Abstract
Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours (RECIST) were introduced in 2000 to provide a standardized method for assessing response to treatments. The RECIST Working Group has updated RECIST to Version 1.1.
Keywords: Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours, version 1.1
Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours (RECIST) were introduced in 2000 to provide a standardized method for assessing response to treatments[1]. The RECIST Working Group has updated RECIST to Version 1.1[2]. The revised version has maintained assessment of tumour burden using the sum of the diameters and continues to use uni-dimensional measurements. The response categories are still complete response, partial response (30% decrease in sum from baseline), stable disease and progressive disease (20% increase in sum from nadir). The revisions address issues that have arisen related to the use of the criteria in clinical practice. Table 1 outlines the main changes.
Table 1.
RECIST 1.0 | RECIST 1.1 | |
---|---|---|
Tumour burden | Maximum 10 target lesions in total and up to 5 per organ | Maximum 5 target lesions in total and up to 2 per organ |
Measurable lesions |
|
|
Lymph nodes | Nodal lesions not distinguished from extra-nodal lesions |
|
Complete response (CR) | CR requires disappearance of all lesions | CR requires the disappearance of all extra-nodal lesions and regression of nodal lesions to <10 mm SAD |
Progressive disease (PD) |
|
|
Confirmation of response | CR and PR require confirmation by a repeat assessment 4 weeks after initial documentation | Confirmation of PR/CR is ONLY required for non-randomized trials where response is the primary end point |
New lesion | Not specifically defined | New lesions should be unequivocal and not attributable to differences in scanning technique or findings which may not be tumour. If a new lesion is equivocal then repeat scans are needed to confirm. Lesions identified in anatomic locations not scanned at baseline are considered new. New lesions on US should be confirmed on CT/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) |
Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) | No specific recommendations |
|
Overall response | Overall response table integrates target, non-target and new lesions |
|
References
- 1.Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–216. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. PMid:10655437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–472. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. PMid:19097774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]