Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adv Nurs. 2012 Mar 14;68(10):2140–2154. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05974.x

External Validity of Physical Activity Interventions for Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Fall Risk: A Quantitative Systematic Literature Review

Siobhan McMahon 1, Julie Fleury 2
PMCID: PMC3463998  NIHMSID: NIHMS364240  PMID: 22416905

Abstract

Aim

To appraise the external validity of physical activity interventions designed to reduce falls among community-dwelling older adults, using the reach, efficacy/effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework.

Background

Falls are a globally common, significant, and preventable problem. The efficacy of physical activity interventions to reduce falls among older adults is well established. Translation of this research into practice is slow as evidenced by persistently low proportions of older adults who engage in physical activities and the rising incidence of falls.

Data Sources

Four electronic databases were searched for relevant studies published between 2000 and 2010. Studies that examined the effects of physical activity interventions designed to reduce falls among community dwelling older adults were included in this review (n = 46).

Review Methods

This was a quantitative systematic review with narrative synthesis. The reach, efficacy/effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework guided the identification, appraisal, and synthesis of indicators representing study validity.

Results

The majority of studies in this review described indicators representing internal validity. Details about indicators representing external validity were reported infrequently, limiting the generalizability of fall-preventive physical activity interventions in diverse cultures and social contexts over time.

Conclusions

To foster translational research in real world settings, additional programmatic intervention research is needed that: (a) targets diverse populations; (b) incorporates theories of behavioural change; (c) describes and operationalizes critical content that enables replication and translation; (d) tests innovative measures of fall risk and physical activity; and (e) evaluates feasibility and acceptability.

Keywords: falls, fall prevention, physical activity interventions, older adults, systematic review, nursing

INTRODUCTION

Despite knowledge of the causes and correlations of fall occurrence and the efficacy of preventive interventions, falls continue to be the leading cause of injurious deaths among older adults, and their incidence is increasing in many areas (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2011; National Center for Health Statistics [NCHS] 2009; WHO, 2007). Approximately 28–35% of people 65 years old and older fall each year (World Health Organization [WHO], 2007). Rates of injurious and fatal falls in the U.S., since 2005, have increased 16% and 12% respectively (CDC, 2011).

Among the modifiable risk factors, leg weakness, gait changes, and imbalance are the most significant (American Geriatrics Society [AGS], British Geriatrics Society [BGS], American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and Panel of Falls Prevention, 2001; AGS, 2010). Age-related musculoskeletal changes that predispose older adults to decreased leg strength and imbalance may be attenuated with regular physical activity (Singh, 2002). Further, the benefits of multi-component physical activities and Tai Chi on the risk and occurrence of falls are well documented (Gillespie et al., 2009). Translation of this research into practice, however, is slow as evidenced by the persistently low proportion of older adults regularly engaging in physical activities and the continually rising incidence of falls.

The negative impact that falls and related injuries have on quality of life and cost is significant. Twenty to thirty percent of older adults who fall suffer moderate to severe injury, such as traumatic brain injury and fractures (Sleet et al., 2008). As many as 32% of those who fall require assistance with activities of daily living for up to six months after their fall (Schiller et al., 2007). In a study of community-dwelling older adults, Tinetti and Williams (1997) documented that injurious falls were associated with nursing home placement. Many older adults (23% – 43%) experience fear of falling, which in turn leads to activity restriction and additional fear of embarrassment and losing independence (Lach, 2005; Yardley and Smith, 2002). Dollars spent on direct medical costs of falls in the United States for persons aged 65 and older in 2005 totalled $19.4 billion and are expected to reach $43.8 billion by 2020 (CDC, 2011; Stevens et al., 2006).

Public health initiatives, such as those from the WHO (2007) and Healthy People 2020 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [USDHHS], 2011), promote regular physical activity across older adult populations. Nonetheless, survey data reveal that 56% of persons over the age of 74 are sedentary and only 12% engage in muscle-strengthening activities (CDC/NCHS, 2009). Over the last decade, there has been marked progress in research identifying correlates of and mechanisms for physical activity initiation and maintenance across populations. Review articles have been published focusing on the efficacy of physical activity interventions (Conn et al., 2003; Conn et al., 2002; King et al.,1998; van der Bij, et al., 2002), including programmes designed to reduce falls (Gillespie et al., 2009; Sherrington et al., 2008b). However, few have addressed the public health impact and translation of these programmes into real world settings. Despite support for physical activity intervention efficacy, the extent to which these interventions might be effectively adopted, implemented, and maintained remains unclear. Specific to older adults, the challenge remains to synthesize findings in a way that fosters the translation of this body of research into practice (Glasgow, et al., 2004; Glasgow and Emmons, 2007; Green and Glasgow, 2006; Whittemore, 2009).

One approach to appraising the translation potential of fall-preventive physical activity interventions is through the reach, efficacy/effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework (Glasgow and Emmons, 2007). The RE-AIM framework has been used to design and assess health behaviour interventions, and to evaluate translation potential through literature review (Akers et al., 2010; Antikainen and Ellis, 2011; RE-AIM, 2011; White, et al., 2009). Reach refers to participation rates of target audiences and the representativeness of participating individuals. Efficacy and effectiveness refers to the measurement and analysis of (i) health and behaviour outcomes that facilitate the explanation of change, clarify anticipated results, and identify unanticipated consequences; and (ii) global outcomes, such as quality of life and cost effectiveness. Adoption refers to the participation rate and representativeness of interventionists and delivery settings. Implementation refers to intervention fidelity, or the extent to which interventions are delivered as intended. Maintenance refers to the extent to which (i) the effects of an intervention are maintained among individuals over time; and (ii) an intervention becomes institutionalized or part of an organizational routine. Expanding literature review methods to include the RE-AIM framework, which emphasizes external validity (Glasgow et al., 2004), will clarify the translation potential of fall-preventive physical activity interventions.

THE REVIEW

Aim

The aim of this literature review was to appraise the external validity of physical activity interventions designed to reduce falls among community-dwelling older adults.

Design

A quantitative systematic review with narrative synthesis was performed. Methods relevant to the aim of this paper (e.g., problem identification, literature search, data extraction management and analysis) outlined by Whittemore (2005) and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (Liberati et al., 2009), were used in review processes. The RE-AIM framework guided the identification, appraisal, and synthesis of indicators representing each of its dimensions (RE-AIM, 2011). The presentation of results is based on the RE-AIM framework, whose goal is to encourage researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to think critically about intervention elements that improve sustainability, adoption, and implementation (Green and Glasgow, 2006).

Search Methods

Systematic computer searches were conducted in 2010 using PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Review databases (2000–2010). Search terms included: falls; accidental falls, fall prevention, nursing, physical activity intervention, exercise intervention, physical activity. Reference lists from relevant studies and resources were also reviewed to identify studies not found via computer search. Research reports were considered for the review that: (i) described intervention and intervention implementation studies, which included fall-preventive physical activity; (ii) included community-dwelling adults over the age of 60; (iii) examined intervention effects on physical activity behaviours, balance and strength, or fall occurrence; (iv) used quasi-experimental or randomized controlled trial methods; and (v) were published in the English language (see Figure 1). Studies were excluded that targeted persons in the hospital or in long term care settings.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Search results

Search Outcome

The search yielded 407 titles and abstracts. Seventy-two articles of relevance were read by both authors. Forty-six studies met inclusion criteria and were analysed for this review. Table 1 lists studies chosen for this review and key intervention characteristics.

Table 1.

Studies reviewed: Key intervention characteristics

Author Number Intervention Delivery Length (weeks) Attendance Attrition Long-term Follow-upa
Alpert et al. (2009) 68 Group 15 Attendance 100%
Attrition 13%
Ashburn et al. (2007) 142 Individual in home by PT 6 Attendance: 95%
Attrition 8%
Barnett et al. (2003) 163 Group in community by exercise instructor 52 Attendance 62%
Attrition 8%
Binder et al. (2002) 115 Group in exercise facility by PT tech 36 Attendance 100%
Attrition 23%
Bunout et al. (2005) 298 Group 52 Attendance 52%
Attrition 19%
Campbell et al. (2005) 391 Individual at home by PT 26 Attendance NA
Attrition 21%
Carter et al. (2002) 93 Group in community centres by instructors 20 Attendance 89%
Attrition 14%
Clemson et al. (2004) 310 Group in community by OT 7 Attendance NA
Attrition 9%
Day et al. (2002) 272 Group 15 80% attended > 50%
Attrition 11%
DiBrezzo et al. (2005) 16 Group in senior centres by instructors 10 Attendance 77%
Attrition 16%
Dubbert et al. (2002) 212 Individual in clinic and phone by RN 8 Attendance NA
Attrition 15%
Fukukawa et al. (2008) 29 Group in community centre 8 Adherence: NA
Attrition 11%
Greaney et al. (2008) 966 Individual over the phone by counsellors 52 Attendance: NA
Attrition 20%
Haines et al. (2009) 53 Individual via DVD/in person at home by PT 2 Attendance: NA
Attrition 34%
Hakim et al. (2003) 80 Group in community centre 12 Attendance NA
Attrition 34%
Hauer et al. (2001) 57 Group in rehabilitation by recreation specialist 12 Attendance 85%
Attrition 21%
Healy et al. (2008) 335 Group in community by volunteers 8 Attendance: 89%
Attrition: 25%
Helbostad et al. (2004) 77 Group and individual by PT 12 Attendance; > 80%
Attrition: 31%
Inokuchi et al. (2007) 268 Group in day centres by RN 17 Attendance 91%
Attrition 11%
Iwamoto et al. (2009) 68 Group in clinic or hospital 20 Attendance 100%
Attrition 1%
Kita et al. (2007) 683 Individual in clinic by MD 32 Attendance NA
Attrition 19%
La Forest et al. (2009) 200 Group in community by EI 12 Attendance 78%
Attrition 8%
Latham et al. (2003) 486 Individual in homes & phone by PT 10 Attendance 82%
Attrition 9%
Li et al. (2005) 256 Group by Tai Chi instructor 2 Attendance: 78%
Attrition 32.5%
Lin et al. (2006) 1200 Group in community by Tai Chi experts 52 Attendance 49%
Attrition 24.5%
Lin et al. (2007) 150 Individual in home by PT 16 Attendance: NA
Attrition 16%
Liu-Ambrose et al. (2004) 104 Group activity by EI 25 Attendance 78–85%
Attrition 6 %
Logghe et al. (2009) 269 Group by Tai Chi Chuan instructors 13 Attendance: 47% ≥ 80%
Attrition 11%
Lord et al. (2003) 551 Group in community by EI 52 Attendance 42.3%
Attrition 9%
Luukinen et al. (2007) 486 Individual & group (home & rehab) by PT /OT Attendance: NA
Attrition 13%
Means et al. (2005) 210 Group by PT 6 Attendance NA
Attrition 30%
Morgan et al. (2004) 219 Group by PT and assistant 8 Attendance 70%
Attrition 31.4%
Nitz & Choy (2004) 73 Group in clinic by PT and student 10 Attendance; NA
Attrition 39%
Robertson et al. (2001) 240 Individual in homes by RN 24 Attendance NA
Attrition 12%
Robitaille et al. (2005) 200 Group in community by fitness pro 12 Attendance78%
Attrition 18%
Rubenstein et al. (2000) 59 Group in clinic by PT students 12 Attendance: 84%
Attrition 12%
Sherrington et al. (2008a) 173 Group in rehabilitation by PT 5 Attendance: NA
Attrition 8%
Shigematsu et al. (2008) 68 Group in health centre by EI 12 Attendance: 84–91%
Attrition 5%
Skelton et al. (2005) 100 Group by EI 36 Attendance NA
Attrition 30%
Steadman et al. (2003) 198 Group in hospital setting by PT 6 Attendance NA
Attrition 33%
Suzuki et al. (2004) 52 Group in community centres 26 Attendance 75.3%
Attrition 15%
Vogler et al. (2009) 180 Individual in home by PT 12 Attendance 70%
Attrition 6%
Voukelatos et al. (2007) 702 Group in community by Tai Chi instructors 16 Attendance: 71%
Attrition 3%
Weerdesteyn et al. (2006) 113 Group 5 Attendance 87%
Attrition 11%
Weerdesteyn et al. (2009) 88 Group in rehabilitation by PT 5 Attendance: NA
Attrition: NA
Woo et al. (2007 180 Group in community centres 52 Attendance 76.3–81%
Attrition 2%
a

= Follow up of 6 months or longer

EI=Exercise Instructor

MD= Medical Doctor

NA= Data not available

PT= Physical therapyst or Physiotherapist

RN= Registered Nurse

Quality Appraisal

Using criteria indicators of each RE-AIM dimensions (Table 2), both authors independently appraised each of the 46 studies included in this review. Authors re-examined articles in which their analyses were discordant, discussing differences until consensus was reached. Findings were integrated into the results section of this paper.

Table 2.

RE-AIM framework dimensions and indicators

RE-AIM Dimension Indicators by RE-AIM dimension Percentage of studies that reported on each RE-AIM indicator

Reach
 Sample size 100 %
 Participant characteristics 100 %
 Description of the target population 98 %
 Selection criteria 95 %
 Participation rate 43 %
 Characteristics of non-participants 2 %
 Cost of recruitment 2 %

Efficacy/effectiveness
 Behavioural outcome 24 %
 Primary outcome measures 100 %
 Primary outcome results 100 %
 Quality of life measures 22 %
 Cost effectiveness 4 %
 Critical inputs guided by theory 9 %
 Adverse outcomes 39 %

Adoption
 Intervention setting and location 72 %
 Description of staff who delivered the intervention 82 %
 Method to identify target delivery agent 0%
 Level of expertise of delivery agent 67 %
 Inclusion/Exclusion of settings or interventionists 6 %
 Cost of adoption. 2 %

Implementation
 Intervention type and delivery 100 %
 Critical input identification 100 %
 Number of contacts 100 %
 Timing of contacts 95 %
 Duration of contacts 76 %
 Intervention fidelity 11 %
 Participant attendance 69 %
 Completion rates 98 %
 Attrition analysis 42 %
 Implementation cost. 9 %

Maintenance
 Follow up of at least 6 months 57 %
 Individual behaviour was described 6 months after the intervention 11 %
 Information on continued delivery 8 %

Data Abstraction

Data from eligible studies was abstracted to facilitate this review. Data coding was based on RE-AIM dimension indicators and intervention characteristics. Data was stored in an electronic spread sheet to facilitate descriptive analyses and data synthesis.

Data Synthesis

After quality appraisal and data abstraction, textual descriptions of each study were composed (see supporting information Table S1 in the online version of the article in Wiley Online Library). The RE-AIM dimension indicators (Table 2) and intervention characteristics (see supporting information Table S2 in the online version of the article in Wiley Online Library) were quantitatively summarized. A narrative synthesis of study results was organized by dimensions in the RE-AIM framework (Noyes et al., 2008; Popay et al., 2006; RE-AIM, 2011).

RESULTS

The selected studies were published between 2000 and 2010. Eighty-two percent tested interventions in controlled laboratory settings, while the remaining 18% were tested in community-based settings. Experimental design was used in 76% of the studies and quasi-experimental design in the remaining 24%.

Reach and Representativeness

The median sample size of studies reviewed was 198, ranging from 15 to 1200. Participants were described in the majority of studies; however documentation of race and ethnicity, socioeconomic characteristics, and fall risk factors was variable. Of the studies that described participant ethnicity or race, the proportion of African American study participants was less than 20% (Binder et al., 2002; Healy et al., 2008). Native Americans comprised approximately 10.5% in another study (Healy et al., 2008). The average age of participants ranged from 68 to 88 years (median 76 years); 51% to 95% were female across studies that included both genders. Six studies included only females and two included only males. Studies reporting education levels described most participants had a high school or college education. However, Healy (2008) and Lin and colleagues (2006) reported that 50.5% and 90% of their respective participants had ≤ 12 years of education. Forty-two percent of studies recruited individuals with fall risk, specifying inclusion factors such as a history of falls, frailty, fear, sedentary lifestyle, and imbalance. The remaining 58% of studies either did not target individuals with fall risk or targeted those with other risks, such as osteoporosis. Participation rates, defined as the number of persons initiating an intervention divided by the number of eligible participants identified (RE-AIM, 2011), were described by 43% of the studies reviewed and averaged 57%.

Efficacy and Effectiveness

Health outcomes were reported in all studies in terms of fall occurrence and/or fall risk. Fall occurrence (e.g., incidence rates, incidence risk ratios, mean differences) was identified as a primary or secondary outcome in 70% of the studies reviewed; 59% of these reported statistically significant intervention effects. The remaining 41% of reports measuring fall occurrence reported statistically insignificant intervention effects or statistically significant effects in both experimental and control groups.

Eighty-seven percent of studies reviewed also reported health outcomes in terms of fall risk (e.g., physical function, balance, strength) using more than 30 measures. Seventy-five percent of these studies described statistically significant improvements in at least one fall risk measure. Others describe statistically insignificant intervention effects on fall risk or statistically significant effects in both experimental and control groups. For example, Steadman and colleagues (2003) found that fall risk significantly decreased among intervention and control group participants. Helbostad and colleagues (2004) found equivalent results between groups that received traditional physiotherapy and physiotherapy plus instruction on home exercises. However, the sample size in their study (n = 77) may not have been large enough to detect important group differences. Two studies (Fukukawa et al., 2008, Greaney et al., 2008) reported no statistically significant change in fall risk among intervention participants for reasons that may relate to intervention dosing. Latham et al. (2003) reported no statistically significant intervention effects on fall occurrence or risk, to which they attributed promoting only quadriceps exercises.

In addition to health outcomes, behavioural outcomes were measured and reported in 24% of the studies reviewed. Two studies validated self-reported physical activity behaviour with objective measures via pedometers (Shigematsu et al., 2008) and accelerometers (Dubbert et al., 2002). Subjective measures included the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (Barnett et al., 2003; Clemson et al, 2003; Hauer, et al., 2001; Liu-Ambrose et al., 2005; Logghe et al., 2009), a walking diary or activity calendar (Dubbert et al., 2002; Hakim et al., 2008), a Likert scale eliciting exercise frequency (Shigematsu et al., 2008), the Yale Physical Activity Scale (Greaney et al., 2008; Rubenstein et al., 2000), Physician-based Assessment and Counselling on Exercise (Healy et al., 2008), and the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (LaForest et al., 2009). Results were not consistent within or across studies. Barnett and colleagues (2003) found that intervention participants experienced decreased falls and risk without changes in self-reported physical activity behaviours. Hauer and colleagues (2001) found that self-reported physical activity behaviour and fall risk improved significantly, but fall occurrence did not. In a study comparing resistance training to agility and flexibility training, fall risk decreased most significantly among resistance and agility groups, but self-reported physical activity behaviour was similar across all groups (Liu-Ambrose et al., 2005).

Psychosocial outcomes included depression, fear of falling, motivation, and social support. The Geriatric Depression Scale was used to measure depression in four studies; two of which reported statistically significant improvements in scores post-intervention (Inokuchi et al., 2007; Lin et al., 2007) while the remaining two reported no improvements (Alpert et al., 2009, Vogler et al., 2009). Fear of falling was measured using the Balance Self-Confidence scale (Robitalle et al., 2005), Falls Self-Efficacy Scale (Clemson et al., 2003, Fukukawa et al., 2008; Greaney et al., 2008; Healy et al., 2008;, Logghe et al., 2009; Nitz and Choy, 2004), the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (Clemson et al., 2003; Day et al., 2002; Latham et al., 2003; Vogler et al., 2009) the Mobility Efficacy Scale (Clemson et al., 2003) the Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly Scale (Li et al., 2005) a 10 cm visual analog scale (Lin et al., 2006; Lin et al., 2007; Weerdesteyn et al., 2009) the Falls Control and Falls Management scales (Healy et al., 2009), and the Activities Specific Balance Scale (Haines et al., 2009; Hakim et al., 2008). Of the studies measuring fear of falling, 46% reported improvements post-intervention. One study measured motivation using the exercise stages of change tool, which showed increased readiness post-intervention (Dubbert et al., 2002). Among the four studies measuring social support, two reported improvements via the Perceived Social Support of Exercise Scale, (Dubbert et al., 2002) and an investigator developed one item scale (Healy et al., 2008); and two reported no effects via an investigator developed five item scale (Fukukawa et al., 2008) and the Falls Handicap Inventory (Steadman et al., 2003).

Global outcomes, such as cost effectiveness and quality of life were reported infrequently. Robertson and colleagues (2001) described cost savings in a nurse-delivered exercise prescription intervention for persons over 80. Quality of life was measured via the brief version of the World Health Organization’s Quality of Life, the SF-36, the European Quality of Life Scale, and the Aging Frailty Scale (Ashburn et al., 2007; Carter et al., 2002; Steadman et al., 2003; Haines et al., 2009). Intervention effects on quality of life ranged from positive among intervention participants (Ashburn et al., 2007) to positive among all study participants (Steadman et al., 2003) to having no effect (Carter et al., 2007; Haines et al., 2009).

Although many studies controlled for baseline demographic and risk variables, only six identified potential modifying variables (Binder et al., 2002; Healy et al., 2008; Means and O’Sullivan, 2005; Rubenstein et al., 2000; Robitallie et al., 2005). The majority of these reports did not describe moderator analyses or interpretations. One study reported an interaction between baseline social support and self-efficacy; those with lower baseline social support had higher self-efficacy post-intervention (Fukukawa et al., 2008).

Four of the studies reviewed referenced a theoretical framework. Hakim and colleagues (2008) designed and tested a fall risk reduction programme operationalizing social cognitive theory constructs of behavioural capability, expectations, expectancies, components of observational learning, and self-efficacy. Although there were significant changes in fall risk and knowledge, measures and outcomes representing all theoretical constructs were not described (Hakim et al., 2008). Greaney and colleagues (2008) evaluated an intervention tailored to stage of change, consistent with the transtheoretical model. Intervention effects were seen when maintenance group participants were removed from analyses (Greaney et al., 2008). Healy and colleagues (2008) examined the efficacy of coaches in assisting persons to decrease their fear of falling and falls operationalizing cognitive behavioural constructs of self-efficacy, goal setting, and knowledge. Although self-reported physical activity and social activity did not improve significantly over time, measures of fall risk and fear of falling did improve significantly across data collection time points (Healy et al., 2008). Clemson and colleagues (2003) examined the effectiveness of an educational programme operationalizing the concepts of self-efficacy and decision making. Control group confidence and physical activity behaviours decreased over time compared to the intervention group, but differences were not statistically significant (Clemson et al., 2003).

Adoption

Many studies identified study setting and the level of interventionist expertise. Countries represented were Australia, Canada, China, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, The Netherlands, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Two studies (DiBrezzo et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2006) were conducted in rural locations. Group-based interventions were conducted in senior community centres, community centres, retirement communities, indoor health facilities, rehabilitation facilities, and clinic settings. Multiple sites were also used in some studies. For example, orthopaedic surgeons promoted two simple daily exercises among clients in more than 60 clinics (Kita et al., 2007). Another study examined the effects of Tai Chi in several rural Taiwan villages (Lin et al., 2006). Eighty-three percent of studies described interventionist characteristics and expertise, indicating that volunteers, nurses, occupational therapists, physicians, physical therapists, physical therapy aides, exercise instructors, and Tai Chi instructors all delivered interventions. The majority of studies did not describe inclusion/exclusion criteria used to select settings or interventionists, or details enough to calculate adoption rates.

Implementation

Interventions occurred in sessions lasting from 15 to 120 minutes at intervals ranging from 1 to 45 days. Intervention doses ranged from 1 to 315 contacts (face to face or telephone sessions) with a median dose of approximately 15.5 contacts. Intervention implementation costs, identified in three studies, ranged from $14.87 per participant (Hakim et al., 2003) to $80.00 per person (Carter et al., 2007) to $NZ487 per person. Longer interventions reported higher implementation costs, but additional details were not available across studies.

In addition to RE-AIM literature review criteria, details about intervention critical content were also explored to foster understanding of each intervention’s essential ingredients (Sidani and Braden, 1998). Behavioural, affective, and cognitive critical content included: (i) providing education about falls and safety; (ii) encouraging social support; (iii) enhancing motivation for physical activity; (iv) individualizing physical activities; (v) reducing fear or optimizing efficacy; (vi) promoting self-regulation; and (vii) providing resources for physical activity at home. Many studies identified more than one critical input, but did not provide descriptions of their linkages to the problem being studied, causal mechanisms or mediating variables, or outcomes, making it difficult to evaluate which critical content fostered intervention effects. For example, of the 11 (24%) interventions that encouraged social support, 4 reported measures and analyses of perceived social support whereas 9 reported improvements in the occurrence or risk of falls post-intervention. Of the six (14%) studies that enhanced motivation for physical activity, one reported measures and analysis of motivation, whereas all six reported improvements in one or more health or behavioural outcomes. Behavioural, affective, and cognitive critical content was delivered through group meetings, phone calls, home visits, and written materials, but specific details about the critical content was limited.

Physical activity critical content in most studies included instructions for progressively intensified leg strengthening and balance activities and exercises. Tai Chi was also used (Hakim et al., 2008; Lin et al., 2006; Li et al., 2005; Logghe et al., 2009; Voukelatos et al., 2007; Woo et al., 2007) and associated with decreased fall risk (Li et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2006; Voukelatos et al., 2007) and fall occurrence (Li et al., 2005; Voukelatos et al., 2007). Non-traditional strength and balance activities such as square stepping, jazz dancing, and walking were also associated with decreased fall risk (Alpert et al., 2009; Dubbert et al., 2002; Shigematsu et al., 2008). Aids such as ankle weights, resistance bands, and exercise balls were used in 24% of studies reviewed.

At least one component of intervention fidelity was described in 5 (11%) of the studies reviewed. Four studies described interventionist training that included two to five days of instruction and access to well-developed manuals and experts (Healy et al., 2008; LaForest, 2009; Robertson et al., 2001; Robitaille et al., 2005). An additional 24 studies (53%) indicated that interventionists were trained, but did not describe training methods or targeted competencies. Healy and colleagues (2008) integrated fidelity monitoring measures based on the five component model developed by the behavioural change consortium (Bellg et al., 2004). Haines and colleagues (2009) had participants share their intervention experiences with non-interventionist interviewers. Steadman and colleagues (2003) evaluated intervention delivery via an independent observer.

Intervention attendance, via self-report or interventionist records, was reported in 21 studies (46%). Average attendance ranged from 18% to 100%. Rationale for participant non-attendance, when reported, was varied. One report described that participants did not attend all sessions due to a loss of interest, inconvenient timing, or becoming ill (Voukelatos et al., 2007).

Intervention completion was described via attrition rates in 98% of studies reviewed, ranging from 1% to 60%. Several reports grouped attrition rationale into broad categories such as illness, lack of transportation or motivation, relocation to a nursing home, death, inconvenient schedules, and intervention non-adherence. Comparisons of participants who withdrew from studies to those who completed studies, described in 42% of studies, produced varied results. Several studies reported statistically insignificant group differences in demographic characteristics, fall history, or physical function (Hakim et al., 2003; Healy et al., 2008; Li et al., 2005; Nitz and Choy, 2004); others reported statistically significant group differences. Compared to participants who completed interventions, participants who did not complete interventions were more often men (Morgan et al., 2004), widowed, divorced, or single (Lin et al., 2007), older (Fukukawa et al., 2008), taking more medications (Morgan et al., 2004) weaker, less active or physically functional (Day et al., 2002; Means and O’Sullivan, 2005; Morgan et al., 2004), or with lower maximal oxygen consumption rates (Day, 2002).

Maintenance

Follow up time ranged from immediately post-study to 24 months, with a median of 6 months. Few studies reported details about the maintenance of individual health-related behaviour post-intervention. Five studies whose follow up time was at least six months reported that 31 – 72% of participants continued physical activities as recommended. At least 12 (26%) of the interventions reviewed have been sustained (Barnett et al., 2003; Campbell et al., 2005; Clemson et al., 2004; Healy, 2008; LaForest et al., 2009; Li et al., 2005; Lord et al., 2003; Robertson et al., 2001; Rubenstein et al., 2000; Skelton et al., 2005; Voukeloatos et al., 2007; Weerdesteyn et al., 2009). For example, “Stepping On” (Clemson, 2004) is being implemented and evaluated in Wisconsin communities (WDHS, 2011; CDC, 2008). “A Matter of Balance” is being evaluated in at least 10 states (CDC, 2008; Healy, 2008). The “Nijmegen Falls Prevention Program” has been disseminated to many physiotherapists in The Netherlands (Weerdesteyn et al., 2009). The CDC compendium of effective fall interventions details seven of the interventions described in studies reviewed (Stevens, 2010).

DISCUSSION

The RE-AIM framework and methods used in this review provided guidance for systematically appraising the external validity of selected studies. The strength of this approach was the a priori acknowledgement that interventions requiring health-related behavioural change are complex and involve multi-level, interactive, social-ecological determinants, which provides a foundation for understanding intervention translation potential in real world settings (Green and Glasgow, 2006; Kessler and Glasgow, 2011). The primary limitation of this review was the emphasis on internal validity in study reports appraised. However, this is not surprising given that efficacy and internal validity are of central importance in randomized controlled trials (RCT). Similar limitations have been found in other reviews using the RE-AIM framework (Antikainen and Ellis, 2011; Glasgow et al., 2004; White et al., 2009). Although the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials includes extensions for non-pharmacological intervention studies (Boutron et al., 2008) and pragmatic studies (Zwarenstein et al., 2008), most research reports in this review were designed and reported as classic RCT. In summary, the RE-AIM framework and methods used in this review begin to clarify the translation potential of fall-preventive physical activity interventions. Implications of review findings linked to each RE-AIM dimension provide a basis for improving future translational research in this field.

Similar to other RE-AIM reviews (Antikainen and Ellis, 2011; Glasgow et al., 2004; White et al., 2009), this review found the majority of studies reported on reach, however few reported on representativeness. There were limited sub-cultural, ethnic, educational, and income differences reported in studies reviewed. Given that falls are a globally significant public health problem, effective interventions to promote physical activity and decrease falls in these populations is important from a public health perspective. To reduce health disparities and provide a basis for the development of relevant interventions, research recruitment and reporting efforts must better address the needs of diverse older persons in their community contexts. Successful intervention design for translation requires an integrative understanding of the unique cultural and contextual perspectives, characteristics, and resources of the target population, as well as the theoretically relevant determinants of behaviour that can be transformed into culturally sensitive behaviour change strategies (Fleury and Lee, 2006).

Indicators of RE-AIM efficacy and effectiveness were comprehensively reported, providing evidence that physical activities improve health outcomes. However, the proportion of studies measuring behavioural outcomes in this review was small (24%) compared to a RE-AIM review of theory based physical activity interventions (100%) (Antikainen and Ellis, 2011). This discrepancy may reflect an emphasis on dose response goals more than behavioural goals in this field of research. While knowledge of which physical activities work safely at which doses is essential, especially in light of existing sociocultural forces negating physical activity among older adults (Brawley et al., 2003), it does not address decisional processes and actions related to the adoption, initiation, and maintenance of these activities into everyday life. Prescribed recommendations for fall-preventive physical activities appear simple, but interacting complexities emerge when used in real world settings (van Stralen et al., 2009). For example, when considering prescribed activities, older adults are often faced with unique and variable barriers to being active and complex behavioural change processes required for maintaining (or regaining) independence (Brawley et al., 2003). Considering the complexity of behaviour change and the high rates of physically inactivity in older adult populations (CDC/NCHS, 2009), integrating behavioural elements into intervention design and evaluation will foster research translation. To this end, continued development of reliable, valid, and feasible measures of physical activity behaviour is needed (Satariano and McAuley, 2003).

A minority of interventions reviewed identified mediating variables or based their interventions on theories of behavioural change. In addition to understanding which physical activities are associated with fall reduction, questions remain about which additional intervention elements are necessary to influence motivation for physical activity initiation and maintenance (van Stralen et al., 2009; Pawson et al., 2005; Sidani and Braden, 1998). Clear links between outcomes and mediating variables that reflect treatment response to a well specified problem of interest will better explain intervention causal mechanisms, and thus generate additional knowledge to guide practice (Whittemore and Grey, 2002). Development, testing, and translation of these linkages can be facilitated through use of theory to guide intervention design, implementation, and evaluation (Lipsey and Cordray, 2000; Sidani and Braden, 1998).

Interventionists described in this review had varied backgrounds, demonstrating the potential for interdisciplinary collaboration in this field. Effectiveness studies included in this review carried out interventions in multiple community and clinic settings suggesting that physical activity interventions may be adopted in homes, community-based settings, and settings outside highly controlled environments. In addition to identifying interventionist background and intervention setting, reporting how they were chosen (inclusion/exclusion criteria), adoption rates, and organizational spread will provide meaningful information about intervention applicability in different settings by different interventionists (Green and Glasgow, 2006; Glasgow et al., 2004).

The intensity, frequency, and duration of interventions tested were reported across studies reviewed. However, few reports provided specific descriptions of behavioural, affective and cognitive critical content used; and few described if interventions were implemented consistently or as intended. These findings are similar to previous reviews using the RE-AIM framework (Antikainen and Ellis, 2011; Glasgow et al., 2004; White et al., 2009). Based on information provided, it would be difficult to replicate interventions in practice settings. Additional attention to implementation components such as detailed descriptions of critical content will improve the ability to reproduce and apply interventions across clinical settings. Attention to fidelity will also foster the implementation, evaluation, and adaptation of these interventions in practice (Bellg et al., 2004).

Measures of intervention attendance, completion, and attrition, reported by the majority of studies reviewed, are essential for evaluating programme implementation, maintenance, and feasibility in the targeted population. Few studies described details about intervention acceptability. Researchers report that older persons are motivated by easily accessible small classes composed of similarly aged people, emphasizing mobility and balance, and led by instructors capable of providing guidance for individualized progression (Hutton et al., 2009). Older persons also have preferences for programmes that respect individual goals, promote social interaction, and focus on life enhancing aspects of fall preventive behaviours, while avoiding negative messages (Bunn et al., 2008; McInnes and Askie, 2004). Descriptions of intervention acceptability from participant perspectives may improve understanding of the extent to which interventions are feasible, suitable, satisfying, and attractive (Bowen et al., 2009).

CONCLUSION

Physical activity interventions that reduce the risk and occurrence of falls among community dwelling older adults have been identified as critically important for achieving global health objectives and for reducing health care costs. Nurses can encourage physical activity that reduces fall risk among their individual clients and within their organizations and communities. To foster translation into practice, programmatic intervention research is needed which reflects the complexity of human responses to fall risk, the complexity of diverse practice settings, and the relational elements in health promotion interventions (Whittemore and Grey, 2002). Based on the findings in this review, future researchers are encouraged to focus on issues of external validity as outlined by the RE-AIM framework, including research that: (i) targets diverse populations; (ii) incorporates and tests theories of behavioural change in real world settings; (iii) operationalizes and reports intervention critical content that enables replication and translation; (iv) explores innovative measures for physical activity behaviours and fall risk; and (v) evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of fall prevention interventions. Strong partnerships among researchers, clinicians, and community members will help interventions become more realistic and relevant (Baumbusch et al., 2008; Garnham et al., 2009; Hanson et al., 2006).

Supplementary Material

Table S1-S2

SUMMARY.

What is Known about the Topic

  • Injurious falls are a global public health concern.

  • Regular engagement in physical activities that build leg strength and balance reduces the risk of falls and their occurrence.

  • Translation of research evidence into practice is slow as evidenced by the continuation of high physical inactivity rates and high fall rates.

What This Paper Adds

  • Physical activity interventions designed to reduce falls, led by nurses and other interventionists in varied settings and social contexts, efficaciously reduce fall occurrence and fall risk.

  • Use of fall-preventive physical activity interventions in nursing may increase when dose response effects of physical activity on fall occurrence are integrated and tested with elements reflecting the change required for adoption and maintenance of physical activity behaviours.

  • The external validity of fall preventive physical activity interventions in diverse cultures and contexts, over time, has yet to be demonstrated.

Implications for Practice and Policy

  • The translation of fall-preventive physical activity intervention research into practice may be fostered by thinking critically about intervention elements that improve sustainability, adoption, and implementation.

  • The reach, efficacy/effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance framework guides clinicians, policy makers, and researchers to integrate and appraise the external validity of research studies, providing a basis for understanding translation potential into real world settings.

Acknowledgments

Funding Statement:

This project was supported with funding from

  • John A. Hartford Foundation/Building Academic Geriatric Nursing Capacity Program Pre-Doctoral Scholarship Program

  • National Institutes of Health /National Institute of Nursing Research Grant # F31NR012351 No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s)

Footnotes

Conflict of interest:

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

Author Contributions:

All authors meet at least one of the following criteria (recommended by the ICMJE*) and have agreed on the final version:

1) substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data;

2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content.

* http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html

References

  1. Akers JD, Estabrooks PA, Dave BM. Translational research: bridging the gap between long-term weight loss maintenance research and practice. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2010;110:1511–1518. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alpert PT, Miller SK, Wallmann H, Havey R, Cross C, Chevalia T, Kodandapari K. The effect of modified jazz dance on balance, cognition, and mood in older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2009;21(2):108–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00392.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons & Panel of Falls Prevention. Guidelines for the prevention of falls in older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2001;49:664–681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. American Geriatrics Society & British Geriatrics Society. Summary of the updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society clinical practice guideline for prevention of falls in older persons. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03234.x. Retrieved from http://www.americangeriatrics.org/health_care_professionals/clinical_practice/clinical_guidelines_recommendations/2010/ [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Antikainen I, Ellis R. The RE-AIM evaluation of theory-based physical activity interventions. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2011;33:198–214. doi: 10.1123/jsep.33.2.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashburn A, Fazakarley L, Ballinger C, Pickering R, McLellan LD, Fitton C. A randomized controlled trial of a home based exercise programme to reduce the risk of falling among people with Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2007;78:678–684. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.099333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnett A, Smith B, Lord SR, Williams M, Balmand A. Community-based group exercise improves balance and reduces falls in at-risk older people: a randomised controlled trial. Age and Ageing. 2003;32(4):407–414. doi: 10.1093/ageing/32.4.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baumbusch JL, Kirkham SR, Khan KB, McDonald H, Semeniuk P, Tan E, Anderson JM. Pursuing common agendas: A collaborative model for knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings. Research in Nursing and Health. 2008;31:130–140. doi: 10.1002/nur.20242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, Hecht J, Minicucci DS, Ory M, et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior practices and recommendations from NIH behavior change consortium. Health Psychology. 2004;23(5):443–451. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Binder EF, Schechtman KB, Ehsani AA, Steger-May K, Brown M, Sinacore DR, Yarasheski KE, Holloszy JO. Effects of exercise training on frailty in community-dwelling older adults: Results of a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2002;50(12):1921–1928. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P for the CONSORT group. Methods and processes of the CONSORT group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008;148-W:60–66. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008-w1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bowen DJ, Dreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linman L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandex M. How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009;36(5):452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brawley LR, Rejeski WJ, King AC. Promoting physical activity for older adults the challenges for changing behavior. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003;25:172–183. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00182-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bunn F, Dickinson A, Barnett-Page E, McInnes E, Horton K. A systematic review of older people’s perceptions of facilitators and barriers to participation in falls-prevention interventions. Ageing & Society. 2008;28(4):449–472. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X07006861. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bunout D, Barrera G, Avendano M. Results of a community-based weight bearing resistance training programme for healthy Chilean elderly subjects. Age Ageing. 2005;34:80–83. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, La Grow SJ, Kerse NM, Sanderson GF, Jacobs RJ, Sharp DM, Hale LA. Randomised controlled trial of prevention of falls in people aged > or =75 with severe visual impairment: The VIP trial. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed) 2005;331(7520):817. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38601.447731.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carter ND, Khan MK, McKay HA, Petite MA, Waterman C, Heinonen A, Janssen PA, Donaldson MG, Mallinson A, Riddell L, Kruse K, Ficker L. Community-based exercise program reduces risk factors for falls in 65 to 75 year-old women with osteoporosis: Randomized control trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2002;167(9):997–1004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC falls prevention activities research studies. 2008 Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/falls/FallsPreventionActivity.html.
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web based injury statistics query and reporting system. 2011 Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars.
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, & National Center for Health Statistics. Physical activity ages 18 +: US, 1997–2008 national health interview survey. 2009 Retrieved December 11, 2010, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm.
  21. Clemson L, Cumming RG, Kendig H, Swann M, Heard R, Taylor K. The effectiveness of a community-based program for reducing the incidence of falls in the elderly: A randomized trial. Journal of American Geriatrics Society. 2004;17(9):1488–1494. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52411.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Conn VS, Minor MA, Burks KJ, Rantz MJ, Pomeroy SH. Integrative review of physical activity intervention research with aging adults. Journal of American Geriatrics Society. 2003;51:1159–1168. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Conn VS, Valentine JC, Cooper HM. Interventions to increase physical activity among aging adults: A meta-analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2002;24(3):190–200. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2403_04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Day L, Fildes B, Gordon I, Fitzharris M, Flamer H, Lord S. Randomised factorial trial of falls prevention among older people living in their own homes. BMJ. 2002;325:1–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7356.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. DiBrezzo R, Shadden BB, Raybon BH, Powers M. Exercise intervention designed to improve strength and dynamic balance among community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Aging & Physical Activity. 2005;13(2):198–209. doi: 10.1123/japa.13.2.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dubbert PM, Cooper KM, Kirchner KA, Meydrech EF, Bilbrew D. Effects of nurse counseling on walking for exercise in elderly primary care patients. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences. 2002;57A(11):M733–40. doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.11.m733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fleury J, Lee SM. The social ecological model and physical activity in African American women. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2006;27(12):129–140. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-9002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fukukawa Y, Kozakal R, Naoakira N, Nishita U, Ando F, Shimokat H. Social support as a moderator in a fall prevention program for older adults. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 2008;34(5):19–25. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20080501-05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Garnham B, Cheek J, Alde P. The research/practice nexus: Underlying assumptions about the nature of research uptake in to practice in literature pertaining to care of the older person. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 2009;4(3):219–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2009.00179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, Lamb SE, Gates S, Cumming RG, Rowe BH. Preventing falls in older people living in the community (Review) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;2:Art. No.: CD007146. doi: 10.1002/14651858CD007146.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annual Review of Public Health. 2007;28:411–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Glasgow RE, Kleges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Estabrooks P. The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004;27(1):3–12. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Greaney ML, Riebe D, Garber CE, Rossi JS, Lees FD, Burbank PA, Nigg CR, Fernone CL, Clark PG. Long-term effects of a stage-based intervention for changing exercise intentions and behavior in older adults. The Gerontologist. 2008;48(3):358–367. doi: 10.1093/geront/48.3.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2006;29(1):126–153. doi: 10.1177/0163278705284445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Haines TP, Russell T, Brauer SG, Erwin S, Lane P, Urry S, Jasiewicz &, Condie P. Effectiveness of a video-based exercise programme to reduce falls and improve health-related quality of life among older adults discharged from hospital: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2009;23(11):973–985. doi: 10.1177/0269215509338998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hakim RM, Newton RA, Segal J, DuCette JP. A group intervention to reduce fall risk factors in community-dwelling older adults [corrected] [published erratum appears in PHYS OCCUP THER GERIATR 2003;22(2):80] Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics. 2003;22(1):1–20. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hanson E, Magnusson L, Nolan J, Nolan M. Developing a model of participatory research involving researchers, practitioners, older people, and their family carers; an international collaboration. Journal of Research in Nursing. 2006;11(4):325–342. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hauer K, Rost B, Rutschle K, Opitz H, Specht N, Oster P, Schlierf G. Exercise training for rehabilitation and secondary prevention of falls in geriatric patients with a history of injurious falls. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2001;49:10–20. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Healy TC, Peng C, Haynes MS, McMahon EM, Botler JL, Gross L. The feasibility and effectiveness of translating a matter of balance into a volunteer lay leader model. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 2008;27(1):34–51. [Google Scholar]
  40. Helbostad J, Sletvold O, Moe-Nilssen R. Effects of home exercises and group training on functional abilities in home-dwelling older persons with mobility and balance problems: A randomized controlled trial. Aging Clinical and Experiential Research. 2004;16:113–121. doi: 10.1007/BF03324539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hutton L, Frame R, Maggo H, Shirakawa H, Mulligan H, Waters D, Hale L. The perceptions of physical activity in an elderly population at risk of falling: A focus group study. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy. 2009;37(2):85–92. [Google Scholar]
  42. Inokuchi S, Matsusaka N, Hayashi T, Shindo H. Feasibility and effectiveness of a nurse-led community exercise programme for prevention of falls among frail elderly people: A multi-centre controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2007;39:479–485. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Iwamoto J, Suzuki H, Tanaka K, Kumakubo T, Hirabayashi H, Miyazaki Y, Sato Y, Takeda T, Matsumoto H. Preventative effect of exercise against falls in the elderly: A randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:1233–1240. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0794-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kessler R, Glasgow RE. Proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice dramatic change is needed. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2011;40(6):637–644. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. King AC, Rejeski JW, Buchner DM. Physical activity interventions targeting older adults: A critical review and recommendations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1998;15(4):316–333. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00085-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kita K, Hujino K, Nasu K, Kawahara K, Sunami Y Japanese Clinical Orthopaedic Association, Committee on musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. A simple protocol for preventing falls and fractures in elderly individuals with musculoskeletal disease. Osteoporosis Int. 2007;18:611–610. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0288-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lach HW. Incidence and risk factors for developing fear of falling in older adults. Public Health Nursing. 2005;22(1):45–52. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2005.22107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. LaForest S, Gauvin L, Robitaille Y, Fournier M, Corriveau H, Filiatrault J. Impact of a community based falls prevention program on maintenance of physical activity among older adults. Journal of Aging and Health. 2009;21:480–500. doi: 10.1177/0898264308328988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Latham NK, Anderson CS, Lee A, Bennett DA, Moseley A, Cameron ID. A randomized controlled trial of quadriceps resistance exercise and vitamin D in frail older people: The frailty interventions trial in elderly subjects (FITNESS) Journal of American Geriatrics Society. 2003;51:291–299. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Li F, Harmer P, Fisher KJ, McAuley E, Shaumeton N, Eckstrom E, Wison NL. Tai chi and fall reductions in older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences. 2005;60A(2):187–194. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.2.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine. 2009;6(7):1–26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lin MR, Hwang H, Wang Y, Chang S, Wolf SL. Community-based tai chi and its effect on injurious falls, balance, gait, and fear of falling in older people. Physical Therapy. 2006;86(9):1189–1201. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20040408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lin M, Wolf SL, Hwang H, Gong S, Chen C. A randomized, controlled trial of fall prevention programs and quality of life in older fallers. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2007;55(4):499–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01146.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Lipsey MW, Cordray DS. Evaluation methods for social intervention. Annual Review of Psychology. 2000;51:345–375. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu-Ambrose T, Khan KM, Eng JJ, Gillies GL, Lord SR, McKay HA. The beneficial effects of group-based exercises on fall risk profile and physical activity persist 1 year post intervention in older women with low bone mass: Follow-up after withdrawal of exercise. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2005;53(10):1767–1773. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53525.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Logghe IH, Zeeuwe PE, Verhagen AP, Wiene-Sponselee RM, Willemsen SP, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Faber MJ, Koes BW. Lack of effect of Tai Chi Chuan in preventing falls in elderly people living at home: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2009;57:70–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lord SR, Castell S, Corcoran J, Dayhew J, Matters B, Shan A, Williams P. The effect of group exercise on physical functioning and falls in frail older people living in retirement villages: A randomized, controlled trial. JAGS. 2003;51:1685–1692. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51551.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Luukinen H, Lehtola S, Jokelainen J, Vaananen-Sainio R, Lotvonen S, Koistinen P. Pragmatic exercise-oriented prevention of falls among the elderly: A population-based, randomized, controlled trial. Preventive Medicine. 2007;44:265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. McInnes E, Askie L. Evidence review on older people’s views and experiences of falls prevention strategies. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2004;1(1):20–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2004.04013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Means KM, O’Sullivan DE. Balance, mobility, and falls among community-dwelling elderly persons. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(4):238–250. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000151944.22116.5a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Morgan RO, Virnig BA, Duque M, Abdel-Moty E, DeVito CA. Low-intensity exercise and reduction of the risk for falls among at-risk elders. Journal of Gernotology, MEDICAL SCIENCES. 2004;59A(10):1062–1067. doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.10.m1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Nitz JC, Choy NL. The efficacy of a specific balance-strategy training programme for preventing falls among older people: A pilot randomised controlled trial. Age and Ageing. 2004;33:52–58. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Noyes J, Popay J, Pearson, Hannes K, Booth A. Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Chapter 20: Qualitative research and Cochrane reviews. Conchrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Verson 5.0.1. 2008 Retrieved from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  64. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review- a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2005;10(1):21–34. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, Britten N, Roen K, Duffy S. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic review. University of Lancaster; UK: 2006. Unpublished Manuscript. [Google Scholar]
  66. RE-AIM.org. Measures, RE-AIM criteria for conducting literature reviews. 2011 Retrieved from http://www.re-aim.org/tools/measures.aspx.
  67. Robertson MC, Devlin N, Gardner MM, Campbell AJ. Effectiveness and economic evaluation of a nurse delivered home exercise programme to prevent falls. 1: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2001;322(697):1–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7288.697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Robitaille Y, Laforest S, Fournier M, Gauvin L, Parisien M, Corriveau H, Trickey F, Damestoy N. Moving forward in fall prevention: An intervention to improve balance among older adults in real-world settings. American Journal of Public Health. 2005;95(11):2049–2056. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Trueblood SL, Harker JO, Pietruszka FM, Robbins AS. Effects of group exercise program on strength, mobility, and falls among fall-prone elderly men. Journal of Gerontology MEDICAL SCIENCES. 2000;55A(6):M317–M321. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.6.m317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Satariano WA, McAuley E. Promoting physical activity among older adults from ecology to the individual. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003;25:184–192. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00183-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Schiller JS, Kramarow EA, Dey AN. Fall injury episodes among noninstitutionalized older adults: United states, 2001–2003. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics. 2007;392:1–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Sherrington C, Pamphlett P, Jacka JA, Olivetti LM, Nugent JA, Hall MJ, Dorsch S, Swan MM, Lord SR. Group exercise can improve participants’ mobility in an outpatient rehabilitation setting; a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2008. 2008a;22:493–502. doi: 10.1177/0269215508087994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sherrington C, Whitney JC, Lord SR, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Close JCT. Effective exercise for the prevention of falls: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008b;56(12):2234–2243. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02014.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Shigematsu R, Okura T, Nakagaichi M, Tanaka K, Sakai T, Kitazumi S, Rantanen T. Square-stepping exercise and fall risk factors in older adults: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences. 2008;63A(1):76–82. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.1.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Sidani S, Braden CJ. Evaluating nursing interventions: A theory-driven approach. 1. California: Sage; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  76. Singh MA. Exercise comes of age: Rationale and recommendations for a geriatric exercise prescription. Journal of Gerontology: MEDICALSCIENCES. 2002;57A(5):M262–M282. doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.5.m262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Skelton DA, Dinan SM, Campbell M, Rutherford OM. Tailored group exercise (falls management exercise—FaME) reduces falls in community dwelling older frequent fallers (a RCT) Age and Ageing. 2005;34(6):636–639. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sleet DA, Moffett DB, Stevens J. CDC’s research portfolio in older adult fall prevention: A review of progress, 1985–2005, and future research directions. Journal of Safety Research. 2008;39(3):259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Steadman J, Donaldson N, Kalra L. A randomized controlled trial of an enhanced balance training program to improve mobility and reduce falls in elderly. Journal of American Geriatrics Society. 2003;51:847–852. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Stevens JA, Corso P, Finkelstein E, Miller T. The costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults. Injury Prevention. 2006;12:290–295. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.011015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Stevens JA. A CDC Compendium of Effective Fall Interventions: What Works for Community-Dwelling Older Adults. 2. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  82. Suzuki T, Kim H, Yoshida H, Ishizaki T. Randomized controlled trial of exercise intervention for the prevention of falls in community-dwelling elderly Japanese women. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. 2004;22:602–611. doi: 10.1007/s00774-004-0530-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Tinetti ME, Williams CS. Falls: Injuries due to falls and the risk of admission to a nursing home. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997;337(18):1279–1284. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710303371806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2020. 2011 Retrieved from www.Healthypeople.gov.
  85. van der Bij AK, Laurant MGH, Wensing M. Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for older adults: A review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002;22(2):120–133. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00413-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. van Stralen MM, DeVries h, Muddle AN, Bolman C, Lechner L. Determinants of initiation and maintenance of physical activity among older adults: a literature review. Health Psychology Review. 2009;3:147–207. [Google Scholar]
  87. Vogler CM, Sherrington C, Ogle SJ, Lord SR. Reducing risk of falling in older people discharged from the hospital: A randomized controlled trial comparing seated exercises, weight-bearing exercises, and social visits. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2009;90:1317–1324. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Voukelatos A, Cumming RG, Lord SR, Rissel C. A randomized, controlled trial of tai chi for the prevention of falls: The central Sydney tai chi trial. JAGS. 2007;55:1185–1191. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Weerdestyn V, Rijken H, Geurts AC, Smits-Engelsman BC, Mulder T, Duysens J. Five-week exercise program can reduce falls and improve obstacle avoidance in the elderly. Gerontology. 2006;52:131–141. doi: 10.1159/000091822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Weerdestyn V, Smulders E, Rijken H, Durysens J. Preserved effectiveness of a falls prevention exercise program after implementation in a daily clinical practice. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2009;57(11):2163. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02531.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. White SM, McAuley E, Estabrooks PA, Courneya KS. Translating physical activity interventions for breast cancer survivors into practice: an evaluation of randomized controlled trials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2009;37:10–19. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9084-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Whittemore R, Grey M. The systematic development of nursing interventions. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2002;34(2):115–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Whittemore R. Combining evidence in nursing research methods and implications. Nursing Research. 2005;54(1):52–56. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200501000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Whittemore R. How can nursing intervention research reduce the research-practice gap? The Canadian Journal of Nursing. 2009;41(4):7–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin injury prevention program fall prevention. 2011 Retrieved from http://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/health/InjuryPrevention/FallPrevention/index.htm.
  96. Woo J, Hong A, Lau E, Lynn H. A randomized controlled trial of Tai Chi and resistance exercise on bone health, muscle strength, and balance in community-dwelling elderly people. Age and Ageing. 2007;36:262–268. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. World Health Organization. Global report on falls in older age. 2007 retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241563536_eng.pdf.
  98. Yardley L, Smith H. A prospective study of the relationship between feared consequences of falling and avoidance of activity in community-living older people. The Gerontologist. 2002;42(1):17–23. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, Altman DG, Tunis S, Haynes B, Oxman AD, Moher D for the CONSORT Pragmatic Trials in Healthcare (Practihc) group. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 2008;337:a2390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1-S2

RESOURCES