Abstract
Ninjurins are conserved transmembrane proteins that are upregulated across species in response to injury and stress. Their biological functions are not understood, in part because there have been few in vivo studies of their function. We analyzed the expression and function of one of three Drosophila Ninjurins, NijA. We found that NijA protein is redistributed to the cell surface in larval immune tissues after septic injury and is upregulated by the Toll pathway. We generated a null mutant of NijA, which displayed no detectable phenotype. In ectopic expression studies, NijA induced cell death, as evidenced by cell loss and acridine orange staining. These dying cells did not display hallmarks of apoptotic cells including TUNEL staining and inhibition by p35, indicating that NijA induced nonapoptotic cell death. In cell culture, NijA also induced cell death, which appeared to be cell autonomous. These in vivo studies identify a new role for the Ninjurin family in inducing nonapoptotic cell death.
Introduction
Ninjurins are a conserved family of transmembrane proteins first identified by upregulation in injured rat nerves [1]. There are two Ninjurin family members in mammals, Ninjurin1 and Ninjurin2 [2], and three in Drosophila, Ninjurin A, B, and C [3]. Ninjurins are small proteins of ∼16–27 kDa, with an N-terminal ectodomain and two predicted transmembrane domains near the C-terminal end. In humans, mice, and Drosophila, Ninjurin transcripts are upregulated upon injury, infection, or stress suggesting that not just their structure but also their function is conserved [1], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] (and see supplemental data in [10], [11], ).
Although little is known about the functions of Ninjurins, many studies have implicated them as adhesion molecules, either directly through homophilic binding on the cell surface [1], [13], [14], [15] or by regulating adhesion via their ectodomain [3]; yet these adhesion studies have been limited to cell culture models. In vivo, some data suggests that Ninjurin1 may promote hyaloid vasculature regression in mouse embryos, as neutralizing antibodies against Ninjurin1 delay this regression, although the relationship between Ninjurin1 and cell death in vivo is unclear from these studies [14]. To our knowledge, no Ninjurin mutants or knock-outs have been reported in any organism.
In this study, we show that Ninjurin A (NijA) protein responds to septic injury in a developmentally regulated manner, as whole-animal levels increase in adults but not in larvae. Rather, in larvae the protein distribution is altered in immune tissues after injury, and NijA protein levels can be elevated via the Tl immune signaling pathway, suggesting that NijA may function in the immune system. We generated several deletion mutants of NijA including a molecular null allele but no phenotype was observed in these animals. In a gain-of-function approach, however, we found that NijA induced cell death at a level comparable to the known apoptotic gene hid, yet the NijA-induced death does not have the hallmarks of apoptosis. From cell culture studies, we conclude that NijA is likely to induce cell death in a cell-autonomous manner, rather than as a nonautonomous signaling molecule.
Results
NijA distribution is regulated in larval immune tissues
Ninjurin A (NijA) is one of three Drosophila Ninjurin family members, and genome-wide analyses have indicated that its transcript is upregulated between 3–12 fold upon septic injury in adults or immune challenge in cultured cells [5], [10], [11]. Using a polyclonal antibody we made to the N-terminal peptide of NijA [3], we determined by western blotting that the protein levels in whole adults increase 2 h after septic injury by about two-fold, verifying the microarray studies (Fig. 1A,B). In contrast, in larvae treated with septic injuries, we did not observe an increase in NijA protein in lysates from whole animals in each of six replicates (Fig. 1C, left lanes). Because western blots of whole larvae might obscure changes in tissue-specific expression or protein localization, we compared NijA protein by immunohistochemistry in tissues from untreated larvae or larvae 2 h after septic wounding. We examined three candidate larval tissues that respond to septic wounding: fat body, hemocytes (immune cells of the blood), and epidermal wound sites. There was no change in NijA at the site of injury at the wound site (data not shown). Fat bodies are known to be heterogeneous across the tissue [16], so we reduced the variability by examining only the cells surrounding the testis; in this area NijA protein distribution was clearly altered after septic wounding in 4/4 fat bodies compared to 6 unwounded (Fig. 1E–G; p = 0.0048, Fisher's exact test). Blood cells were examined ex vivo, and NijA staining was altered in 9/9 samples of blood cells after septic wounding compared to 9 unwounded (Fig. 1H,I; p = 4.1×10−5, Fisher's exact test). In both fat and blood cells, there was a marked increase in NijA localized to the cell surface, easily observed in unpermeabilized tissue since our antibody recognizes an extracellular epitope of the NijA transmembrane protein [3]. Thus NijA protein responds to septic injury in both adults and larvae.
Since fat body and blood cells are both Drosophila immune organs [17], we asked whether the immune regulator Tl was capable of regulating NijA [18]. We found that whole larvae with the constitutively active Tl10b mutation have higher levels of NijA protein, even in the absence of injury (Fig. 1C, D). Anti-NijA immunostaining of the fat body indicated that NijA levels were increased in this tissue in 9/9 Tl10b mutants compared to wild type (Fig. 1K–M; p = 4.1×10−5, Fisher's exact test), and this Tl-mediated upregulation appears to increase NijA levels at the cell surface. The sufficiency of Tl to upregulate NijA in larvae is consistent with the microarray findings of De Gregorio et al that spz flies, which cannot activate the Tl pathway, also cannot upregulate NijA; in contrast, larvae mutant for the Imd pathway were able to upregulate NijA like wild type [11]. The regulation of NijA by the Tl pathway, combined with its relocalization after septic injury in the immune tissues of the blood and fat body, suggest that NijA functions in the immune system of larvae.
