Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2012 Jun 15;6(1):22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2012.05.009

Hematological Parameters and Metabolic Syndrome: Findings from an Occupational Cohort in Ethiopia

K Nebeck a, B Gelaye a,d,*, S Lemma b, Y Berhane b, T Bekele c, A Khali c, Y Haddis c, MA Williams a,d
PMCID: PMC3460271  NIHMSID: NIHMS378824  PMID: 23014250

Abstract

Objective

To examine associations between hematological parameters (i.e., hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet counts, red blood cell (RBC), and white blood cell (WBC) counts) and components of metabolic syndrome (MetS) among working adults in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods

Participants were 1,868 (1,131 men and 737 women) working Ethiopian adults. MetS was classified according to the International Diabetes Federation criterion. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of MetS were calculated using logistic regression procedures.

Results

Hematologic parameters (hemoglobin, hematocrit, and RBC) were positively associated with MetS components (Ptrend<0.05).In both men and women, white blood cell (WBC) counts were positively associated with BMI and waist circumference (P<0.05). RBC counts were associated with diastolic blood pressure in men (P<0.05) and women (P<0.001). Men in the third quartile of hemoglobin concentrations had 2-fold increased odds (OR=1.99; 95% CI) of MetS compared with the lowest reference quartile (Ptrend = 0.031) while women in the fourth hemoglobin quartile had 2.37-fold increased odds of having MetS compared with the reference group (ptrend = 0.003). Both men and women in the fourth quartiles of RBC counts had2.26-fold and 3.44-foldincreased odds of MetS (P=0.002 in men, P <0.001 in women). Among women, those in the fourth quartiles of hematocrit and platelet counts had2.53-fold and 2.01-foldincreased odds of MetS as compared with those in the reference group (Ptrend = 0.004 and 0.065 respectively).

Conclusions

Our study findings provide evidence in support of using hematological markers for early detection of individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of non-communicable disease mortality worldwide. In 2008, CVD accounted for roughly 30% of global deaths [1]. A constellation of risk factors collectively referred to as metabolic syndrome (MetS) is known to precede the onset of CVD and type 2 diabetes (T2DM)[2]. These risk factors include abdominal obesity, hypertension, reduced high density lipoprotein cholesterol, elevated triglycerides, and high fasting glucose concentrations [2, 3].

A growing body of epidemiologic evidence shows that incidence of MetS, CVD and T2DM areincreasing in Sub-Saharan Africa where behavioral and lifestyle changes, commonly associated with increasing urbanization, are having detrimental effects on health. Such changes include increased tobacco and alcohol use, poor diet (e.g., increased calorie dense foods and low dietary fiber intake), and physical inactivity[48]. A recent study conducted among adults in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia revealed unexpectedly high prevalence estimates of hypertension: 31.5% among men and 28.9% among women [6]. Furthermore, Tran et al reported the prevalence of MetS to be 14.0% in men and 24.0% in women in their study of adults in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia [7].

A complete blood count is an inexpensive, frequently obtained test of hematological status recorded during routine health examinations [9]. Increasingly investigators have noted that hematological parameters commonly available from routine clinical examinations may provide important information indicative of increased risk for MetS. Consequently, some investigators have argued that hematological parameters may be used in early detection and evaluation of cardiovascular disease prevention and control programs. Of note, investigators have reported that elevated hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), and blood platelet counts are correlated with MetS and its components [1023]. For example, in Thailand Lohsoonthorn et al reported that men in the highest quartiles of WBC counts (>8.03×103cells/μl) had a 2.26- fold (95% CI: 1.27–4.02) increased odds of MetS as compared with those whose WBC counts were in the lowest quartile (<5.72 × 103cells/μl)[16]. The odds of MetS were particularly elevated for women with high WBC counts (OR for highestvs. lowest quartile = 5.41; 95% CI:2.08–14.07)[16].

Currently, no published research has investigated relationships between hematological parameters and MetS in Sub-Saharan African populations. We, therefore, sought to evaluate the relationship between hematological parameters and MetS among working adults in Ethiopia. Elucidation of the relationship between hematological parameters and MetS may provide evidence in support of using low cost, readily available, routinely collected clinical hematological parameters for the early detection of individuals at risk for MetS and CVD.

Methods

This study was conducted in Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia, during the months of December 2009 and January 2010. Study participants were current permanent employees of the Commercial Bank of Ethiopia and teachers in government and public schools of Addis Ababa. Details of the study setting, sampling strategy and data collection procedures have been described in detail elsewhere [7, 8]. For the present study, a total of 1,858 (1,131 men and 737 women) participants were included.

We employed the World Health Organization's (WHO) STEP-wise (STEPS) approach for non-communicable diseases surveillance approach to collect data[24]. This approach consists three levels of risk factor assessment including collecting socio-demographic and behavioralinformation using questionnaires (step 1), physical measurements (step 2), and taking blood samples for biomedical assessment, (step 3). Study subjects were current permanent employees of the Commercial Bank of Ethiopia and teachers in public and government schools of Addis Ababa. Blood specimens were collected from each participant by research nurses and processed at the Internal Clinical Laboratories. The collected blood samples were processed according to standard operating procedures to determine participants' complete blood counts including white blood cells, red blood cells, platelets, hemoglobin, and hematocrit. All subjects gave informed consent and research protocols were approved by the Addis Continental Institute of Public Health in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and the Human Subjects Division at the University of Washington, USA.

Analytical variable specification

In this study, characterization of MetS was in accordance with the International Diabetes Federation(IDF) definition[3]. MetS was defined as a presence of central obesity (defined as waist circumference of ≥94cm for men and ≥80cm for women) and at least two of the following factors: [1] raised triglycerides (≥150mg/dL) or specific treatment for this lipid abnormality, [2] reduced HDL cholesterol (≤40mg/dL for men and ≤50mg/dL for women) or specific treatment for this lipid abnormality, [3] raised systolic (≥130mmHg) or diastolic (≥85mmHg) blood pressure or treatment of previously diagnosed hypertension, [4] raised fasting plasma glucose levels (≥100mg/dL) or previously diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.

Statistical analysis

Frequency distributions of socio-demographic characteristics of the study population were determined by performing cross-tabulations of covariates across gender and were expressed in percentage (%). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean values. For skewed variables median [interquartile range] were provided. Chi-Square tests were used to evaluate the differences in the distribution of categorical variables for study groups. Student's T-tests were used to evaluate differences in mean values for study groups. Pearson's partial correlation coefficients were calculated between hematologic parameters (i.e., hematocrit, hemoglobin, platelet counts, RBC, WBC) and components of MetS (fasting blood glucose, triglyceride concentrations, HDL-C concentrations, systolic BP and diastolic BP). Participants were divided into three groups according to the number of components of the MetS: no MetS, abdominal obesity, abdominal obesity and 1 component of MetS, and abdominal obesity and ≥ 2 components of MetS. Means of each hematological parameter were then calculated for each subgroup. Significance for monotonic trends was assessed by linear regression analysis.

Logistic regression procedures were used to examine the relative odds of having MetS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression procedures were used to calculate unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of MetS in relation to varying categories of each hematological parameter. Hematological parameters were categorized into quartiles and the lowest quartile was specified as the reference group. Potential confounding variables were considered a priori on the basis of their hypothesized relationship with MetS and each hematologic parameter. Confounding was also assessed by entering potential covariates into a logistic regression model one at a time, and by comparing the adjusted and unadjusted OR. Final logistic regression models included covariates that altered unadjusted ORs by at least 10%[25]. In multivariate analysis, tests for linear trend acrossincreasing categories of hematological parameters were conducted by treatingthe four-level hematological quartiles as an ordinalvariable. Separate analyses were performed for men and women. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 19.0, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) software. Confidence intervals were calculated at 95% level and all reported P-values are two tailed.

Results

Socio-demographic, lifestyle and clinical characteristics of study participants are summarized in Table 1. More than two third of participants reported a “moderate” level of alcohol consumption (70.7% of men and 68.5% of women) whilst only 11.8% of men and 0.1% of women reported heavy alcohol use. Current khat use (an evergreen plant with amphetamine-like effects commonly used as a mild stimulant for social recreation and improve work performance in Ethiopia)[26, 27] was 13.7% among men and 0.5% among women. In addition, 7.2% of men and 0.1% of women reported being current cigarette smokers.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population by gender

Characteristic Men N=1,131 Women N=737 p-value

n % n %
Age (years)
 ≤24 195 17.2 167 22.6 <0.001
 25–34 425 37.6 234 31.8
 35–44 185 16.4 123 16.7
 45–54 204 18.0 160 21.7
 ≥55 122 10.8 53 7.2
Education
 ≤ High school 238 21.0 307 41.7 <0.001
 ≥ Bachelors 893 79.0 430 58.3
Current Smoker
 Yes 81 7.2 1 0.1 <0.001
Alcohol consumption in past year
 Non-Drinker 197 17.4 231 31.3 <0.001
 Moderate 800 70.7 505 68.6
 Heavy 134 11.9 1 0.1
Khat chewing
 No 976 86.3 732 99.5 <0.001
 Yes 155 13.7 4 0.5
Self reported health status
 Poor/Fair 413 36.5 323 43.8 0.0015
 Excellent 718 63.5 414 56.2
Body mass index (kg/m2)
 Underweight (<18.5) 147 13.3 90 12.5 <0.001
 Normal (18.5–24.9) 655 59.4 368 51.0
 Overweight (25.0–29.9) 275 24.9 187 25.8
 Obese (≥30.0) 26 2.4 77 10.7

As shown in Table 2, there were substantial differences in mean values for cardiometabolic and hematological parameters between men and women in this cohort. Mean RBC counts were higher in men (mean±standard deviation:5.5±0.7 vs. 4.8±0.6, P-values < 0.001) than women (mean=, SD: 0.6). Similarly mean percentages of hematocrit and waist circumference were higher among men compared to women. However, mean plateletcounts were higher in women(mean± standard deviation: 229.3±62.7) compared with men (85.7±11.3) WBC count and fasting glucose levels remained similar between men and women.

Table 2.

Hematological and cardiometabolic characteristics of study population according to gender

Gender
P-value
Men N=1,125 Women N=728
Characteristic Mean(SD) Mean(SD)
WBC (× 103) 5.9 (1.9) 5.9 (2.0) 0.539
RBC (× 106) 5.5 (0.7) 4.8 (0.6) <0.001
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 16.5 (1.3) 14.3 (2.2) <0.001
Hematocrit (%) 43.6 (14.3) 39.1 (12.3) <0.001
Platelet Count (× 103) 209.6 (62.7) 229.3 (66.6) <0.001
Waist Circumference 85.7 (11.3) 80.6 (12.9) <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 80.1 (14.7) 76.3 (10.3) <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 124.4 (16.1) 116.4 (17.0) <0.001
Mean Arterial Pressure 94.9 (13.5) 89.6 (11.8) <0.001
Fasting glucose (mg/dL) 94.6 (29.0) 93.6 (27.0) 0.479
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 45.6 (8.7) 50.6 (10.6) <0.001
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 115.7 (45.3) 120.1 (35.8) 0.028
Median [IQ] Median [IQ]
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 113.0 [81.0–173.0] 95.0 [72.0–126.5] <0.001

Data reported as median and interquartile range due to a skewed distribution.

A significance test was performed for log-transformed values.

We next sought to evaluate the extent to which, if at all, hematological parameters were associated with successively increasing number of MetS components (Table 3). Mean platelet counts decreased with increasing MetS components among men (P<0.05). No similar trends were observed among women. WBC counts, however, increased with increasing numbers of MetS components in both men and women although statistical significance was not achieved. Among women, we found that levels of hemoglobin, hematocritand red blood cells increased with increasing components of MetS.

Table 3.

Hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, and white blood cell counts (mean and SD) for men and women in relation to the number of the components of the metabolic syndrome.

*Number of Mets Components 0 1 ≥2 p-value for trend
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Men n=873 n=95 n=162
Hemoglobin 16.4 (1.3) 16.5 (1.1) 16.5 (1.3) 0.322
Hematocrit (%) 43.8 (14.1 41.4 (16.2) 44.1 (14.1) 0.825
Platelet (×103) 211.9 (64.1) 202.8 (50.7) 201.2 (60.8) 0.028
WBC (×103) 5.9 (1.9) 5.9 (2.1) 6.0 (2.1) 0.248
RBC (× 106) 5.4 (0.6) 5.4 (0.7) 5.5 (0.8) 0.685
Women n=426 n=155 n=102
Hemoglobin 14.2 (2.0) 14.3 (2.9) 14.6 (1.2) 0.070
Hematocrit (%) 38.3 (12.8) 39.9 (10.4) 40.1 (12.6) 0.086
Platelet (×103) 235.8 (69.9) 217.9 (57.7) 222.5 (63.5) 0.831
WBC (×103) 5.9 (2.1) 5.9 (1.8) 6.1 (2.0) 0.151
RBC (× 106) 4.8 (0.6) 4.8 (0.5) 4.9 (0.7) 0.022
*

Number of MetS components in addition to abdominal obesity

As shown in Table 4, after adjusting for age, hemoglobin counts were positively associated with BMI and waist circumference in men (P <0.001). Positive association was observed between hemoglobin and triglycerides concentrations among men and women (men: P<0.001, women: P<0.05). WBC counts were also positively associated with BMI and waist circumference in men (P<0.05) and in women (P<0.05). In addition, a statistically significant association between RBC counts and diastolic blood pressure was noted in both genders (men: P<0.05; women: P<0.001). RBC counts were significantly positively associated with waist circumference in men at a P-value of <0.001 whereas no such associations were found in women.

Table 4.

Age adjusted Pearson partial correlation coefficients between selected hematological parameters with individual components of the metabolic syndrome for men and women

Hematological Parameters BMI HDL TG FG SBP DBP WC
Men(N=1120)
 Hemoglobin 0.146b −0.021 0.160b 0.051 0.069a 0.085a 0.142b
 Hematocrit 0.031 0.002 −0.020 0.023 0.067a 0.040 0.018
 Platelet 0.059a 0.003 0.044 0.026 0.001 0.018 0.039
 WBC 0.079a −0.019 0.057 0.036 0.035 0.041 0.065a
 RBC 0.074a −0.026 0.073 0.041 0.053 0.061a 0.101b
Women(N=730)
 Hemoglobin 0.023 −0.086a 0.101a 0.074a −0.027 −0.006 0.041
 Hematocrit 0.088a −0.007 <0.001 0.082a 0.045 0.060 0.055
 Platelet 0.015 0.045 0.062 0.043 0.058 0.036 0.008
 WBC 0.135b −0.080a 0.038 0.075a 0.062 0.027 0.089a
 RBC 0.067 −0.059 0.073a −0.005 0.084a 0.124b 0.043
a

p<0.05

b

p<0.001

The odds of MetS risk according to each quartile of hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet, WBC and RBC counts are shown in Table 5. After adjusting for potential confounders, men within the third quartile of hemoglobin (16.4–17.2 g/dL) had a 1.99-fold increased odds of MetS as compared with the reference group (quartile 1: hemoglobin <15.8 g/dL) (95% CI: 1.2–3.3) (Ptrend = 0.031). Statistically significant increases in risk of MetS were found across successive quartiles of hemoglobin (Ptrend = 0.003) and hematocrit (Ptrend = 0.004) levels in women. Those in the highest quartile of hemoglobin had a 2.37-fold increased odds of MetS(95% CI: 1.36–4.12). There was also a 2.53-fold increased odds of MetS for women in the highest compared to lowest quartiles of hematocrit (95% CI: 1.43–4.50). The odds ratio of developing MetS for women in the highest quartile of blood platelets was 2.01 (95% CI: 1.12–3.63) however, no significance was found across increasing quartiles of platelet counts (Ptrend = 0.065).

Table 5.

Odds ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence interval (CI) for hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets and WBC counts among study participants

Hematological Parameters Men Hematological Parameters Women
OR* (95% CI) OR* (95% CI)
Hemoglobin (g/dl)
 <15.8 Reference <13.6 Reference
 15.8–16.4 1.28 (0.77–2.14) 13.6–14.2 0.89 (0.49–1.59)
 16.4–17.2 1.99 (1.21–3.27) 14.2–15 0.78 (0.42–1.44)
 >17.2 1.55 (0.90–2.66) >15 2.37 (1.36–4.12)
p-value for trend 0.031 0.003
Hematocrit (%)
 <45.6 Reference <40.0 Reference
 45.6–48.0 1.02 (0.62–1.69) 40.0–42.4 1.25 (0.68–2.28)
 48.0–50.4 1.46 (0.86–2.46) 42.4–45.0 1.17 (0.66–2.05)
 >50.4 1.48 (0.88–2.46) >45.0 2.53 (1.43–4.50)
p-value for trend 0.068 0.004
Platelet Count (All) (× 103)
 <171 Reference <187 Reference
 171–206 0.79 (0.48–1.31) 187–224 1.69 (0.97–2.96)
 206–243 0.88 (0.54–1.47) 224–263 1.22 (0.68–2.19)
 >243 1.08 (0.66–1.76) >263 2.01 (1.12–3.63)
p-value for trend 0.767 0.065
WBC (× 103)
 <4.6 Reference <4.5 Reference
 4.6–5.8 0.87 (0.52–1.47) 4.5–5.9 0.96 (0.54–1.71)
 5.8–7.1 1.20 (0.73–1.98) 5.9–7.4 1.31 (0.74–2.32)
 >7.1 1.05 (0.63–1.74) >7.4 1.64 (0.91–2.94)
p-value for trend 0.579 0.058
RBC (× 106)
 <5.2 Reference <4.6 Reference
 5.21–5.5 1.36 (0.82–2.24) 4.61–4.85 1.57 (0.83–2.97)
 5.51–5.8 1.84 (1.10–3.09) 4.86–5.1 2.17 (1.22–3.87)
 >5.81 2.26 (1.29–3.94) >5.11 3.44 (1.93–6.13)
p-value for trend 0.002 <0.001
*

Adjusted for age (continuous), alcohol (never, moderate, heavy) and smoking (none, past, current).

Separate models were estimated for men and women

The odds of MetS increased across quartiles of RBC counts in both genders (men: Ptrend = 0.002; women: Ptrend = <0.001). Men in the highest quartiles of RBC counts (>5.81×106) had a 2.26-fold increased odds of having MetS than those in the reference group (OR=2.26, 95% CI: 1.29–3.94). Women also had a 3.44-fold increased odds of having MetS when in the highest quartile group (>5.11×106) for RBC count (OR=3.44, 95% CI: 1.93–6.13) compared with the reference group.

Discussion

We found levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit and RBC counts to be significantly associated with accumulating components of MetS in women while no statically significant associations between hematological parameters and components of MetS were found among men. In addition,we found that elevated WBC counts were significantly associated with BMI and waist circumference in both men and women.

Our findings are in general agreement with previous reports[12, 16, 17, 20, 22]. For instance, in a Brazilian study Ellinger et al. found significant correlations between hematologic parameters (RBC, WBC, hemoglobin concentrations and hematocrit) and insulin resistance syndrome[12]. In 2005, Mardi et al, in Israel,found a significant correlation between increased erythropoiesis and the number of components of MetS in both men (p= 0.003) and women (p= 0.016). Erythropoiesis and waist circumference were also correlated in both men and women (p<0.005) [17]. While significant associations between platelet and WBC counts and increasing features of MetS was not observed in our study, some investigators have noted such associations [1113, 15, 16, 18, 22, 23]. For example, Lohsoonthorn et al in their study among Thai men and women found mean WBC and platelet counts were 14.1% and 9.5% greater for women with 3 or more features of MetScompared with those lacking any features of MetS. Hemoglobin and hematocrit values were also significantly associated with MetS components in women but not in the men of their study (Hemoglobin Ptrend= 0.004; Hematocrit Ptrend = 0.001) [16]. Similar findings were reported by Wang et al[22]. On the contrary, Taniguchi et al, in their study of study of non-obese Japanese T2DM patients, found platelets to be an independent predictor of insulin resistance (P<0.0001) [20]. A study by Tamariz et al found adults in the highest hematocrit quartiles (>44.3%)were 60% more likely to develop diabetes compared with theircounterparts in the lowest quartiles (<39%)[19]. In our study, women in the highest quartiles of hematocrit (>50.4%) had a 2.53-fold increased odds of having MetS compared with the reference quartile (<45.6%)

Differences in study design, operational definitions of cardiovascular disease risk, as well as ethnic and racial differences across study populations may account for the absence of consistency across studies. Despite these variations, the concordance of our results with many other studies [10, 12, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22] suggests that observed associationsofhematologic parameters with MetS may provide some important opportunities for CVD risk prediction and for understanding the pathophysiology of cardiometabolic risk. It is important to note, however, thatbiological pathways linking cardiometabolicdisordersand hematologic parameters are not yetfully understood. Investigators have proposed a mechanism in which components of MetS, particularly raised LDL cholesterol, hypertension and insulin resistance trigger endothelial dysfunction and an inflammatory response[28]. Prolonged inflammation increases activation of WBC and endothelial cellswhich in turn leads to platelet and thrombus formation[28]. As mentioned previously, increased RBC and glycated hemoglobin concentrations can result from elevated insulin and glucose levels in the blood [17, 2931]. High levels of RBC's, glycated hemoglobin and hematocrit can lead to reduced blood flow (via increased blood viscosity) and subsequent decreased circulation of oxygen, insulin and glucose to essential tissues. Therefore, slowed blood viscosity due to accumulation of hematological components can be a catalyst when it comes to the progression of type 2 diabetes[19, 32].

Some caveats should be considered when interpreting the results of our study. Social desirability bias to survey questions is a potential problem in our study where participants are likely to report low khat use and current smoking status especially among the women in our study population (0.5% and 0.1% respectively). The cross sectional nature of our study design does not allow us to determine the causal relationship between hematological parameters and MetS. Longitudinal studies, with serial measurements of hematologic parameters and the onset of conditions that define MetS, are needed.

MetS has been associated with an increased risk for CVD and T2DM[2]. A growing body of evidence shows that MetS is currently an important and prevalent risk factor in many Sub-Saharan African countries including Ethiopia [48]. Elucidating the changes in hematological parameters indicative of MetS could lead to new standards of early detection and potentially reduce CVD morbidity and mortality. Use of simple, inexpensive and widely available hematological paramaters as biological markers for MetS and CVD may be useful in low income countries such as Ethiopia where a physician's limited resources often prevent proper diagnosis. A recent study conducted by Gelaye et al has established reference values of hematological parameters in healthy Ethiopian adults [33]. These values could provide a baseline standard by which other Ethiopians may be compared when assessing for increased risk of MetS.

In summary, we found elevated levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit and RBCl counts to be significantly associated with clustered components of metabolic syndrome in working adults in Ethiopia. Regardless of the mechanisms, available evidence suggests that hematological parameters are potentially important biological markers of cardiometabolic risk. Inferences can be enhanced by future studies that aim to identify the relationships between incident cardiometabolic cases and hematologic parameters.

Acknowledgements

This research was completed while Ms. Kelsey Nebeck was a research training fellow with the Multidisciplinary International Research Training (MIRT) Program of the University and Washington, School of Public Health. The MIRT Program is supported by an award from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (T37-MD001449). The authors thank Addis Continental Institute of Public Health for providing facilities and logistics support throughout the research process. The authors also thank the Commercial Bank of Ethiopia and Addis Ababa Education Office for granting access to conduct the study and International Clinical Laboratories for completing all laboratory analyses.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflict of Interest: NIL

References

  • [1].WHO . Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2010. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Grundy SM. Metabolic syndrome: connecting and reconciling cardiovascular and diabetes worlds. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1093–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome--a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005;366:1059–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67402-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Njelekela MA, Mpembeni R, Muhihi A, Mligiliche NL, Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E, et al. Gender-related differences in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors and their correlates in urban Tanzania. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-9-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Oladapo OO, Salako L, Sodiq O, Shoyinka K, Adedapo K, Falase AO. A prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors among a rural Yoruba south-western Nigerian population: a population-based survey. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2010;21:26–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Tesfaye F, Byass P, Wall S. Population based prevalence of high blood pressure among adults in Addis Ababa: uncovering a silent epidemic. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009;9:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-9-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Tran A, Gelaye B, Girma B, Lemma S, Berhane Y, Bekele T, et al. Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome among Working Adults in Ethiopia. Int J Hypertens. 2011;2011:193719. doi: 10.4061/2011/193719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Wai WS, Dhami RS, Gelaye B, Girma B, Lemma S, Berhane Y, et al. Comparison of Measures of Adiposity in Identifying Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Ethiopian Adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011 doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].NCCLS . Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboartory; Aproved Guidline-Third Edition, 2009 C28-A3. No. 30. Vol. 28. National Committee for Clinical Laboarotry Standards; Wayne, PA: 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Barbieri M, Ragno E, Benvenuti E, Zito GA, Corsi A, Ferrucci L, et al. New aspects of the insulin resistance syndrome: impact on haematological parameters. Diabetologia. 2001;44:1232–7. doi: 10.1007/s001250100634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Chen LK, Lin MH, Chen ZJ, Hwang SJ, Chiou ST. Association of insulin resistance and hematologic parameters: study of a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc. 2006;69:248–53. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70251-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Ellinger VC, Carlini LT, Moreira RO, Meirelles RM. Relation between insulin resistance and hematological parameters in a Brazilian sample. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2006;50:114–7. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302006000100016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Gkrania-Klotsas E, Ye Z, Cooper AJ, Sharp SJ, Luben R, Biggs ML, et al. Differential white blood cell count and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional and prospective studies. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Jesri A, Okonofua EC, Egan BM. Platelet and white blood cell counts are elevated in patients with the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2005;7:705–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2005.04809.x. quiz 12–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Kim DJ, Noh JH, Lee BW, Choi YH, Chung JH, Min YK, et al. The associations of total and differential white blood cell counts with obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia and glucose intolerance in a Korean population. J Korean Med Sci. 2008;23:193–8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.2.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Lohsoonthorn V, Jiamjarasrungsi W, Williams MA. Association of Hematological Parameters with Clustered Components of Metabolic Syndrome among Professional and Office Workers in Bangkok, Thailand. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2007;1:143–9. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2007.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Mardi T, Toker S, Melamed S, Shirom A, Zeltser D, Shapira I, et al. Increased erythropoiesis and subclinical inflammation as part of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005;69:249–55. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Nakanishi N, Sato M, Shirai K, Nakajima K, Murakami S, Takatorige T, et al. Associations between white blood cell count and features of the metabolic syndrome in Japanese male office workers. Ind Health. 2002;40:273–7. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.40.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Tamariz LJ, Young JH, Pankow JS, Yeh HC, Schmidt MI, Astor B, et al. Blood viscosity and hematocrit as risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:1153–60. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Taniguchi A, Fukushima M, Seino Y, Sakai M, Yoshii S, Nagasaka S, et al. Platelet count is independently associated with insulin resistance in non-obese Japanese type 2 diabetic patients. Metabolism. 2003;52:1246–9. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(03)00099-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Veeranna V, Ramesh K, Zalawadiya SK, Niraj A, Pradhan J, Jacob S, et al. Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Prevalent Metabolic Syndrome in Nondiabetic Multiethnic U.S. Adults. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2011 doi: 10.1089/met.2011.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Wang YY, Lin SY, Liu PH, Cheung BM, Lai WA. Association between hematological parameters and metabolic syndrome components in a Chinese population. J Diabetes Complications. 2004;18:322–7. doi: 10.1016/S1056-8727(04)00003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Wu CZ, Lin JD, Li JC, Kuo SW, Hsieh CH, Lian WC, et al. Association between white blood cell count and components of metabolic syndrome. Pediatr Int. 2009;51:14–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2008.02658.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].WHO . STEPs manual. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. Lippincott-Raven; Philadelphia: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Belew M, Kebede D, Kassaye M, Enquoselassie F. The magnitude of khat use and its association with health, nutrition and socio-economic status. Ethiop Med J. 2000;38:11–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Kalix P. Khat: scientific knowledge and policy issues. Br J Addict. 1987;82:47–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1987.tb01436.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Ross R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:115–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901143400207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Aoki I, Taniyama M, Toyama K, Homori M, Ishikawa K. Stimulatory effect of human insulin on erythroid progenitors (CFU-E and BFU-E) in human CD34+ separated bone marrow cells and the relationship between insulin and erythropoietin. Stem Cells. 1994;12:329–38. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530120309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Bersch N, Groopman JE, Golde DW. Natural and biosynthetic insulin stimulates the growth of human erythroid progenitors in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1982;55:1209–11. doi: 10.1210/jcem-55-6-1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Kurtz A, Jelkmann W, Bauer C. Insulin stimulates erythroid colony formation independently of erythropoietin. Br J Haematol. 1983;53:311–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1983.tb02025.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Lowe GD, Lee AJ, Rumley A, Price JF, Fowkes FG. Blood viscosity and risk of cardiovascular events: the Edinburgh Artery Study. Br J Haematol. 1997;96:168–73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.8532481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Gelaye B, Bekele T, Khali A, Haddis Y, Lemma S, Berhane Y, et al. Laboratory reference values of complete blood count for apparently healthy adults in Ethiopia. Clin Lab. 2011;57:635–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES