Abstract
Background:
In Asia, large-scale studies on anti-HER2 treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases are limited. We studied the treatment patterns of these patients in Asia to evaluate the impact of anti-HER2 treatment on the time to occurrence of brain metastases (TTBM) and survival after brain metastasis (BM).
Methods:
A retrospective study of HER2-positive breast cancer patients diagnosed with BM between January 2006 and December 2008 in six Asian countries was conducted. Demographics, tumour characteristics, treatment details, and events dates were collected from medical records.
Results:
Data from 280 patients were analysed. Before BM, 63% received anti-HER2 treatment. These patients had significantly longer TTBM than those without anti-HER2 treatment (median 33 vs 19 months; P<0.002). After BM, 93% received radiotherapy, 57% received chemotherapy, and 41% received anti-HER2 treatment (trastuzumab and/or lapatinib). Use of both anti-HER2 agents, primarily sequentially, after BM demonstrated the longest survival after BM and was associated with a significant survival benefit over no anti-HER2 treatment (median 26 vs 6 months; hazard ratio 0.37; 95% CI 0.19–0.72).
Conclusion:
Anti-HER2 treatment before BM was associated with longer TTBM. Anti-HER2 treatment after BM was associated with a survival benefit, especially when both trastuzumab and lapatinib were utilised.
Keywords: Asian, HER2-positive breast cancer, brain metastases, lapatinib, trastuzumab, survival
Brain metastases are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in cancer (DiStefano et al, 1979). The incidence of metastases to the brain is particularly high in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 or ErbB2)-positive breast cancer (Bendell et al, 2003; Clayton et al, 2004; Shmueli et al, 2004; Stemmler et al, 2006; Park et al, 2009a).
Trastuzumab-based treatment is regarded as standard treatment of care for HER2-positive breast cancer because of its proven survival benefits (Slamon et al, 2001; Vogel et al, 2002). Trastuzumab-based treatment has also been shown to delay the development of brain metastases (Dawood et al, 2008; Park et al, 2009b). However, consensus guidelines on systemic treatment after the development of brain metastasis (BM) in HER2-positive breast cancer are limited (NCCN, 2011). Published studies on the effect of trastuzumab-based treatment on survival after BM reported mixed results. Although some studies demonstrated significant survival benefit (Bartsch et al, 2007; Park et al, 2009b; Le Scodan et al, 2011), another study showed no significant benefit after having adjusted for confounders (Dawood et al, 2008). The observed survival benefit may also be attributed to better control of extracranial disease rather than BM, as trastuzumab penetrates the blood–brain barrier poorly (Pestalozzi and Brignoli, 2000; Altundag et al, 2005).
These findings highlight the need for new therapeutic approaches to effectively prevent or treat brain metastases in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Lapatinib, a small-molecule, dual HER-1/HER-2 inhibitor, which can potentially cross the blood–brain barrier, has shown promising effects on brain metastases in both preclinical and clinical settings. In preclinical models, lapatinib showed activity in inhibiting BM and reducing the number of large HER2-transfected brain metastases (Gril et al, 2008). In clinical studies, lapatinib was effective in volumetric reduction of brain lesions as monotherapy (Lin et al, 2008; Lin et al, 2009) and in combination with capecitabine (Boccardo et al, 2008; Lin et al, 2009; Ro et al, 2010; Sutherland et al, 2010; Bachelot et al, 2011; Lin et al, 2011). Lapatinib and capecitabine combination therapy was also effective in reducing BM as the first site of recurrence (Cameron et al, 2008). More recently, a few observational studies have demonstrated positive impact on survival in limited numbers of HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with lapatinib alone (Park et al, 2009a) or in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy (Metro et al, 2011; Bartsch et al, 2012) after BM.
To date, most observational studies on HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases have investigated the use of trastuzumab only, primarily in Western populations (Stemmler et al, 2006; Yau et al, 2006; Bartsch et al, 2007; Lichinitser et al, 2007; Dawood et al, 2008; Niwinska et al, 2010). In Asia, there is a paucity of large-scale studies on anti-HER2 treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases and its impact on BM-related outcomes in ‘real world’ clinical practice. We conducted a multicentre, retrospective study of HER2-positive breast cancer patients diagnosed with BM in six Asian countries. This report aims to: (i) describe the current treatment paradigm for brain metastases in HER2-positive breast cancer patients in Asia, with specific focus on the use of anti-HER2 treatment; and (ii) understand the potential clinical role of anti-HER2 treatments on time to BM as well as survival after the development of brain metastases.
Patients and methods
Study design and population
In this retrospective observational study, consecutive female HER2-positive breast cancer patients diagnosed with BM between January 2006 and December 2008 were identified from hospital medical records and databases in 23 medical centres in six Asian countries (Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand). Women who had leptomeningeal metastases only or another primary cancer diagnosed between the time of diagnosis of breast cancer and brain were excluded from this study.
HER2 positivity was defined as either HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ staining or positive HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Brain metastases were diagnosed by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging with neurological signs and symptoms.
Patient demographics, tumour characteristics at diagnosis, dates of metastatic events, treatment details, and survival status were abstracted from medical records. All patients were followed until either the date of death or the last-known physician visit on or before 30 June 2009. This study was approved by all local institutional review boards.
Statistical methods
Patient demographics and tumour characteristics were summarised overall and by receipt of anti-HER2 treatment after BM. Comparisons between groups used the χ2, Fisher’s exact or Kruskall–Wallis test, where appropriate.
Time to occurrence of brain metastases (TTBM) was defined as the time from initial diagnosis of HER2-positive breast cancer to the diagnosis of BM. Brain as first site of metastasis was defined as the presence of brain metastases in the absence of other synchronous metastases. Overall survival (OS) after BM was defined as the time from diagnosis of BM to death (event) or last follow-up visit (censor).
Kaplan–Meier estimates of median TTBM overall and stratified by anti-HER2 treatment before BM were calculated and compared using the log-rank test. As there were insufficient numbers of patients treated with individual anti-HER2 treatments before BM diagnosis, exposure before BM was reported as a binary variable (any or no anti-HER2 treatment). Brain as first site of metastasis was stratified by receipt of anti-HER2 treatment in the adjuvant setting and compared using the χ2 test. As trastuzumab alone was the only anti-HER2 treatment received in the adjuvant setting, exposure in the adjuvant setting was reported as a binary variable (adjuvant trastuzumab or no adjuvant trastuzumab treatment).
Median OS after BM was also estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Exposure to anti-HER2 treatment after BM was reported both as a binary variable (any or no anti-HER2 treatment) and as a detailed variable that separated patients into those who received either trastuzumab alone, lapatinib alone, both agents or no anti-HER2 treatment. Patients in the ‘both agents’ category may have received the anti-HER2 agents either sequentially or concomitantly.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of OS after BM. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were also developed to estimate the association between anti-HER2 treatment received after BM and OS after BM. Potential confounding variables that were significantly associated with both the likelihood of receiving anti-HER2 treatment after BM and with OS after BM were entered into a backward selection model, which retained only those variables significant with a P-value of ⩽0.05.
Sensitivity analyses of the final fully adjusted model were conducted to explore the robustness of the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). The adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were refitted after having relaxed the proportional hazards assumption for key confounders (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy after BM) that may have a time-dependent effect on OS after BM.
Results
Patient demographics and characteristics
A total of 311 patients were initially identified as potential study candidates; 31 patients were subsequently excluded either due to lack of information on HER2 testing or due to lack of FISH confirmation for tumours graded 2+ by IHC. The remaining 280 patients with confirmed HER2-postive breast cancer were included in this final analysis (Figure 1). Among these 280 patients, 239 were graded 3+ by IHC with or without confirmatory FISH, 21 were graded 2+ by IHC with FISH confirmation, and 20 were graded FISH-positive alone.
Figure 1.
Patient cohort. FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; IHC, immunohistochemistry.
Approximately one-half (48.9%) of the patients came from Korea, while 25.4%, 13.6%, 9.6%, 1.8%, and 0.7% were from Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Philippines, respectively. The majority of patients (75.7%) were treated in public medical centres.
Table 1 shows the demographics and clinical features at diagnosis of breast cancer and BM in the analysed population and in different anti-HER2 treatment groups. The median age at diagnosis of BM was 52 years. Three-quarters (76.8%) of patients had multiple brain lesions and 10.7% had leptomeningeal seeding. Apart from differences in frequency of various histological types and nuclear grades of primary breast cancer, and leptomeningeal seeding, the treatment groups were well balanced with regards to other characteristics.
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
|
Anti-HER2 treatment after diagnosis of BM
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | All (n=280), n (%) | Trastuzumab alone (n=56), n (%) | Lapatinib alone (n=30), n (%) | Both agentsa (n=28), n (%) | No anti-HER2 treatment (n=166), n (%) | P |
| At primary breast cancer diagnosis | ||||||
| Median age (range), years | 48 (23–78) | 51 (27–74) | 45 (26–61) | 47 (28–66) | 50 (23–78) | 0.089 |
| Menopausal status | 0.211 | |||||
| Pre-menopausal | 120 (42.9) | 25 (44.6) | 17 (56.7) | 14 (50.0) | 64 (38.6) | |
| Post-menopausal | 118 (42.1) | 27 (48.2) | 8 (26.7) | 9 (32.1) | 74 (44.6) | |
| Unknown | 42 (15.0) | 4 (7.1) | 5 (16.7) | 5 (17.9) | 28 (16.9) | |
| Hormone receptor status b | 0.409 | |||||
| ER+ and/or PR+ | 119 (42.5) | 26 (46.4) | 9 (30.0) | 14 (50.0) | 70 (42.7) | |
| ER− and PR− | 159 (56.8) | 30 (53.6) | 21 (70.0) | 14 (50.0) | 94 (57.3) | |
| Both unknown or unknown and negative | 2 (0.7) | |||||
| Histology b | 0.006 | |||||
| Invasive ductal | 266 (95.0) | 51 (91.1) | 30 (100.0) | 24 (85.7) | 161 (97.6) | |
| Invasive lobular | 6 (2.1) | 3 (5.4) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (10.7) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Others | 7 (2.5) | 2 (3.6) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.6) | 4 (2.4) | |
| Unknown | 1 (0.4) | |||||
| AJCC stage | 0.711 | |||||
| I | 21 (7.5) | 3 (5.4) | 3 (10.0) | 2 (7.1) | 13 (7.8) | |
| II | 73 (26.1) | 16 (28.6) | 11 (36.7) | 4 (14.3) | 42 (25.3) | |
| III | 102 (36.4) | 20 (35.7) | 9 (30.0) | 10 (35.7) | 63 (38.0) | |
| IV | 70 (25.0) | 16 (28.6) | 5 (16.7) | 9 (32.1) | 40 (24.1) | |
| Unknown | 14 (5.0) | 1 (1.8) | 2 (6.7) | 3 (10.7) | 8 (4.8) | |
| Nuclear grade | 0.017 | |||||
| 1 | 7 (2.5) | 3 (5.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (2.4) | |
| 2 | 76 (27.1) | 5 (8.9) | 7 (23.3) | 6 (21.4) | 58 (34.9) | |
| 3 | 123 (43.9) | 26 (46.4) | 15 (50.0) | 14 (50.0) | 68 (41.0) | |
| Unknown | 74 (26.4) | 22 (39.3) | 8 (26.7) | 8 (28.6) | 36 (21.7) | |
| At diagnosis of BM | ||||||
| Median age (range), years | 52 (25–81) | 54 (27–74) | 49 (28–65) | 49 (30–69) | 52 (25–81) | 0.084 |
| Number of brain lesions | 0.631 | |||||
| Solitary | 65 (23.2) | 12 (21.4) | 8 (26.7) | 5 (17.9) | 40 (24.1) | |
| Multiple | 215 (76.8) | 44 (78.6) | 22 (73.3) | 23 (82.1) | 126 (75.9) | |
| CNS involvement | 0.034 | |||||
| Parenchymal only | 240 (85.7) | 44 (78.6) | 30 (100.0) | 26 (92.9) | 140 (84.3) | |
| Parenchymal and leptomeningeal | 30 (10.7) | 11 (19.6) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (7.1) | 17 (10.2) | |
| Unknown | 10 (3.6) | 1 (1.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (5.4) | |
| Site of first metastasis | 0.395 | |||||
| Brain | 63 (22.5) | 16 (28.6) | 4 (13.3) | 5 (17.9) | 38 (22.9) | |
| Other sites | 217 (77.5) | 40 (71.4) | 26 (86.7) | 23 (82.1) | 128 (77.1) | |
Abbreviations: BM=brain metastasis; ER=oestrogen receptor; PR=progesterone receptor; AJCC=American Joint Committee on Cancer; CNS=central nervous system.
Trastuzumab and lapatinib given sequentially or concomitantly.
Patients with unknown values were not included in analysis.
Treatment patterns
Tables 2 and 3 show the treatments received before and after BM. Seven (2.5%) patients did not receive any treatment for BM (Table 2). Radiotherapy (92.9%) and chemotherapy (57.1%) were the most common treatment modalities received after diagnosis of BM. Sequential radiotherapy and chemotherapy was the most common treatment (54.6%) received after BM.
Table 2. Treatments.
| Treatment | All (n=280), n (%) |
|---|---|
| Prior to diagnosis of BM | |
| Hormonal therapy | 103 (36.8) |
| Chemotherapy | 252 (90.0) |
| Anti-HER2 treatment | 176 (62.9) |
| Other targeted therapy | 6 (2.1) |
| After diagnosis of BM | |
| No treatment | 7 (2.5) |
| Local treatment | |
| Radiotherapya | 260 (92.9) |
| WBRT | 251 (89.6) |
| SRS or SRT | 32 (11.4) |
| Surgery | 35 (12.5) |
| Intrathecal treatment | 11 (3.9) |
| Additional systemic treatment | |
| Hormonal therapy | 34 (12.1) |
| Chemotherapy | 160 (57.1) |
| Anti-HER2 treatment | 114 (40.7) |
| Other targeted therapy | 5 (1.8) |
| Treatment combination | |
| Radiotherapya+surgery | 24 (8.6) |
| Radiotherapya+surgery+chemotherapy | 19 (6.8) |
| Radiotherapya+chemotherapy | 153 (54.6) |
| Radiotherapya+chemotherapy+anti-HER2 treatmentb | 92 (32.9) |
| Radiotherapya+Anti-HER2 treatmentb | 106 (37.9) |
| Radiotherapya+hormonal therapy+anti-HER2 treatmentb | 17 (6.1%) |
| Surgery+chemotherapy | 25 (8.9) |
Abbreviations: BM=brain metastasis; WBRT=whole brain radiotherapy; SRS=stereotactic surgery; SRT=stereotactic therapy.
Includes WBRT, SRS or SRT.
Also includes other targeted therapy.
Table 3. Anti-HER2 treatment patterns.
|
Anti-HER2 treatment after diagnosis of BM
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-HER2 treatment before diagnosis of BM | Trastuzumab alone (n=56), n (%) | Lapatinib alone (n=30), n (%) | Both agentsa (n=28), n (%) | No anti-HER2 treatment (n=166), n (%) |
| Trastuzumab alone (n=153) | 26 (9.3) | 28 (10.0) | 18 (6.4) | 81 (28.9) |
| Lapatinib alone (n=2) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.7) |
| Both agentsb (n=21) | 5 (1.8) | 1 (0.4) | 2 (0.7) | 13 (4.6) |
| No anti-HER2 treatment (n=103) | 25 (8.9) | 1 (0.4) | 8 (2.9) | 69 (24.6) |
Abbreviation: BM=brain metastasis.
Note: Results are calculated as a percentage of the analysed population (n=280).
Trastuzumab and lapatinib given sequentially (78.6% n=22) or concomitantly (21.4% n=6).
Trastuzumab and lapatinib given sequentially (85.7% n=18) or concomitantly (14.3% n=3).
Anti-HER2 treatment was utilised in 62.9% of patients before BM and in 40.7% of patients after presentation with brain metastases (Table 2). Anti-HER2 treatment before diagnosis of BM was primarily trastuzumab alone (86.9% 153 of 176) administered in the adjuvant (n=28) and/or metastatic setting (n=131) (Table 3). After the diagnosis of BM, trastuzumab alone was still the most common anti-HER2 treatment received (49.1% 56 of 114), followed by lapatinib alone (26.3% 30 of 114) and lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab (24.6% 28 of 114). Among the 28 patients who received both anti-HER2 agents after BM, trastuzumab and lapatinib were primarily given sequentially in 22 patients (78.6%); 6 patients (21.4%) received both drugs concomitantly. Anti-HER2 treatment was commonly given in combination with radiotherapy (93.0% 106 of 114) or radiotherapy and chemotherapy (80.7% 92 of 114).
Time to brain metastasis (TTBM) and timing of brain metastasis (BM)
The median TTBM was 30.1 months (95% CI 25.0–32.7) for all patients. BM occurred significantly later in patients who received anti-HER2 treatment before BM (median TTBM 33.2 months; 95% CI 31.6–35.8) compared with those who did not (19.1 months; 95% CI 15.4–24.9; P=0.002) (Supplementary Table 1). Brain was the first site of metastasis in 62 (22.2%) patients. Patients who received adjuvant trastuzumab were more likely to present with brain as the first site of metastasis than those who did not (46.4% n=13 vs 19.5% n=49; P=0.003).
Overall survival (OS) after brain metastasis (BM)
At the end of the study period, 61.8% (n=173) had died, of which 54.9% (n=95) died due to complications of brain metastases. The median OS after BM was 10.9 months (95% CI 9.0–11.9) for all patients. OS after BM was significantly longer in patients who received anti-HER2 treatment after BM than those who did not (median 18.5 vs 5.7 months; P<0.001; Figure 2A). The greatest survival benefit (25.9 months) was observed in patients who received both trastuzumab and lapatinib, followed by lapatinib alone (21.4 months), trastuzumab alone (10.5 months), and without anti-HER2 treatment (5.7 months) (P<0.001) (Figure 2B).
Figure 2.
Overall survival (OS) after brain metastasis (BM) by anti-HER2 treatment received after diagnosis of brain metastasis (BM). (A) Anti-HER2 treatment vs no anti-HER2 treatment. Median OS after BM for all patients was 10.9 months (95% CI 9.0–11.9). (B) Both agents vs lapatinib only vs trastuzumab only vs no anti-HER2 treatment. Median OS after BM for all patients was 10.9 months (95% CI 9.0–11.9). *Trastuzumab and lapatinib given sequentially or concomitantly.
Table 4 summarises the results of Cox regression analyses for independent prognostic factors for OS after BM. Older age at BM diagnosis, multiple brain metastases lesions, and leptomeningeal seeding were associated with poorer survival, whereas pre-menopausal status, and receipt of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy or anti-HER2 treatment after BM were predictors of prolonged survival. Of note, receipt of anti-HER2 treatment before diagnosis of BM was not significantly associated with improved OS after BM. In multivariate analysis, after controlling for age at BM, number of brain metastases lesions, receipt of chemotherapy, and receipt of hormonal therapy after BM, anti-HER2 treatment after BM remained significantly associated with improved OS after BM (38% reduction in risk of death compared with no anti-HER2 treatment; HR, 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.89) (Table 4).
Table 4. Results of Cox regression analyses for independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) after brain metastasis (BM).
|
Univariate analysis
|
Multivariate analysis
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Crude HR (95% CI) | P a | Adjusted HR (95% CI) | P a |
| Menopausal status (pre- vs post-menopausal) | 0.59 (0.43–0.81) | 0.003 | NS | NS |
| Age at BMb (years) (1 year increase in age) | 1.03 (1.01–1.04) | <0.001 | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) | 0.003 |
| Number of brain metastases lesions (multiple vs solitary) | 1.50 (1.03–2.19) | 0.035 | 1.84 (1.25–2.72) | 0.002 |
| Leptomeningeal seedingc (yes vs no) | 1.78 (1.15–2.74) | 0.010 | NS | NS |
| Chemotherapy after BM (yes vs no) | 0.24 (0.18–0.33) | <0.001 | 0.27 (0.19–0.39) | <0.001 |
| Hormonal therapy after BM (yes vs no) | 0.56 (0.34–0.93) | 0.025 | 0.44 (0.26–0.73) | 0.001 |
| Anti-HER2 treatment after BM (yes vs no) | 0.41 (0.30–0.56) | <0.001 | 0.62 (0.43–0.89) | 0.009 |
Abbreviations: HR=hazard ratio; CI=confidence interval; NS=not significant; BM=brain metastasis; OS=overall survival.
Note: The following factors were not significantly associated with OS after BM in univariate analysis: medical centre type, stage or nuclear grade of primary breast tumour at diagnosis, oestrogen and progesterone receptor status of primary breast tumour at diagnosis, duration between diagnosis of breast cancer and first metastases, brain as site of first metastasis, chemotherapy before diagnosis of BM, anti-HER2 treatment before diagnosis of BM, and hormonal therapy before diagnosis of BM.
P-value from the proportional hazards model.
Variable modelled as a continuous variable.
Patients with missing or unknown value(s) for this variable were excluded.
When examining the effect of individual anti-HER2 treatment on OS after BM in multivariate analysis, use of both agents was associated with significantly greater survival benefit than no anti-HER2 treatment (63% risk reduction; HR, 0.37; 95% CI 0.19–0.72), and a non-significant trend towards improved survival over either trastuzumab alone (HR, 0.51; 95% CI 0.25–1.01) or lapatinib alone (HR, 0.60; 95% CI 0.27–1.31) (Table 5). In sensitivity analyses, treatment with both agents remained significantly associated with improved survival over no anti-HER2 treatment after relaxing the proportional hazards assumption for key confounders (HR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.18–0.69; P=0.002). All other comparisons also remained nearly identical, except for the HR comparing both agents to trastuzumab alone, which gained statistical significance (HR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.24–0.96; P=0.039).
Table 5. Crude and adjusted association between anti-HER2 treatment received after diagnosis of brain metastasis (BM) and overall survival (OS) after BM.
| Comparison | Crude HR (95% CI) | P a | Adjusted HRb (95% CI) | P a |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bothc vs no anti-HER2 | 0.24 (0.13–0.44) | <0.001 | 0.37 (0.19–0.72) | 0.003 |
| Bothc vs trastuzumab alone | 0.41 (0.21–0.81) | 0.011 | 0.51 (0.25–1.01) | 0.055 |
| Bothc vs lapatinib alone | 0.65 (0.30–1.42) | 0.283 | 0.60 (0.27–1.31) | 0.200 |
| Trastuzumab alone vs no anti-HER2 | 0.57 (0.39–0.84) | 0.005 | 0.73 (0.49–1.10) | 0.13 |
| Lapatinib alone vs no anti-HER2 | 0.36 (0.21–0.62) | <0.001 | 0.62 (0.35–1.11) | 0.11 |
| Lapatinib alone vs trastuzumab alone | 0.63 (0.34–1.16) | 0.139 | 0.85 (0.45–1.58) | 0.605 |
Abbreviations: HR=hazard ratio; CI=confidence interval; BM=brain metastasis.
P-value from the proportional hazards model.
Model adjusted for age at diagnosis of BM, number of brain metastases lesions, receipt of hormonal treatment after diagnosis of BM, and receipt of chemotherapy after diagnosis of BM.
Trastuzumab and lapatinib given sequentially or concomitantly.
Discussion
Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer are at increased risk of developing brain metastases (Bendell et al, 2003; Clayton et al, 2004; Shmueli et al, 2004; Stemmler et al, 2006; Park et al, 2009a). Anti-HER2 treatments have been shown to delay the development of brain metastases and prolong survival after BM in HER2-positive breast cancer patients (Bartsch et al, 2007, 2012; Dawood et al, 2008; Park et al, 2009a, 2009b; Le Scodan et al, 2011; Metro et al, 2011). However, most research has been limited to trastuzumab only and is primarily conducted in Western populations. In Asia, data on the use of anti-HER2 treatments in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with BM is limited. Our study provides a unique opportunity to understand the usage of trastuzumab and lapatinib among Asian HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases and the potential clinical role of anti-HER2 treatments on TTBM and survival after development of brain metastases in these patients.
The proportion of patients with leptomeningeal metastasis in this Asian HER2-positive breast cancer cohort (11%) was similar to other HER2-positive breast cancer populations (9–19%) (Bendell et al, 2003; Dawood et al, 2008; Park et al, 2009a, 2009b) and higher than what has been observed for breast cancer patients in general (2–5%) (DeAngelis et al, 2000, pp 867–874). These findings suggest that HER2-positive breast cancer patients are at increased risk of leptomeningeal metastasis and may have poorer prognosis. Closer surveillance with physicians’ awareness is warranted for these patients.
We found that the majority of patients (93%) in these Asian countries received radiotherapy as part of their care for BM, suggesting high level of compliance with recommended treatment guidelines and standard of care for BM (NCCN, 2011). However, anti-HER2 treatment was not as uniformly utilised, ranging from 63% before BM to only 41% after BM. Of note, a quarter of patients (25%) never received anti-HER2 treatment. Two other studies conducted in Korea also reported low usage of anti-HER2 treatment after BM. One study reported 33% of anti-HER2 treatment usage after BM (Park et al, 2009b) and the other reported a decrease in anti-HER2 treatment usage from 71% before BM to 37% after BM (Park et al, 2009a). The pattern observed in Asia is in contrast to that in Western populations where there is no marked decrease in anti-HER2 treatment usage after BM (58–60% before BM; 50–80% after BM) (Church et al, 2008; Eichler et al, 2008; Wolstenholme et al, 2008; Brufsky et al, 2011). The low usage of anti-HER2 treatment after BM observed in our Asian cohort may be largely related to the high costs associated with anti-HER2 treatment, especially in countries with no reimbursement. Further, discontinuation of anti-HER2 treatment upon the development of resistance to prior trastuzumab or lapatinib treatment may also partly explain the decline in use.
Our results showed that patients who received anti-HER2 treatment before BM, primarily trastuzumab alone, had 1.5 times significantly longer interval to the development of brain metastases than those who did not (33 vs 19 months). This concurs with the findings of previous studies, which reported a significant delay in the development of brain metastases with trastuzumab treatment in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (Park et al, 2009a, 2009b).
Several retrospective studies have demonstrated improved survival with trastuzumab treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases, with median survival ranging from 9 to 24 months (Bendell et al, 2003; Stemmler et al, 2006; Gori et al, 2007; Park et al, 2009b; Niwinska et al, 2010; Bartsch et al, 2012). The observed survival benefit has largely been attributed to control of the extracranial disease. Considering the promising activity of lapatinib against BM demonstrated in clinical studies (Boccardo et al, 2008; Lin et al, 2008, 2009; Ro et al, 2010; Sutherland et al, 2010; Bachelot et al, 2011; Lin et al, 2011), lapatinib may provide additional survival benefits to these patients.
In this Asian population, use of both anti-HER2 agents, primarily in a sequential manner, after BM demonstrated the greatest survival benefit (26 months vs 21 months for lapatinib alone vs 11 months for trastuzumab alone vs 6 months for no anti-HER2 treatment). In the adjusted analysis, although non-significant, use of both anti-HER2 agents provided a 49% risk reduction over trastuzumab alone, and a 40% risk reduction over lapatinib alone. Recent observational studies in Western populations have also reported improved survival with the use of both anti-HER2 agents compared with trastuzumab alone. Metro et al (2011) demonstrated that patients treated with sequential combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib plus capecitabine (n=30) had significantly longer survival compared with patients treated with trastuzumab-based treatments alone (n=23) (28 vs 17 months; P=0.01). Bartsch et al (2012) showed that among 80 patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer, use of trastuzumab and lapatinib, either sequentially or concomitantly, with or without chemotherapy was significantly associated with a 72% reduction in risk of death compared with trastuzumab-based treatment alone (P=0.012).
Our results also concur with recent data from a large prospective study in the US that reported significantly longer survival after BM in HER2-positive MBC patients who received anti-HER2 treatment with or without chemotherapy (72.5% trastuzumab alone; 27.5% trastuzumab and lapatinib) after BM than those who did not receive anti-HER2 treatment (median 17.5 vs 3.7 months; P<0.001) (Brufsky et al, 2011).
Our analysis showed that chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and anti-HER2 treatment after BM were important predictors of prolonged survival, although the overlapping usage of these treatments may contribute to a confounding effect. Recent studies have also reported survival benefits associated with the use of systemic treatments in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases (Park et al, 2009a; Braccini et al, 2011; Kim et al, 2012). These findings show the potential for systemic treatments in improving the outcome of breast cancer patients even after BM diagnosis.
These findings need to be interpreted within the limitations of the study design and sample size. First, this is a retrospective, non-randomised study, and there is potential for imbalance in key prognostic factors between patients who received anti-HER2 treatment and those who did not, which may give rise to biased results. For instance, patients with better prognosis may be more likely to receive anti-HER2 treatment by virtue of living longer. Although we attempted to adjust for potential confounding factors that were known to be associated with treatment or survival, there is potential for unmeasured confounding by factors that were not collected. Nonetheless, our results were generally consistent with other retrospective studies. Second, as the sample size in each treatment group is small, further research with a larger number of patients is warranted to confirm our results. Next, there is the possibility that patients received sequential therapy with both anti-HER2 agents by virtue of living longer, which may give rise to biased results. Also, patients who received both anti-HER2 agents sequentially may have a different treatment effect from those who received them concomitantly. However, our limited sample size does not allow these groups to be analysed separately. Future studies in a larger cohort are needed to confirm if there is a different treatment effect when both the drugs are used sequentially or concomitantly. Finally, as the majority of patients were from Korea and Singapore, the treatment patterns and outcomes of patients from other Asian countries merit further study.
In conclusion, there is limited usage of anti-HER2 treatment after detection of brain metastases among our Asian cohort of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Anti-HER2 treatment before BM, primarily trastuzumab alone, was associated with significantly longer time to the development of brain metastases. Anti-HER2 treatment after diagnosis of BM, along with local treatment and other systemic treatments, was associated with a survival benefit, especially when both trastuzumab and lapatinib were utilised. Our results support the role of continuing systemic treatments, including anti-HER2 treatment, in improving survival even after development of brain metastases. The management strategy for HER2-positive brain metastases should incorporate the use of systemic treatments, including anti-HER2 treatment; clinical trials on anti-HER2 treatment in this setting will help to determine the optimal regimen.
Acknowledgments
This study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, United Kingdom. We would like to acknowledge the following investigators who have also contributed to the study—Indonesia: Dr Abdul Muthalib; Korea: Dr Joo Seop Chung, Dr Yu Jung Kim, Dr Hyuk Chan Kwon; Malaysia: Dr Biswa Mohan Biswal, Dr Adel Zaatar, and Thailand: Dr Surachat Chakrapee-Sirisuk, Dr Kanonporn Jaisathaporn, Dr Narongsak Kiatikajornthada, Dr Vicharn Lorvidhaya, Dr Pittayapoom Pattaranutaporn. We also thank Hui Hwa Choo for editorial assistance. C Khorprasert and DWY Wong have received research funding from GlaxoSmithKline.
Footnotes
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on British Journal of Cancer website (http://www.nature.com/bjc)
YS Yap and N Sutandyo have received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline. DWY Wong has received honoraria from Roche. M Kobayashi is an ex-employee of GlaxoSmithKline. SH Landis, EM Yeoh and H Moon are employees of GlaxoSmithKline. M Kobayashi, SH Landis, EM Yeoh and H Moon hold stock ownership in GlaxoSmithKline. J Ro has acted as an advisor and received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Altundag K, Altundag O, Atik MA, Morandi P, Gunduz M (2005) Rationale for the use of trastuzumab in patients with cerebral metastases who previously receive trastuzumab-based therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Breast 14: 425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bachelot TD, Romieu G, Campone M, Dieras V, Cropet C, Roche HH, Jimenez M, Le Rhun E, Pierga J, Goncalves A, Leheurteur M, Domont J, Gutierrez M, Cure H, Ferrero J, Labbe C (2011) LANDSCAPE: an FNCLCC phase II study with lapatinib (L) and capecitabine (C) in patients with brain metastases (BM) from HER2-positive (+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) before whole-brain radiotherapy (WBR). J Clin Oncol 29(Suppl 15): 509 [Google Scholar]
- Bartsch R, Berghoff A, Pluschnig U, Bago-Horvath Z, Dubsky P, Rottenfusser A, DeVries C, Rudas M, Fitzal F, Dieckmann K, Mader RM, Gnant M, Zielinski CC, Steger GG (2012) Impact of anti-HER2 therapy on overall survival in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients with brain metastases. Br J Cancer 106: 25–31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bartsch R, Rottenfusser A, Wenzel C, Dieckmann K, Pluschnig U, Altorjai G, Rudas M, Mader RM, Poetter R, Zielinski CC, Steger GG (2007) Trastuzumab prolongs overall survival in patients with brain metastases from Her2 positive breast cancer. J Neurooncol 85: 311–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bendell JC, Domchek SM, Burstein HJ, Harris L, Younger J, Kuter I, Bunnell C, Rue M, Gelman R, Winer E (2003) Central nervous system metastases in women who receive trastuzumab-based therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 97: 2972–2977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boccardo F, Kaufman B, Baselga J, Dieras V, Link J, Casey MA, Fittipaldo A, Oliva C, Zembryki D, Rubin SD (2008) Evaluation of lapatinib (Lap) plus capecitabine (Cap) in patients with brain metastases (BM) from HER2+ breast cancer (BC) enrolled in the Lapatinib Expanded Access Program (LEAP) and French Authorisation Temporaire d'Utilisation (ATU). J Clin Oncol 26: 1094 [Google Scholar]
- Braccini AL, Azria D, Thezenas S, Chamorey E, Romieu G, Ferrero JM, Jacot W (2011) Prognostic factors of breast cancer brain metastases. Eur J Cancer 47(Suppl 1): S359 (poster 5098)21944015 [Google Scholar]
- Brufsky AM, Mayer M, Rugo HS, Kaufman PA, Tan-Chiu E, Tripathy D, Tudor IC, Wang LI, Brammer MG, Shing M, Yood MU, Yardley DA (2011) Central nervous system metastases in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: incidence, treatment, and survival in patients from registHER. Clin Cancer Res 17: 4834–4843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cameron D, Casey M, Press M, Lindquist D, Pienkowski T, Romieu CG, Chan S, Jagiello-Gruszfeld A, Kaufman B, Crown J, Chan A, Campone M, Viens P, Davidson N, Gorbounova V, Raats JI, Skarlos D, Newstat B, Roychowdhury D, Paoletti P, Oliva C, Rubin S, Stein S, Geyer CE (2008) A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112: 533–543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Church DN, Modgil R, Guglani S, Bahl A, Hopkins K, Braybrooke JP, Blair P, Price CG (2008) Extended survival in women with brain metastases from HER2 overexpressing breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 31: 250–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clayton AJ, Danson S, Jolly S, Ryder WD, Burt PA, Stewart AL, Wilkinson PM, Welch RS, Magee B, Wilson G, Howell A, Wardley AM (2004) Incidence of cerebral metastases in patients treated with trastuzumab for metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 91: 639–643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dawood S, Broglio K, Esteva FJ, Ibrahim NK, Kau SW, Islam R, Aldape KD, Yu TK, Hortobagyi GN, Gonzalez-Angulo AM (2008) Defining prognosis for women with breast cancer and CNS metastases by HER2 status. Ann Oncol 19: 1242–1248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeAngelis L, Rogers L, Foley KM (2000) Leptomeningeal metastasis. In Diseases of the Breast, Harris JR (ed), pp 867–874. Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia [Google Scholar]
- DiStefano A, Yong Yap Y, Hortobagyi GN, Blumenschein GR (1979) The natural history of breast cancer patients with brain metastases. Cancer 44: 1913–1918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eichler AF, Kuter I, Ryan P, Schapira L, Younger J, Henson JW (2008) Survival in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer: the importance of HER-2 status. Cancer 112: 2359–2367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gori S, Rimondini S, De Angelis V, Colozza M, Bisagni G, Moretti G, Sidoni A, Basurto C, Aristei C, Anastasi P, Crino L (2007) Central nervous system metastases in HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab: incidence, survival, and risk factors. Oncologist 12: 766–773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gril B, Palmieri D, Bronder JL, Herring JM, Vega-Valle E, Feigenbaum L, Liewehr DJ, Steinberg SM, Merino MJ, Rubin SD, Steeg PS (2008) Effect of lapatinib on the outgrowth of metastatic breast cancer cells to the brain. J Natl Cancer Inst 100: 1092–1103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim HJ, Im SA, Keam B, Kim YJ, Han SW, Kim TM, Oh DY, Kim JH, Lee SH, Chie EK, Han W, Kim DW, Kim TY, Noh DY, Heo DS, Park IA, Bang YJ, Ha SW (2012) Clinical outcome of central nervous system metastases from breast cancer: differences in survival depending on systemic treatment. J Neurooncol 106: 303–313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Scodan R, Jouanneau L, Massard C, Gutierrez M, Kirova Y, Cherel P, Gachet J, Labib A, Mouret-Fourme E (2011) Brain metastases from breast cancer: prognostic significance of HER-2 overexpression, effect of trastuzumab and cause of death. BMC Cancer 11: 395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lichinitser M, Ganshina I, Zhukova L, Lud H, Meluzova O (2007) P26 HER-2 overexpressed breast cancer and brain metastases. The Breast 16(Suppl 1): S19 (abstract P26) [Google Scholar]
- Lin NU, Carey LA, Liu MC, Younger J, Come SE, Ewend M, Harris GJ, Bullitt E, Van den Abbeele AD, Henson JW, Li X, Gelman R, Burstein HJ, Kasparian E, Kirsch DG, Crawford A, Hochberg F, Winer EP (2008) Phase II trial of lapatinib for brain metastases in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26: 1993–1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin NU, Dieras V, Paul D, Lossignol D, Christodoulou C, Stemmler HJ, Roche H, Liu MC, Greil R, Ciruelos E, Loibl S, Gori S, Wardley A, Yardley D, Brufsky A, Blum JL, Rubin SD, Dharan B, Steplewski K, Zembryki D, Oliva C, Roychowdhury D, Paoletti P, Winer EP (2009) Multicenter phase II study of lapatinib in patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 15: 1452–1459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin NU, Eierman W, Greil R, Campone M, Kaufman B, Steplewski K, Lane SR, Zembryki D, Rubin SD, Winer EP (2011) Randomized phase II study of lapatinib plus capecitabine or lapatinib plus topotecan for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. J Neurooncol 105: 613–620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metro G, Foglietta J, Russillo M, Stocchi L, Vidiri A, Giannarelli D, Crino L, Papaldo P, Mottolese M, Cognetti F, Fabi A, Gori S (2011) Clinical outcome of patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer treated with lapatinib and capecitabine. Ann Oncol 22: 625–630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NCCN (2011) National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer. Version 2.2011. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf (accessed November 2011)
- Niwinska A, Tacikowska M, Murawska M (2010) The effect of early detection of occult brain metastases in HER2-positive breast cancer patients on survival and cause of death. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77: 1134–1139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park YH, Park MJ, Ji SH, Yi SY, Lim DH, Nam DH, Lee JI, Park W, Choi DH, Huh SJ, Ahn JS, Kang WK, Park K, Im YH (2009a) Trastuzumab treatment improves brain metastasis outcomes through control and durable prolongation of systemic extracranial disease in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 100: 894–900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park IH, Ro J, Lee KS, Nam BH, Kwon Y, Shin KH (2009b) Trastuzumab treatment beyond brain progression in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 20: 56–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pestalozzi BC, Brignoli S (2000) Trastuzumab in CSF. J Clin Oncol 18: 2349–2351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ro J, Park S, Kim SB, Kim TY, Im YH, Rha SY, Chung JS, Moon H, Santillana S (2010) Clinical outcomes of brain metastasis by lapatinib (L) and capecitabine (C) in an open-label expanded access study among Korean patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer. In 33rd Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. (abstract P1-14-04); San Antonio, TX, USA [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shmueli E, Wigler N, Inbar M (2004) Central nervous system progression among patients with metastatic breast cancer responding to trastuzumab treatment. Eur J Cancer 40: 379–382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344: 783–792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stemmler HJ, Kahlert S, Siekiera W, Untch M, Heinrich B, Heinemann V (2006) Characteristics of patients with brain metastases receiving trastuzumab for HER2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Breast 15: 219–225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutherland S, Ashley S, Miles D, Chan S, Wardley A, Davidson N, Bhatti R, Shehata M, Nouras H, Camburn T, Johnston SR (2010) Treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with lapatinib and capecitabine in the lapatinib expanded access programme, including efficacy in brain metastases--the UK experience. Br J Cancer 102: 995–1002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, Gutheil JC, Harris LN, Fehrenbacher L, Slamon DJ, Murphy M, Novotny WF, Burchmore M, Shak S, Stewart SJ, Press M (2002) Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20: 719–726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolstenholme V, Hawkins M, Ashley S, Tait D, Ross G (2008) HER2 significance and treatment outcomes after radiotherapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients. Breast 17: 661–665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yau T, Swanton C, Chua S, Sue A, Walsh G, Rostom A, Johnston SR, O'Brien ME, Smith IE (2006) Incidence, pattern and timing of brain metastases among patients with advanced breast cancer treated with trastuzumab. Acta Oncol 45: 196–201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.