NijA is not required for viability
To understand the functional requirements for NijA, we made a deletion mutant by excising a P element at the genomic locus. Three imprecise excisions were generated that removed part of the NijA coding sequence: D3, E1, and F9 (Fig. 2A). The D3 allele removed the 5′ UTR and most of the coding region including the last internal methionine, suggesting that D3 may be a null allele. To determine whether there was internal translation of the 3′ remnant of the gene in the D3 allele, we performed quantitative PCR on the fourth exon, present in the D3 allele, comparing its transcription level to the third exon, deleted from the D3 allele and acting as a negative control. We found no transcription of either the third or fourth exon, confirming that the D3 allele is a null (Fig. 2B). NijAD3 homozygous mutants were viable and fertile with no obvious developmental abnormalities (data not shown). Thus NijA is not required for viability.
To examine the role of NijA in the immune system, we tested viability of NijAD3 homozygous mutants after wounding or infection with gram positive or negative bacteria, but found no differences in survival or melanization (Supporting Information S1 and data not shown). The ability of NijAD3 mutants to mount an antimicrobial peptide response after septic injury was examined by measuring Drosomycin (Drs) or Drosocin (Dro), both targets of the Tl pathway [18]. Both antimicrobial peptides were elevated in the NijAD3 mutant in a manner not significantly different from wild type (Supporting Information S2 A,B). To further assess a potential role for NijA in Tl signaling, we performed an epistasis test to ask whether NijA is required for the upregulation of a Tl pathway target when Tl is genetically activated by mutation in the fat body (by driving Tl10b with the c564-GAL4 driver). Examining the levels of Drs, we found that Drs elevation was similar after septic wounding of wild type or genetic activation of Tl10b in the fat body, and these levels were not affected by the NijAD3 mutation in Tl10b NijA double mutants (Supporting Information S2C). To examine the cellular immune response we assayed phagocytosis and found that the capacity of hemocytes or S2 cells to phagocytose labeled E. coli did not depend on NijA, although hemocyte phagocytosis was sensitive to a dominant locus on the NijAD3 chromosome (Supporting Information S3). Similarly, a dominant locus on the NijAD3 chromosome obscured our ability to assess a homozygous mutant phenotype in response to starvation (Supporting Information S4). Thus we were unable to identify a function for NijA using loss-of-function approaches.
Ectopic expression of NijA induces nonapoptotic cell death
Because NijA is upregulated on septic injury, we focused on analyzing its function by ectopically upregulating NijA using the GAL4/UAS system for a gain-of-function approach. Under the ubiquitously expressed tubulin and actin drivers, we found that embryos died with morphological abnormalities around the time of cellularization (data not shown), which is also when zygotic transcription begins [19], [20]. Lethality was also observed when we expressed NijA with A58-GAL4 in the larval epidermis [21] or in most blood cells with He-Gal4 [22] (data not shown). Attempts to control the onset of lethality by using the conditional GAL80ts inhibitor [23] or the inducible GeneSwitch-GAL4 driver [24] both failed because even under restrictive conditions (18° or absence of RU486, respectively) leaky expression of NijA still caused lethality (data not shown). We expressed NijA in a tissue not required for viability, the eye, with GMR-GAL4 and ey-GAL4; to our surprise, NijA expression with each driver was pupal lethal (Table 1 and data not shown). Expression of NijA with hml-GAL4, expressed in differentiated blood cells of the larval lymph gland and in circulation [25], [26], was not lethal and allowed us to ask about the cellular consequences of NijA overexpression.
Table 1. Organismal death resulting from GMR-driven expression of a cell-death gene is not dependent on the gene acting non-autonomously.
# GMR>UAS | Expected | ||
cross | progeny observed | Mendelian # | X2 value |
if viable | |||
GMR-GAL4/CyO | |||
x | 3/338 (0.89%) | 85.5/338 (25%) | 104.8 (p<0.001) |
UAS-NijA/TM3 | |||
GMR-GAL4/CyO | |||
x | 3/175 (1.7%) | 58.3/175 (33%) | 78.7 (p<0.001) |
UAS-hid/CyO |
Hml expressing cells, visualized by Hml>GFP, can be observed under the cuticle of whole third instar larvae (Fig. 3A,B); however, when NijA is co-expressed, the cells appear to be absent (Fig. 3C). To compare the effects of NijA to a known apoptosis inducer, we drove the expression of hid with hml-GAL4, and found a similar loss of GFP-labeled cells (Fig. 3D). The similarity of these results suggested that NijA induces cell death in differentiated blood cells. We confirmed by quantitative Western blotting that GFP was absent from animals co-expressing GFP and either NijA or hid (Fig. 3E,F). This lack of GFP indicated that larvae were missing nearly all Hml-expressing cells, both in circulation and in the lymph gland, the site of hematopoiesis in larvae.
We examined dissected lymph glands expressing NijA. Although 7/7 control (hml>GFP) lymph glands did not stain with acridine orange, which can only permeate dead cells, in contrast all lymph glands expressing either NijA or the apoptosis inducer hid stained brightly with acridine orange (7 of each genotype, compare Fig. 3G–I′). The dying cells appeared to be restricted to differentiated cells that express hml, as undifferentiated hemocytes expressing hemese but not hml were still present in lymph glands expressing hml>NijA or hml>hid (Fig. 2J–L). We were able to detect little to no GFP signal with an anti-GFP antibody in the lymph glands of hml>NijA,GFP or hml>hid,GFP animals (Fig. 3J′–L′), consistent with the dramatic decrease in GFP expression in whole animals by western blot analysis (Fig. 3E–F). Interestingly, NijA was not required for developmentally regulated apoptosis, however, as apoptosis in the stage 10 embryonic head region occurs normally in a NijAD3 mutant with no zygotic or maternal NijA (Supporting Information S5). Thus NijA induces cell death when ectopically expressed.
