Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a neuromuscular disorder transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion with almost complete penetrance, affecting 1 in 20 000 individuals worldwide. The main clinical symptoms of patients with FSHD include progressive weakness of the shoulder and facial muscles, as well as of the lower extremities (distal and proximal) in later stages of the disease. Non-muscle tissue phenotypic consequences that occur very frequently are hearing loss (∼75% patients) and retinal telangiectasia (∼60% patients). Secondary, less frequent clinical manifestations include respiratory insufficiency, cardiac conduction defects, learning difficulties and epilepsy.
The genetic region associated with FSHD is localized in the telomeric region of chromosome 4. Like many other genomic locations, it contains a repetitive sequence, in particular, a macrosatellite tandem array called D4Z4, which is highly variable in copy number among the population. In normal individuals, the copy number ranges from 11 to ∼150 D4Z4 repeats while most affected individuals carry at least one chromosome with fewer than 11 repeats. The term macrosatellite is indicative of the large size of the affected genomic region. We should bear in mind not only that each D4Z4 repeat spans 3.3 kb but also that there are several protein-coding genes closely located with these repetitions. Interestingly, these genes have great myopathic potential (ANT1/SLC25A4, FRG1/2, or DUX4), which reinforces the notion that 4q35 locus is the Rosetta Stone of FSHD syndrome.
Since the 1990s, interest in the genetic basis of FSHD has centered on the deletions at the 4q35 locus that affect the D4Z4 repeat copy number. Significantly, these deletions were seen to be associated with chromatin architecture. The disruption caused by them induces critical chromatin modifications, whereby their loss produces changes in chromatin conformation, making it more accessible to transcription. These findings tell us that FSHD is not only a genetic disease but also one with an important epigenetic component. A recent paper published in Cell has proposed a new model that sets out the epigenetic basis of FSHD disease, and offers new and interesting discoveries from research in this area. Cabianca et al.1 have turned their attention to a molecular world that has been poorly investigated until now. They describe a novel, long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), known as DBE-T, arising from repetitive sequences, that plays an important role in human disease through its involvement in gene regulation. This elegant study provides one of the first descriptions of a lncRNA acting as a master regulator of a retrogene, DUX4, that has conserved its ORF intact during mammalian evolution, and is involved in the etiology of an important human disorder. The lncRNA regulates how the chromatin structure of 4q35 locus changes its conformation from a heterochromatic/close state to a more euchromatic/open condition. They dissect the D4Z4 repeated unit into its specific putative functional elements and analyze the enrichment of their epigenetic marks. It is clear that the epigenetic marks at the 4q35 locus differ between healthy and affected individuals. In normal subjects, the high number of D4Z4 repeats allows the attachment of polycomb-repressive complex 2 (PRC2) to the DNA, promoting the maintenance of repressed chromatin through histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27m3), DNA methylation, and histone deacetylation marks. Conversely, in FSHD patients, reduction in D4Z4 repeats diminishes the presence of PRC2, causing the chromatin to open, and resulting in DBE-T transcription.
There are several examples of lncRNAs interacting with proteins of the PcG complex, which are major players in the cell-specific recruitment of PRC2 and regulators of PcG target genes. The specific gene targeting performed by lncRNAs may involve linear base pairing with target sequences. Base-to-base complementarity presents itself as the most powerful mechanism for directing proteins against regulatory DNA elements. However, there is also a growing belief that the tertiary structure of the lncRNAs may be the key to achieving this2. There are several examples of PRC2-recruiting lncRNAs. In mammals, Xist lncRNA coats one of the X chromosome in cis, then the RepA lncRNA recruits PRC2, interacting with Xist and spreading across the chromosome, finally resulting in histone methylation (H3K27m3) and heterochromatin formation3 (Figure 1A). Another lncRNA, known as HOTAIR, was shown to recruit the PRC2 complex and to silence 40 kb of the HOXD locus4. It is also worth noting that more than 90% of all human DNA is transcribed and that the vast majority of these transcripts are of the non-protein-coding type5, derived from antisense transcription, which is more widespread than previously believed. Importantly, antisense transcription implies the existence of nascent RNA molecules that can modify the epigenetic landscape of promoter regions, changing the DNA methylation profiles of promoters in genes with CpG canonical islands or recruiting PRC2 complexes to the vicinity of the transcription start sites (TSS) of their associated genes (e.g., Kcnq1ot1 lncRNA and the KCNQ1 gene)6.
In contrast to the aforementioned lncRNAs, and highlighting one of the most significant discoveries of Cabianca et al.1, DBE-T is an example of a lncRNA that interacts with the PcG antagonist protein complex, the Trithorax group (Trx). Therefore, the DBE-T transcript is defined as a lncRNA that coordinates the activation of certain PRC2 target-repressed genes, such as DUX4, at the 4q35 locus (Figure 1B). The de-repression of this transcription factor results in significant cell toxicity. It is accumulated into the nucleus where it is involved in emerin relocalization and caspase 3 and/or 7 induction, resulting in increased cell death7. Moreover, its expression is correlated with lower MyoD expression levels, preventing normal cell signaling, and contributing to the final FSHD phenotype8. In particular, DBE-T interacts with one of the Trx components, the ASH1L protein, which has also been studied in Drosophila, demonstrating its involvement in the activation of Hox gene expression when it is recruited to Hox regulatory elements by lncRNAs9. Wang et al.10 described the first activatory lncRNA in 2011: HOTTIP, a long intergenic non-coding RNA (lincRNA) involved in the production of HOXA genes. Cabianca et al.1 have identified the first lncRNA linked to the Trithorax activation complex in relation to a particular disorder. A long list of lncRNAs involved in human disease lies ahead of us to be discovered11.
References
- Cabianca DS, Casa V, Bodega B, et al. A long ncRNA links copy number variation to a Polycomb/Trithorax epigenetic switch in FSHD muscular Dystrophy. Cell. 2012;149:819–831. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Margueron R, Reinberg D. The polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life. Nature. 2011;469:343–349. doi: 10.1038/nature09784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee JT. Lessons from X-chromosome inactivation: long ncRNA as guides and tethers to the epigenome. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1831–1842. doi: 10.1101/gad.1811209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rinn JL, Kertesz M, Wang JK, et al. Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human Hox loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2007;129:1311–1323. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birney E, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Dutta A, et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007;447:799–816. doi: 10.1038/nature05874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pandey RR, Mondal T, Mohammad F, et al. Kcnq1ot1 antisense noncoding RNA mediates lineage-specific transcriptional silencing through chromatin-level regulation. Mol Cell. 2008;32:232–246. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kowaljow V, Marcowycz A, Ansseau E, et al. The DUX4 gene at the FSHD1A locus encodes a proapoptotic protein. Neuromuscul Disord. 2007;17:611–623. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2007.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bosnakovski D, Xu Z, Gang EJ, et al. An isogenic myoblast expression screen identifies DUX4-mediated FSHD-associated molecular pathologies. EMBO J. 2008;27:2766–2779. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Elsner T, Gou D, Kremmer E, et al. Noncoding RNAs of trithorax response elements recruit Drosophila Ash1 to Ultrabithorax. Science. 2006;311:1118–1123. doi: 10.1126/science.1117705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang K, Yang YW, Liu B, et al. A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature. 2011;472:120–124. doi: 10.1038/nature09819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Esteller M. Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:861–874. doi: 10.1038/nrg3074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]