidis G, Rausch V, Baumann B, Apel A, Beckermann BM, et al. (2009) Sulforaphane targets pancreatic tumour-initiating cells by NF-kappaB-induced antiapoptotic signalling. Gut 58: 949–963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zhou W, Kallifatidis G, Baumann B, Rausch V, Mattern J, et al. (2010) Dietary polyphenol quercetin targets pancreatic cancer stem cells. Int J Oncol 37: 551–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Arumugam T, Ramachandran V, Fournier KF, Wang H, Marquis L, et al. (2009) Epithelial to mesenchymal transition contributes to drug resistance in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 69: 5820–5828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Hotz B, Arndt M, Dullat S, Bhargava S, Buhr HJ, et al. (2007) Epithelial to mesenchymal transition: expression of the regulators snail, slug, and twist in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13: 4769–4776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ohuchida K, Mizumoto K, Ohhashi S, Yamaguchi H, Konomi H, et al. (2007) Twist, a novel oncogene, is upregulated in pancreatic cancer: clinical implication of Twist expression in pancreatic juice. Int J Cancer 120: 1634–1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Maier HJ, Schmidt-Strassburger U, Huber MA, Wiedemann EM, Beug H, et al. (2010) NF-kappaB promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration and invasion of pancreatic carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett 295: 214–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Chang CJ, Chao CH, Xia W, Yang JY, Xiong Y, et al. (2011) p53 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stem cell properties through modulating miRNAs. Nat Cell Biol 13: 317–323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Cheng JC, Auersperg N, Leung PC (2011) Inhibition of p53 represses E-cadherin expression by increasing DNA methyltransferase-1 and promoter methylation in serous borderline ovarian tumor cells. Oncogene 30: 3930–3942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bhaskara VK, Mohanam I, Rao JS, Mohanam S (2012) Intermittent hypoxia regulates stem-like characteristics and differentiation of neuroblastoma cells. PLoS One 7: e30905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Durand RE (2001) Intermittent blood flow in solid tumours–an under-appreciated source of ‘drug resistance’. Cancer Metastasis Rev 20: 57–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Hugo H, Ackland ML, Blick T, Lawrence MG, Clements JA, et al. (2007) Epithelial–mesenchymal and mesenchymal–epithelial transitions in carcinoma progression. J Cell Physiol 213: 374–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Celia-Terrassa T, Meca-Cortes O, Mateo F, Martinez de Paz A, Rubio N, et al. (2012) Epithelial-mesenchymal transition can suppress major attributes of human epithelial tumor-initiating cells. J Clin Invest 122: 1849–1868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Paez-Ribes M, Allen E, Hudock J, Takeda T, Okuyama H, et al. (2009) Antiangiogenic therapy elicits malignant progression of tumors to increased local invasion and distant metastasis. Cancer Cell 15: 220–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ebos JM, Lee CR, Cruz-Munoz W, Bjarnason GA, Christensen JG, et al. (2009) Accelerated metastasis after short-term treatment with a potent inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Cell 15: 232–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.