To examine whether NijA induces cell death via apoptosis, we examined lymph glands by TUNEL staining, a nuclear label for apoptotic cells. We compared lymph glands expressing GFP and NijA to glands expressing only the GFP marker as a negative control, and to glands expressing GFP and the apoptosis-inducer hid as a positive control. We counted the number of TUNEL positive nuclei in primary lymph gland lobes: fewer than 30 nuclei was considered background, and more than 30 (often uncountable) was considered apoptotic. By these criteria, we found that 10/11 hid-expressing lymph glands were apoptotic, whereas 22/23 GFP lymph glands were TUNEL-negative and 9/13 NijA-expressing lymph glands were TUNEL-negative (Fig. 3J″–L″). The penetrance of apoptosis in NijA lymph glands is significantly different from hid lymph glands by Fisher's exact test (p = 0.004). Some of the unexpected variability in our NijA overexpressing lymph glands may be an artifact of our cut-offs, as 3 of the 4 NijA expressing lymph glands scored as “apoptotic” qualitatively appeared to have fewer TUNEL positive cells than the hid expressing glands; another possibility is that there is significant cross-talk between cell death pathways (see Discussion).
As a second independent assay to assess whether NijA induces apoptotic or nonapoptotic cell death, we co-expressed NijA with p35, an apoptotic inhibitor that blocks cell death when co-expressed with reaper or hid [27], [28]. Examining GFP-labeled hemocytes in live animals, we found that p35 inhibited Hid-induced cell death as expected, but importantly p35 did not inhibit NijA-induced cell death (Fig. 3M–P). Our data indicate that NijA induces a nonapoptotic form of cell death, as dying cells do not label with TUNEL and cell death is not inhibited by p35.
NijA appears to kill cells in a cell-autonomous manner
Because the expression of NijA in the eye with ey-GAL4 or GMR-GAL4 was lethal to the animal, we asked whether this phenotype represented tissue nonautonomous cell death, i.e., if NijA expressed in the eye disc was effectively instructing tissues outside the eye to die. Alternatively, it was possible that even the autonomous destruction of a large tissue may release toxic factors that could cause animal lethality. To determine if we could assess tissue autonomy in this assay, we expressed hid, which is known to be an autonomous cell-death gene [27] also under GMR-GAL4 and found that the overexpression of hid caused organismal lethality with very few escapers (Table 1 and data not shown). Either GMR-GAL4 is not eye-specific or the massive developmentally-inappropriate induction of cell death is sufficient to cause organismal death; in either case this assay cannot indicate the autonomy of NijA-induced cell death.
As another means to assess the autonomy of NijA-induced cell death, we turned to cell culture. We previously reported that when overexpressed in cultured Drosophila S2 cells, NijA inhibits cell adhesion in a nonautonomous manner within a few hours of its induction. This NijA-mediated phenotype was dependent on the activity of the protease Mmp1, and the NijA ectodomain was sufficient to release adhesion even when Mmp1 proteolysis was inhibited [3]. We revisited these experiments and found that when S2 cells express NijA for longer periods, the cells died as measured by trypan blue exclusion: after 24 h, 20.2% of cell had died (not shown), and after 48 hours 33% of cells had died, a significant increase over the background death rate of about 9% in non-expressing cells (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, like in whole flies, NijA was not required for apoptosis, as the apoptosis-inducer actinomycin D [29], [30] was able to induce death at similar levels in wild-type and NijA knock-down cells (Fig. 4C,D), indicating that NijA is not an essential component of the cell death machinery. In contrast to our previous adhesion results, NijA-induced death does not require Mmp1 (Fig. 4B). Similarly, we found that the NijA ectodomain is not sufficient to trigger cell death, even though we were able to detect the tagged ectodomain in cells, cell lysates, and in the culture medium (Supporting Information S6). These Mmp1 and NijA ectodomain results suggested that NijA may induce death in a cell-autonomous manner.
To examine the autonomy of Ninjurin-induced cell death, we considered testing conditioned media, but we were concerned that dying cells may release toxic factors into the media even if the death were cell autonomous, similar to our results in whole animals. Instead, we chose to examine the relationship between NijA transfection status labeled by GFP and cell death measured by trypan blue exclusion. We co-transfected NijA and GFP expression vectors and counted the number of GFP-expressing cells remaining after 48 h induction, as transfected cells are expected to take up both vectors simultaneously (Fig. 5). When transfected with only the GFP plasmid, 39% of cells expressed GFP, and 8% of cells were dead as measured by trypan blue exclusion (Fig. 5A), consistent with the baseline rate of cell death we measured in these cultures (Fig. 4). In contrast, when cells were co-transfected with NijA and GFP, only 9% of cells expressed GFP, and 37% of the cultured cells were dead as measured by trypan blue exclusion (Fig. 5A). Thus it appeared that NijA-expressing cells were much more likely to die than their non-transfected neighbors. We continued this analysis to ask which residues were important for inducing cell death, examining four site-directed NijA mutants generated by alanine-scanning [31], in which charged residues in the ectodomain were replaced with alanines (Fig. 5A,C). We found that D140 was absolutely required, as this point mutation ablated NijA's ability to induce death; importantly the D140A mutant protein was not able to localize correctly to the cell surface (Fig. 5D–F), suggesting that cell-surface localization is critical for inducing death. Surprisingly, two mutants seemed to increase the potency of NijA, as D124A or the double mutant K131A, K132A were more toxic to cells than wild-type NijA, resulting in no GFP-positive cells; yet because the fraction of dead cells was similar to the sum of the baseline death rate plus the transfection rate, it appears that this overactive toxic mutant still killed in a cell-autonomous manner. The double-mutant R152A, E156A killed cells similarly to wild-type NijA (Fig. 5A), and the mutant protein localized at the cell surface similarly to wild-type NijA (Fig. 5G). In a separate experiment, we asked which domains were required to induce death (Fig. 5B). The N-terminal ectodomain was required, as a deletion removing it (NijAΔN-term) induced only 8% death with 52% of the cells expressing GFP, similar to the GFP-alone controls. The ectodomain was also required for localization of NijA to the cell surface, as the NijAΔN-term protein (carrying a myc epitope at the new N-terminus) was not detectable in unpermeabilized cells (Fig. 5I). The predicted 20-amino acid intracellular domain was partially required, as a mutant replacing most of the intracellular sequence (NijAΔintracell) with the myc epitope gave an intermediate level of death, with 20% dead cells and 32% GFP-expressing cells. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that NijA induces death in a cell-autonomous manner, requiring cell surface localization to kill cells.
To determine if these mechanisms applied to NijA cell death induction in vivo, we transformed flies with GAL4-inducible constructs encoding the NijA double mutant R152A, E156A and the NijA ectodomain (UAS-NijAect). As in cell culture, the double mutant phenocopied wild-type NijA, whereas the ectodomain alone did not induce cell death comparable to wild-type NijA (Fig. 6). We conclude that when expressed at high levels, NijA kills cells by a nonapoptotic mechanism, likely in a cell autonomous manner.
Discussion
In the present study, we found that Drosophila NijA is upregulated or relocalized in tissues of the immune system upon septic injury. The NijA upregulation observed in adults may result in more protein localized to the cell surface, a similar effect to the relocalization to the cell surface observed in larvae after septic injury. NijA protein levels are upregulated via the Tl pathway, an established immunoregulatory pathway, and in activated Tl mutants, there is more NijA observed at the surface of fat body cells, supporting the idea that NijA upregulation and relocalization are functionally similar immune responses. In whole-animal genetic experiments we found that the ectopic upregulation of NijA induces cell death characterized by acridine orange staining and tissue loss. However, NijA-induced cell death is not associated with DNA fragmentation, as assessed by TUNEL labeling, and is not suppressible by p35, an apoptotic inhibitor. These data indicate that NijA induces nonapoptotic cell death. Similar death phenotypes were observed both in tissues of whole larvae and in cultured S2 cells, and the cell death appears to be autonomous. In cultured cells, NijA mutants that cannot localize to the cell surface also cannot induce cell death, suggesting that in vivo the observed increase of NijA levels at the cell surface after septic injury may be critical to NijA function.
Originally identified as gene products upregulated on nerve injury, Ninjurins have been characterized as adhesion molecules [1], [13], [14], [15], anti-adhesion signals [3], and mediators of cell cycle regulation [32]. This lack of consensus likely stems from the fact that these studies have been performed in cultured cells. There is scant information about Ninjurin function in vivo, in part because animal studies have focused almost exclusively on expression analysis [1], [2], [3], [14], [15]. The only study investigating Ninjurin function in vivo was performed with neutralizing antibodies to Ninjurin1 during rat ocular development [14], and it found that Ninjurin antibodies slowed the regression of the hyaloid vasculature, an embryonic tissue that is removed by cell death during development.
Our in vivo gain-of-function data suggests that Ninjurins promote nonapoptotic cell death. In addition to apoptosis, the other main types of programmed cell death are autophagy and programmed necrosis (sometimes called necroptosis) [33]. Autophagy, a process in which the cell digests its own components, can regulate a variety of cellular processes including viral clearance and signal transduction [34], [35]. Autophagy can result in cell survival in response to stress or can lead to cell death [36]. The death outcome utilizes components of the apoptotic machinery [37]. The differences between autophagic death and apoptosis are still being elucidated, and it is likely that in some contexts they can compensate for each other if one death mechanism fails [38], [39]. The pathways leading to programmed necrosis also have considerable crosstalk with the pathways leading to apoptosis, and they are believed to inhibit each other [40]. Unfortunately, programmed necrosis has not been characterized in Drosophila, although it may be induced genetically [41], [42]. We speculate that the interplay between these different types of cell death may explain why we observe no cell-death phenotypes in the NijA null mutants. Because cell death mechanism are known to compensate for each other, it is possible that in our NijA null mutants, cells that would have been killed by a NijA-dependent mechanism are now killed by another cell-death mechanism. Of note, genome-wide expression studies report that NijA is expressed during metamorphosis at levels ∼12-fold higher than during any other time in the Drosophila life cycle ([43] as reported at flybase.org), suggesting that NijA may function during cell and tissue death in development. Interestingly, several Toll family members (Toll, 18-wheeler/tollo, Toll-6, and Toll-7) are also highly expressed during metamorphosis as well [44], and our data demonstrates that Tl can upregulate NijA.
Another possibility to explain the lack of cell death or other phenotypes in our NijA null mutants is genetic redundancy among the three Drosophila Ninjurin genes, NijA, NijB, and NijC. However, expression data does not support the idea of Ninjurin family redundancy. Genome-wide expression data sets, examining developmental timing and tissue-specific expression of all genes, indicate that NijA, NijB, and NijC are not expressed in similar times or tissues in developing flies ([43], [45], [46] as reported at flybase.org). Nevertheless, it is possible that analysis of double and triple mutants may uncover redundant Ninjurin functions. In our preliminary examination of NijA, NijC double mutants we have not found any obvious developmental abnormalities (X. Wang and A. Page-McCaw, unpubl.).
Our data suggest that Ninjurin may participate in an immune response that promotes cell death. Although cell death is critical in the mammalian immune system [40], in Drosophila it is unclear why immune tissues would initiate death in response to immune challenge. One possibility is that NijA is required not for the initial immune response, but rather for resolving the immune response once a pathogen has been neutralized. In mammals, superfluous neutrophils are cleared by cell death after resolution of an immune challenge [47], and if neutrophils are not cleared excessive inflammation can result in damage to healthy tissue [48]. In Drosophila, there is a dramatic increase in circulating hemocytes after immune challenge [49], and it is not clear if these hemocytes persist after the challenge has been eliminated; it is possible that NiA may participate in their clearance. Another possibility is that increased NijA primes cells to die in an orderly manner if they should become injured in the course of an infection. A third possibility is based on the idea that physiological increases of NijA in response to septic injury are significantly smaller than those in our genetic overexpression system; perhaps on immune challenge, moderate levels of NijA initiate an autophagic mechanism of pathogen clearance from cells, but at physiologic levels NijA does not promote cell death at all.
Our genetic gain-of-function studies indicate that NijA induces cell death in a cell-autonomous manner. This is different from the nonautonomous apoptotic cell death observed in endothelial cells adjacent to Ninjurin1-positive macrophages that was interpreted as a result of altered adhesion [14], and it is different from the cell nonautonomous loss-of-adhesion signaling we observed in cultured cells [3]. It is possible that in different contexts Ninjurins can act either autonomously or nonautonomously, as their cell-membrane location would allow them to relay information from outside to inside the cell, or allow them to signal via their extracellular domain to other cells. Our study highlights a novel and potentially medially important role for the conserved Ninjurin family in inducing cell death.
Materials and Methods
Drosophila genetics and imaging
Unless otherwise noted flies were raised at 25° under standard conditions. Hml-GAL4, UAS-GFP and UAS-hid were from J. Royet [25]; C564-GAL4 and Tl10b were from K.V. Anderson [50], [51]; UAS-Tl10b was from S. Cherry [52]. The EP element G4196 was generated by Genexel (Korea) and deposited at the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center. The site of the insertion was determined by sequencing genomic DNA to be 51 bp upstream of the transcription start site. The insertion line was outcrossed 3 times to w1118 before excising the transposon. 60 excision lines were screened in pools of five by PCR amplification of a 3561 bp genomic fragment surrounding the P insertion site; from these three imprecise excisions (shown in Figure 2) were identified by gel electrophoresis of PCR products. The UAS-NijA line was generated by ligating the cDNA RE5744 (Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project) corresponding to NijA-RA, into the pUAST vector at the EcoR1 and BamH1 sites. The fly transformation vectors UAS-NijAect and UAS-NijAR152A,E156A were generated by ligating the inserts from the corresponding RmHa3 plasmids (see below) into pUAST. Transformants were generated by Genetic Services Inc (Cambridge, MA). We examined two independent transformants of the UAS-NijA and UAS-NijAect, and in both cases we saw comparable results.
For hml>GFP analysis in whole larvae, third instars were selected from the food of a healthy vial, washed in sterile water to remove debris, and placed on a grape juice plate. GFP-labeled blood cells were scored in live larvae under a Zeiss LumarV12 fluorescence stereomicroscope prior to heat-killing for imaging. A minimum of 20 animals were scored per genotype. For imaging, each larva was placed in 20 µl of PBS on a cover slip, and heated for 5 sec at 95°C to kill the larvae. Larvae were immediately imaged by bright field and epifluorescence with a Zeiss 0.8× Neolumar objective, on magnification setting 64×. Images were cropped and edited using Adobe Photoshop.
For imaging lymph glands live-stained with acridine orange, third instar larvae were selected from the food of a healthy vial and washed in sterile water to remove debris. Each larva was placed in a 50 µl drop of freshly diluted 1.6×10−6 M acridine orange in Drosophila Ringer's solution on a Sylgard dissection plate. The dorsal cuticle was carefully torn away from posterior to the anterior to expose the internal organs. The flap of dorsal cuticle was pinned to the plate, and the fat surrounding the dorsal vessel quickly cleared away for imaging. Just prior to imaging the acridine orange solution was removed and replaced with Drosophila Ringer's solution. Bright field and epifluorescence images were taken on a Zeiss LumarV12 with a 1.5× Neolumar objective and processed using Adobe Photoshop.
Western blotting and antibody staining
For Western blots, lysates were made by mechanically grinding samples on ice in Laemmli buffer and heating at 95°C for 5 min. Blots were probed with guinea pig anti-NijA at 1∶1500 [3], mouse anti-GAPDH at 1∶2000 (IMGENEX, #IMG3073), mouse anti-Actin at 1∶2000 (Abcam, #ab6276), and rabbit anti-GFP at 1∶2000 (Abcam, #ab6556). Detection was performed by either HRP-mediated chemiluminescence or fluorescence imaging (Licor, Odyessy). Figure 1A and Supplementary Figure 3C were probed with HRP-labeled goat anti-guinea pig at 1∶5000 (Santa Cruz) and HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse at 1∶5000 (Jackson Immuno-research) secondary antibodies. Figures 1C, 2E, and 4D were probed with IRDye 680-labeled donkey anti-mouse, IRDye 800CW-labeled donkey anti-guinea pig, IRDye 680-labeled donkey anti-rabbit, or IRDye 800CW-labeled donkey anti-mouse, all diluted 1∶5000 (Licor). Data was quantified using the ImageJ software. Blots were cropped and edited using Adobe Photoshop.
For antibody staining, samples were dissected, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 20 mins, and then blocked for 30 mins in 1% bovine albumin serum (BSA) in PBS+0.2%Tween (PBST) for permeabilized samples or in 5% normal goat serum (NGS) in PBS for non-permeabilized samples. Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking reagent and incubated with sample overnight at 4°C. Primary antibodies used were guinea pig anti-NijA at 1∶100 [3], mouse IgG2a anti-hemese at 1∶100 (from Istvan Ando [53]), and rabbit anti-GFP at 1∶50 (Abcam, #ab6556). Samples were washed and labeled with secondary antibody for 2 h in the dark at room temperature. Secondary antibodies used were Cy3-labeled goat anti-guinea pig, DyLight 649-labeled goat anti-mouse, and FITC-labeled goat anti-rabbit, all diluted 1∶500 (Jackson ImmunoResearch). TUNEL labeling was performed according to the manufacturer's directions (Roche In situ cell death detection Kit TMR red). Tissues were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Lab) and imaged on a Zeiss Imager M2 with Apotome. Images are 2D projections of Z-sections. Projections were generated by the ImageJ software, and images were cropped and edited using Adobe Photoshop.
Hemocytes were recovered for ex vivo staining as described [54]. In brief, the posterior end of a clean larva was bled onto a glass slide, and the hemolymph was recovered with a pulled glass needle. (To control the needle suction with a P20 pipettor, the dull end of the pulled needle was attached to the small end of a P20 tip by melting the plastic tip and sealing with nail polish.) The hemolymph was transferred to a Multitest slide (MP Biomedicals) in 10 ul of PBS, and the hemocytes were allowed to settle for 10 mins. Hemocytes were fixed for 7 mins in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, rinsed briefly in PBS, and then blocked for 15 mins in 1% BSA in PBST. The primary antibody was applied to the samples for 2 h while the slide was in a humidified chamber. The samples were washed in several changes of PBST, and the secondary antibody was applied for 1 h in a dark humidified chamber. The samples were washed several times in PBST, and once in PBS prior to mounting in Vectasheild mounting media for viewing on a Zeiss Imager M2 with a Plan Neofluor 40× oil objective.
qPCR Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from whole third instar males using the TRIzol reagent (Ambion) according to the manufacture's directions. Only males were used because of sex-specific differences in antimicrobial peptides [55]. Total RNA extracts were treated with DNase to remove contaminating DNA with the TURBO DNA-free kit (Ambion). 800 ng of total DNase-treated RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA pools using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (BioRad) according to the manufacture's directions in an Eppendorf AG 22331 Hamburg Thermocycler. 2 µl of the cDNA pools were primed with validated primers sets for NijAExon 3 (Fwd:AACTGTTGGAGGCAACGGAG, Rev:AAAGGAGAAACTGGGTCGTCTT. R2<0.99), NijAExon 4 (Fwd:GCGTGGGCCTTATATTGATG, Rev:TGTTCGCCCGGCAGATAT, R2<0.99), and rp49 (R2<0.99) [56]. qPCR reactions were run using the SSO Advanced SYBR Green Super Mix (BioRAD) for SYBR green chemistry according to the manufacture's directions in a CFX96 Real-Time C1000 Thermocycler (BioRad). Resulting Ct values were analyzed in Microsoft Excel. Ct values were fit to a standard dilution curve for correction to primer efficiency and then normalized to the rp49 housekeeping gene. Three replicates were performed for each condition.
Cell culture and transient transfection
Drosophila S2 cells were obtained from the Drosophila Genomics Resources Center (Bloomington, IN) and maintained at 27°C in Schneider's Drosophila medium (Gibco) containing 10% heat inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (Gibco, 16140) and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin. For transient transfection, 3×10 5cells were seeded per well in 750 µl of complete medium in a 24-well plate. The next day, cells were transfected with 2 µg plasmid DNA/well (1 µg DNA/well for co-transfected GFP plasmids) using the calcium phosphate method according to manufacturer's protocols (Invitrogen). NijA-RA wild-type, mutant, deleted, tagged, and ectodomain constructs were each cloned into pRmHa3 for inducible expression from the metallothionine promoter; the wild-type and ectodomain constructs were described in [3]. The Mmp1E225A mutant, also in pRmHa3, was in splice isoform 1 (Mmp1-RD) and encodes an inactivating mutation at the catalytic core rendering the protein a dominant negative [3], [57]. 16–24 h after transfection, cells were washed once in complete medium, and copper sulfate was added to a final concentration of 0.7 mM to induce gene expression from the metallothionine promoter in pRmHa3. Transfection with empty pRmHa3 was used as the vector control. For immunostaining, S2 cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 20 min, washed with PBS, permeabilized in PBS +0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min and blocked in PBS +0.1% Triton X-100+1% NGS +1% BSA. Triton X-100 was removed from all washing and blocking solutions for nonpermeabilized staining. Primary antibodies used were guinea pig anti-NijA (1∶500), rabbit anti-myc (1∶500, Abcam), and mouse anti-β-tubulin (1∶500) as permeablization control.
S2 cell death assay
At different time points after induction (24 h, 40 h or 48 h), cells were resuspended, mixed with 0.4% trypan blue (Gibco) and applied to a hemocytometer for counting. The percentage of dead cells was calculated by dividing the number of trypan blue positive cells by that of the total cells counted. For counting GFP positive cells, different plasmids were co-transfected with pRmHa3-GFP. 48 h after the induction, cells were resuspended and 30–50 µl were applied to single wells of a 12-well multi-test slide (MP Biomedicals), allowed to settle for 2 h and then fixed and mounted in Vectashield with DAPI. Pictures were taken with a 20× Plan Aprochromat objective on a Zeiss AxioImager M2 microscope. GFP positive/negative cells were counted from three randomly chosen fields. 600–2500 cells were counted for each sample. For cell death after 100 nM actinomycin D treatment, 5 µg/well dsRNA against NijA was added to 3×105 cells in 250 µl serum-free medium in a 24-well plate. After incubation for 1 h, 500 µl complete medium was added and 48 h later, actinomycin D was added to a final concentration of 100 nM. 6 h after actinomycin D treatment, total numbers of living (trypan blue negative) cells were counted using the hemocytometer and the survival rate was determined relative to the untreated (DMSO), wild-type sample.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Jessica McGovern for generating pRmHa3-NijAΔintracell construct, and Kaleena Shirley and Bernie Glasheen for generating the D124A, the K131A,K132A, the D140A, and the R152A,E156A constructs. We thank Sara Cherry (University of Pennsylvania), Kathryn Anderson (Sloan-Kettering Institute), Julien Royet (IBDML) and the Bloomington Stock Center for Drosophila stocks, István Andó (Biological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) for antibodies, the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project for plasmids, and the Drosophila Genomics Resources Center for cells. We thank an anonymous reviewer for an interesting model of NijA function in the immune system, and we thank Heather Broihier and Laura Lee for comments on the manuscript.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Basil O'Connor Starter Scholar Research Award no. 5-FY07-99 and by National Institutes of Health R01 GM073883, both to APM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Araki T, Milbrandt J (1996) Ninjurin, a novel adhesion molecule, is induced by nerve injury and promotes axonal growth. Neuron 17: 353–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Araki T, Milbrandt J (2000) Ninjurin2, a novel homophilic adhesion molecule, is expressed in mature sensory and enteric neurons and promotes neurite outgrowth. J Neurosci 20: 187–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zhang S, Dailey GM, Kwan E, Glasheen BM, Sroga GE, et al. (2006) An MMP liberates the Ninjurin A ectodomain to signal a loss of cell adhesion. Genes Dev 20: 1899–1910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Koike M, Ninomiya Y, Koike A (2008) Characterization of Ninjurin and TSC22 induction after X-irradiation of normal human skin cells. The Journal of dermatology 35: 6–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Boutros M, Agaisse H, Perrimon N (2002) Sequential activation of signaling pathways during innate immune responses in Drosophila. Dev Cell 3: 711–722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kim JW, Moon AR, Kim JH, Yoon SY, Oh GT, et al. (2001) Up-Regulation of ninjurin expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma associated with cirrhosis and chronic viral hepatitis. Mol Cells 11: 151–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kubo T, Yamashita T, Yamaguchi A, Hosokawa K, Tohyama M (2002) Analysis of genes induced in peripheral nerve after axotomy using cDNA microarrays. J Neurochem 82: 1129–1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Di Giovanni S, De Biase A, Yakovlev A, Finn T, Beers J, et al. (2005) In vivo and in vitro characterization of novel neuronal plasticity factors identified following spinal cord injury. J Biol Chem 280: 2084–2091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Buchon N, Broderick NA, Poidevin M, Pradervand S, Lemaitre B (2009) Drosophila intestinal response to bacterial infection: activation of host defense and stem cell proliferation. Cell Host Microbe 5: 200–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. De Gregorio E, Spellman PT, Rubin GM, Lemaitre B (2001) Genome-wide analysis of the Drosophila immune response by using oligonucleotide microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 12590–12595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. De Gregorio E, Spellman PT, Tzou P, Rubin GM, Lemaitre B (2002) The Toll and Imd pathways are the major regulators of the immune response in Drosophila. Embo J 21: 2568–2579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Miyairi I, Tatireddigari VR, Mahdi OS, Rose LA, Belland RJ, et al. (2007) The p47 GTPases Iigp2 and Irgb10 regulate innate immunity and inflammation to murine Chlamydia psittaci infection. J Immunol 179: 1814–1824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Araki T, Zimonjic DB, Popescu NC, Milbrandt J (1997) Mechanism of homophilic binding mediated by ninjurin, a novel widely expressed adhesion molecule. J Biol Chem 272: 21373–21380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lee HJ, Ahn BJ, Shin MW, Jeong JW, Kim JH, et al. (2009) Ninjurin1 mediates macrophage-induced programmed cell death during early ocular development. Cell death and differentiation 16: 1395–1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ahn BJ, Lee H-J, Shin MW, Choi J-H, Jeong J-W, et al. (2009) Ninjurin1 is expressed in myeloid cells and mediates endothelium adhesion in the brains of EAE rats. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 387: 321–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lemaitre B, Meister M, Govind S, Georgel P, Steward R, et al. (1995) Functional analysis and regulation of nuclear import of dorsal during the immune response in Drosophila. EMBO J 14: 536–545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lemaitre B, Hoffmann J (2007) The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Immunol 25: 697–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lemaitre B, Nicolas E, Michaut L, Reichhart JM, Hoffmann JA (1996) The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell 86: 973–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Edgar BA, Schubiger G (1986) Parameters controlling transcriptional activation during early Drosophila development. Cell 44: 871–877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Anderson KV, Lengyel JA (1979) Rates of synthesis of major classes of RNA in Drosophila embryos. Dev Biol 70: 217–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Galko MJ, Krasnow MA (2004) Cellular and genetic analysis of wound healing in Drosophila larvae. PLoS Biol 2: E239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zettervall CJ, Anderl I, Williams MJ, Palmer R, Kurucz E, et al. (2004) A directed screen for genes involved in Drosophila blood cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14192–14197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. McGuire SE, Mao Z, Davis RL (2004) Spatiotemporal gene expression targeting with the TARGET and gene-switch systems in Drosophila. Sci STKE 2004: pl6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Osterwalder T, Yoon KS, White BH, Keshishian H (2001) A conditional tissue-specific transgene expression system using inducible GAL4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 12596–12601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Charroux B, Royet J (2009) Elimination of plasmatocytes by targeted apoptosis reveals their role in multiple aspects of the Drosophila immune response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 9797–9802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Goto A, Kadowaki T, Kitagawa Y (2003) Drosophila hemolectin gene is expressed in embryonic and larval hemocytes and its knock down causes bleeding defects. Dev Biol 264: 582–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Grether ME, Abrams JM, Agapite J, White K, Steller H (1995) The head involution defective gene of Drosophila melanogaster functions in programmed cell death. Genes Dev 9: 1694–1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. White K, Tahaoglu E, Steller H (1996) Cell killing by the Drosophila gene reaper. Science 271: 805–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Primrose DA, Chaudhry S, Johnson AGD, Hrdlicka A, Schindler A, et al. (2007) Interactions of DNR1 with the apoptotic machinery of Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Cell Science 120: 1189–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Wright CW, Means JC, Penabaz T, Clem RJ (2005) The baculovirus anti-apoptotic protein Op-IAP does not inhibit Drosophila caspases or apoptosis in Drosophila S2 cells and instead sensitizes S2 cells to virus-induced apoptosis. Virology 335: 61–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wertman KF, Drubin DG, Botstein D (1992) Systematic mutational analysis of the yeast ACT1 gene. Genetics 132: 337–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Toyama T, Sasaki Y, Horimoto M, Iyoda K, Yakushijin T, et al. (2004) Ninjurin1 increases p21 expression and induces cellular senescence in human hepatoma cells. J Hepatol 41: 637–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Vandenabeele P, Abrams J, Alnemri ES, et al. (2009) Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2009. Cell Death Differ 16: 3–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Denton D, Nicolson S, Kumar S (2012) Cell death by autophagy: facts and apparent artefacts. Cell Death Differ 19: 87–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Nakamoto M, Moy RH, Xu J, Bambina S, Yasunaga A, et al. (2012) Virus recognition by toll-7 activates antiviral autophagy in Drosophila. Immunity 36: 658–667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Baehrecke EH (2005) Autophagy: dual roles in life and death? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 505–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Yu L, Alva A, Su H, Dutt P, Freundt E, et al. (2004) Regulation of an ATG7-beclin 1 program of autophagic cell death by caspase-8. Science 304: 1500–1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ryoo HD, Baehrecke EH (2010) Distinct death mechanisms in Drosophila development. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22: 889–895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bass BP, Tanner EA, Mateos San Martin D, Blute T, Kinser RD, et al. (2009) Cell-autonomous requirement for DNaseII in nonapoptotic cell death. Cell Death Differ 16: 1362–1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Han J, Zhong C-Q, Zhang D-W (2011) Programmed necrosis: backup to and competitor with apoptosis in the immune system. Nature Immunology 12: 1143–1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kanda H, Igaki T, Okano H, Miura M (2011) Conserved metabolic energy production pathways govern Eiger/TNF-induced nonapoptotic cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 18977–18982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. McCall K (2010) Genetic control of necrosis - another type of programmed cell death. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22: 882–888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Graveley BR, Brooks AN, Carlson JW, Duff MO, Landolin JM, et al. (2011) The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 471: 473–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Tauszig S, Jouanguy E, Hoffmann JA, Imler JL (2000) Toll-related receptors and the control of antimicrobial peptide expression in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 10520–10525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Chintapalli VR, Wang J, Dow JA (2007) Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease. Nat Genet 39: 715–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Celniker SE, Dillon LA, Gerstein MB, Gunsalus KC, Henikoff S, et al. (2009) Unlocking the secrets of the genome. Nature 459: 927–930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Bratton DL, Henson PM (2011) Neutrophil clearance: when the party is over, clean-up begins. Trends Immunol 32: 350–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Salmen S, Montes H, Soyano A, Hernandez D, Berrueta L (2007) Mechanisms of neutrophil death in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: role of reactive oxygen species, caspases and map kinase pathways. Clin Exp Immunol 150: 539–545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Lanot R, Zachary D, Holder F, Meister M (2001) Postembryonic hematopoiesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol 230: 243–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Brennan CA, Delaney JR, Schneider DS, Anderson KV (2007) Psidin is required in Drosophila blood cells for both phagocytic degradation and immune activation of the fat body. Curr Biol 17: 67–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Schneider DS, Hudson KL, Lin TY, Anderson KV (1991) Dominant and recessive mutations define functional domains of Toll, a transmembrane protein required for dorsal-ventral polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev 5: 797–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Hu X, Yagi Y, Tanji T, Zhou S, Ip YT (2004) Multimerization and interaction of Toll and Spatzle in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 9369–9374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Kurucz E, Zettervall CJ, Sinka R, Vilmos P, Pivarcsi A, et al. (2003) Hemese, a hemocyte-specific transmembrane protein, affects the cellular immune response in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 2622–2627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Sorrentino RP, Melk JP, Govind S (2004) Genetic analysis of contributions of dorsal group and JAK-Stat92E pathway genes to larval hemocyte concentration and the egg encapsulation response in Drosophila. Genetics 166: 1343–1356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Taylor K, Kimbrell DA (2007) Host immune response and differential survival of the sexes in Drosophila. Fly (Austin) 1: 197–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Leulier F, Lhocine N, Lemaitre B, Meier P (2006) The Drosophila inhibitor of apoptosis protein DIAP2 functions in innate immunity and is essential to resist gram-negative bacterial infection. Mol Cell Biol 26: 7821–7831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Glasheen BM, Kabra AT, Page-McCaw A (2009) Distinct functions for the catalytic and hemopexin domains of a Drosophila matrix metalloproteinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 2659–2664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.