Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012 Jul 11;22(17):5612–5617. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.07.003

High-affinity and selective dopamine D3 receptor full agonists

Jianyong Chen a, Beth Levant d, Shaomeng Wang a,b,c,*
PMCID: PMC3461280  NIHMSID: NIHMS399697  PMID: 22871578

Abstract

We have designed, synthesized and evaluated a series of new compounds with the goal to identify potent and selective D3 ligands. The two most potent and selective new D3 ligands are compounds 38 and 52, which bind to the D3 receptors with a Ki value of <1 nM and display a selectivity of 450–494 times over the D2 receptors and >10,000 times over the D1 receptors. Both 38 and 52 are full agonists with high potency at the D3 receptor in a D3 functional assay.

Keywords: Dopamine 3 receptor, Full agonists, Structure-activity-relationships


Dopaminergic neurotransmission is mediated by five dopamine receptors (D1–D5), which can be grouped into the D1-like (D1 and D5) and D2-like (D2, D3, and D4) receptor subtypes. The dopamine 3 (D3) subtype receptor has been identified as an important target for agents currently used clinically for the treatment of schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease, depression, and other neurological diseases14 and a number of studies have provided strong evidence that potent and selective D3 ligands may have therapeutic potential as novel therapies for the treatment of drug abuse.58 Hence, considerable effort has been devoted to the discovery and development of potent and selective D3 ligands.732

A number of known potent and selective D3 ligands, including antagonists, partial agonists and full agonists, are shown in Figure 1. Evaluated in in vitro binding assays either using cloned human dopamine receptors or rat brain,7,8 these ligands were shown to bind to the D3 receptor with high affinities and selectivities of 100–500 fold over the D2 receptor and >1,000 over the D1-like receptors. SB-277011A (1) is a potent and selective D3 antagonist9 which has been extensively used in animals to investigate the role of the D3 receptor in drug abuse.8 A shortcoming of SB-277011A is that relatively high doses are needed to produce an in vivo effect, suggesting only moderate CNS penetration. Subsequent optimization efforts led to the identification of SB-414796 (2), which is a potent and selective D3 antagonist with excellent bioavailability in the rat, and good CNS penetration.16 However, SB-414796 was not advanced into clinical development because it inhibits p450 and has potential cardiotoxicity due to its strong binding to the hERG potassium channel.8,32 Very recently, compound 3 was designed as a highly potent and selective D3 antagonist.32 This compound has excellent oral bioavailability and good CNS penetration, shows weak inhibition on all the P450 isoforms and at the hERG channel, thus defusing the major issues associated with compound 2. BP 897 (4) was initially described as a potent D3 partial agonist with a modest selectivity of < 100 over D2,6 but subsequent studies have shown that it may behave as a D3 antagonist.33,34 NGB 2904 (5) is a potent and selective D3 antagonist10 and has been extensively evaluated in vivo.8 A large number of new analogues, including compounds 6,18 730 and 8,30 have been designed and synthesized in an effort to improve D3 selectivity and solubility. Among them, compound 8 is the most potent and selective D3 antagonist and displays a selectivity of >400-fold over D2 in in vitro binding assays.30 Significantly, compound 8 is also more soluble than compound 5.30

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical structures of representative known D3 ligands.

Pramipexole (9) is a highly potent D3 full agonist but with only modest selectivity for the D3 receptor over the D2 receptor.25,28 Pramipexole has been approved for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease and restless legs syndrome and has excellent safety and pharmacological properties in humans. Hence, Pramipexole serves as an excellent leading compound for the design of potent and selective D3 ligands. In an effort to improve its selectivity for D3 over D2, we have previously designed and synthesized a series of compounds based upon the core structure of pramipexole.25 Our study led to the identification of several potent D3 ligands such as compounds 10 and 11, which are much more selective for D3 over D2 25 than pramipexole. Unfortunately, notwithstanding their high binding affinity to the D3 receptor (Ki < 1nM) and excellent aqueous solubility, compounds 10 and 11 were found to be active at the D3 receptor only at 32 mg/kg in the yawning assay in the rat, indicating that these compounds have poor bioavailability in the brain.25

In the present study, we have performed additional chemical modifications based upon the chemical structures of compounds 10 and 11 with the goal of identifying new D3 ligands with high affinity and excellent selectivity.

Since the D3 radioligand [3H]PD128907 used previously in our D3 binding assays recently became unavailable, it became necessary to switch to another radioligand [3H]-R(+)-7-hydroxy-N,N-di-n-propyl-2-aminotetralin ([3H]-R(+)-7-OH-DPAT) for our D3 receptor binding assay. Accordingly, we re-evaluated compounds 10 and 11 in both D3 and D2 binding assays using this new D3 radioligand. Compounds 10 and 11 were found to bind to the D3 receptor with Ki values of 1.0 ± 0.04 nM (Table 1) and 1.1 ± 0.3 nM (Table 2), respectively, as compared to 0.41 ± 0.031 nM and 0.40 ± 0.057 nM, respectively, in our previous D3 assay25 using [3H]PD128907. Compounds 10 and 11 were found to bind to the D2 receptor with Ki values of 239 ± 60 nM (Table 1) and 185±61 nM (Table 2), respectively, as compared to 330 ± 69 nM and 307±38 nM, respectively, as we previously reported.25 The selectivity of compounds 10 and 11 for D3 over D2 are 239- and 168-times, respectively, as compared to 800- and 763-times, respectively, in our previous report.25 This is due primarily to the 2.5-fold increase in Ki values in the D3 receptor binding assay.

Table 1.

Binding Affinities at the D1-like, D2-like, and D3 Receptors in Binding Assays Using Rat Brain.

graphic file with name nihms399697u1.jpg
Ki±SEM (nM) Selectivity
ligand R D3 ([3H]-R(+)-7-OH-DPAT) D2-like ([3H]Spiperone) D1-like ([3H]SCH23390) D2-like/D3 D1-like/D3
9 0.78 3.1±0.3 >100,000 4.0 >100,000
10 H 1.0 ± 0.04 239 ± 60 NT 239 NT
15 4-F 1.0 ± 0.2 66 ± 10 4,674±466 66 71
16 3-F 9.9 ± 2.4 80 ± 2 6,606±556 8 666
17 2-F 2.9 ± 0.3 92 ± 32 10,022±1692 32 3,513
18 4-Cl 2.5 ± 0.7 27 ± 4 4,032±394 11 1,596
19 3-Cl 1.2 ± 0.3 52 ± 7 5,766±508 43 4,644
20 2-Cl 1.2 ± 0.2 30 ± 5 5,436±389 26 4,646
21 4-OMe 6.7 ± 1.5 94 ± 9 8,026±776 14 1,196
22 3-OMe 9.3 ± 1.7 122 ± 23 8,890±928 13 953
23 2-OMe 8.1 ± 0.8 102 ± 10 7,916±712 13 983

Table 2.

Binding Affinities at the D1-like, D2-like, and D3 Receptors in Binding Assays Using Rat Brain.

graphic file with name nihms399697u2.jpg
Ki±SEM (nM) Selectivity
ligand R D3 ([3H]-R(+)-7-OH-DPAT) D2-like ([3H]Spiperone) D1-like ([3H]SCH23390) D2-like/D3 D1-like/D3
11 graphic file with name nihms399697t1.jpg 1.1±0.3 185±61 NT 168 NT
24 graphic file with name nihms399697t2.jpg 1.6±0.24 88±4.8 11,305±864 55 6,054
25 graphic file with name nihms399697t3.jpg 1.6±0.25 72±5.7 44,047±2,317 45 27,106
26 graphic file with name nihms399697t4.jpg 5.9±1.4 64±16 26,450±2,782 11 4,503
27 graphic file with name nihms399697t5.jpg 2.0±0.55 45±3.3 46,877±5,199 23 23,755
28 graphic file with name nihms399697t6.jpg 1.9±0.03 23±2.6 37,163±2,354 12 19,909
29 graphic file with name nihms399697t7.jpg 3.0±0.69 43±5.9 59,660±5,488 14 19,877
30 graphic file with name nihms399697t8.jpg 1.1±0.26 32±2.3 24,667±1,894 29 21,790
31 graphic file with name nihms399697t9.jpg 3.0±0.29 52±0.43 14,407±1,184 18 4,867
32 graphic file with name nihms399697t10.jpg 2.4±0.51 56±5.2 14,033±1,691 23 5,959
33 graphic file with name nihms399697t11.jpg 1.3±0.12 442±41 34,613±3,625 345 27,041
34 graphic file with name nihms399697t12.jpg 2.1±0.15 328±53 17,748±921 155 8,381
35 graphic file with name nihms399697t13.jpg 2.0±0.19 470±53 10,912±756 231 5,366
36 graphic file with name nihms399697t14.jpg 3.5±0.57 633±100 11,410±765 180 3,245
37 graphic file with name nihms399697t15.jpg 1.5±0.23 491±70 5,000±495 339 3,448
38 graphic file with name nihms399697t16.jpg 0.73±0.028 359±58 9,937±888 494 13,678

We first performed modifications on 10 by installation of an F, Cl or CH3O group in the para-, meta- or ortho-positions in the phenyl ring to yield compounds 1523 (Table 1). Compounds 1523 were tested for their binding affinities to the dopamine D1, D2 and D3 receptors and the results are summarized in Table 1. Our binding data showed that substitution of the phenyl ring in compound 10 with F, Cl or OCH3 improves neither the potency to D3 nor the selectivity for D3 over D2.

We next synthesized compounds 2426 to investigate the effect of replacing a carbon atom in the naphthyl group with a nitrogen atom at each of three different positions in compound 11 (Table 2). These three compounds bind to D3 with Ki values of 1.6, 1.6 and 5.9 nM, respectively, and are somewhat less potent than 11. They are also less selective than 11 for D3 over D2.

A series of compounds (2732) in which a phenyl group connected to different 2–3 nitrogen-containing hetero-cyclic systems replaces the naphthyl group in 11 (Table 2) was synthesized. These compounds bind to D3 with Ki values of 1.1 to 3.0 nM and have a modest selectivity of 12–29 times for D3 over D2.

We synthesized compound 33, in which the naphthyl group is replaced by a 4-(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)phenyl group, which had been used in the design of compound 2 (Table 2). Compound 33, binds to D3 with the same high affinity (Ki = 1.3 nM) as 11, but its selectivity over the D2 receptor is improved to 345-fold due to its decreased binding affinity to D2. Encouraged by this promising binding and selectivity data, we further modified 33 with different 1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl-phenyl groups, to obtain compounds 3438 (Table 2). Replacement of the methyl group in 33 with ethyl (34), isopropyl (35) or cyclopropyl (36) decreased the binding affinity to D3 and also the selectivity for D3 over D2 by factors of 2–3 as compared to 33. Compounds 37 and 38, in which the 4-(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)phenyl group in 33, has been replaced by either 3-(5-ethyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)phenyl or 3-(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)phenyl, bind to D3 with Ki values of 1.5 nM and 0.73 nM, respectively and their selectivity for D3 over D2 is 339 and 494, respectively.

Compounds 3953, which all contain a sulfonamide group in place of the amide group in the linker region (Table 3), were made. Compound 39, in which a sulfonamide group was used to replace the amide group in 11, binds to D3 with a similar affinity (1.5 nM) as 11, but its selectivity over D2 is decreased due to its increased binding affinity to D2. Compound 40, in which the naphthyl group is connected to the sulfonamide group via its alpha position instead of the beta position in 39, binds to D3 with a Ki value of 1.5 nM and has a selectivity of 21-times for D3 over D2. Compound 41, in which the naphthyl group in 39 is replaced by a phenyl group, binds to the D3 receptor with a Ki of 0.79 nM, and due to its decreased binding affinity to D2, its selectivity over D2 is improved to 72-fold, 8 times more selective than 39. Compound 42, in which the naphthyl group in 39 is replaced by a biphenyl group, binds to D3 with a Ki value of 41 nM, much weaker than compound 39.

Table 3.

Binding Affinities at the D1-like, D2-like, and D3 Receptors in Binding Assays Using Rat Brain.

graphic file with name nihms399697u3.jpg
Ki±SEM (nM) Selectivity
ligand R D3 ([3H]-R(+)-7-OH-DPAT) D2-like ([3H]Spiperone) D1-like ([3H]SCH23390) D2-like/D3 D1-like/D3
39 graphic file with name nihms399697t17.jpg 1.5 ± 0.2 14 ± 2 3,689 ± 366 9 2,427
40 graphic file with name nihms399697t18.jpg 1.5 ± 0.4 31 ± 3 4,667 ± 476 21 3,164
41 graphic file with name nihms399697t19.jpg 0.79 ± 0.08 57 ± 8 23,370 ± 1,331 72 29,686
42 graphic file with name nihms399697t20.jpg 41 ± 3 75 ± 10 1,800 ± 168 2 44
43 graphic file with name nihms399697t21.jpg 0.72 ± 0.11 136 ± 17 10,359 ± 805 190 14,467
44 graphic file with name nihms399697t22.jpg 0.78 ± 0.11 38 ± 3 21,330 ± 1,006 49 27,487
45 graphic file with name nihms399697t23.jpg 1.1 ± 0.1 127 ± 15 5,552 ± 231 117 5,094
46 graphic file with name nihms399697t24.jpg 0.95 ± 0.01 71 ± 5 8,287 ± 257 75 8,754
47 graphic file with name nihms399697t25.jpg 0.68 ± 0.06 66 ± 11 9,484 ± 630 98 14,015
48 graphic file with name nihms399697t26.jpg 0.89 ± 0.04 62 ± 8 8,399 ± 672 70 9,472
49 graphic file with name nihms399697t27.jpg 4.5 ± 0.1 133 ± 16 8,147 ± 836 30 1,810
50 graphic file with name nihms399697t28.jpg 5.0 ± 0.4 101 ± 12 3,149 ± 263 20 626
51 graphic file with name nihms399697t29.jpg 0.63 ± 0.04 28 ± 3 8,191 ± 937 44 12,933
52 graphic file with name nihms399697t30.jpg 0.38 ± 0.05 170 ± 19 17,443 ± 1,727 451 46,310
53 graphic file with name nihms399697t31.jpg 0.93 ± 0.10 213 ± 11 10,716 ± 623 229 11,523

Compound 41 has a high binding affinity to D3 but a modest selectivity for D3 over D2. We next modified the phenyl ring of 41 using different substituents, which yielded compounds 4350. Compound 43, which has a meta-F substituent, has a high binding affinity to D3 (Ki = 0.72 nM) and displays 190-fold selectivity over D2. Compound 44, which has a methoxyl group at the para position of the phenyl ring, binds to D3 with a high affinity (Ki = 0.78 nM), but its selectivity over D2 is decreased to 49-fold due to its improved binding affinity to D2. Compounds 4547 with a Cl substituent at three different positions in the phenyl ring have high binding affinities (Ki = 0.68–1.1 nM) to D3 and 100-fold selectivity over D2. Compound 48 with a meta methyl substituent binds to D3 with a high affinity (0.89 nM) and has a selectivity of 70-fold over D2. However, an isopropyl (49) or a tert-butyl (50) substituent at the para position of the phenyl ring decreases the binding affinity to the D3 receptor by a factor of 6 as compared to 41. These two compounds also have a modest selectivity of 20–30 times over D2.

Both 46 and 47 have a high affinity to D3 but a modest selectivity for D3 over D2. We replaced one carbon atom with a nitrogen atom in the phenyl ring in 46 and 47 to investigate the effect on binding and selectivity. Compound 51, in which a nitrogen atom was inserted into the meta position of the phenyl ring in 46, binds to D3 with the same affinity as 46 but is slightly less selective than 46 over D2. Compound 52, in which a nitrogen atom was inserted into the ortho position with respect to the Cl substituent in the phenyl ring in 47, binds to D3 with a Ki value of 0.38 nM and has a selectivity of 451 times over D2. Compound 53, in which a nitrogen atom was inserted into the para position with respect to the Cl substituent in the phenyl ring in 47, binds to D3 with a Ki value of 0.93 nM and has a selectivity of 229 times over D2.

Hence, our chemical modifications of compound 11 have identified a number of new ligands with high affinities to D3 and an excellent selectivity for D3 over D2. Of these, 38 (UM-206) and 52 (UM-226) bind to D3 with Ki values of 0.73 nM and 0.38 nM, respectively, and have a selectivity of 494 and 451 times, respectively, over D2. These two compounds also display a selectivity of >10,000 times for D3 over the D1-like receptors.

We evaluated 38 and 52 in the D3 functional mitogenesis assay using CHO cells transfected with the human D3 receptor. The functional data showed that both 38 and 52 function as full agonists with EC50 values of 4.3 ± 1.2 nM and 1.5 ± 0.5 nM, respectively.

The synthesis of compounds 1523 is shown in Scheme 1. Pramipexole 9 was allowed to react with commercially available tert-butyl trans-4-(2-oxoethyl)cyclohexylcarbamate to give key intermediate 13 which was treated with TFA to afford the amine 14. Compound 14, when reacted with different cinnamoyl chlorides, gave compounds 1523. The synthesis of compounds 2438 is straightforward and is shown in Scheme 2. Compound 14 was condensed with the appropriate carboxylic acid to give the designed compounds, 2438. The synthesis of compounds 3953 is described in Scheme 3. Compound 14 was reacted with appropriate sulfonyl chloride in the presence of diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) to give compounds 3953.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of compounds 1523. Conditions and reagents: (i) tert-butyl trans-4-(2-oxoethyl)cyclohexyl carbamate, NaBH(OAc)3, MOAc, DCM, 75%; (ii) TFA, DCM, RT, 12 h, 90%; (iii) respective cinnamoyl chloride, DIPEA, DCM, RT, 2 h, 50–76%.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of compounds 2438. Conditions and reagents: (i) RCO2H, EDCI, HOBt, DIPEA, DCM, 55–78%.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of compounds 39–53. Conditions and reagents: (i) RSO2CI, DIPEA, DCM, RT, 2 h, 60–75%.

In summary, through chemical modifications of our previously reported two D3 ligands, compound 10 and 11, we have identified a number of new D3 ligands with high binding affinities to the D3 receptor and an excellent selectivity over the D2 and D1 receptors based upon our in vitro binding data. Compounds 38 and 52 are the two most potent and selective D3 ligands among these new analogues. Both compounds bind to D3 with a Ki value of <1 nM and display a selectivity of 450–494 times over D2 and >10,000 selectivity over D1. Both 38 and 52 are full agonists with a high potency at the D3 receptor in a D3 functional assay. Further in vivo characterizations of these compounds are in progress and will be reported in due course.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health (R01DA020669). We are grateful to the Addiction Treatment Discovery Programs at the NIDA, NIH, for evaluation of compounds 38 and 52 for their functional activity in cells transfected with cloned human dopamine receptors under the contract NIDA Y1-DA-0101-02, performed by Dr. Aaron Janowsky at the Oregon Health & Science University (Portland, Oregon).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and notes

  • 1.Joyce JN. Pharmacol Ther. 2001;90:231. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(01)00139-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Prasad S, Semwal P, Deshpande S, Bhatia T, Nimgaonkar VL, Thelma BK. J Biosci. 2002;27:35. doi: 10.1007/BF02703682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shimohama S, Sawada H, Kitamura Y, Taniguchi T. Trends Mol Med. 2003;9:360. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(03)00117-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ. Behav Pharmacol. 2002;13:355. doi: 10.1097/00008877-200209000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Luedtkea RR, Mach RH. Curr Pharm Des. 2003;9:643. doi: 10.2174/1381612033391199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pilla M, Perachon S, Sautel F, Garrido F, Mann A, Wermuth CG, Schwartz JC, Everitt BJ, Sokoloff P. Nature. 1999;400:371. doi: 10.1038/22560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Newman AH, Grundt P, Nader MA. J Med Chem. 2005;48:3663. doi: 10.1021/jm040190e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Heidbreder CA, Newman AH. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1187:4. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05149.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reavill C, Taylor SG, Wood MD, Ashmeade T, Austin NE, Avenell KY, Boyfield I, Branch CL, Cilia J, Coldwell MC, Hadley MS, Hunter AJ, Jeffrey P, Jewitt F, Johnson CN, Jones DN, Medhurst AD, Middlemiss DN, Nash DJ, Riley GJ, Routledge C, Stemp G, Thewlis KM, Trail B, Vong AK, Hagan JJ. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000;294:1154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yuan J, Chen X, Brodbeck R, Primus R, Braun J, Wasley JW, Thurkauf A. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1998;8:2715. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(98)00469-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Robarge MJ, Husbands SM, Kieltyka A, Brodbeck R, Thurkauf A, Newman AH. J Med Chem. 2001;44:3175. doi: 10.1021/jm010146o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bettinetti L, Schlotter K, Hubner H, Gmeiner P. J Med Chem. 2002;45:4594. doi: 10.1021/jm025558r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hackling A, Ghosh R, Perachon S, Mann A, Holtje HD, Wermuth CG, Schwartz JC, Sippl W, Sokoloff P, Stark H. J Med Chem. 2003;46:3883. doi: 10.1021/jm030836n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Leopoldo M, Berardi F, Colabufo NA, De Giorgio P, Lacivita E, Perrone R, Tortorella V. J Med Chem. 2002;45:5727. doi: 10.1021/jm020952a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Campiani G, Butini S, Trotta F, Fattorusso C, Catalanotti B, Aiello F, Gemma S, Nacci V, Novellino E, Stark JA, Cagnotto A, Fumagalli E, Carnovali F, Cervo L, Mennini T. J Med Chem. 2003;46:3822. doi: 10.1021/jm0211220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Macdonald GJ, Branch CL, Hadley MS, Johnson CN, Nash DJ, Smith AB, Stemp G, Thewlis KM, Vong AK, Austin NE, Jeffrey P, Winborn KY, Boyfield I, Hagan JJ, Middlemiss DN, Reavill C, Riley GJ, Watson JM, Wood M, Parker SG, Ashby CR., Jr J Med Chem. 2003;46:4952. doi: 10.1021/jm030817d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Campiani G, Butini S, Fattorusso C, Catalanotti B, Gemma S, Nacci V, Morelli E, Cagnotto A, Mereghetti I, Mennini T, Carli M, Minetti P, Di Cesare MA, Mastroianni D, Scafetta N, Galletti B, Stasi MA, Castorina M, Pacifici L, Vertechy M, Di Serio S, Ghirardi O, Tinti O, Carminati P. J Med Chem. 2004;47:143. doi: 10.1021/jm0309811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grundt P, Carlson EE, Cao J, Bennett CJ, McElveen E, Taylor M, Luedtke RR, Newman AH. J Med Chem. 2005;48:839. doi: 10.1021/jm049465g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Varady J, Wu X, Fang X, Min J, Hu Z, Levant B, Wang S. J Med Chem. 2003;46:4377. doi: 10.1021/jm030085p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haadsma-Svensson SR, Cleek KA, Dinh DM, Duncan JN, Haber CL, Huff RM, Lajiness ME, Nichols NF, Smith MW, Svensson KA, Zaya MJ, Carlsson A, Lin CH. J Med Chem. 2001;44:4716. doi: 10.1021/jm010145w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ji M, Chen J, Ding K, Wu X, Varady J, Levant B, Wang S. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15:1701. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ding K, Chen J, Ji M, Wu X, Varady J, Yang CY, Lu Y, Deschamps JR, Levant B, Wang S. J Med Chem. 2005;48:3171. doi: 10.1021/jm049031l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen J, Ding K, Levant B, Wang S. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006;16:443. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ehrlich K, Gotz A, Bollinger S, Tschammer N, Bettinetti L, Harterich S, Hubner H, Lanig H, Gmeiner P. J Med Chem. 2009;52:4923. doi: 10.1021/jm900690y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen J, Collins GT, Zhang J, Yang CY, Levant B, Woods J, Wang S. J Med Chem. 2008;51:5905. doi: 10.1021/jm800471h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Micheli F, Arista L, Bertani B, Braggio S, Capelli AM, Cremonesi S, Di-Fabio R, Gelardi G, Gentile G, Marchioro C, Pasquarello A, Provera S, Tedesco G, Tarsi L, Terreni S, Worby A, Heidbreder C. J Med Chem. 2010;53:7129. doi: 10.1021/jm100832d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Biswas S, Hazeldine S, Ghosh B, Parrington I, Kuzhikandathil E, Reith ME, Dutta AK. J Med Chem. 2008;51:3005. doi: 10.1021/jm701524h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brown DA, Kharkar PS, Parrington I, Reith ME, Dutta AK. J Med Chem. 2008;51:7806. doi: 10.1021/jm8008629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ghosh B, Antonio T, Reith ME, Dutta AK. J Med Chem. 2010;53:2114. doi: 10.1021/jm901618d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Grundt P, Prevatt KM, Cao J, Taylor M, Floresca CZ, Choi JK, Jenkins BG, Luedtke RR, Newman AH. J Med Chem. 2007;50:4135. doi: 10.1021/jm0704200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Newman AH, Grundt P, Cyriac G, Deschamps JR, Taylor M, Kumar R, Ho D, Luedtke RR. J Med Chem. 2009;52:2559. doi: 10.1021/jm900095y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Micheli F, Arista L, Bonanomi G, Blaney FE, Braggio S, Capelli AM, Checchia A, Damiani F, Di-Fabio R, Fontana S, Gentile G, Griffante C, Hamprecht D, Marchioro C, Mugnaini M, Piner J, Ratti E, Tedesco G, Tarsi L, Terreni S, Worby A, Ashby CR, Jr, Heidbreder C. J Med Chem. 2010;53:374. doi: 10.1021/jm901319p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wood MD, Boyfield I, Nash DJ, Jewitt FR, Avenell KY, Riley GJ. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;407:47. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00732-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wicke K, Garcia-Ladona J. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;424:85. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES