Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2012 Aug 6;287(40):33554–33566. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.378554

Calcium Currents Are Enhanced by α2δ-1 Lacking Its Membrane Anchor*

Ivan Kadurin 1,1, Anita Alvarez-Laviada 1,2, Shu Fun Josephine Ng 1, Ryan Walker-Gray 1, Marianna D'Arco 1, Michael G Fadel 1, Wendy S Pratt 1, Annette C Dolphin 1,3
PMCID: PMC3460456  PMID: 22869375

Background: We examined the role of membrane anchoring of voltage-gated calcium channel α2δ subunits.

Results: We used a truncated α2δ-1 construct (α2δ-1ΔC-term), which still increases CaV2.1/β1b currents, despite being mainly secreted.

Conclusion: The effect of α2δ-1ΔC-term on calcium currents does not involve secretion and subsequent re-binding to the plasma membrane.

Significance: C-terminal membrane anchoring of α2δ is not essential for calcium current enhancement.

Keywords: Calcium Channels, Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchors, Imaging, Patch Clamp Electrophysiology, Western Blotting, Auxiliary Subunit, Truncation

Abstract

The accessory α2δ subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels are membrane-anchored proteins, which are highly glycosylated, possess multiple disulfide bonds, and are post-translationally cleaved into α2 and δ. All α2δ subunits have a C-terminal hydrophobic, potentially trans-membrane domain and were described as type I transmembrane proteins, but we found evidence that they can be glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored. To probe further the function of membrane anchoring in α2δ subunits, we have now examined the properties of α2δ-1 constructs truncated at their putative glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor site, located before the C-terminal hydrophobic domain (α2δ-1ΔC-term). We find that the majority of α2δ-1ΔC-term is soluble and secreted into the medium, but unexpectedly, some of the protein remains associated with detergent-resistant membranes, also termed lipid rafts, and is extrinsically bound to the plasma membrane. Furthermore, heterologous co-expression of α2δ-1ΔC-term with CaV2.1/β1b results in a substantial enhancement of the calcium channel currents, albeit less than that produced by wild-type α2δ-1. These results call into question the role of membrane anchoring of α2δ subunits for calcium current enhancement.

Introduction

Voltage-gated Ca2+ (CaV)4 channels comprise an α1 subunit, which forms the pore and determines the main functional and pharmacological attributes of the channel (1). For the high voltage-activated channels, the α1 subunit is associated with an intracellular β subunit, which is required for the channel to reach the plasma membrane (24), and an α2δ subunit, whose functions are less well understood but which also influences trafficking of the channel (57). Genes encoding 10 α1, four β, and four α2δ subunits have been identified (1, 8, 9).

The topology of the α2δ protein was initially determined for skeletal muscle α2δ-1 but is likely to generalize to all α2δ subunits (10, 11). The α2δ subunits were predicted to be type I transmembrane proteins, as they have an N-terminal signal peptide sequence and a C-terminal hydrophobic and potentially transmembrane region (12). From the early studies of α2δ-1 purified from skeletal and cardiac muscle, it was identified that the α2 subunit is disulfide-bonded to a transmembrane δ subunit (13). However, both subunits are the product of a single gene, encoding the α2δ protein, which is post-translationally glycosylated and further processed with the formation of disulfide bond(s) and subsequent proteolytic cleavage into α2 and δ (12).

In terms of function, the α2 moiety of α2δ was found to play a role in enhancement of calcium currents (11), and we showed that the von Willebrand factor-A domain in α2 is essential for its trafficking function (6, 14). In contrast, the transmembrane δ subunit was reported to function by modifying the voltage-dependent properties of the channels (10, 11).

We have recently obtained evidence that α2δ subunits can form GPI-anchored proteins (15). In this study, we wished to further examine the role of membrane anchoring of α2δ-1 by creating an anchorless α2δ-1, truncated at the putative GPI-anchor ω-site, which removes the C-terminal hydrophobic domain (Fig. 1, α2δ-1ΔC-term, construct iii). A similar approach has been taken with GPI-anchored prion protein, which was found to remain associated with lipid rafts despite the loss of membrane anchoring (16). The interaction of a transmembrane form of prion protein with lipid rafts was found to require interaction with glypicans, which are themselves GPI-anchored (17).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Biochemical properties of α2δ-1ΔCterm-HA expressed in tsA-201 cells. A, scheme of α2δ-1 constructs used. The site of truncation and the position of the HA epitope (light gray box) are marked as follows: construct i, wild-type (WT) α2δ-1; construct ii, full-length α2δ-1 with an internal HA epitope (α2δ-1 mid-HA); construct iii, truncated α2δ-1 with C-terminal HA (α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA). The amino acid sequence of the C terminus of rat α2δ-1, with the site of truncation at the GPI anchor attachment site predicted in our previous study (15) (ω-site; C in CGG underlined), and the C-terminal hydrophobic sequence (underlined) are shown at top. B, WCL from untransfected tsA-201 cells (lanes 1 and 5) or cells transfected with WT α2δ-1 (lanes 2 and 6), α2δ-1 mid-HA (lanes 3 and 7), or α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (lanes 4 and 8), either untreated (left panel) or treated with PNGase-F (right panel). Bands were visualized with the indicated Abs, either against α2-1 (top panel) or against the HA epitope (middle two panels). The arrows on the right indicate bands corresponding to the deglycosylated proteins shown in the scheme in A, either uncleaved α2δ-1 (upper band), cleaved α2-1 (lower band), or free δ-1. The lower part of the same membrane was blotted with anti-GAPDH Ab as a loading control (bottom panel). WB, Western blot.

We have examined the role of membrane anchoring of α2δ-1 on its biochemical properties, processing, subcellular localization, and function. We present the surprising evidence that α2δ-1ΔC-term is still able to produce a significant enhancement of CaV2.1/β1b calcium channel currents following its heterologous expression, indicating that intrinsic membrane anchoring is not essential for this property. Furthermore, we have found that although a large fraction (∼75% after 3 days in culture) of α2δ-1ΔC-term is soluble and secreted into the medium, some of this protein remains extrinsically associated with the external leaflet of the plasma membrane. Future studies will be directed toward identifying the binding partner(s) of α2δ-1ΔC-term mediating this extrinsic interaction.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Molecular Biology

α2δ-1ΔC-term was constructed with a C-terminal HA tag, followed immediately by a STOP codon inserted directly after Cys-1059 (thus abolishing the Cys-1059/Gly-1060/Gly-1061-predicted GPI anchor ω-site). A second construct was made with an HA tag between Asn-549 and Asp-550, which was also truncated by a STOP codon immediately after Cys-1059. All mutations were made by standard molecular biological techniques and verified by DNA sequencing.

Heterologous Expression of cDNAs

The calcium channel cDNAs used were rabbit CaV2.1 (M64373), rat α2δ-1 (M86621), and rat β1b (18). The cDNAs were cloned into the pMT2 vector for expression, unless otherwise stated. tsA-201 cells were transfected with the cDNA combinations stated. The cDNA for green fluorescent protein (mut3 GFP) (19) was also included to identify transfected cells from which electrophysiological recordings were made. Transfection was performed as described previously (20). In control experiments where α2δ was omitted, the ratio was made up as stated with empty vector.

Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) Neuron Culture and Transfection

DRG neurons were isolated from P10 Sprague-Dawley rats and transfected by Amaxa nucleofection as described in the manufacturer's protocol (program G13, Lonza). Briefly, neurons were dissociated in dissection solution as follows: Hanks' basal salt solution buffer containing 5 mg/ml Dispase (Invitrogen), 2 mg/ml collagenase type 1A (Worthington), and 0.1 mg/ml DNase, (Invitrogen), for 30 min at 37 °C, and then resuspended in 160 μl of nucleofection buffer (80 μl per sample). 2 μg of total plasmid DNA was used for each transfection condition. For expression, α2δ-1 mid-HA and α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA were used in pcDNA3. Enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (Clontech) was co-transfected with α2δ-1 cDNA at a ratio of 1:4. After transfection, DRGs were plated on poly-l-lysine-coated glass coverslips and cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS and 50 ng/ml NGF. Culture medium was replaced 18 h after transfection.

Primary Antibodies (Abs)

The following primary Abs were used: anti-α2-1 (mouse monoclonal, Sigma); anti-HA (rabbit polyclonal, Sigma, or rat monoclonal, Roche Applied Science); anti-flotillin-1 (mouse monoclonal, BD Biosciences); anti-Akt/PKB (rabbit polyclonal, Cell Signaling Technologies), and anti-GAPDH (mouse monoclonal, Ambion).

Cell Lysis, Cell Surface Biotinylation, and Immunoblotting

The procedures were modified from those described previously (15, 20). 72 h after transfection, tsA-201 cells were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4, Sigma) and then incubated with PBS containing 1 mg/ml EZ-link Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin (Thermo Scientific) for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were then rinsed twice with PBS containing 200 mm glycine to quench the reaction. The cells were scraped, resuspended in cold PBS, and centrifuged at 1000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min. The cell pellets were homogenized in PBS, pH 7.4, at 4 °C containing 1% Igepal and protease inhibitors (complete, Roche Applied Science) by five passes through a 23-gauge needle, followed by sonication for 10 s, and were incubated on ice for 45 min. The whole cell lysates (WCL) were then centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 25 min at 4 °C, and the pellet was discarded. Aliquots of supernatant were assayed for total protein (Bradford assay, Bio-Rad). WCL corresponding to 20–40 μg of total protein was diluted with Laemmli sample buffer (15) supplemented with 100 mm dithiothreitol, incubated at 60 °C for 10 min, resolved by SDS-PAGE on 3–8% Tris-acetate or 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen), and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad) by Western blotting (semi-dry, Bio-Rad). 500 μg of the same lysate was used to precipitate biotinylated protein by adding 50 μl of prewashed streptavidin-agarose beads (Thermo Scientific) and overnight incubation at 4 °C. The beads were washed five times with PBS containing 0.1% Igepal and resuspended in an equal volume of 2× Laemmli buffer with 100 mm DTT, followed by 10 min of incubation at 60 °C. The eluted protein was analyzed by immunoblotting, as described above. The following secondary Abs were used for Western blot: goat anti-rabbit coupled to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and goat anti-mouse coupled to HRP (Bio-Rad). The signal was obtained by HRP reaction with fluorescent product (ECL Plus, GE Healthcare), and membranes were scanned on a Typhoon 9410 phosphorimager (GE Healthcare).

Quantification of Western Blots

ImageJ software (rsb.info.nih.gov) was used to draw a box around each band of interest, to quantify the mean gray intensity. The background was subtracted using an equally sized “background” box next to each band. To quantify the cleavage of α2δ to α2 and δ, the α2δ-1 and α2-1 bands were summed (total = cleaved + uncleaved), from which the % cleavage was calculated.

The proportion of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA secreted into the medium 72 h after transfection of tsA-201 cells was quantified by measuring the mean intensity of α2δ-1-associated bands detected by HA Ab in the media and in the WCL. Taking into account the total volume of the media and the WCL for each condition, an estimate of the amount of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA protein in each fraction was obtained and expressed as % of the total α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA in all fractions.

Deglycosylation with Peptide N-Glycosidase-F (PNGase-F)

WCL were brought to 0.2–0.5 mg/ml protein in PNGase-F buffer (PBS, pH 7.4, supplemented with 75 mm β-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, and protease inhibitors). 1 unit of PNGase-F (Roche Applied Science) was added per 10-μl volume and incubated at 37 °C for 5–12 h.

For the secreted proteins, equal amounts of concentrated media were taken for each reaction. For PNGase-F deglycosylation, the concentrated media were diluted with 9 volumes of PNGase-F buffer and incubated with PNGase-F as described above. Samples without enzyme were incubated in parallel in both cases, and the whole reaction volume was analyzed by Western blot.

Collection of Medium

tsA-201 cells were incubated for 72 h post-transfection, and medium was collected and centrifuged (1000 × g) to remove any detached cells. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22-μm syringe filter (Millipore). The resulting cell-free medium was applied to 3-kDa cutoff filtration column (Amicon) and centrifuged to concentrate the proteins (∼150-fold). Aliquots of the concentrate were diluted in the appropriate amount of Laemmli sample buffer and analyzed by Western blot.

Preparation of Triton X-100-insoluble Membrane Fractions (DRMs)

All steps were performed on ice. Confluent tsA-201 cells from two 175-cm2 flasks were taken up in Mes-buffered saline (MBS, 25 mm Mes, pH 6.5, 150 mm NaCl, and complete protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science)) containing 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Thermo Scientific), resuspended by 10 passages through a 1-ml Gilson pipette tip, and left on ice for 1 h. An equal volume of 90% (w/v) sucrose in MBS was then added. The sample was transferred to a 13-ml ultracentrifuge tube and overlaid with 10 ml of discontinuous sucrose gradient, consisting of 35% (w/v) sucrose in MBS (5 ml) and 5% (w/v) sucrose in MBS (5 ml). The sucrose gradients were centrifuged at 33,000 rpm for 18 h at 4 °C (Beckman SW40 rotor). 1-ml fractions were subsequently harvested from the top to the bottom of the tube. When necessary, protein fractions from the gradient were washed free of sucrose by dilution into 25 volumes of cold PBS and ultracentrifugation (150,000 × g, for 1 h at 4 °C) to pellet the cholesterol-enriched microdomain material. Triton X-100-insoluble protein was resuspended in deglycosylation buffer and treated with PNGase-F as described.

Basic pH Treatment of DRMs

Triton X-100-insoluble membrane fractions were resuspended at 4 °C in 0.1 m K2CO3, pH 11.5, or 0.1 m Tris, pH 7.4, incubated on ice for 20 min, and then centrifuged (150,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C) (21). The supernatants and pellets from both washes were separated, and the supernatants were concentrated by centrifugation through a 10-kDa cutoff filtration column (Amicon). Equal volumes of each fraction were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

Immunocytochemistry on tsA-201 Cells

The method used is essentially as described previously (22). Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in TBS for 5 min at room temperature and then washed twice with TBS. Either no permeabilization step was used or cells were permeabilized for 15 min with 0.02% Triton X-100. The primary rat anti-HA (1:500) or mouse anti-α2-1 (1:100) Abs were incubated overnight at 4 °C, followed by Texas Red-conjugated anti-rabbit, Texas Red-conjugated anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse (Molecular Probes) or biotinylated anti-rat Abs, and streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen). All secondary antibodies were used in 1:500 dilution. 4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was used to visualize the nuclei. Cells were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) to reduce photobleaching. Cells were examined on a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM), using a ×40 (1.3 NA) or ×63 (1.4 NA) oil-immersion objective. Confocal optical sections were 1 μm. Photomultiplier settings were kept constant in each experiment, and all images were scanned sequentially. Image processing was performed using ImageJ. Data illustrated are representative of more than 10 cells each.

Live Labeling of DRG Neuron Cultures

DRG cultures were incubated with monoclonal rat anti-HA Ab (1:250, Roche Applied Science) for 1 h at 37 °C in medium containing (in mm) the following: 145 NaCl; 5 KCl; 2 CaCl2; 1 MgSO4; 10 Hepes; 10 glucose, pH 7.4. Neurons were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 5 min and then blocked for 30–60 min with PBS supplemented with 10% goat serum. Secondary Ab (anti-rat Alexa Fluor 555, 1:500, Invitrogen) was applied for 2 h at room temperature. Samples were mounted and scanned as above.

Electrophysiology

Calcium channel currents were recorded in tsA-201 cells by whole cell patch-clamp recording, essentially as described previously (23). The internal (pipette) and external solutions and recording techniques were similar to those previously described (24). The patch pipette solution contained in mm: cesium aspartate, 140; EGTA, 5; MgCl2, 2; CaCl2, 0.1; K2ATP, 2; Hepes, 10; pH 7.2, 310 mosm with sucrose. The external solution for recording Ba2+ currents contained in mm: tetraethylammonium bromide, 150; KCl, 3; NaHCO3, 1.0; MgCl2, 1.0; Hepes, 10; glucose, 4; BaCl2, 1 or 5 as indicated, pH 7.4, 320 mosm with sucrose. Pipette of resistance 2–4 megohms were used. An Axopatch 1D amplifier (Axon Instruments, Burlingame, CA) was used, and data were filtered at 1–2 kHz and digitized at 5–10 kHz. Current records were subjected to leak and residual capacitance current subtraction (P/8 protocol). Analysis was performed using PCLAMP9 (Molecular Devices) and Origin 7 (Microcal Origin, Northampton, MA).

Current-voltage (I-V) plots were fit with a modified Boltzmann equation as described previously (25), for determination of the voltage for 50% activation (V50, act). Where data are given as mean ± S.E., statistical comparisons were performed using either Student's t test or analysis of variance with post hoc test, as appropriate.

RESULTS

Expression of α2δ-1ΔC-term

An anchorless α2δ-1 construct (α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA) was made with a C-terminal HA tag (Fig. 1A, construct iii), to monitor expression. It was expressed in tsA-201 cells, and expression was compared with WT α2δ-1 (Fig. 1A, construct i) and α2δ-1 mid-HA (Fig. 1A, construct ii) in the WCL (Fig. 1B, lanes 2–4). The presence of a mid-HA tag in this position within α2-1 does not affect the function of the full-length α2δ-1 (see Fig. 4A). Similar expression levels and a similar level of N-linked glycosylation, as shown by treatment with PNGase-F, were observed (Fig. 1B, top two panels, α2-1 Ab).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA produces a partial enhancement of calcium channel currents. A, I-V relationships for CaV2.1 plus β1b, either alone (black squares, n = 6) or co-expressing either WT α2δ-1 (black circles, n = 6) or α2δ-1 mid-HA (white triangles, n = 7). Data are mean ± S.E. Data between −30 and + 50 mV were fit with a modified Boltzmann function. The mean V50, act values obtained were −4.2, −7.3, and −5.3 mV, respectively. B, I-V relationships for CaV2.1 plus β1b, either alone (white squares, n = 8) or co-expressing either WT α2δ-1 (black circles, n = 8) or α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (gray triangles, n = 12). Data are mean ± S.E. Data between −30 and + 45 mV were fit with a modified Boltzmann function. The V50, act values obtained were −4.1, −4.7, and −5.5 mV, respectively. C, representative current traces for the three transfection conditions in response to depolarizing steps from −30 to +10 mV from VH of −90 mV as shown; calibration bars refer to all traces. D, representative IBa (normalized to the peak current), in response to 900 ms of depolarization to +5 mV, to show differences in inactivation kinetics between CaV2.1/β1b plus WT α2δ-1 (rapidly inactivating black trace), without α2δ (slowly inactivating black trace) and with α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (gray trace). E, mean τinact for IBa at +5 mV for WT α2δ-1 (black bar, n = 7), in comparison with no α2δ (white bar, n = 5) and α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (gray bar, n = 6). IBa was recorded using 1 mm Ba2+. Statistical differences were determined using one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett's post hoc test, where **, p < 0.01, NS = nonsignificant.

As found previously for heterologous expression of WT α2δ subunits (15, 26), both α2δ-1 mid-HA and α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA were only partially cleaved into α2 and δ (Fig. 1B, lanes 6–8). Partial cleavage is the reason that the α2-1 Ab recognizes two bands in reduced samples. These can best be distinguished following deglycosylation and have molecular masses of ∼130 kDa (α2δ-1 “uncleaved form”) and ∼105 kDa (α2-1 “cleaved form”) (Fig. 1B, top right panel). As expected from the location of the HA epitope, in reduced deglycosylated samples, the HA Ab revealed bands associated with uncleaved α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (∼130 kDa) and δ-1ΔC-term-HA peptide (∼19 kDa) (Fig. 1B, lane 8). Note that the α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA showed increased HA immunoreactivity, compared with full-length α2δ-1 mid-HA (Fig. 1B, middle panels). This is likely due to better accessibility of the C-terminally located HA epitope tag, rather than to increased expression levels of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, as the corresponding bands revealed by the α2-1 Ab were of similar intensities (Fig. 1B, top panel). To examine whether the C-terminal HA tag was affecting the properties of the protein, we also made a truncated α2δ-1ΔC-term construct with an internal HA tag (α2δ-1 mid-HA ΔC-term) (supplemental Fig. 1A). This construct was similarly expressed (supplemental Fig. 1B) and glycosylated (data not shown), compared with α2δ-1 mid-HA, and it was recognized by both α2-1 and HA Abs.

Truncated α2δ-1ΔC-term Is Secreted into the Medium

In medium conditioned by tsA-201 cells expressing α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, we observed a band of ∼165 kDa, which was immunoreactive to both α2-1 and HA Abs (Fig. 2A, lane 4), indicating that the anchorless construct was secreted. This band was absent from medium conditioned by untransfected cells or those expressing full-length WT α2δ-1 or α2δ-1 mid-HA (Fig. 2A, lanes 1–3).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Truncated α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, but not full-length WT α2δ-1 or α2δ-1 mid-HA, is secreted into the medium as a glycosylated protein. A, conditioned medium from untransfected tsA-201 cells (lane 1) or cells transfected with the full-length WT α2δ-1 (lane 2), α2δ-1 mid-HA (lane 3), or α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (lane 4) was concentrated and analyzed as described under “Experimental Procedures.” The Western blots (WB) were revealed with α2-1 Ab (upper panel) and HA Ab (lower panel). The arrows indicate a single band of ∼165 kDa corresponding to the glycosylated uncleaved α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, which was the main form found secreted in the medium. No secreted material was seen using WT α2δ-1 or α2δ-1 mid-HA-transfected cells (lanes 2 and 3) or untransfected cells (lane 1). B, conditioned medium, from cells transfected with α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, was either untreated (lane 1) or treated with PNGase-F (lane 2). Bands were visualized with HA Ab. C, WCL from cells transfected with 3, 6, or 10 μg of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA cDNA was analyzed on blots visualized with anti-HA Ab. 20 μg of total deglycosylated protein was loaded for each transfection condition. D, conditioned medium from the same cells was also blotted against HA Ab. An equal amount of medium was loaded for each condition. E, % of the total α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA that was either secreted (black bar) or present in the WCL (gray bar) was determined from three independent experiments (±S.E.), taking into account both the total volumes of the samples and the intensity of Western blot bands (see “Experimental Procedures”). Examples of gels used for this quantification are shown in C and D. Both the cleaved and uncleaved forms of α2δ-1-ΔC-term-HA were included in this analysis.

The secreted anchorless protein was glycosylated, because PNGase-F treatment shifted the predominant band from ∼165 to ∼130 kDa, equivalent to the observed size of the unprocessed form of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA after deglycosylation (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 and 2; see also Fig. 1B). Surprisingly, we barely detected any proteolytically processed α2δ-1ΔC-term in the medium, as demonstrated by the absence of δ-1ΔC-term-HA peptide in Fig. 2A (lane 4).

Transfection with increasing amounts of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA cDNA (3, 6, or 10 μg) resulted in increased expression and secretion of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA at 72 h, as demonstrated by Western blot analysis (Fig. 2, C and D). We quantified the percentage of secreted α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, relative to the total amount expressed, by measuring the mean intensity of bands and taking into account the total volume of each fraction, as described under “Experimental Procedures.” For this calculation, we have summed the cleaved and uncleaved α2δ-1 bands detectable in WCL and in the media to obtain the total expression. The proportion of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA secreted into the medium was 75.6 ± 2.8% of the total amount of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA expressed (n = 3; Fig. 2E). Truncation within the hydrophobic domain resulting in a longer α2δ-1 construct was previously shown to result in a construct that was partially secreted into the medium (27). The truncated construct with an internal HA tag (α2δ-1 mid-HA ΔC-term) also showed secretion into the medium as the uncleaved protein (supplemental Fig. 1C).

Despite Removal of the Membrane Anchor, α2δ-1ΔC-term Remains in Part Associated with the Plasma Membrane

We compared the distribution of full-length α2δ-1 mid-HA to that of anchorless α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, following heterologous expression in tsA-201 cells. Unexpectedly, we found that α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA was also associated with the plasma membrane in nonpermeabilized cells (Fig. 3A, panel ii), to a similar extent to the robust cell surface staining observed for α2δ-1 mid-HA in nonpermeabilized cells (Fig. 3A, panel i) and to WT α2δ-1, as demonstrated by anti-α2-1 Ab staining (supplemental Fig. 2). In permeabilized cells, immunostaining was also observed intracellularly in both conditions (Fig. 3A, panels iii and iv). Association of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA with the plasma membrane was not affected by co-transfection with an α1 and β subunit (CaV2.2 and β1b; Fig. 3B; supplemental Fig. 2, compare A and B), indicating that α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA does not require association with other calcium channel subunits for its membrane localization. Furthermore, the fact that the HA epitope is exposed in nonpermeabilized α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA-transfected cells indicates that it has not utilized another hydrophobic region in the protein as a transmembrane domain, in which case the C-terminal HA tag would be intracellular. We also observed that, when expressed by nucleofection in DRG neurons, α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA was associated with the cell surface, both in the cell bodies and in neurites, to a similar extent to α2δ-1 mid-HA (Fig. 3, C and D).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

A proportion of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA is associated with the plasma membrane, independently of other CaV channel subunits. A, confocal images of tsA-201 cells expressing either α2δ-1 mid-HA (left, panels i and iii) α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (right, panels ii and iv). Immunostaining was performed using anti-HA Ab. Upper row, nonpermeabilized cells showing surface expression of both constructs. Lower row, cells were permeabilized with 0.02% Triton X-100 to show total expression. DAPI was used to visualize the nucleus (blue). B, confocal images of tsA-201 cells expressing α2δ-1 mid-HA (left, panels i and iii) or α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (right, panels ii and iv) both co-transfected with CaV2.2 and β1b, stained with anti-HA Ab as in A. C, three-dimensional projection images of DRG neurons transfected with CFP/α2δ-1 mid-HA or CFP/α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA. Cell surface detection of exogenous α2δ-1 subunits was obtained by incubation of live neuronal cultures with anti-HA Ab (right) in CFP-positive neurons (left). Images are representative of nine CFP-positive neurons examined in each condition. D, higher magnification images of a neuronal process expressing CFP and labeled for surface α2δ-1-mid-HA (upper panels) or α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (lower panels). Scale bars, 20 μm in A and B and 10 μm in C and D.

To rule out that the C-terminal HA tag was in some way artifactually mediating noncovalent membrane association, we also used the α2δ-1 mid-HA ΔC-term construct. We found that this construct behaved similarly to α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, being associated with the plasma membrane in nonpermeabilized cells (supplemental Fig. 1D), as well as being secreted (supplemental Fig. 1C).

α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA Retains Partial Functionality, in Terms of Enhancing Calcium Currents

First, we showed that the full-length α2δ-1 mid-HA construct used in this study retained full functionality in comparison with untagged full-length α2δ-1 (WT α2δ-1), in terms of increasing calcium currents relative to CaV2.1/β1b alone (Fig. 4A). We then examined the ability of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA to enhance CaV2.1/β1b calcium currents, and surprisingly, we found that it retained substantial ability to cause an increase in these currents, relative to no α2δ co-expression (Fig. 4, B and C), although the enhancement was smaller than that observed with WT α2δ-1 (Fig. 4, B and C). In the absence of α2δ-1, peak IBa at + 5 mV (from Fig. 4B) was 9.0 ± 2.7% of that in the presence of WT α2δ-1, whereas for α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA it was 38.5 ± 7.6%, representing a 3.8-fold increase over no α2δ (p < 0.001 compared with no α2δ-1, analysis of variance, and Dunnett's post hoc test).

As observed previously (28), WT α2δ-1 increased the inactivation rate of the peak CaV2.1/β1b IBa (Fig. 4, D and E), τinact being reduced from 177 ms in the absence of α2δ-1 to 120 ms when WT α2δ-1 was co-expressed. The truncated α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA had a less marked effect on inactivation, with τinact being 145 ms (Fig. 4, D and E).

Does Intercellular Transfer Occur from Secreted Anchorless α2δ-1?

To examine whether transcellular transfer of secreted α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA might occur via the medium to neighboring cells and contribute to plasma membrane association or calcium current enhancement, tsA-201 cells expressing either α2δ-1 mid-HA or α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA were co-cultured with cells expressing CaV2.1/β1b/GFP. The cells were transfected separately and then washed and mixed after 5 h in culture. After a further 48 h in culture, cell surface α2δ-1 was examined by immunocytochemistry in fixed nonpermeabilized cells, for both α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA and α2δ-1 mid-HA (Fig. 5A, panels i and ii, red staining, white arrows), whereas GFP-positive cells were rarely found to be associated with any red staining. We found a very small amount of evidence of possible transfer of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA to areas of the plasma membrane of CaV2.1/β1b/GFP-transfected cells (indicated by a yellow arrow in Fig. 5A, panel i). No evidence of transfer of full-length α2δ-1 mid-HA was observed (Fig. 5A, panel ii). These results suggest that attachment of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA to cell surface components occurs mainly during the secretory process, rather than via secretion into the medium and reattachment.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Examination of whether intercellular transfer occurs for α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA. A, images of cells expressing CaV2.1 plus β1b and GFP, mixed and co-cultured with cells expressing either α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (left) or α2δ-1 mid-HA (right). Cells were not permeabilized, and the HA tag is seen as red immunostaining, on cells transfected with α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA or WT α2δ-1 mid-HA (white arrows). Cells expressing GFP were rarely found to have some small regions of red surface stain in the α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA condition (solid yellow arrow) but not in the α2δ-1 mid-HA condition. DAPI was used to visualize cell nuclei (blue). Scale bars, 10 μm. B, left, I-V relationship for cells expressing CaV2.1 plus β1b and GFP, co-cultured with cells expressing empty vector (white squares, n = 7) or either α2δ-1 mid-HA (black circles, n = 5) or α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (gray triangles, n = 7). Data are mean ± S.E. Right, representative current traces for each condition in response to depolarizing steps from −30 to +10 mV from VH of −90 mV as shown; calibration bars refer to all traces. IBa was recorded using 5 mm Ba2+ to record the small currents accurately.

Furthermore, co-culture of cells expressing CaV2.1/β1b for 24–36 h directly with cells transfected with α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, with α2δ-1 mid-HA, or with empty vector as a control did not cause any increase in IBa recorded from these cells (Fig. 5B). Similarly, culture of tsA-201 cells expressing CaV2.1/β1b for 5 h with medium conditioned by cells expressing α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA did not cause any increase in IBa compared with cells incubated with unconditioned medium (data not shown). These results indicate that the enhancement of calcium currents only occurs after co-expression of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA with the calcium channel α1 and β subunits, and it is likely to involve an interaction of this construct with CaV2.1/β1b channel complexes intracellularly, rather than once the α1/β complex has reached the plasma membrane.

Anchorless α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA at the Plasma Membrane Is Proteolytically Processed to α2 and δ to a Greater Extent than the Full-length α2δ-1 mid-HA

We next examined the properties of the α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA on the cell surface by cell surface biotinylation (Fig. 6A). Interestingly, we observed that α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA in the cell surface biotinylated fractions was proteolytically cleaved to form α2-1 to a greater extent, compared with the WCL (Fig. 6A, compare lanes 3 and 6). The proteolytic cleavage, quantified from three independent experiments, revealed an almost 2-fold increase of processing for α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA from the cell surface biotinylated fraction (80 ± 4.7% cleavage) compared with the corresponding WCL (43 ± 6%) (Fig. 6B). In contrast, there was a smaller increase from 38 ± 4.5 to 50 ± 3.3%, respectively, for full-length α2δ-1 mid-HA (Fig. 6). Therefore, the anchorless α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA that remained attached to the cell surface by an as yet unknown mechanism was mainly processed to α2-1 and δ. In contrast, the secreted form of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA was predominantly unprocessed, as demonstrated by the absence of δ-HA in the medium (Fig. 2A).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

α2δ-1 ΔC-term-HA associated with the plasma membrane is highly processed to α2-1 and δ-1. A, samples of deglycosylated WCL (left panel) and precipitated cell surface-biotinylated proteins (right panel) from untransfected cells (U/T, lanes 1 and 4) and cells transfected with α2δ-1 mid-HA (lanes 2 and 5) or α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (lanes 3 and 6) were resolved on a 3–8% Tris acetate gel. Western blots (WB) were revealed with α2-1 Ab. Lower panel, Western blotting with anti-Akt Ab (cytoplasmic protein) was used as a biotinylation control. Note the difference in relative proportions between the bands corresponding to α2δ-1 and α2-1 in WCL (lanes 2 and 3) and cell surface biotinylated fractions (lanes 5 and 6). B, proteolytic cleavage of α2δ-1 to α2-1 was calculated for different subcellular fractions for α2δ-1 mid-HA (white bars) and α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (black bars) using blots revealed with α2-1 Ab (n = 3 independent experiments ± S.E.); an example of one of the blots used for quantification of cleavage in the WCL and on the cell surface is shown in A, and for the DRM fraction is shown in Fig. 7, E and F. *, p < 0.05 compared with α2δ-1 mid HA, Student's t test.

Some α2δ-1ΔC-term Is Associated with Lipid Rafts

Because some α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA was associated with the plasma membrane, we also examined whether it was still associated with DRMs, also termed lipid rafts, as demonstrated for WT α2δ-1 and other α2δ subunits (15, 26). We isolated DRMs from cells expressing WT α2δ-1, α2δ-1 mid-HA, or α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA by discontinuous sucrose gradient centrifugation as described previously (26). Untransfected tsA-201 cells express a small amount of endogenous α2δ-1 (Fig. 7A), which localizes in DRMs. In transiently transfected tsA-201 cells, 66 ± 5.7% of WT α2δ-1 (Fig. 7B, fractions 5–7; n = 3) and 59.5 ± 5.7% of α2δ-1 mid-HA (Fig. 7C, n = 3) were found in DRM fractions. The DRM localization of the endogenous marker flotillin-1 was quantified to be 85.4 ± 3.9%, whereas the transferrin receptor, which was used a marker for the soluble fractions, was essentially absent from DRMs (n = 3; Fig. 7, A--D). In contrast, we observed a large proportion of α2δ-1ΔC-term HA (Fig. 7D) and α2δ-1 mid-HA ΔC-term (supplemental Fig. 1) to be in the soluble fractions (1113), as judged by both α2-1 and HA immunoreactivity. This distribution would be expected for a soluble protein in the process of being secreted. However, a significant fraction of both anchorless constructs (22.9 ± 4.7% of α2δ-1 mid-HA ΔC-term and 29.1 ± 2.1% of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, n = 3) remained associated with the DRMs (Fig. 7D and supplemental Fig. 1E). This result suggests that the GPI anchor is not the only means by which the protein is retained in DRMs.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA is partially associated with DRMs. A–D, WCL from untransfected tsA-201 cells (A) or those expressing WT α2δ-1 (B), α2δ-1 mid-HA (C), or α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (D) were subjected to sucrose gradient fractionation to isolate DRMs (fractions 5–7). Fractions were examined using α2-1 (top panels) and HA (middle panels) Abs. In each case, the distributions of the endogenous DRM marker, flotillin-1, and non-raft marker, transferrin receptor (TfR) were also examined (bottom two panels). Data are representative of at least three experiments. Quantification of % of material present in DRMs is given in the “Results.” E and F, isolated DRM fractions of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (E) and α2δ-1 mid-HA (F)- transfected cells were deglycosylated with PNGase-F (lane 2 compared with lane 1) to show the presence of α2-1 (E and F) and δ-1-HA (E). The % cleavage of α2δ-1 into α2-1 was quantified for three independent experiments and included in the graph shown in Fig. 6B. Note that proteolytic cleavage of the protein into α2-1 and δ-1 in DRMs is increased relative to WCL, as also shown in quantification on Fig. 6B.

As observed previously, proteolytic cleavage of α2δ-1 to α2 and δ was more pronounced in isolated DRMs than in WCL (15, 26). However, that increase was greater for α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (Fig. 7E) than for full-length α2δ-1 mid-HA (Fig. 7F, quantification included in Fig. 6B). Therefore, similarly to the cell surface biotinylated α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, isolated DRM fractions also contained more processed α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (Fig. 6B).

How Is α2δ-1ΔC-term Associated with the Plasma Membrane

We examined a number of possibilities that could be responsible for the extrinsic interaction of α2δ-1ΔC-term with the cell surface. The fact that the HA epitope at the C terminus is accessible in nonpermeabilized cells strongly suggested that the truncated construct does not adopt a transmembrane configuration. To rule out the possibility that α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA formed an integral membrane protein, we treated DRMs isolated from cells expressing α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA or α2δ-1 mid-HA with neutral (pH 7.4) or basic carbonate (pH 11.5) buffers. This method has been used previously to examine whether proteins are extrinsically associated with the membrane (16, 21, 29). We found that a high pH wash could release more α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA from DRMs into the supernatant, which was not the case for α2δ-1 mid-HA. Less α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA was released by neutral pH washes (Fig. 8). This indicates that α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA is not an integral membrane protein, rather the interaction involves electrostatic association.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8.

α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA, but not α2δ-1 mid-HA, is released from membranes by alkaline carbonate treatment. Isolated DRM fractions from tsA-201 cells transfected with α2δ-1 mid-HA (lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6) or α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA (lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8) were treated with buffer composed of either 0.1 m Tris, pH 7.4, or 0.1 m K2CO3, pH 11.5, as indicated, to dissociate extrinsically associated proteins. After centrifugation, the pellets (left panel) and supernatants (right panel) were deglycosylated with PNGase-F followed by Western blotting (top panel α2-1 Ab; bottom panel anti-HA Ab to reveal the δ-1-HA peptide).

To test whether, similar to prion protein, the interaction of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA with DRMs and cell surface involved interaction with glypicans, we treated cells with heparin (100 μg/ml), which should interfere with any interaction with heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Incubation of either isolated DRMs or transfected cells with heparin had no effect on the association of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA with DRMs or the plasma membrane (data not shown). We also found that mutation of the metal ion-dependent adhesion motif in the von Willebrand factor-A domain (6) of α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA did not prevent the protein from interacting with the plasma membrane (data not shown), indicating that the interaction does not require this site.

DISCUSSION

The recent discovery that α2δ subunits can be anchored to the membrane via a GPI moiety rather than a transmembrane protein domain has provided a novel point of view concerning some of their previously investigated properties as key modulators of CaV currents (10, 11). However, it has also opened new questions related to the role of membrane anchoring for the physiological function of α2δ proteins. The initial aim of this study was to address some of those issues with respect to membrane anchoring of α2δ-1.

Previous in vitro studies have shown that α2δ-1, α2δ-2, and α2δ-3 subunits all increase the maximum conductance of whole cell calcium channel currents arising from α1/β subunit combinations for the CaV1 and CaV2 classes, in several different expression systems (3034). For α2δ-1, it was previously shown that expression of the α2-1 or δ-1 alone did not enhance calcium currents through CaV2.1 channels (10). Furthermore, these authors also found that expression of α2δ-1 with the transmembrane segment from another protein (adhalin) did not enhance calcium currents, which is now unsurprising in the light of our recent finding that the α2δ subunits can form GPI-anchored proteins (15). Replacing the transmembrane segment with an unrelated sequence might interfere with the cleavage of GPI-anchoring signal sequence and the subsequent attachment of the GPI moiety. It has been found that uncleaved GPI precursor proteins show aggregation in the endoplasmic reticulum (35).

It was initially suggested that the transmembrane segment of δ was required for calcium current stimulation, and the entire extracellular portion of α2δ-1 was implicated in subunit interaction with CaV2.1 (10). Moreover, co-expression of CaV2.1 channels with δ-1 alone affected the biophysical properties of the currents but did not enhance their amplitudes (26). We have now revisited this issue with respect to our recent findings that α2δ subunits can form GPI-anchored proteins.

We have created an anchorless α2δ-1 (α2δ-1ΔC-term) by adding a stop codon immediately prior to the predicted site of attachment of the GPI moiety (15, 36). This approach has previously been employed successfully to study the role of GPI anchoring on the behavior of the prion protein (16). By this means, we obtained a soluble protein deprived of hydrophobic membrane anchoring but containing α2-1 and all the extracellular parts of δ-1, both of which were both previously shown to be of major importance for channel regulation and interaction (11, 26). In our study we found the surprising result that the C-terminal membrane anchoring is not the only determinant of the ability of α2δ-1 to enhance calcium channel currents, because α2δ-1ΔC-term still produced a substantial increase of calcium currents when co-expressed with CaV2.1 and β1b. Interestingly, we did not observe such effects upon external application of secreted α2δ-1ΔC-term to cells previously transfected with CaV2.1 and β1b, suggesting that an intracellular interaction with other subunits is required for the functionality of α2δ-1 in the calcium channel complex. Moreover, this result implies that other factors than membrane anchoring are likely to be involved in the current-potentiating effects of α2δ-1.

As expected, a large proportion of α2δ-1ΔC-term is secreted into the medium, when it is expressed in tsA-201 cells. However, we also found, using both immunocytochemistry and cell surface biotinylation, that α2δ-1ΔC-term constructs, despite the lack of a C-terminal membrane anchor, remain partially associated with the plasma membrane. However, α2δ-1ΔC-term-HA does not utilize another hydrophobic region as a transmembrane anchor, because both the α2-1 and HA Abs can access their epitopes in nonpermeabilized cells.

The interaction of α2δ-1ΔC-term with membranes occurs via a noncovalent linkage, because alkaline carbonate treatment disrupted the DRM association. Furthermore, the interaction is not affected by the presence or absence of other calcium channel subunits. Our finding that secreted α2δ-1ΔC-term does not re-attach to the plasma membrane following secretion further suggests that its association with the plasma membrane occurs during the maturation and trafficking of the protein.

There are 16 predicted N-linked glycosylation sites in the rat α2δ-1 sequence. We have found that secreted α2δ-1ΔC-term was heavily glycosylated, because PNGase-F removed all N-glycosylation (∼35 kDa) producing a shift to an apparent mass of ∼130 kDa, corresponding to unprocessed deglycosylated α2δ-1ΔC-term (Fig. 2B).

We have shown in our previous studies that α2δ subunits are strongly localized in DRMs, both in native tissue and following heterologous expression (15, 26). The GPI-anchoring of α2δ subunits, as for other proteins, is likely to be an important determinant of their localization in these domains (15) but not the sole factor (16, 37). This is reinforced by the finding that α2δ-1ΔC-term remains, in part, associated with DRMs. Much of the DRM fraction is derived from the cholesterol-rich plasma membrane, as determined by combined cell surface biotinylation and DRM studies (17). Thus, the partial association of the α2δ-1ΔC-term constructs with DRMs is in agreement with our evidence that some α2δ-1ΔC-term is associated with the plasma membrane.

Removal of the C-terminal GPI anchor signal sequence from prion protein did not completely prevent its lipid raft or membrane association (16), although the anchorless prion protein was mainly secreted. Furthermore, prion protein was found to interact with GPI-anchored heparan sulfate proteoglycans (glypicans), which play a role in retaining it in DRM fractions (17). In contrast, in this study heparin, which should disrupt such an interaction, did not prevent cell surface or DRM association of α2δ-1ΔC-term.

We have found previously that heterologously expressed α2δ proteins are only partially proteolytically processed into α2 and δ in many expression systems (15, 26, 38). This behavior of expressed α2δ subunits contrasts with the complete processing of native α2δ proteins, where no full-length α2δ is observed (15, 38). In this study, we found that α2δ-1ΔC-term is also incompletely processed, and in particular the secreted form shows very little proteolytic cleavage. In contrast, α2δ-1ΔC-term in both the DRM fraction and the cell surface-biotinylated fraction exhibits a much greater proportion of cleaved α2-1 and δ-1ΔC-term than the WCL or the secreted fraction. These results indicate that the protease in question is likely to be absent from the constitutive secretory pathway, but it is present in the biogenesis pathway for membrane components. The increased proteolytic cleavage of plasma membrane and DRM-associated α2δ-1ΔC-term, compared with full-length α2δ-1, may result from its greater flexibility and availability as a substrate. Furthermore, a number of proteases have also been localized to lipid rafts (39, 40), which may relate to the increased processing of α2δ in DRM fractions.

Because it has been found that the proteolytic cleavage of α2δ-1 is important for its function to enhance calcium channel currents (41), it is likely that the proteolytically cleaved α2δ-1ΔC-term associated with the plasma membrane is responsible for its function, but this remains to be conclusively demonstrated by using a protease-deficient mutant of α2δ-1ΔC-term.

The main physiological relevance of this study is that the truncation of α2δ-1 at its predicted GPI anchor site does not prevent the ability of this construct to affect calcium channel function. This indicates that intrinsic association of α2δ-1 to the plasma membrane is not essential for its function. Our finding that anchorless α2δ-1 is still in part extrinsically associated with the plasma membrane and DRMs suggests that α2δ-1ΔC-term may be processed by two alternative routes, a secretory pathway and a membrane biogenesis pathway, and in the latter pathway it becomes associated with one or more binding partners that determine its association with membranes. This now gives us an important means of identifying the physiological binding partner(s) of α2δ proteins involved in controlling their trafficking and cell surface localization.

Our future research will therefore be aimed at identifying the binding partner(s) with which α2δ-1ΔC-term is interacting during the trafficking process, and which may also serve to tether it to the plasma membrane. It will also be of great interest to determine whether this interaction is related to the surprising ability of α2δ-1ΔC-term to produce a partial enhancement of calcium channel currents.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data
*

This work was supported in part by Medical Research Council Grants G0700368 and G0801756.

Inline graphic

This article contains supplemental Figs. 1 and 2.

4
The abbreviations used are:
CaV
voltage-gated calcium
Ab
antibody
DRG
dorsal root ganglion
DRM
detergent-resistant membrane
GPI
glycosylphosphatidylinositol
PNGase
peptide N-glycosidase
WCL
whole cell lysate
BisTris
2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol
CFP
cyan fluorescent protein.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Catterall W. A. (2000) Structure and regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 521–555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Dolphin A. C. (2003) β subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 35, 599–620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Leroy J., Richards M. W., Richards M. S., Butcher A. J., Nieto-Rostro M., Pratt W. S., Davies A., Dolphin A. C. (2005) Interaction via a key tryptophan in the I-II linker of N-type calcium channels is required for β1 but not for palmitoylated β2, implicating an additional binding site in the regulation of channel voltage-dependent properties. J. Neurosci. 25, 6984–6996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Waithe D., Ferron L., Page K. M., Chaggar K., Dolphin A. C. (2011) β-Subunits promote the expression of CaV2.2 channels by reducing their proteasomal degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 9598–9611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Cantí C., Davies A., Dolphin A. C. (2003) Calcium channel alpha2delta subunits: structure, functions and target site for drugs. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 1, 209–217 [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cantí C., Nieto-Rostro M., Foucault I., Heblich F., Wratten J., Richards M. W., Hendrich J., Douglas L., Page K. M., Davies A., Dolphin A. C. (2005) The metal ion-dependent adhesion site in the von Willebrand factor-A domain of α2δ subunits is key to trafficking voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 11230–11235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Davies A., Hendrich J., Van Minh A. T., Wratten J., Douglas L., Dolphin A. C. (2007) Functional biology of the α2δ subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 28, 220–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ertel E. A., Campbell K. P., Harpold M. M., Hofmann F., Mori Y., Perez-Reyes E., Schwartz A., Snutch T. P., Tanabe T., Birnbaumer L., Tsien R. W., Catterall W. A. (2000) Nomenclature of voltage-gated calcium channels. Neuron 25, 533–535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Burgess D. L., Gefrides L. A., Foreman P. J., Noebels J. L. (2001) A cluster of three novel Ca2+ channel γ subunit genes on chromosome 19q13.4. Evolution and expression profile of the γ subunit gene family. Genomics 71, 339–350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gurnett C. A., De Waard M., Campbell K. P. (1996) Dual function of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel α2δ subunit in current stimulation and subunit interaction. Neuron 16, 431–440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gurnett C. A., Felix R., Campbell K. P. (1997) Extracellular interaction of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel α2δ and α1 subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18508–18512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ellis S. B., Williams M. E., Ways N. R., Brenner R., Sharp A. H., Leung A. T., Campbell K. P., McKenna E., Koch W. J., Hui A. (1988) Sequence and expression of mRNAs encoding the α1 and α2 subunits of a DHP-sensitive calcium channel. Science 241, 1661–1664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Jay S. D., Sharp A. H., Kahl S. D., Vedvick T. S., Harpold M. M., Campbell K. P. (1991) Structural characterization of the dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channel α2-subunit and the associated δ peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 3287–3293 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hoppa M. B., Lana B., Margas W., Dolphin A. C., Ryan T. A. (2012) α2δ expression sets presynaptic calcium channel abundance and release probability. Nature 486, 122–125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Davies A., Kadurin I., Alvarez-Laviada A., Douglas L., Nieto-Rostro M., Bauer C. S., Pratt W. S., Dolphin A. C. (2010) The α2δ subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels form GPI-anchored proteins, a posttranslational modification essential for function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1654–1659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Campana V., Caputo A., Sarnataro D., Paladino S., Tivodar S., Zurzolo C. (2007) Characterization of the properties and trafficking of an anchorless form of the prion protein. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 22747–22756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Taylor D. R., Whitehouse I. J., Hooper N. M. (2009) Glypican-1 mediates both prion protein lipid raft association and disease isoform formation. PLoS. Pathog. 5, e1000666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Tomlinson W. J., Stea A., Bourinet E., Charnet P., Nargeot J., Snutch T. P. (1993) Functional properties of a neuronal class C L-type calcium channel. Neuropharmacology 32, 1117–1126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Cormack B. P., Valdivia R. H., Falkow S. (1996) FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene 173, 33–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Page K. M., Heblich F., Davies A., Butcher A. J., Leroy J., Bertaso F., Pratt W. S., Dolphin A. C. (2004) Dominant-negative calcium channel suppression by truncated constructs involves a kinase implicated in the unfolded protein response. J. Neurosci. 24, 5400–5409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Fujiki Y., Hubbard A. L., Fowler S., Lazarow P. B. (1982) Isolation of intracellular membranes by means of sodium carbonate treatment. Application to endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 93, 97–102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Brice N. L., Berrow N. S., Campbell V., Page K. M., Brickley K., Tedder I., Dolphin A. C. (1997) Importance of the different β subunits in the membrane expression of the α1A and α2 calcium channel subunits. Studies using a depolarization-sensitive α1A antibody. Eur. J. Neurosci. 9, 749–759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Berrow N. S., Brice N. L., Tedder I., Page K. M., Dolphin A. C. (1997) Properties of cloned rat α1A calcium channels transiently expressed in the COS-7 cell line. Eur. J. Neurosci. 9, 739–748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Campbell V., Berrow N. S., Fitzgerald E. M., Brickley K., Dolphin A. C. (1995) Inhibition of the interaction of G protein Go with calcium channels by the calcium channel β-subunit in rat neurones. J. Physiol. 485, 365–372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Cantí C., Davies A., Berrow N. S., Butcher A. J., Page K. M., Dolphin A. C. (2001) Evidence for two concentration-dependent processes for β-subunit effects on α1B calcium channels. Biophys. J. 81, 1439–1451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Davies A., Douglas L., Hendrich J., Wratten J., Tran Van Minh A., Foucault I., Koch D., Pratt W. S., Saibil H. R., Dolphin A. C. (2006) The calcium channel α2δ 2 subunit partitions with CaV2.1 into lipid rafts in cerebellum. Implications for localization and function. J. Neurosci. 26, 8748–8757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Brown J. P., Gee N. S. (1998) Cloning and deletion mutagenesis of the α2δ calcium channel subunit from porcine cerebral cortex. Expression of a soluble form of the protein that retains [3H]gabapentin binding activity. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25458–25465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Felix R., Gurnett C. A., De Waard M., Campbell K. P. (1997) Dissection of functional domains of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel α2δ subunit. J. Neurosci. 17, 6884–6891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Brown D. A., Rose J. K. (1992) Sorting of GPI-anchored proteins to glycolipid-enriched membrane subdomains during transport to the apical cell surface. Cell 68, 533–544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Walker D., De Waard M. (1998) Subunit interaction sites in voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Role in channel function. Trends Neurosci. 21, 148–154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Mori Y., Friedrich T., Kim M. S., Mikami A., Nakai J., Ruth P., Bosse E., Hofmann F., Flockerzi V., Furuichi T. (1991) Primary structure and functional expression from complementary DNA of a brain calcium channel. Nature 350, 398–402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Klugbauer N., Lacinová L., Marais E., Hobom M., Hofmann F. (1999) Molecular diversity of the calcium channel α2δ subunit. J. Neurosci. 19, 684–691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Dolphin A. C., Wyatt C. N., Richards J., Beattie R. E., Craig P., Lee J. H., Cribbs L. L., Volsen S. G., Perez-Reyes E. (1999) The effect of α2δ and other accessory subunits on expression and properties of the calcium channel α1G. J. Physiol. 519, 35–45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Hobom M., Dai S., Marais E., Lacinova L., Hofmann F., Klugbauer N. (2000) Neuronal distribution and functional characterization of the calcium channel α2δ-2 subunit. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 1217–1226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Delahunty M. D., Stafford F. J., Yuan L. C., Shaz D., Bonifacino J. S. (1993) Uncleaved signals for glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchoring cause retention of precursor proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12017–12027 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Pierleoni A., Martelli P. L., Casadio R. (2008) PredGPI. A GPI-anchor predictor. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Robinson P., Etheridge S., Song L., Shah R., Fitzgerald E. M., Jones O. T. (2011) Targeting of voltage-gated calcium channel α2δ-1 subunit to lipid rafts is independent from a GPI-anchoring motif. PLoS ONE 6, e19802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Douglas L., Davies A., Wratten J., Dolphin A. C. (2006) Do voltage-gated calcium channel α2δ subunits require proteolytic processing into α2 and δ to be functional? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34, 894–898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Cordy J. M., Hussain I., Dingwall C., Hooper N. M., Turner A. J. (2003) Exclusively targeting β-secretase to lipid rafts by GPI anchor addition up-regulates β-site processing of the amyloid precursor protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 11735–11740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Vetrivel K. S., Cheng H., Lin W., Sakurai T., Li T., Nukina N., Wong P. C., Xu H., Thinakaran G. (2004) Association of γ-secretase with lipid rafts in post-Golgi and endosome membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 44945–44954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Andrade A., Sandoval A., Oviedo N., De Waard M., Elias D., Felix R. (2007) Proteolytic cleavage of the voltage-gated Ca2+ channel α2δ subunit. Structural and functional features. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25, 1705–1710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES