Abstract
The Tbx2 transcription factor is implicated in growth control based on its association with human cancers. In the heart, Tbx2 represses cardiac differentiation to mediate development of the atrioventricular canal (AVC). The zebrafish genome retains two tbx2 genes, and both are required for formation of the AVC. Here we show that both genes are also expressed earlier in the primitive heart tube, and we describe a previously unrecognized role for Tbx2 in promoting proliferation of presumptive myocardium at the heart tube stage. In contrast to single knockdowns, depletion of both gene products causes chamber defects, resulting in an expanded atrium and a smaller ventricle, associated with decreased proliferation of ventricular cardiomyocytes. The phenotype correlates with changes in the expression for known cardiac growth factors. Therefore, in zebrafish, two tbx2 genes are functionally redundant for regulating chamber development, while each gene is required independently for development of the AVC.
Keywords: cardiogenesis, T-box, cardiomyocytes, nppa, ndrg4
INTRODUCTION
In zebrafish, specified cardiac progenitors are located in bilateral stripes within anterior lateral plate mesoderm. These cell populations migrate medially and fuse at the midline forming a cardiac cone at 19.5 hours post fertilization (hpf), through a process called “cardiac fusion” (Zaffran and Frasch, 2002). Cells from the cone “telescope” to form an extended tubular structure called the primitive heart tube, with regions specified as presumptive atrial or ventricular tissue. In the first obvious break of symmetry, the heart tube “jogs” to the left and begins beating by 24 hpf. Around 36 hpf the heart tube undergoes a more extensive morphogenetic process called cardiac looping (Bakkers et al., 2009), which is essential for orienting the eventual positions of the atrium and ventricle in the mature heart. At the junction of atrial and ventricular myocardium, endocardial cushion tissue grows out at the atrioventricular canal (AVC) and from this non-myocardial tissue valves develop between the two chambers (Boogerd et al., 2009; Yelon, 2001). Regulated signals including those related to Wnt, BMP, Notch, and RA pathways tightly control each of these steps of cardiac development (Joziasse et al., 2008; Zaffran and Frasch, 2002). Mediating response to these signals is a complex network of cardiac transcription factors, including those comprising GATA, HAND, NKX2 and T-box families (Schoenebeck and Yelon, 2007). This network in turn regulates proliferative cues that modulate chamber outgrowth and formation of the AVC, while proliferation is inhibited at the outflow tract (OFT) and the inflow tract (IFT).
Members of the T-box family of transcription factors share an approximately 200 amino acid DNA-binding domain called the T-domain. Brachyury (T) was the first family member identified at the locus of a murine loss-of-function mutation that causes a short tail phenotype (Abrahams et al., 2010; Chapman et al., 1996). Over 17 family members have since been identified and they are expressed in a variety of tissues from embryogenesis to adulthood (Hoogaars et al., 2007). Mutations or deletions of some family members are linked to human genetic disorders. Thus, DiGeorge syndrome is caused by a deletion at 22q11, characterized by thymic hypoplasia, cleft palate, and cardiovascular anomalies. Haploinsufficiency of Tbx1 in mice largely recapitulates cardiac defects seen in patients (Hoogaars et al., 2007; Merscher et al., 2001; Yamagishi et al., 2003). Mutation of TBX3 causes ulnar-mammary syndrome, an autosomal-dominant disorder characterized by hypoplasia of upper limbs, as well as mammary and apocrine glands (Abrahams et al., 2010; Klopocki et al., 2006). Haploinsufficiency of Tbx5 causes Holt-Oram syndrome, an autosomal dominant disorder with skeletal and cardiac abnormalities (Boogerd et al., 2009; Li et al., 1997; Liu et al., 2009). Tbx5 deficient mice exhibit conduction and septation defects, as well as hypoplasia of the left ventricle and atrium (Bruneau et al., 2001; Harrelson et al., 2004).
Tbx2 encodes a T-box factor that has been associated with growth control. TBX2 is over-expressed in melanoma cells (Vance et al., 2005), and is amplified and over-expressed in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutant breast cancer cells (Mahlamaki et al., 2002; Sinclair et al., 2002) and pancreatic cancer cell lines (Mahlamaki et al., 2002). TBX2 has both repressor and activator domains (Abrahams et al., 2010; Paxton et al., 2002) and blocks chamber differentiation by repressing chamber-specific genes (Christoffels et al., 2004). In mice, Tbx2 is expressed in non-chamber myocardium, namely the OFT, AVC, and IFT (Boogerd et al., 2009; Christoffels et al., 2004; Habets et al., 2002). In these areas it blocks chamber differentiation programs, represses proliferation, and thereby generates constrictions between chambers, modulating heart morphogenesis (Abrahams et al., 2010). Tbx2 null embryos die due to cardiovascular defects caused by the absence of AVC, dilated ventricle, and failure of OFT septation, while heterozygotes are viable and fertile (Harrelson et al., 2004).
In zebrafish two tbx2 genes are retained in the genome following gene duplication, designated tbx2a and tbx2b, sharing 79.5% identity. The tbx2a transcripts are detected in the linear heart tube but are subsequently restricted to the AVC and OFT by 42 hpf (Ribeiro et al., 2007). Morpholino mediated knockdown showed looping defects due to the loss of AVC constriction. The tbx2b transcripts were reported at 48 hpf in the embryonic AVC and OFT. The tbx2b morphants also lack the AVC at 40 hpf (Chi et al., 2008). Thus, the requirement for both tbx2 genes in zebrafish AVC development has been well described. However, since tbx2 has been duplicated and retained in zebrafish as two separate genes, it is possible that functions for either gene, in addition to roles in AVC development, might be compensated in loss-of-function experiments by the sister gene. Here we show that both tbx2 genes are expressed in the linear heart tube, and we provide evidence that, in addition to regulating proper AVC formation, Tbx2 is also important, at an earlier stage, for regulating myocardial chamber development.
RESULTS
Transcripts for both tbx2a and tbx2b are expressed in presumptive chamber myocardium
It was reported previously that tbx2a transcripts are expressed throughout the linear heart tube of zebrafish embryos at 31 hpf (Ribeiro et al., 2007). Yet loss-of-function studies for tbx2a showed functions only in the non-myocardial AVC. Alignment of Tbx2a and Tbx2b proteins revealed that they share 79.5% sequence identity (data not shown). We considered that loss-of-function for tbx2a in chambers could be compensated by this closely related sister gene, assuming they are co-expressed. Therefore, we examined and compared the expression patterns of tbx2a and tbx2b during early stages of cardiac development, by in situ hybridization experiments. This revealed that both tbx2a and tbx2b transcripts are expressed throughout the linear heart tube, as detected by in situ hybridization, by 36 hpf (Fig. 1A,C). Both transcript patterns are subsequently restricted to the AVC region by 3 days post fertilization (dpf; Fig. 1B,D). Since expression in the AVC is challenging to visualize at this stage, we confirmed that the restriction is apparent already at 2 dpf, by comparison to the bmp4 transcript pattern that marks the AVC (Fig. 1G-I). Since previous studies of Tbx2 focused only on its function during AVC development, yet both sister genes are expressed earlier in the heart tube, we further investigated a possible role for chamber development.
Blocking expression of both tbx2 genes generates cardiac defects that are different from tbx2a or tbx2b single knockdowns
To best assure efficient and equivalent depletion of both Tbx2 proteins, we took advantage of the high sequence identity for the two genes to design a single antisense morpholino oligomer (MO2ab) predicted to bind to a common sequence near the ATG translation initiation codon for each transcript (Supplemental Fig. S1). To test the efficacy of targeting, chimeric cDNAs were constructed representing each gene, comprised of the 5′ UTR and initial coding region, including the morpholino binding site, fused in frame with GFP. Injection into fertilized eggs of RNA derived from these constructs, encoding Tbx2ab-GFP or Tbx2b-GFP, generates embryos that express high levels of GFP in all tissues. In both cases, co-injection of 2 ng of MO2ab is sufficient to eliminate detectable GFP expression, indicating that MO2ab efficiently binds to both transcripts to effectively block translation (Fig. 2).
The phenotypes of single tbx2a and tbx2b morphants are well documented in the literature (Chi et al., 2008; Ribeiro et al., 2007). We compared the embryonic phenotype caused by injection of MO2ab with morpholinos that target only tbx2a (MO2a) or tbx2b (MO2b). The tbx2ab morphants have hypoplastic eyes and brain, and a shorter AP axis. These phenotypes were previously described in tbx2 morpholino-mediated knockdowns (Fong et al., 2005; Gross and Dowling, 2005) and further verify the effectiveness of the MO2ab morpholino. Like the single morphants, the tbx2ab double morphants also fail to develop a normal AVC, as expected (with an expanded domain of bmp4 expression and morphological disruption noted in the tie2:gfp reporter fish, data not shown). However, with respect to heart development, the tbx2ab morphants develop pericardial edema as early as 24 hpf (Fig. 3A), which becomes more prominent by 2 dpf and 3 dpf (Fig. 3B,C). We compared morphants at 24 hpf for jogging defects. By this time, 95% of wild type embryonic hearts jog to the left. The single tbx2a or tbx2b morphants display heart jogging appropriately to the left side, 94% and 88% of the time, respectively, while this is the case for only 23% of tbx2ab double morphant embryos. Rather, 60% of tbx2ab morphant hearts fail to jog and remain at the midline, and the remaining 17% jog to the right (Fig. 4A). We found no evidence for direct defects in left-right patterning (for example, lefty2 expression is normal, data not shown), suggesting that the jogging defect is caused indirectly by abnormal heart tube morphology. We note that these morphological defects occur earlier than the time we first reliably detect tbx2 transcripts by in situ hybridization. We believe this reflects limitations in the assay. The tbx2 transcripts are readily detected by qPCR in whole embryos by 24 hpf (Supplemental Fig. S2). In addition, we purified using flow cytometry 24 hpf cardiomyocytes from myl7:gfp reporter fish embryos. Using degenerate oligomers we cloned out PCR products predicted to encode the Tbox domain, and found representation of tbx2a and tbx2b in this pool. Finally, we used deep sequencing of 24 hpf purified cardiomyocyte mRNA and verified tbx2a and tbx2b transcripts were readily quantified (BPKM 4.7 and 4.6, respectively). Therefore, the tbx2 genes are expressed in the heart tube cardiomyocytes earlier than we can document by in situ hybridization. Signals below the threshold of in situ hybridization noise may still be functionally relevant. Therefore, depletion of both tbx2 gene products generates morphological defects that are not seen in either single morphant, indicating that they are functionally redundant.
