Abstract
Human genetic studies are beginning to identify a large number of genes linked to neuropsychiatric disorders. It is increasingly evident that different genes contribute to risk for similar syndromes and, conversely, the same genes or even the same alleles cross over traditional diagnostic categories. A current challenge is to understand the cellular biology of identified risk genes. However, most genes associated with complex neuropsychiatric phenotypes are not related through a known biochemical pathway, and many have an entirely unknown cellular function. One possibility is that diverse disease-linked genes converge at a higher-level cellular structure. The synapse is already known to be one such convergence, and emerging evidence suggests the primary cilium as another. Because many genes associated with neuropsychiatric illness are expressed also outside the nervous system, as are cilia, we tested the hypothesis that such genes affect conserved features of the primary cilium. Using RNA interference to test 41 broadly expressed candidate genes associated with schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability, we found 20 candidates that reduce ciliation in NIH3T3 cells when knocked down, and three whose manipulation increases cilia length. Three of the candidate genes were previously implicated in cilia formation and, altogether, approximately half of the candidates tested produced a ciliary phenotype. Our results support the hypothesis that primary cilia indeed represent a conserved cellular structure at which the effects of diverse neuropsychiatric risk genes converge. More broadly, they suggest a relatively simple cell-based approach that may be useful for exploring the complex biological underpinnings of neuropsychiatric disease.
Introduction
Human disease genetics are presently making important inroads to investigating the biological basis of severe neuropsychiatric disorders. As progress in this exciting field continues to advance, a major next challenge is to understand biological mechanisms underlying the influence of identified genes on pathophysiology or disease vulnerability. This requires defining normal cellular structures or functions that are impacted by the respective disease-linked genes.
A remarkable observation that has emerged is that the same locus, the same gene or even the same allele can affect risk for phenotypically different syndromes [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Many genes implicated in schizophrenia (SCZ), for example, are also implicated in bipolar affective disorder (BAD) [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. The same can be said for genes implicated in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID) [12]. Such extensive genetic crossover suggests that common biological vulnerabilities underlie the pathophysiology of, or determine susceptibility to, multiple neuropsychiatric syndromes. Identifying these shared ‘nodes’ of vulnerability is not a simple task because the genetic architecture of neuropsychiatric illness is complex. Indeed, most genes exhibiting such phenotypic crossover do not encode products that are known to physically interact or function in a shared biochemical pathway. This suggests that apparently disparate risk genes may be related at a higher level of biological integration, through convergent effects on a common cellular structure or process.
One such shared cellular node, which is already well recognized, is the synapse. Numerous genes associated with severe neuropsychiatric disorders affect synaptic structure or function [13], [14]. Even though their respective gene products are not related by direct interaction, or through any single biochemical pathway, these genes converge in supporting the integrated operation of synapses in intercellular signaling. Only a subset of neuropsychiatric risk genes are known to affect synapses, however. Moreover, synapses are specific to neural cell types, whereas neuropsychiatric disorders have systemic manifestations and many disease-implicated genes are expressed also outside the nervous system [15]. This raises the question of whether there exist additional cellular nodes at which disease-linked genes converge, and if such convergence of disease-linked genes can be observed in non-neural cells.
Here we describe a cell culture-based approach for addressing these questions, and provide evidence suggesting that the primary cilium represents such a node. Specifically, we identify 20 genes previously linked to diverse neuropsychiatric disorders -including SCZ, BAD, ASD and ID - which converge in supporting proper cilium formation or maintenance in a simplified non-neural model system.
Results
We showed previously that knocking down expression of DISC1, a gene linked to SCZ, BAD and ASD, disrupts primary cilia in medium spiny neurons cultured from rat striatum. We also established that DISC1 is endogenously expressed in NIH3T3 cells, an experimentally advantageous non-neural cell model, and that the ciliation defect of DISC1 knockdown could be reliably observed in this cell type [16]. Accordingly, in the present study we extended our search to ask if primary cilia are affected by knockdown of other broadly expressed genes linked to major neuropsychiatric disorders, sampling a variety of candidates and verifying their endogenous expression in NIH3T3 cells. First, we considered disease-linked genes encoding proteins already known to physically interact with DISC1 [17], [18], [19], [20]. Second, we sampled genes whose protein products are not known to interact with DISC1, and whose disease associations have been identified through rare variants distinct from DISC1. Third, we investigated a sampling of genes whose disease associations have been detected independently in large genome-wide association studies ( Tables 1 , 2 , and 3 , respectively).
Table 1. Summary of DISC1 interactors tested.
Gene symbol | SCZ | ASD | BAD | ID | Cilia phenotype | Full name | Proposed function |
CEP63 | 21983783 | centrosomal protein 63 kDa | centrosome, cytoskeleton | ||||
CEP170 | 21926974 | centrosomal protein 170 kDa | centrosome, cytoskeleton | ||||
FEZ1 | 1552225, 21926974 | fasciculation and elongation protein zeta 1 | cytoskeleton | ||||
PDE4B | 16293762 | phosphodiesterase 4B | cAMP hydrolysis | ||||
SYNE1 | 20351715 | 21572417, 21738484 21926972, 22565781 | 19596800 | spectrin repeat containing, nuclear envelope 1 | cytoskeleton |
Table 2. Summary of rare variants tested.
Gene symbol | SCZ | ASD | BAD | ID | Cilia phenotype | Full name | Proposed function |
ABCA13 | 19944402 | 22495311 | 19944402 | ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 13 | transporter | ||
ASPM | 12355089, 15355437, 16673149, 14722158 19028728, 9770472 20978018 | asp (abnormal spindle) homolog, microcephaly associated (Drosophila) | Regulation of mitotic spindle | ||||
CCDC18 | 22495311 | coiled-coil domain containing 18 | unknown | ||||
CHD1 | 22495311 | chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 1Probable transcription regulator | Transcription regulator | ||||
CHD3 | 22495309 | chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 3 | Transcription regulator | ||||
CHD5 | See 1p36 | See 1p36 One gene 22495309 | See 1p36 | See 1p36 | chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 5Probable transcription regulator | Transcription regulator | |
CHD7 | 22495309, 1563772 1635959, 15688419 | 21378379 | chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7 | Transcription regulator | |||
CNTN4 | 19404257, 18349135 18551756 | contactin 4 | Cell surface interaction | ||||
CNTNAP2 | 17646849 | 16571880, 19896110 | contactin associated protein-like 2 | unknown | |||
FOXP1 | 20950788,21572417 22521361 | 20950788, 20848658 | forkhead box P1 | Transcription regulator | |||
GNB1L | See 22q11 | See 22q11, Also 2 genes, 16684884 | See 22q11 | See 22q11, Also 1 gene, 22095694 | guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), beta polypeptide 1-like | G protein beta subunit | |
KATNAL2 | 22495311, 22495309 | katanin p60 subunit A-like 2 | Microtubule severing | ||||
KIF17 | 20646681 | kinesin family member 17 | Microtubule motor | ||||
NRXN1 | 18668038, 17989066 19197363,18945720 19736351 | 20468056,19736351 18179900, 20531469 17322880, 20162629 | 20468056, 19736351 19896112 | neurexin 1 | Cell surface interaction | ||
TBX1 | See 22q11 | See 22q11, Also 2 genes 1668488 | See 22q11 | T-box 1 | Transcription regulator | ||
22q11 Deletion Syndrome | 7644464, 18668038 19557195, 18668039 10509171 | 16684884, 19557195 20020400, 18252227 7455106, 20531469 19046189, 17322880 | 22095694, 16208694, 20020400 | ||||
1p36 Deletion Syndrome | 19805367 | 8914743, 19015223 20034100, 16840569 1075546, 15689456 | 9326330, 18245432, 12687501, 16835933, 20034097 |
Table 3. Summary of common variants tested.
Common Variants | SCZ | ASD | BAD | ID | Cilia phenotype | Full name | Proposed function |
ANK3 | 2018514, 21926974 | 22521361 | 18711365, 20351715 21926972, 21926974 | ankyrin 3, node of Ranvier (ankyrin G) | cytoskeleton | ||
CACNA1C | 21926974 | 15454078 | 18711365, 21926972 21926974 | calcium channel, voltage-dependent, L type, alpha 1C subunit | Calcium channel | ||
CCDC68 | 21926974, 21791550 | coiled-coil domain containing 68 | unknown | ||||
CNNM2 | 21926974 | Ancient conserved domain-containing protein 2 | Divalent metal cation transporter | ||||
CSMD1 | 21926974 | CUB and Sushi multiple domains 1 | Unknown, type I membrane protein | ||||
HISTH2BJ | 19571808, 19571809 | histone cluster 1, H2bj | Chromatin structure | ||||
IFT88 | 20713499 | 11062270 | intraflagellar transport 88 homolog | Component of intraflagellar transport complex | |||
MIR137 | 21926974 | microRNA 137 | Gene regulation | ||||
MMP16 | 21926974 | matrix metallopeptidase 16 (membrane-inserted) | Endopeptidase for ECM substrates | ||||
NEK4 | 21926972 21926974 | 21926972, 21926974 19416921 | 21685204 | Serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek4 | kinase | ||
NRGN | 19571808 21791550 | neurogranin | Signaling mediator | ||||
NOTCH4 | 1,957,180,819,571,810 | notch 4 | Signaling receptor | ||||
NT5C2 | 21926974 | 5′-nucleotidase, cytosolic II | Hydrolysis of purine nucleotides | ||||
ODZ4 | 21926972 | odz, odd Oz/ten-m homolog 4 (Drosophila) | Signal transduction | ||||
PGBD1 | 1,957,180,819,571,810 | piggyBac transposable element derived 1 | unknown | ||||
PRSS16 | 1957180, 9571809 | protease, serine, 16 (thymus) | protease | ||||
SDCCAG8 | 21926974 | 20835237 | serologically defined colon cancer antigen 8 | Polarity, ciliogenesis | |||
STT3A | 21926974 | STT3, subunit of the oligosaccharyltransferase complex, homolog A (S. cerevisiae) | N-glycosylation | ||||
TCF4 | 19571811, 19571808 21926974 | :22521361 | 17478476 | 20713499 | transcription factor 4 | Transcription factor, wnt signalling | |
TRANK1 | 22182935, 21926972 | tetratricopeptide repeat and ankyrin repeat containing 1 | unknown | ||||
TRIM26 | 21926974 | tripartite motif containing 26 | unknown |
Numbers indicate Pubmed ID for primary references to disease associations or cilia phenotype, as indicated. Gene name and proposed function are excerpted from the Uniprot database.
Candidate genes were knocked down in NIH3T3 cells by specific siRNA transfection. Knockdown was assessed using quantitative reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Fluorescence microscopy was used to assess the effects of gene knockdown on the fraction of cells in the culture expressing a primary cilium. We designed a screening strategy ( Fig. 1 ) that required any gene scored as a hit to meet three critical experimental criteria: First, the knockdown effect on ciliation must be reproducible using at least two independent RNA duplexes. Second, endogenous expression of the gene must be verified in the cell model. Third, the observed effects of each RNA duplex on ciliation must correlate with the degree of knockdown achieved.
Acetylated tubulin immunoreactivity was used as a cilia marker, and DAPI was used to stain nuclei (see Experimental Procedures). In untransfected cultures, or cultures transfected with control (scrambled, nonsilencing) duplex, 50–60% of cells recognized by DAPI stain ( Fig. 2 A, top row) possessed a clearly visible primary cilium recognized by acetylated tubulin immunoreactivity ( Fig. 2 A, middle row). The arrow in the figure indicates an example, which is shown at higher magnification in the merged image ( Fig. 2 A, bottom row). As expected [21], a previously validated [16] siRNA targeting IFT88 caused a visually obvious decrease in the number of ciliated cells (compare left and right panels). To quantify effects on ciliation, the fraction of ciliated cells observed in siRNA-transfected cultures was determined relative to that observed in control (scrambled RNA) -transfected cultures in the same experiment, and this normalized value was then averaged across multiple experiments. Quantification across multiple specimens verified that IFT88 knockdown reliably produced a pronounced (∼75%) reduction in the number of cells expressing a primary cilia ( Fig. 2B , compare first and second bars from the left). Knockdown of PCM1, another positive control [22], [23], also reliably reduced ciliation albeit to to a lesser degree (∼35%; Fig. 2B , compare first and third bars from the left). We chose this degree of ciliary depletion, which exceeded four standard deviations from the effect any negative control RNA duplex, as a conservative threshold for scoring positive hits with siRNAs targeting the candidate genes ( Fig. 2 B, blue line).
The majority of candidate genes that encode DISC1-interacting proteins strongly inhibited ciliation when knocked down. FEZ1, CEP63 and PDE4B were identified in round one, based on the criterion of both duplexes producing a ciliation defect that correlated with knockdown verified by qRT-PCR ( Fig. 2 B and C). SYNE1 was called in round two due to a non-silencing duplex in round one (Syne1-2, Fig. 2C ), followed by confirmed effects of independent duplexes in round two. A split was also observed in round one for CEP170 but, in contrast to SYNE1, the independent duplexes tested in round two failed to reduce % ciliation below our experimental threshold; accordingly CEP170 was not scored as a hit. Thus, using this conservative assay strategy, four of the five disease-associated DISC1 interactors tested produced a clearly detectable loss of ciliation when knocked down ( Fig. 2 D): CEP63, FEZ1, PDE4B and SYNE1.
A number of genes whose protein products are not known to interact with DISC1, and whose disease linkage was detected through rare variants distinct from DISC1, also affected ciliation when knocked down. In our survey we tested 18 and, using the same experimental strategy and scoring criteria as for the direct DISC1 interactors, identified seven more disease-linked genes that reduced ciliation when depleted ( Fig. 3 A and B). Six of these were called in round one and two more in round two ( Fig. 3 C): ASPM, CHD4, CHD5, CHD7, GNB1L, KATNAL2, NRXN1 and TBX1.
We identified still more hits by sampling broadly expressed genes that have been independently implicated in neuropsychiatric disease through large GWAS efforts. Specifically, of the 19 genes tested in our limited screening effort, eight strongly reduced ciliation when knocked down ( Fig. 4 A and B): ANK3, CCDC68, NEK4, NOTCH4, NT5C2, SDCCAG8, TCF4 and TRANK1 ( Fig. 4C ).
In carrying out the screen, we also noticed that some siRNAs had an opposite effect- they appeared to increase the frequency of ciliation observed in transfected cultures. To verify this, we applied the same criteria as used in the primary screen for cilia loss, except we required at least two independent duplexes to produce a significant increase in % ciliation, and we excluded any candidate for which this phenotype did not correlate with knockdown assessed by qRT-PCR. The genes whose knockdown produced this effect were CCDC18 and FOXP1 (green bars in Fig. 3A and B ). We also noticed increased % ciliation in cells transfected with the MIR137 mimic (green bars in Fig. 4A and B ). This effect was visually striking in some of the transfected cells ( Fig. 5A shows an example for the MIR137 mimic) and a significant, albeit moderate, increase in average cilia length (relative to the scrambled control) was verified for all of the hits in this group ( Fig. 5B ).
Discussion
In the present study we identified 20 genes linked to phenotypically diverse clinical syndromes including SCZ, BAD, ASD and ID, which disrupt primary cilia when knocked down in a simple cell culture model, and three for which altering cellular expression increases the frequency of ciliation and cilia length. Three of the genes identified- NEK4, SDCCAG8 and SYNE1- were previously reported to function in ciliogeneisis [24], [25], [26], supporting the validity of the present screening approach and revealing a ciliary phenotype for 20 additional candidates. This is a remarkably high hit rate relative to that observed in RNAi screens not focusing on neuropsychiatric risk genes, and we note that screening the druggable genome collection for ciliary defects achieved <1% hit rate using similar methods and scoring criteria [27]. With the exception of DISC interactors and CHD4/CHD5 [28], we are not aware of previous evidence for physical or functional interaction between the hits identified in the present study. Accordingly, we propose that the present cell-based screen has the potential to detect additional relationship(s) between disease genes, and that primary cilia may represent a common cellular ‘node’ at which the effects of diverse neuropsychiatric risk genes converge.
We pursued a simple loss-of-function approach, based on RNAi-mediated knockdown in a non-neural cellular model, and thus focused on detecting conserved normal cellular functions of the selected candidate genes. We did not attempt to test specific disease-linked alleles, or disease-relevant neuronal populations, although doing so could represent an interesting future direction. Accordingly, the present results do not indicate that neuropsychiatric disorders represent ciliopathies per se. Indeed this seems unlikely, as major neuropsychiatric syndromes are not associated with classical manifestations of gross cilia loss or dysfunction. Rather, the present results suggest that primary cilia represent a common cellular node at which diverse disease-linked genes impact proper formation, maintenance or regulation. Thus we would propose that neuropsychiatric pathology could involve relatively subtle defects in the structure or function of primary cilia, rather than a complete disruption, much like disease-linked genes affecting the synapse do not simply abrogate neurotransmission in affected individuals.
The primary cilium represents a complex and dynamic cellular structure that is conserved in neurons and non-neural cell types, and which mediates diverse and important functions in cellular signaling [29]. Primary cilia display numerous receptors and downstream signaling components that are important both in development and adult tissue function, including D1 and D2 dopamine receptors which are affected by drugs used currently in the management of neuropsychiatric illness [16], [30]. Moreover, while classical ciliopathies and primary neuropsychiatric disorders are discrete clinical entities, many ciliopathies have behavioral manifestations [31]. Thus we think that ciliary convergence of diverse neuropsychiatric risk genes, as suggested by the present analysis, is plausible with regard to previous knowledge in the area.
The present study took a simplified cell culture-based approach that was motivated by 1) extensive conservation of primary cilia across cell types, 2) the fact that many of genes implicated in neuropsychiatric disease are expressed widely in neural as well as non-neural tissues, and 3) previous evidence showing that NIH3T3 cells reliably detect DISC1-dependent ciliation effects. A possible implication of our results is that primary cilia contribute directly to neuropsychiatric pathophysiology and/or determine disease vulnerability. Alternatively, because primary cilia are themselves complex structures that are functionally associated with numerous cellular processes, our results could reflect a more distant convergence of disease-linked genes [32], [33]. In either case, our results establish a starting point for elucidating the cellular function of genes determining neuropsychiatric disease risk. They may also provide a useful approach for identifying biochemical events occurring downstream of disease-linked gene convergence, and thus reveal new targets for therapeutic consideration.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture and Transfection
NIH3T3 cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA) were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (University of California, San Francisco, Cell Culture Facility). The fraction of ciliated cells declined with extended passaging, so all experiments were carried out using early-passage cells within 30 days of thaw.
RNA Depletion
Predesigned siRNA duplexes were ordered from (Qiagen). A complete list of siRNA target sequences is provided in Table S1. Duplexes were transfected using Lipofectamine RNAi-max (Invitrogen) using the optimized protocol provided by the manufacturer for NIH3T3 cells. In all experiments reagent amounts were scaled to 12 well plates, based on the optimized protocol listed for 24-well plates. Experiments were conducted 3 days after siRNA transfection followed 6 hours of starvation. For each gene selected for RNA analysis cell lysates from NIH3T3 cells were run in triplicate through Qiashredder columns (Qiagen) and RNA was purified and concentrated in RNeasy MinElute columns (Qiagen). Using Brilliant II SYBR Green dye chemistry (Qiagen), qRT-PCR was performed with the Stratagene MX4000. Data from the assay were standardized and normalized with MxPro software (Stratagene). A complete list of amplification primers is presented in Table S2.
Fluorescence Microscopy
Cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde dissolved in PBS and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X- 100 and 3% milk in PBS. We incubated cells with mouse anti-acetylated tubulin (Sigma, 1 µg/ml for 60 min) and then probed with goat anti-rabbit Alexa594 (Invitrogen) for 20 minutes. For cilia counts in NIH3T3 cells, we stained for acetylated tubulin in NIH3T3 cells indicated above. Across experiments, under control (scrambled RNA duplex) conditions, 55±5% cells formed primary cilia. This was determined by counting the number of primary cilia labeled with acetylated tubulin and dividing by the number of DAPI-positive cells examined. To assure unbiased analysis, in all cases microscopic fields with similar cell density were first selected at random by DAPI staining, and then acetylated tubulin immunoreactivity was examined to score cilia. Each siRNA condition was measured in the same manner. For each duplex, experiments were preformed at least 5 times on separate days. In each experiment, ≥150 cells were examined for each condition. Specimens were imaged by epifluorescence microscopy using a Nikon inverted microscope, 60×, numerical aperture 1.4 objective (Nikon), mercury arc lamp illumination and standard dichroic filter sets (Chroma). Images were captured using a cooled CCD camera (Princeton Instruments) and exposures adjusted to avoid saturation. For display, acquired images were converted to 8 bit format with ImageJ software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) using linear lookup tables. Cilia length was measured in fluorescence images as described [34].
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data were averaged across multiple independent experiments, with the number of experiments specified in the corresponding figure legend. Unless indicated otherwise, the error bars represent the S.E.M. calculated across experiments calculated using Prism 4.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.).
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the von Zastrow, Cheyette, Marshall and Reiter laboratories for valuable discussion, and Mirko Srzentich for inspiration.
Funding Statement
These studies were supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (DA010154) and the Friends of Langley Porter Endowed Chair for Research in Schizophrenia and Depression. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Baala L, Audollent S, Martinovic J, Ozilou C, Babron MC, et al. (2007) Pleiotropic effects of CEP290 (NPHP6) mutations extend to Meckel syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 81: 170–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bergmann C, Fliegauf M, Bruchle NO, Frank V, Olbrich H, et al. (2008) Loss of nephrocystin-3 function can cause embryonic lethality, Meckel-Gruber-like syndrome, situs inversus, and renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia. Am J Hum Genet 82: 959–970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Gerdes JM, Davis EE, Katsanis N (2009) The vertebrate primary cilium in development, homeostasis, and disease. Cell 137: 32–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Leitch CC, Zaghloul NA, Davis EE, Stoetzel C, Diaz-Font A, et al. (2008) Hypomorphic mutations in syndromic encephalocele genes are associated with Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Nat Genet 40: 443–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Olbrich H, Fliegauf M, Hoefele J, Kispert A, Otto E, et al. (2003) Mutations in a novel gene, NPHP3, cause adolescent nephronophthisis, tapeto-retinal degeneration and hepatic fibrosis. Nat Genet 34: 455–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sayer JA, Otto EA, O’Toole JF, Nurnberg G, Kennedy MA, et al. (2006) The centrosomal protein nephrocystin-6 is mutated in Joubert syndrome and activates transcription factor ATF4. Nat Genet 38: 674–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ripke S, Sanders AR, Kendler KS, Levinson DF, Sklar P, et al. (2011) Genome-wide association study identifies five new schizophrenia loci. Nat Genet 43: 969–976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sklar P, Ripke S, Scott LJ, Andreassen OA, Cichon S, et al. (2011) Large-scale genome-wide association analysis of bipolar disorder identifies a new susceptibility locus near ODZ4. Nat Genet 43: 977–983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Knight HM, Pickard BS, Maclean A, Malloy MP, Soares DC, et al. (2009) A cytogenetic abnormality and rare coding variants identify ABCA13 as a candidate gene in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Am J Hum Genet 85: 833–846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Millar JK, Wilson-Annan JC, Anderson S, Christie S, Taylor MS, et al. (2000) Disruption of two novel genes by a translocation co-segregating with schizophrenia. Hum Mol Genet 9: 1415–1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. St Clair D, Blackwood D, Muir W, Carothers A, Walker M, et al. (1990) Association within a family of a balanced autosomal translocation with major mental illness. Lancet 336: 13–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Talkowski ME, Rosenfeld JA, Blumenthal I, Pillalamarri V, Chiang C, et al. (2012) Sequencing Chromosomal Abnormalities Reveals Neurodevelopmental Loci that Confer Risk across Diagnostic Boundaries. Cell 149: 525–537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kirov G, Pocklington AJ, Holmans P, Ivanov D, Ikeda M, et al. (2012) De novo CNV analysis implicates specific abnormalities of postsynaptic signalling complexes in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 17: 142–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grant SG (2012) Synaptopathies: diseases of the synaptome. Curr Opin Neurobiol. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15. Betancur C (2011) Etiological heterogeneity in autism spectrum disorders: more than 100 genetic and genomic disorders and still counting. Brain Res 1380: 42–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Marley A, von Zastrow M (2010) DISC1 regulates primary cilia that display specific dopamine receptors. PLoS One 5: e10902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Miyoshi K, Honda A, Baba K, Taniguchi M, Oono K, et al. (2003) Disrupted-In-Schizophrenia 1, a candidate gene for schizophrenia, participates in neurite outgrowth. Mol Psychiatry 8: 685–694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Morris JA, Kandpal G, Ma L, Austin CP (2003) DISC1 (Disrupted-In-Schizophrenia 1) is a centrosome-associated protein that interacts with MAP1A, MIPT3, ATF4/5 and NUDEL: regulation and loss of interaction with mutation. Hum Mol Genet 12: 1591–1608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Camargo LM, Collura V, Rain JC, Mizuguchi K, Hermjakob H, et al. (2007) Disrupted in Schizophrenia 1 Interactome: evidence for the close connectivity of risk genes and a potential synaptic basis for schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 12: 74–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Millar JK, Pickard BS, Mackie S, James R, Christie S, et al. (2005) DISC1 and PDE4B are interacting genetic factors in schizophrenia that regulate cAMP signaling. Science 310: 1187–1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Pazour GJ, Dickert BL, Vucica Y, Seeley ES, Rosenbaum JL, et al. (2000) Chlamydomonas IFT88 and its mouse homologue, polycystic kidney disease gene tg737, are required for assembly of cilia and flagella. J Cell Biol 151: 709–718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kubo A, Sasaki H, Yuba-Kubo A, Tsukita S, Shiina N (1999) Centriolar satellites: molecular characterization, ATP-dependent movement toward centrioles and possible involvement in ciliogenesis. J Cell Biol 147: 969–980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kim J, Krishnaswami SR, Gleeson JG (2008) CEP290 interacts with the centriolar satellite component PCM-1 and is required for Rab8 localization to the primary cilium. Hum Mol Genet 17: 3796–3805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Coene KL, Mans DA, Boldt K, Gloeckner CJ, van Reeuwijk J, et al. (2011) The ciliopathy-associated protein homologs RPGRIP1 and RPGRIP1L are linked to cilium integrity through interaction with Nek4 serine/threonine kinase. Hum Mol Genet 20: 3592–3605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Otto EA, Hurd TW, Airik R, Chaki M, Zhou W, et al. (2010) Candidate exome capture identifies mutation of SDCCAG8 as the cause of a retinal-renal ciliopathy. Nat Genet 42: 840–850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Dawe HR, Adams M, Wheway G, Szymanska K, Logan CV, et al. (2009) Nesprin-2 interacts with meckelin and mediates ciliogenesis via remodelling of the actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 122: 2716–2726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kim J, Lee JE, Heynen-Genel S, Suyama E, Ono K, et al. (2010) Functional genomic screen for modulators of ciliogenesis and cilium length. Nature 464: 1048–1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Rahman S, Sowa ME, Ottinger M, Smith JA, Shi Y, et al. (2011) The Brd4 extraterminal domain confers transcription activation independent of pTEFb by recruiting multiple proteins, including NSD3. Mol Cell Biol 31: 2641–2652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Singla V, Reiter JF (2006) The primary cilium as the cell’s antenna: signaling at a sensory organelle. Science 313: 629–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Domire JS, Green JA, Lee KG, Johnson AD, Askwith CC, et al. (2011) Dopamine receptor 1 localizes to neuronal cilia in a dynamic process that requires the Bardet-Biedl syndrome proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci 68: 2951–2960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lee JE, Gleeson JG (2011) Cilia in the nervous system: linking cilia function and neurodevelopmental disorders. Curr Opin Neurol 24: 98–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Follit JA, Tuft RA, Fogarty KE, Pazour GJ (2006) The intraflagellar transport protein IFT20 is associated with the Golgi complex and is required for cilia assembly. Mol Biol Cell 17: 3781–3792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Oh EC, Katsanis N (2012) Cilia in vertebrate development and disease. Development 139: 443–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Avasthi P, Marley A, Lin H, Gregori-Puigjane E, Shoichet BK, et al. (2012) A chemical screen identifies class a g-protein coupled receptors as regulators of cilia. ACS Chem Biol 7: 911–919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.