Skip to main content
PMC home page
Cytotechnology logoLink to Cytotechnology
. 2002 Jul;39(2):55–67. doi: 10.1023/A:1022949730029

Cell line provenance

R Ian Freshney 1
PMCID: PMC3463983  PMID: 19003293

Abstract

Cultured cell lines have become an extremely valuable resource, both in academic research and in industrial biotechnology. However, their value is frequently compromised by misidentification and undetected microbial contamination. As detailed elsewhere in this volume, the technology, both simple and sophisticated, is available to remedy the problems of misidentification and contamination, given the will to apply it. Combined with proper records of the origin and history of the cell line, assays for authentication and contamination contribute to the provenance of the cell line. Detailed records should start from the initiation or receipt of the cell line, and should incorporate data on the donor as well as the tissue from which the cell line was derived, should continue with details of maintenance, and include any accidental as well as deliberate deviations from normal maintenance. Records should also contain details of authentication and regular checks for contamination. With this information, preferably stored in a database, and suitable backed up, the provenance of the cell line so created makes the cell line a much more valuable resource, fit for validation in industrial applications and more likely to provide reproducible experimental results when disseminated for research in other laboratories.

Keywords: cell lines, industrial biotechnology, microbialcontamination

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (326.4 KB).

References

  1. Andersson LC, Jokinen M, Gahmberg CG. Induction of erythroid differentiation in the human leukaemia cell line K562. Nature. 1979;278:364–365. doi: 10.1038/278364a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burchell J, Durbin H, Taylor-Papadimitriou J. Complexity of expression of antigenic determinants, recognized by monoclonal antibodies HMFG-l and HMFG-2 in normal and malignant human mammary epithelial cells. J Immunol. 1983;131:508–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. The United Kingdom Compliance Programme. London: HMSO; 1986. Good laboratory practice. [Google Scholar]
  4. Federal Register 21. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 58. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fojo A, Akiyana S-I, Gottesman MM, Pastan I. Reduced drug accumulation in multiple drug resistant human KB carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 1985;51:67–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Freshney RI. Culture of Animal Cells, a Manual of Basic Technique. New York: Wiley; 2000. pp. 269–283. [Google Scholar]
  7. Freshney RI. Culture of Animal Cells, a Manual of Basic Technique. New York: Wiley; 2000. pp. 51–63. [Google Scholar]
  8. Freshney RI. Introduction. In: Freshney RI, Freshney MG, editors. Culture of Epithelial Cells. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2002. pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  9. Friend C, Scher W, Holland JG, Sato T. Hemoglobin synthesis in murine virus-induced leukemic cells in vitro. 2. Stimulation of erythroid differentiation by dimethyl sulfoxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1971;68:378–382. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.2.378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hay RJ. Cell Line Preservation and Characterization. In: Masters JWR, editor. Animal Cell Culture, a Practical Approach. Oxford, UK: IRL Press at Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 95–148. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hay RJ. Cell Quantitation and Characterization. In: Atala A, Lanza RP, editors. Methods of Tissue Engineering. San Diego: Academic Press; 2002. pp. 55–84. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayflick L, Moorhead PS. The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res. 1961;25:585–621. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90192-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heyderman E, Strudley I, Powell G, Richardson TC, Cordell IL, Mason DY. A new monoclonal antibody to epithelial membrane antigen (EMA)E29. A comparison of its immunocytochemical reactivity with polyclonal anti-EMA antibodies and with another monoclonal antibody, HMFG-2. Br J Cancer. 1985;52:355–361. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1985.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ikeda T, Sawada N, Satoh M, Mori M. Induction of tyrosine aminotransferase of primary cultured rat hepatocytes depends on the organization of microtubules. J Cell Physiol. 1998;175:41–49. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199804)175:1<41::AID-JCP5>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Keith WN. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation. In: Masters JWR, editor. Animal Cell Culture, a Practical Approach. Oxford, UK: IRL Press at Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 221–233. [Google Scholar]
  16. MacLeod RA, Dirks WG, Matsuo Y, Kaufmann M, Milch H, Drexler HG. Widespread intraspecies cross-contamination of human tumor cell lines arising at source. Int J Cancer. 1999;83:555–563. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19991112)83:4<555::AID-IJC19>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nelson-Rees W, Daniels D, Flandermeyer RR. Cross Contamination of cells in culture. Science. 1981;212:446–452. doi: 10.1126/science.6451928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Otsu K, Ito K, Kuzumaki T, Iuchi Y. Differential regulation of liver-specific and ubiquitously-expressed genes in primary rat hepatocytes by the extracellular matrix. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2001;11:33–40. doi: 10.1159/000047790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Parkinson EK, Yeudall WA. In: Culture of Epithelial Cells. 2nd ed. Freshney RI, Freshney MG, editors. New York: Wiley; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pollack MS, Heagney SD, Livingston PO, Fogh J. HLAA, B, C and DR alloantigen expression on forty-six cultured human tumor cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;66:1003–1012. doi: 10.1093/jnci/66.6.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Raff MC, Fields KL, Hakomori SL, Minsky R, Pruss RM, Winter J. Cell-type-specific markers for distinguishing and studying neurons and the major classes of glial cells in culture. Brain Res. 1979;174:283–309. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90851-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sasaki M, Honda T, Yamada H, Wake N, Barrett JC. Evidence for multiple pathways to cellular senescence. Cancer Res. 1994;54:6090–6093. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schleger C, Heck R, Niketeghad F, Schirmacher P, Radaeva S, Oesch F, Dienes HP, Bannasch P, Steinberg P. Establishment and characterization of a nontumorigenic cell line derived from a human hepatocellular adenoma expressing hepatocyte-specific markers. Exp Cell Res. 1997;236:418–426. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Soule HD, Maloney TM, Wolman SR, Teterson WD, Brenz R, McGrath CM, Russo J, Pauley RJ, Jones RF, Brooks SC. Isolation and characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human breast epithelial cell line, MCF-10. Cancer Res. 1990;50:6075–6086. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stacey GN, Masters JRM, Hay RJ, Drexler HG, MacLeod RAF, Freshney RI. Cell contamination leads to inaccurate data: We must take action now. Nature. 2000;403:456. doi: 10.1038/35000394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Villa S, Delia D. Analysis of leukocyte antigens detected by immunoenzymatic staining on human bone marrow colonies. Experim Hematol. 1988;16:340–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cytotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

RESOURCES