The tbx2ab double morphants have enlarged atria and small ventricles
In order to characterize the apparent morphogenetic defect caused by targeting both tbx2 genes, we repeated the analysis using transgenic myl7:gfp (previously called cmlc2:gfp) reporter fish that express GFP in cardiomyocytes. Compared to control injected or uninjected embryos, at 24 hpf the morphants have normally formed (albeit non-jogging) heart tubes (Fig. 4B,E). By 2 or 3 dpf cardiac chamber defects are obvious; specifically the tbx2ab morphant hearts have an enlarged balloon-like atrium with a smaller ventricle (Fig. 4C,D,F,G). While 132/135 (98%) of wildtype embryos were scored as normal, 110/172 (64%) of tbx2ab morphant embryos have an enlarged atrium and a small ventricle at 3 dpf. This cardiac phenotype is distinct from those described for either tbx2a or tbx2b single morphants, and this was confirmed by our own experiments (Fig. 4H-K). The single morphants exhibit heart tube looping defects due to the lack of AVC formation, but chamber sizes are not grossly affected. We quantified chamber defects comparing tbx2ab double morphants and wildtype embryos by measuring the size of cardiac chambers using embryos derived from the myl7:gfp reporter fish. At 1 dpf there is no difference in size between morphant and wildtype hearts (Fig. 5A, B, E). By 2 dpf morphant atria are twice the size of wildtype stage-matched embryos (Fig. 5A,C,F) and this chamber size difference is maintained at 3 dpf (Fig. 5A,D,G). Ventricular chamber size is not affected in morphant embryos at 2 dpf; however, by 3 dpf morphant ventricles are just over 20% smaller (Fig. 5A,D,G). Therefore, the two tbx2 genes are functionally redundant for regulating chamber size.
The tbx2ab morphants are altered in proliferation of cardiomyocytes
We next used embryos derived from transgenic dsRed:nuc-myl7 reporter fish line to quantify cardiomyocytes in wildtype and morphant hearts, in order to determine if differences in the size of chambers is due to changes in cell number. In embryos from this transgenic line, nuclear RFP expression is readily visible in cardiomyocytes around 2 dpf. At this time, there are approximately 40% fewer cardiomyocytes (average of 104 cells) in the tbx2ab morphant heart tubes compared with wildtype embryos (average of 176 cells; Fig. 6A,B,D). The numbers at 3 dpf are similar, with no significant difference between the numbers of atrial cardiomyocytes in morphant (average of 65 cells) and wildtype embryos (average of 64 cells), while there are 35% fewer ventricular cardiomyocytes in the morphants compared to wildtype embryos (average of 72 and 110 cells, respectively; Fig. 6A,C,E). Because a constriction that delineates the presumptive chambers can be seen at 2 dpf, we repeated the study using an independent set of embryos to evaluate presumptive chamber-specific differences at this early time point. This analysis suggests that the difference in cell numbers can likely be accounted for by a significant deficit in morphant embryos of cardiomyocytes of the presumptive ventricle (average of 84 compared to 114 in wildtype), while cell numbers in the presumptive atrium are not significantly changed (Fig. 7).
The relative decrease in cardiomyocyte number in the morphants does not appear to be due to cell death, since staining by TUNEL or acridine orange showed no increase in labeled cells in the heart (data not shown). We therefore tested if the phenotype could be attributed to defects in cardiomyocyte proliferation. For this purpose, embryos were pulse labeled with BrdU, followed by dual-immunohistochemistry to identify BrdU+ cardiomyocytes, based on co-reactivity to the MF20 antigen. At 32 hpf, the number of double-labeled cells in the tbx2ab morphant embryos is reduced (Fig. 8). This result was confirmed in several independent experiments. Although the exact number of double-positive cells varies depending on BrdU labeling efficiency, there was a consistent statistically significant relative decrease in the double morphants compared to controls. We repeated this assay and co-stained BrdU pulse-labeled embryos with the S46 antibody, which marks specifically the atrial cells. In this case we did not find a statistically significant difference in the double-labeled cells, comparing wildtype and double morphant embryos (Fig. 9). This observation is consistent with our finding that the number of cells in the atrium is not different in the 2 dpf or 3 dpf morphants compared to controls. Therefore, the relative decrease in the number of cardiomyocytes found by 2-3 dpf in the heart tube of tbx2ab morphant embryos appears to be caused by a cell proliferation defect in the presumptive ventricle. By 48 hpf the change in cardiomyocyte number can be fully accounted for by the ventricle, and the data indicates that the two tbx2 genes redundantly regulate cardiomyocyte proliferation at the heart tube stage.
Changes in gene expression of growth factors are consistent with a role for Tbx2 in chamber development
To investigate the molecular mechanism underlying chamber defects seen in the tbx2ab morphant embryos, we used in situ hybridization to examine the expression pattern of cardiac markers. In the tbx2ab morphants, specification of cardiac tissue occurs normally, since the expression patterns for early precardiac markers nkx2.5, gata4, gata5, and gata6 are normal (data not shown). At 24 hpf, the chamber markers myl7 (heart tube), amhc (presumptive atrial), and vmhc (presumptive ventricular) are expressed in morphant embryos similar to wildtype, except that the patterns now reflect morphological changes. Therefore, the rostral region of the heart tube that will form the ventricle (indicated by myl7 and vmhc) is smaller, while the caudal pre-atrial pattern indicated by myl7 and amhc is broadened (Supplemental Fig. S3). In contrast, based on these markers the morphology of tbx2a or tbx2b single morphants is undisturbed (Fig. S3). Although specification appears to be normal, we evaluated whether normal proportions of chamber-specific progenitors are present at pre-heart tube stages. Expression domains at the 19.5 hpf cardiac cone stage for chamber-specific markers amhc and vmhc are not changed in morphants compared to controls (Supplemental Fig. S4). The morphology of the amhc pattern is slightly disturbed, but the staining area is normal, and notably the vmhc patterns are indistinguishable. The data is consistent with an interpretation of the heart tube phenotype caused by disturbed morphology and not defects in chamber progenitor cell numbers.
The nppa gene (natriuretic peptide precursor a, formerly known as anf, atrial natriuretic factor) is expressed in the outer curvature (OC) of myocardium. Transcript levels for nppa are enhanced in the OC of haf mutants (lacking Vmhc protein and ventricular contractility), and this leads to increased cell surface area (Auman et al., 2007). Since the tbx2ab morphants have enlarged atria, but with normal cell numbers, we tested if nppa gene expression is altered. In situ hybridization experiments suggest that as early as 24 hpf the tbx2a morphants have increased expression of nppa in the atrial region, compared to wildtype embryos (Supplemental Fig. S5). However, the pattern in the double morphant already suggests a morphological change in the presumptive atrium. It is possible that this reflects a developmental delay in heart tube formation, although the morphology does not recover; in other words, at later times the double morphants do not display a normal 24 hpf heart tube. At any rate, this apparent increase in nppa expression levels in the tbx2a morphant is not maintained by 48 hpf (data not shown, but see qPCR data below), while in the double morphants by 48 hpf the expression pattern of nppa shows a disturbed atrial morphology (Fig. 10).
Based on the reduction in the size and cell number of the ventricular cardiomyocytes, we also analyzed ndrg4 expression in the tbx2ab morphants compared to wildtype embryos. Ndrg4 (N-myc downstream regulated gene 4) is a member of the NDRG family of proteins that regulate cellular differentiation. The ndrg4 gene is expressed throughout the linear heart tube at low levels and by 48 hpf is mainly restricted to the ventricle. Loss of ndrg4 leads to a loss of myocardial cell numbers due to proliferation defects (Qu et al., 2008). Analysis by in situ hybridization of tbx2ab morphants at 48 hpf suggests a clear decrease in the ndrg4 transcript levels compared to wildtype embryos (Fig. 10). We carried out qPCR experiments to compare nppa and ndrg4 transcript levels at 1, 2, and 3 dpf. This verified that by 3 dpf the expression levels of nppa RNA are increased nearly 4-fold in tbx2ab morphants, which is significantly higher than found for either single morphant at that stage (Fig. 11). However, the qPCR data shows a similar increase in nppa levels in the tbx2a single morphants at 24 hpf (consistent with the in situ hybridization data, Fig. S5). Furthermore, although not maintained, both single morphants have higher transcript levels compared to wildtype by 3dpf (albeit significantly lower levels than the double morphant). These observations indicate that both genes can affect nppa levels, but that they also at least partially compensate for each other. The qPCR data documents a 2-fold relative decrease in ndrg4 transcript levels for the double morphant at 3 dpf compared to wildtype (Fig. 11). Again, depletion of either single gene product causes a similar change in ndrg4 transcript levels at earlier stages (in this case, a decrease) but this change compared to wildtype is only maintained by 3 dpf in the double morphants, suggesting again that the genes eventually compensate for each other. In summary, two growth factor genes known to regulate chamber growth may be regulated by both tbx2a and tbx2b, but each gene can compensate for loss of its sister gene product, which could explain at least in part why chamber abnormalities are only revealed by examining the double morphant embryos.
DISCUSSION
Functions for Tbx2 during non-chamber myocardial development are well established. In mice, Tbx2 is normally repressed by Tbx20, thereby establishing the boundary between proliferating chamber myocardium and the AVC (Cai et al., 2005; Singh et al., 2005; Stennard et al., 2005). Mis-expression of Tbx2 in the heart causes a block to chamber development. Likewise, over-expression of human TBX2 in zebrafish by injection of mRNA causes lack of chamber growth and disrupted looping (Ribeiro et al., 2007). However, gain-of-function approaches can in principle mask additional developmental roles that are stage-specific. We note that our results are not contradictory to the published literature, which documents clearly that tbx2 is eventually restricted to non-chamber myocardium and in this context it clearly can repress proliferation. However, the previous studies evaluated tbx2 function at a different developmental stage than we report here. Our work demonstrates that the expression patterns for tbx2 genes is dynamic in the zebrafish, since both genes are expressed at low but readily quantifiable levels in cardiomyocytes at 24 hpf. However, by 48 hpf, the gene expression patterns become restricted to the presumptive AVC and Tbx2 inhibits cell proliferation at this time and place. Our results suggest that for zebrafish, in addition to repressing myocardial development in the AVC, tbx2 also regulates an earlier stage of chamber development by promoting cardiomyocyte proliferation and regulating chamber size. Our study benefits by the fact that zebrafish have two distinct tbx2 genes due to a genome-wide duplication event. During the course of evolution, the function of tbx2 was shared between these two genes. Both genes have a similar expression pattern in the embryonic heart. In addition to their previously established expression in the AVC, they are also expressed early throughout myocardium of the linear heart tube. Knockdown of both tbx2 genes leads to cardiac chamber size defects.
Tbx2 appears to regulate atrial and ventricular chamber development in different ways. In the developing ventricle tbx2 promotes cell proliferation, so that when both gene products are depleted below a threshold the ventricle is smaller due to fewer cardiomyocytes, which can be attributed to decreased proliferation. This is consistent with previous studies that associate Tbx2 with growth control. One mechanism by which tbx2 could regulate ventricular development is by activating expression of ndrg4, a gene involved in cell proliferation and differentiation. The ndrg4 promoter has putative T-box binding sites, and so tbx2 might regulate ndrg4 directly. Although ndrg4 transcript levels are relatively reduced in the double morphants by 3 dpf, it is not clear if this is functionally relevant to the ventricular phenotype, since at earlier stages ndrg4 transcript levels are also reduced in either single morphant. There may be a developmental window particularly sensitive to ndrg4 expression levels, and the gene might also be regulated at the post-transcriptional level. However, forced expression of nrdg4 by RNA injection was not sufficient to rescue the ventricular phenotype (data not shown) so there are likely to be other, perhaps more relevant, tbx2ab targets required for normal ventricular cell proliferation. In contrast, in the developing atrium, tbx2 restricts atrial size. This could be achieved by regulating cardiomyocyte cell size, consistent with the fact that atria in the tbx2ab morphants are enlarged, yet the cell number is normal. However, an equally plausible explanation is that cell shape is altered, for example cells may be flattened due to physiological forces or from stretch placed upon the atrium. Alterations in hemodynamic forces, for example caused by weakened contractility or reduced blood flow from a shortened ventricle, could affect the chamber morphology. Our attempts at higher resolution morphometrics were not conclusive. However, the change is associated in the morphants with an expanded domain and increased levels of transcripts encoding nppa, as early as 24 hpf. Whether this reflects a direct or indirect mechanism is unclear, but Tbx2 can form a complex in vitro with Nkx2.5 and repress nppa promoter activity (Habets et al., 2002). In summary, our experiments targeting simultaneously the depletion of both zebrafish tbx2 genes has shown that, in addition to a key role in AVC development, the two tbx2 genes encode an earlier and functionally redundant activity for regulating myocardial chamber development by promoting ventricular cell proliferation and restricting atrial chamber size. The previously described role of tbx2 in AVC development appears to be conserved with mammals. Although not described, an earlier function for TBX genes in heart chambers could be conserved in mammals, if, as in zebrafish, Tbx2 functions redundantly with a closely related sister gene, for example Tbx3.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Fish strains and microinjection
Zebrafish embryos were maintained at 28°C and staged as described (Westerfield, 1995). Wildtype fish are hybrids derived from a cross between AB and TU strains. The myl7:dsRed-nuc strain was kindly provided by Nathalia Holtzman.
Morpholinos and micro-injections
Morpholinos were designed to block translation or splicing and were obtained from the manufacturer, GeneTools, Inc. The MO2b (Gross and Dowling, 2005) morpholino was previously validated in the published studies and was confirmed to be effective when injected at 6 ng per embryo. A morpholino to tbx2a was validated in published studies (Ribeiro et al., 2007) and this was phenocopied by MO2a (GATCCAGTTTTCACAGCGAACGCTA). The MO2a oligomer has significant mis-match with the tbx2b sequence (Fig. S2) and was used at 4 ng. The MO2ab (ATGCACCGATGAGAGATCCAGTTTT) is 100% matched to both tbx2a and tbx2b transcripts and gave reproducible and consistent results when injected at 2ng/embryo.
Generation of chimeric RNAs
The following oligomers were designed to span the MO2ab binding sequence present in both genes. In addition the tbx2a sequence also contains the binding site for the specific MO2a site.
tbx2aF: 5′-AATTCggatgcaccgatgagagatccagttttcacagcgaacgctatggcGGTAC
tbx2aR: 5′-CgccatagcgttcgctgtgaaaactggatctctcatcggtgcatccG
tbx2bF: 5′-AATTCgtttgttggatgcaccgatgagagatccagtttttacaggGGTAC
tbx2bR: 5′-CcctgtaaaaactggatctctcatcggtgcatccaacaaacG
After annealing, each pair was cloned into the pEGFP-1 expression vector that was digested with EcoRI and KpnI, placing GFP in frame with the translation initiation sites. Inserts were transferred using XhoI and (blunted) NotI into the pCS2 expression vector (XhoI and SnaBI digested). RNA was generated in vitro using the Ambion SP6 mMessage protocol.
in situ hybridization
Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed essentially as described (Alexander et al., 1998). Briefly, embryos were treated with 0.003% phenylthiourea (PTU) to prevent pigmentation. After fixation, embryos older than 24 hours were treated with 10 μg/ml proteinase K. Hybridization was performed at 70C, in 57% formamide buffer with digoxigenin-labeled RNA anti-sense probes. The probes used for in situ hybridization were prepared using either Sp6 or T7 polymerase and linearized templates. Antisense probes have been described for myl7, amhc, and vmhc (Reiter et al., 1999). To generate a probe for nppa, the following primers were used to isolate a 420 bp fragment from embryonic cDNA: nppaF: 5′-AGAGATGGCCGGGGGACTAA and nppaR: 5′-CCGAGGGTGCTGGAAGAC. The product was sub-cloned into the TOPO vector and antisense probe generated using Sp6 polymerase following EcoRV digestion. A full-length cDNA clone for ndrg4 was purchased from OpenBiosystems (clone ID 7049397, accession number BC116615). The pExpress-1 vector was linearized with EcoRI and used to generate antisense probe using T7 polymerase.
BrdU assay
20mM BrdU/15% DMSO in E3 buffer solution (2 nl) was injected into the pericardial cavity of tricaine anesthetized embryos. Embryos were placed into fish system water and incubated at 28.5C for 1.5 hours. Embryos were then de-yolked and fixed in 4% PFA for 2 hours, transferred to methanol and stored at -20C overnight. Embryos were rehydrated in methanol:PBST (3:1, 1:1, 1:3) and twice in PBST for 5 min each. Embryos were subsequently treated with 10μg/ml proteinase K for 10 min, washed twice in PBST and fixed in 4% PFA for 20 min at room temperature. Embryos were washed 3 times in H20, twice with 2N HCl, and incubated for 1 hour in HCl at room temperature. They were rinsed 5-7 times with PBST and blocked for 30 min (0.2% Roche blocking reagent, 10% fetal bovine serum, and 1% DMSO in PBST) followed by incubation with 1:100 dilution of Anti-BrdU-Fluorescein monoclonal antibody (Roche) and 1:20 dilution of MF20 antibody (Iowa Hybridoma Bank) for 2 hour at room temperature in blocking solution. They were then washed 5 times with PBST for 10 min each and incubated with a 1:500 dilution of secondary anti-mouse IgG2b antibody (Alexa fluor 568) in PBST solution at 4C overnight. Finally, they were washed 5 times with PBST 10 min each and stored at 4C in the dark. The S46 antibody was also obtained from the Iowa Hybridoma Bank and used at 1:50 concentration. In this case the anti-BrdU IgG2a monoclonal antibody from TheromoScientific was used at a 1:100 dilution and secondary antibodies were AlexaFluor® 488 goat anti-mouse IgG2a and AlexaFluor® 568 goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Invitrogen), both used at 1:500 dilution. Embryos were positioned in methylcellulose for imaging.
Heart measurements
The myl7:gfp morphant and control embryos were anesthetized in tricaine until hearts stopped beating, positioned in methylcellulose and photographed under fluorescence. Because the embryos were tricaine-overdosed the hearts are considered to be in diastole. The area comprising cardiac chambers was outlined and measured using Zeiss AxioVision4.8 software. To count cardiomyocytes, myl7:dsRed-nuc control or morpholino-injected embryos were flat mounted on standard microscope slides. Z-stack sections of hearts were imaged in order to visualize and manually count all cardiomyocyte nuclei.
Quantitative RT/PCR
RNA was isolated from approximately 25 embryos using a Qiagen RNeasy mini kit and cDNA was synthesized using the Qiagen SuperscriptRT III kit. The cDNA was diluted 1:20 in qPCR reactions using the Roche SyberGreen kit. Samples that were analyzed on a Roche light cycler 480 instrument and test genes normalized to the 18s ribosomal RNA gene transcripts. All samples were prepared in triplicate, and each experiment was repeated at least 3 times using independent batches of embryos. The PCR cycle conditions were 95C for 5 minutes, (94C for 10 seconds, 55C for 10 seconds, and 72C for 10 seconds) for 40 cycles. The Ct value data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).
The following primers were used for qPCR:
18sF: TCGCTAGTTGGCATCGTTTATG
18sR: CGGAGGTTCGAAGACGATCA
nppaF: ACAGAGACCGAGAGGAAGCA
nppaR: CTTCGGGTCGACAATAGGAG
ndrg4F: TTGAGTGCAATTCCAAGCTG
ndrg4R: GTGTGATCTGAGGCATTCCA
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to Bernice Morrow and her laboratory for assistance in the design and testing of tbx2 morpholinos. We also thank Nathalia Holtzman for providing the myl7:dsRed-nuc reporter strain. We thank Gabriel Rosenfeld for providing unpublished RNA-sequencing data from purified 24 hpf cardiomyocytes. Kellie McCartin provided outstanding fish husbandry. We also thank Bernice Morrow, Rick Kitsis, Nick Sibinga, Florence Marlow, and members of the Evans laboratory for helpful comments during the course of these studies.
Grant Sponsor: National Institutes of Health, HL064282
REFERENCES
- Abrahams A, Parker MI, Prince S. The T-box transcription factor Tbx2: its role in development and possible implication in cancer. IUBMB Life. 2010;62:92–102. doi: 10.1002/iub.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alexander J, Stainier DY, Yelon D. Screening mosaic F1 females for mutations affecting zebrafish heart induction and patterning. Dev Genet. 1998;22:288–299. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1998)22:3<288::AID-DVG10>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Auman HJ, Coleman H, Riley HE, Olale F, Tsai HJ, Yelon D. Functional modulation of cardiac form through regionally confined cell shape changes. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e53. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bakkers J, Verhoeven MC, Abdelilah-Seyfried S. Shaping the zebrafish heart: from left-right axis specification to epithelial tissue morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2009;330:213–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boogerd CJ, Moorman AF, Barnett P. Protein interactions at the heart of cardiac chamber formation. Ann Anat. 2009;191:505–517. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruneau BG, Nemer G, Schmitt JP, Charron F, Robitaille L, Caron S, Conner DA, Gessler M, Nemer M, Seidman CE, Seidman JG. A murine model of Holt-Oram syndrome defines roles of the T-box transcription factor Tbx5 in cardiogenesis and disease. Cell. 2001;106:709–721. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00493-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cai CL, Zhou W, Yang L, Bu L, Qyang Y, Zhang X, Li X, Rosenfeld MG, Chen J, Evans S. T-box genes coordinate regional rates of proliferation and regional specification during cardiogenesis. Development. 2005;132:2475–2487. doi: 10.1242/dev.01832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapman DL, Garvey N, Hancock S, Alexiou M, Agulnik SI, Gibson-Brown JJ, Cebra-Thomas J, Bollag RJ, Silver LM, Papaioannou VE. Expression of the T-box family genes, Tbx1-Tbx5, during early mouse development. Dev Dyn. 1996;206:379–390. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199608)206:4<379::AID-AJA4>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chi NC, Shaw RM, De Val S, Kang G, Jan LY, Black BL, Stainier DY. Foxn4 directly regulates tbx2b expression and atrioventricular canal formation. Genes Dev. 2008;22:734–739. doi: 10.1101/gad.1629408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christoffels VM, Hoogaars WM, Tessari A, Clout DE, Moorman AF, Campione M. T-box transcription factor Tbx2 represses differentiation and formation of the cardiac chambers. Dev Dyn. 2004;229:763–770. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fong SH, Emelyanov A, Teh C, Korzh V. Wnt signalling mediated by Tbx2b regulates cell migration during formation of the neural plate. Development. 2005;132:3587–3596. doi: 10.1242/dev.01933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gross JM, Dowling JE. Tbx2b is essential for neuronal differentiation along the dorsal/ventral axis of the zebrafish retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:4371–4376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501061102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Habets PE, Moorman AF, Clout DE, van Roon MA, Lingbeek M, van Lohuizen M, Campione M, Christoffels VM. Cooperative action of Tbx2 and Nkx2.5 inhibits ANF expression in the atrioventricular canal: implications for cardiac chamber formation. Genes Dev. 2002;16:1234–1246. doi: 10.1101/gad.222902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrelson Z, Kelly RG, Goldin SN, Gibson-Brown JJ, Bollag RJ, Silver LM, Papaioannou VE. Tbx2 is essential for patterning the atrioventricular canal and for morphogenesis of the outflow tract during heart development. Development. 2004;131:5041–5052. doi: 10.1242/dev.01378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoogaars WM, Barnett P, Moorman AF, Christoffels VM. T-box factors determine cardiac design. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:646–660. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-6518-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joziasse IC, van de Smagt JJ, Smith K, Bakkers J, Sieswerda GJ, Mulder BJ, Doevendans PA. Genes in congenital heart disease: atrioventricular valve formation. Basic Res Cardiol. 2008;103:216–227. doi: 10.1007/s00395-008-0713-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klopocki E, Neumann LM, Tonnies H, Ropers HH, Mundlos S, Ullmann R. Ulnar-mammary syndrome with dysmorphic facies and mental retardation caused by a novel 1.28 Mb deletion encompassing the TBX3 gene. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14:1274–1279. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li QY, Newbury-Ecob RA, Terrett JA, Wilson DI, Curtis AR, Yi CH, Gebuhr T, Bullen PJ, Robson SC, Strachan T, Bonnet D, Lyonnet S, Young ID, Raeburn JA, Buckler AJ, Law DJ, Brook JD. Holt-Oram syndrome is caused by mutations in TBX5, a member of the Brachyury (T) gene family. Nat Genet. 1997;15:21–29. doi: 10.1038/ng0197-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu CX, Shen AD, Li XF, Jiao WW, Bai S, Yuan F, Guan XL, Zhang XG, Zhang GR, Li ZZ. Association of TBX5 gene polymorphism with ventricular septal defect in the Chinese Han population. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009;122:30–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahlamaki EH, Barlund M, Tanner M, Gorunova L, Hoglund M, Karhu R, Kallioniemi A. Frequent amplification of 8q24, 11q, 17q, and 20q-specific genes in pancreatic cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2002;35:353–358. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merscher S, Funke B, Epstein JA, Heyer J, Puech A, Lu MM, Xavier RJ, Demay MB, Russell RG, Factor S, Tokooya K, Jore BS, Lopez M, Pandita RK, Lia M, Carrion D, Xu H, Schorle H, Kobler JB, Scambler P, Wynshaw-Boris A, Skoultchi AI, Morrow BE, Kucherlapati R. TBX1 is responsible for cardiovascular defects in velo-cardio-facial/DiGeorge syndrome. Cell. 2001;104:619–629. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00247-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paxton C, Zhao H, Chin Y, Langner K, Reecy J. Murine Tbx2 contains domains that activate and repress gene transcription. Gene. 2002;283:117–124. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00878-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qu X, Jia H, Garrity DM, Tompkins K, Batts L, Appel B, Zhong TP, Baldwin HS. Ndrg4 is required for normal myocyte proliferation during early cardiac development in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2008;317:486–496. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reiter JF, Alexander J, Rodaway A, Yelon D, Patient R, Holder N, Stainier DY. Gata5 is required for the development of the heart and endoderm in zebrafish. Genes and Dev. 1999;13:2983–2995. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.22.2983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro I, Kawakami Y, Buscher D, Raya A, Rodriguez-Leon J, Morita M, Rodriguez Esteban C, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Tbx2 and Tbx3 regulate the dynamics of cell proliferation during heart remodeling. PLoS One. 2007;2:e398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schoenebeck JJ, Yelon D. Illuminating cardiac development: Advances in imaging add new dimensions to the utility of zebrafish genetics. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007;18:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sinclair CS, Adem C, Naderi A, Soderberg CL, Johnson M, Wu K, Wadum L, Couch VL, Sellers TA, Schaid D, Slezak J, Fredericksen Z, Ingle JN, Hartmann L, Jenkins RB, Couch FJ. TBX2 is preferentially amplified in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast tumors. Cancer Res. 2002;62:3587–3591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh MK, Christoffels VM, Dias JM, Trowe MO, Petry M, Schuster-Gossler K, Burger A, Ericson J, Kispert A. Tbx20 is essential for cardiac chamber differentiation and repression of Tbx2. Development. 2005;132:2697–2707. doi: 10.1242/dev.01854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stennard FA, Costa MW, Lai D, Biben C, Furtado MB, Solloway MJ, McCulley DJ, Leimena C, Preis JI, Dunwoodie SL, Elliott DE, Prall OW, Black BL, Fatkin D, Harvey RP. Murine T-box transcription factor Tbx20 acts as a repressor during heart development, and is essential for adult heart integrity, function and adaptation. Development. 2005;132:2451–2462. doi: 10.1242/dev.01799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vance KW, Carreira S, Brosch G, Goding CR. Tbx2 is overexpressed and plays an important role in maintaining proliferation and suppression of senescence in melanomas. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2260–2268. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Westerfield M. The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) University Of Oregon Press; Eugene, OR: 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Yamagishi H, Maeda J, Hu T, McAnally J, Conway SJ, Kume T, Meyers EN, Yamagishi C, Srivastava D. Tbx1 is regulated by tissue-specific forkhead proteins through a common Sonic hedgehog-responsive enhancer. Genes Dev. 2003;17:269–281. doi: 10.1101/gad.1048903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yelon D. Cardiac patterning and morphogenesis in zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2001;222:552–563. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zaffran S, Frasch M. Early signals in cardiac development. Circ Res. 2002;91:457–469. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000034152.74523.a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.