Skip to main content
Cancer Imaging logoLink to Cancer Imaging
. 2012 Sep 28;12(2):345–346. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.9011

RECIST rules

Aslam Sohaib 1,
PMCID: PMC3460554  PMID: 23023096

Abstract

Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours (RECIST) were introduced in 2000 to provide a standardized method for assessing response to treatments. The RECIST Working Group has updated RECIST to Version 1.1.

Keywords: Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours, version 1.1


Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours (RECIST) were introduced in 2000 to provide a standardized method for assessing response to treatments[1]. The RECIST Working Group has updated RECIST to Version 1.1[2]. The revised version has maintained assessment of tumour burden using the sum of the diameters and continues to use uni-dimensional measurements. The response categories are still complete response, partial response (30% decrease in sum from baseline), stable disease and progressive disease (20% increase in sum from nadir). The revisions address issues that have arisen related to the use of the criteria in clinical practice. Table 1 outlines the main changes.

Table 1.

RECIST 1.0 RECIST 1.1
Tumour burden Maximum 10 target lesions in total and up to 5 per organ Maximum 5 target lesions in total and up to 2 per organ
Measurable lesions
  • ≥10 mm in longest diameter (LD) for spiral CT (nodal and extranodal lesions)

  • ≥20 mm in LD for non-spiral CT

  • ≥20 mm in LD for clinical lesions

  • ≥20 mm in LD for chest radiograph

  • Ultrasound (US) may be an alternative to clinical measurement of superficial nodes or nodules

  • ≥10 mm in LD and 2 time the slice thickness for extra-nodal lesions

  • ≥15 mm in short axis diameter (SAD) for nodal lesions

  • ≥10 mm in LD for clinical lesions

  • ≥20 mm in LD for chest radiograph

  • US cannot be used to measure lesions

Lymph nodes Nodal lesions not distinguished from extra-nodal lesions
  • Lymph nodes are considered abnormal enlarged if SAD >10 mm

  • Measurable nodal lesions must be ≥15 mm in SAD

  • Non-measurable nodal lesions SAD >10 mm and <15 mm

  • The sum of the diameters (LD for extra-nodal target lesions and SAD for nodal lesions) is followed through treatment

Complete response (CR) CR requires disappearance of all lesions CR requires the disappearance of all extra-nodal lesions and regression of nodal lesions to <10 mm SAD
Progressive disease (PD)
  • PD occurs if the sum of the longest diameters increases by ≥20% from nadir

  • PD occurs if there is “unequivocal progression” of existing non-target lesions

  • PD occurs if the sum of the diameters has increased by ≥20% and ≥5 mm from nadir

  • Patients with measurable disease for “unequivocal progression” based on non-target disease, there must be an overall substantial worsening that merits discontinuation of therapy (if target disease is SD/PR)

  • Patients without measurable disease for “unequivocal progression” of non-target disease, the increase in overall tumour burden must be comparable to the increase needed for PD of measurable disease

Confirmation of response CR and PR require confirmation by a repeat assessment 4 weeks after initial documentation Confirmation of PR/CR is ONLY required for non-randomized trials where response is the primary end point
New lesion Not specifically defined New lesions should be unequivocal and not attributable to differences in scanning technique or findings which may not be tumour. If a new lesion is equivocal then repeat scans are needed to confirm. Lesions identified in anatomic locations not scanned at baseline are considered new. New lesions on US should be confirmed on CT/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) No specific recommendations
  • New lesions can be assessed using FDG/PET

  • PET negative at baseline and positive at follow-up is PD based on a new lesion

  • No PET at baseline and positive PET at follow-up is PD if the new lesion is confirmed on CT

  • No PET at baseline and positive PET at follow-up corresponding to a pre-existing lesion on CT that is not progressing is not PD

Overall response Overall response table integrates target, non-target and new lesions
  • One overall response table integrates target, non-target and new lesions

  • Another table integrates non-target and new lesions for the assessment of subjects without measurable disease

References

  • 1.Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–216. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. PMid:10655437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–472. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. PMid:19097774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Imaging are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES