Abstract
Streptococcus species is considered as an important pathogen for human and animals. The antibiotic resistance mechanism in this species is continuously increased. On the other side, the tolerance of environmental stresses play an effective role in the severity of many streptococcal causative disease. In this study we assayed survey on the causative agents of pharyngitis and tonsillitis patients. The predominant causative strain was Streptococcus pyogenes with 93 % isolating ratio frequency. The other pathogenic species were S. agalactia 5.3 % and S. pneumonia 1.7 %. According to the antibiotic resistant test the S. pyogenes isolates were classified into six different groups. A selected strain from each antibiotic resistant group was tested for tolerance of a restrictive environmental factors. The variations of the environmental niches of isolates were in consistence with their antibiotic resistant variation.
Keywords: Streptococcus pyogenes, Antibiotic resistant, Environmental stresses
Introduction
Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is a gram-positive pathogen that causes many infections (pharyngitis, septicemia, toxic shock, and necrotizing fasciitis) and post-infectious sequelae (rheumatic heart disease and glomerulonephritis). Humans are the natural host and sole reservoir of GAS. The organism can survive and replicate in diverse anatomic sites such as the skin, throat, female urogenital tract, lower gastrointestinal tract, and blood [1]. The same strain may cause a more serious, invasive disease in another patient. The more severe diseases are caused by the invasion of GAS into deeper tissues and include necrotizing fasciitis, septicemia, and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, all of which can be life threatening. For GAS to cause disease in such diverse host tissues, this organism must be able to withstand a variety of environmental factors and grow in different microenvironments. GAS can face many stress conditions within the human host, such as the increased salt concentration on the skin, the low pH of the vagina, and the pH fluctuations within the nasopharynx. Also, the bacteria must be able to overcome the stress conditions that arise as a consequence of the GAS infection itself, such as high temperature resulting from fever and decreased pH as a result of abscess formation. Bacteria often sense and respond to specific environmental changes by using two-component signal transduction regulatory systems [2, 3] The terminal target for this system are DNA binding proteins CovR and CovS which has been assumed that they have cotranscribed effects [4]. The response difference for environmental stresses between S. pyogenes could be used as well as other markers to detect the intra specific differences.
Approximately 20 years ago, the virulence associated with S. pyogenes increased worldwide. Changes in the predominate serotypes in natural populations and in the repertoire of genes encoding exoproteins, including superantigens, are thought to have contributed to the increase in virulence [5, 6].
Although large-colonyforming-hemolytic streptococci (LCF-BHS) are still susceptible to β-lactams, macrolides or lincosamides are recommended as alternative choices when indicated [7–9]. However, recent studies have shown that changes in the susceptibility of LCF-BHS to erythromycin and clindamycin have been substantially decreased, although differences in resistance rates to these agents exist according to geographical variation and investigators [10–12].
The objectives of the present study is to investigate the incidence and trend in susceptibility among the streptococci isolated from clinical specimens in Minufiya region and to clarify the microbial response of different antibiotic resistance groups against different environmental stresses.
Materials and Methods
Isolates of group A Streptococcus recovered from throat swab specimens (one per patient) adults and children with streptococcal pharyngitis, secondary to treatment failure. The specimens were cultured immediately on blood nutrient agar. The bacterial isolates were selected, categorized into several groups of Streptococci according to Bergey’s (1983) [13]. Streptokinase specific activity of the isolates were tested using both animal and human plasminogen on agar plates according to Silverstein (1975) [14]. Different antibiotic discs were used to determine the antibiotic resistance of S. pyogenes isolates [15]. For all experiments, the S. pyogenes ATCC 19615 strain was simultaneously tested as a reference strain. The following antimicrobial agents were obtained from (Oxoid UK) amoxicillin clavulanic acid (AMC30), cefadroxil (CFR30), cephradine (CE30), ciprofloxacin (CIP5), erythromycin (E15), norfloxacin (NOR10), pipracillin (PRL), rifamycin (RF30), streptomycin (S10), sulbactam ampicillin (SAM 20).
The heart infusion media was used for experiments of antibiotic resistance and growth optimization. The bacterial isolates were cultured on solid medium supplemented antibiotic discs and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The growth parameter was measured using the optical density of the bacterial culture at 600 nm.
Results
Characterization of Bacterial Isolates
Forty-five infected samples were isolated from pharyngitis and tonsillitis patients. The microbiological analysis of the pathogenic agents was demonstrated in (Table 1), the predominant causative strain was Streptococcus pyogenes with 93 % isolating ratio frequency. The other pathogenic species were S. agalactia 5.3 % and S. pneumonia 1.7 %.
Table 1.
The effect of some antibiotics on the growth of different strains of streptococci
| Strains | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp | S. agalactia | S. dysgalactia | S. pyogenes (standard strain) | S.pneumonia | S. bovis | S. pyogenes |
| Gram reaction | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Growth in air | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Catalase | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Growth in air plus 5 % Co2 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Growth anaerobically | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Growth at °C | ||||||
| 10 | d | − | − | − | − | − |
| 45 | − | − | − | − | d | − |
| Growth at pH 9.6 | − | − | − | − | d | − |
| Growth with | ||||||
| 6.5 % NaCl | d | − | − | − | − | − |
| 40 % bile | d | − | − | − | + | − |
| 0.25 % optocin | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Alpha-hemolysis | − | + | − | + | dw | − |
| Beta-hemolysis | d | − | + | − | − | + |
| Hydrolysis of | ||||||
| Arginine | + | + | + | + | − | + |
| Hippurate | + | − | − | − | − | − |
| Esculin | − | − | − | − | − | d |
| Acid from | ||||||
| Inulin | − | − | − | − | − | d |
| Lactose | d | + | + | + | + | + |
| Mannnitol | − | − | − | − | d | − |
| Raffinose | − | − | − | + | Nd | + |
| Ribose | + | Nd | − | − | − | − |
| Salicin | d | d | + | + | + | − |
| Sorbitol | − | d | − | − | d | − |
| Trehalose | + | + | + | + | d | + |
| Production of | ||||||
| Alkaline phosphatase | + | + | + | − | − | − |
| α-Glactosidase | − | − | − | − | d | − |
| β-Glucouronidase | d | + | − | − | − | − |
| β-Glactosidase | − | − | − | − | − | d |
| Pyrrolidonearylamidase | − | − | + | + | − | d |
| Voges-proskauer test | + | − | − | − | Nd | − |
| Lancefield serological group | B | C | A | A | D | None |
Specific Streptokinase Production
The specific streptokinase secretion of the characterized strains were detected using agar plates with addition of human or animal plasminogen. All S. pyogenes isolates show active reaction with human plasminogen while all other isolates of S. pneumonia, S. agalactia showed a comparable activities with animal plasminogen. The enzyme activity was demonstrated as a clear zone formation as it was demonstrated in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Comparison of streptokinase secretion activity of different isolates of streptococci. a The human plasminogene assay, (11) is the clear zone of S. Pyogenes standard strain. b The animal plasminogene assay
Antibiotic Resistance
According to the antibiotic resistant test the S. pyogenes isolates were classified into six different groups. All bacterial isolates were resistance to streptomycin and sensitive to cefadroxil and pipracillin. The conventional streptococcal antibiotic erythromycin was effective in case of standard strain while some bacterial isolates (four of six) show resistance to erythromycin. The sensitivity to cephradine was common between the standard strain and some isolated bacterial isolates. Comparing to standard strain some isolates of S. pyogenes demonstrated higher resistance to other antibiotic like amoxicillin clavulanic acid (AM), norfloxacin (NOR) and sulbactam ampicillin (SAM). Most of local isolated streptococcal strains are resistant to erythromycine (E15). From these data it can be concluded that the most potent antibiotic was cefadroxil (CFR) and streptomycin (S) was the most compromised one (Table 2).
Table 2.
The effect of some antibiotics on the growth of different strains of streptococci
| Antibiotics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. groups | PRL100 | AMC30 | NOR10 | SAM20 | RF30 | CE30 | CiP5 | E15 | CFR30 | S10 |
| 1 | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R |
| 2 | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | R | S | R |
| 3 | S | S | R | S | S | S | R | R | S | R |
| 4 | S | S | R | S | S | R | R | S | S | R |
| 5 | S | S | S | R | S | R | R | R | S | R |
| 6 | S | R | R | R | R | R | S | R | S | R |
| Standard | S | S | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | R |
Tolerance for Environmental Stresses
Different media were tested for best growth yield of S. pyogenes. The best medium for bacterial growth was brain heart infusion media at 37 °C. This medium was used to determine the tolerance limit of bacterial isolates at different environmental stresses. The antibiotic resistant groups showed similar growth patterns at different temperatures 15, 20, 30, and 35 °C. The optimum growth was attained at 35 °C for all groups (Table 3). However, the antibiotic resistant groups 2, 3 showed better heat tolerance at 40 °C. The effect of pH degrees on growth curve showed optimum growth at pH 7. At other pH values the growth pattern of the different groups were similar. The different response was occurred only at pH 8 (Table 4). The NaCl gradient effect showed very similar response for the different bacterial isolates (Table 5) however, the antibiotic resistant group 3 was the only one that demonstrate higher tendency for salt tolerance at 6 % NaCl comparing the other groups.
Table 3.
The effect of different temperatures on the growth of different strains of streptococcus grown on liquid medium
| Temperature | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strains | 15 °C | 20 °C | 25 °C | 30 °C | 35 °C | 40 °C |
| 1 | 0.13 | 0.32 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.30 |
| 2 | 0.14 | 0.28 | 0.81 | 1.12 | 1.56 | 0.65 |
| 3 | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.82 | 0.94 | 1.72 | 0.80 |
| 4 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.85 | 1.02 | 1.53 | 0.07 |
| 5 | 0.13 | 0.27 | 0.72 | 1.05 | 1.26 | 0.06 |
| 6 | 0.21 | 0.35 | 0.83 | 1.15 | 1.27 | 0.03 |
| Standard | 0.20 | 0.35 | 0.74 | 1.02 | 1.30 | 0.35 |
Data are expressed as O.D(600)
Table 4.
The effect of different pH degrees on the growth of different antibiotic groups of S. pyogenes
| pH degrees | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strains | 5.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| 1 | 0.08 | 0.85 | 1.26 | 0.90 | 0.04 |
| 2 | 0.08 | 0.55 | 1.03 | 1.25 | 0.05 |
| 3 | 0.09 | 0.71 | 1.33 | 0.61 | 0.03 |
| 4 | 0.09 | 0.67 | 1.23 | 0.51 | 0.02 |
| 5 | 0.08 | 0.53 | 1.25 | 0.89 | 0.02 |
| 6 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 1.12 | 1.01 | 0.01 |
| Standard | 0.07 | 0.73 | 1.30 | 0.62 | 0.06 |
Table 5.
The effect of different concentrations of NaCl on the growth of different strains of streptococcus grown on liquid medium
| NaCl % | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strains | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 1 | 1.02 | 1.50 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 0.53 | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.05 |
| 2 | 0.99 | 1.37 | 1.15 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.02 |
| 3 | 0.88 | 1.60 | 1.20 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 0.13 |
| 4 | 1.03 | 1.24 | 1.05 | 0.62 | 0.44 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.05 |
| 5 | 0.92 | 1.40 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.51 | 0.35 | 0.16 | 0.01 |
| 6 | 0.97 | 1.28 | 1.04 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 0.04 |
| Standard | 0.98 | 1.31 | 0.99 | 0.81 | 0.60 | 0.31 | 0.20 | 0.02 |
Data are expressed as O.D(600)
Discussion
Comparing to the standard strain the local isolated streptococci in our study show high resistance ratio against erythromycine as well as other antibiotics like amoxicillin clavulanic acid, norfloxacin and sulbactam ampicillin.Until the 1980s, pathogenic strains of S. pyogenes were generally considered uniformly susceptible to erythromycin and clindamycin, but resistance spread rapidly in the 1990s. The prevalence of erythromycin resistant S. pyogenes has been reported to be variable and depends on the country, selective pressure, serogroup, serotype, age, and season, [16]. High rates of erythromycin-resistance have been reported in San Francisco (27 %) and Genoa (50 %). Only 16.2 % of GAS strains, 28.3 % of GGS strains and 25 % of GCS strains were erythromycin resistant [17].
One mechanism of antibiotic resistance in S. pyogenes is the Macrolide efflux, which is effected by a membrane protein encoded by the mef class genes [18, 19]. This antibiotic resistance mechanism has recently emerged among Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae in many countries [20]. These results demonstrate clearly that antibiotic resistance could be used as evidence for genetic changes and as a tool for interspecific grouping in bacteria.
The continued high resistance rates to erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline are considered related to the clonal spread of serotype V with a multi-drug resistance phenotype [21]. The classification of S. pyogenes as a serotype groups was used to detect and differentiate the virulence of infection and the previous results indicate that it could be an effective way for detection of antibiotic resistance and vise versa. Bacciaglia et al. (2007) [22] demonstrate that the change of antibiotic resistance pattern was related to genetically reforming of the bacterial genome. On the other side, the bacterial biochemical characterization is also closely related to the genetic make up and any change in these activities could be a strong evidence about genetic change. To demonstrate the relation between change of antibiotic resistance pattern and change of other bacterial biochemical characters, several environmental stresses as well as nutrition requirements were tested. However, the relation between genetic elements that control the metabolic activities and expression of virulence factors has been proved [23–25]. Other genetic factor, CovS plays essential role for resistance against low pH, high temperature and high osmolarity in S. pyogenes [4]. The high growth temperature was associated with 2.4 fold increase in the transcription of virulence factor streptolysin O in the aggregate. The results demonstrate that transcription of genes encoding iron transporters and iron-dependent regulators are similarly affected at decreased (29 vs. 37 °C) and increased (40 vs. 37 °C) temperatures. One explanation for this pattern of gene regulation is that growth at 29 and 40 °C. [26].
In this study some antibiotic resistance groups of S. pyogenes isolates show a response difference for different environmental stress, specially concerning the pH and salinity stress. This can be further evidence about the genetically change of the local isolated streptococcal strains.
All streptococcal isolated strains rather than S. pyogenes secrete streptokinase with animal plasmin binding property. This means that the infection may was resulted as animal carrier.
References
- 1.Cunningham MW. Pathogenesis of group A streptococcal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:470–511. doi: 10.1128/CMR.13.3.470-511.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Russo FD, Silhavy TJ. The essential tension: opposed reactions in bacterial two-component regulatory systems. Trends Microbiol. 1993;1:306–310. doi: 10.1016/0966-842X(93)90007-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hoch JA. Two-component and phosphorelay signal transduction. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2000;3:165–170. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00070-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tracy DL, Scott JR. CovS inactivates CovR and is required for growth under conditions of general stress in Streptococcus pyogenes. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(12):3928–3937. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3928-3937.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nelson K, Schlievert PM, Selander RK, Musser JM. Characterization and clonal distribution of four alleles of the speA gene encoding pyrogenic exotoxin A (scarlet fever toxin) in Streptococcus pyogenes. J Exp Med. 1991;174:1271–1274. doi: 10.1084/jem.174.5.1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Musser JM, Krause RM. The revival of group A streptococcal diseases, with a commentary on staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome. In: Krause RM, editor. Emerging infections. New York: Academic Press; 1998. pp. 185–218. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schuchat A. Group B streptococcal disease: from trials and tribulations to triumph and trepidation. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:751–756. doi: 10.1086/322697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bisno AL, Gerber MA, Gwaltney JM, Jr, Kaplan EL, Schwartz RH. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:113–125. doi: 10.1086/340949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ruoff KL, Whiley RA, Beighton D. Streptococcus. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Pfaller MA, Yolken RH, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 8. Washington: American Society for Microbiology; 2003. pp. 405–421. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Traub WH, Leonhard B. Comparative susceptibility of clinical group A, B, C, F, and G β-hemolytic streptococcal isolates to 24 antimicrobial drugs. Chemotherapy. 1997;43:10–20. doi: 10.1159/000239529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gordon KA, Beach ML, Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN, Rhomberg PR, Mutnick AH. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of β-hemolytic and viridans group streptococci: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (1997–2000) Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002;43:157–162. doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(02)00374-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Biedenbach DJ, Stephen JM, Jones RN. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile among β-haemolytic Streptococcus spp. collected in the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program-North America (2001) Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;46:291–294. doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(03)00065-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Manual of systematic bacteriology. 8. Baltimor: William and Wilkins, Co; 1983. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Silverstein RM. The determination of human plasminogen using Nα–CBZ-l-lysine p-nitrophenyl ester as substrate. Anal Biochem. 1975;65:500–506. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(75)90535-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am J Pathology. 1966;49:493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim HY, Uh Y. Macrolide resistance in β-hemolytic streptococci: changes after the implementation of the separation of prescribing and dispensing of medications policy in Korea. Yonsei Med J. 2004;45:591–597. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.4.591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brahmadathan KN, Anitha P, Gladstone P. Increasing erythromycin resistance among group A streptococci causing tonsillitis in a tertiary care hospital in southern India. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:335–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01100.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Baldassarri L, Creti R, Recchia S, Imperi M, Facinelli B, Giovanetti E, Pataracchia M, Alfarone G, Orefici G. Therapeutic failures of antibiotics used to treat macrolide-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes infections may be due to biofilm formation. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(8):2721–2727. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00512-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sato T, Tateda K, Kimura S, Iwata M, Ishii Y, Yamaguchi K. In vitro antibacterial activity of modithromycin, a novel 6,11-bridged bicyclolide, against respiratory pathogens, including macrolide-resistant gram-positive cocci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(4):1588–1593. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01469-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Uh Y, Yong D, Lee K, Kwon O, Yoon KJ. Emergence of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus agalactiae serotype V is due to clonal spread. Korean J Lab Med. 2005;25:564. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Uh Y, Hwang GY (2007) In: Jang H, Cho HM, Noh SM, Kim HY, Kwon O, Yoon KJ (eds) Macrolide resistance trends in β-hemolytic streptococci in a tertiary Korean hospital. Yonsei Med J 48(5): 773–778. doi:10.3349/ymj.2007.48.5.773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Bacciaglia A, Brenciani A, Varaldo PE, Giovanetti E. SmaI type ability and tetracycline susceptibility and resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes isolates with efflux-mediated erythromycin resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(8):3042–3043. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00249-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chaussee MS, Ajdic D, Ferretti JJ. The rgg gene of Streptococcuspyogenes NZ131 positively influences extracellular SPE B production. Infect Immun. 1999;67:1715–1722. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.4.1715-1722.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chaussee MS, Watson RO, Smoot JC, Musser JM. Identification of Rgg-regulated exoproteins of Streptococcus pyogenes. Infect Immun. 2001;69:822–831. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.2.822-831.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chaussee MS, Somerville GA, Reitzer L, Musser JM. Rgg coordinates virulence factor synthesis and metabolism in Streptococcus pyogenes. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:6016–6024. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.20.6016-6024.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Smoot LM, Smoot JC, Graham MR, Somerville GA, Sturdevant DE, Lux Migliaccio CA, Sylva GL, Musser JM. Global differential gene expression in response to growth temperature alteration in group A streptococcus. PNAS. 2001;98(18):10416–10421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191267598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

