Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 4.
Published in final edited form as: ChemMedChem. 2010 May 3;5(5):682–686. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201000018

Synthesis and Properties of a Photoactivatable Analogue of Psychosine (β-Galactosylsphingosine)

Ravi S Lankalapalli [a], Attila Baksa [b], Károly Liliom [b], Robert Bittman [a],*
PMCID: PMC3464015  NIHMSID: NIHMS387636  PMID: 20209561

The lysosphingolipid psychosine (shown below) is the β-galactosyl derivative of d-erythro-sphingosine.[1] Psychosine inhibits cytokinesis and induces the formation of multinuclear globoid cells in the brains of patients afflicted with globoid cell leuko-dystrophy (Krabbe's disease), an inherited neurological disorder in which the activity of β-galactosylceramide β-galactosidase is defective.[2] Psychosine-induced cytotoxicity is assumed to arise from the accumulation of this lipid [reviewed in Reference [2d]], but the molecular mechanisms responsible for the toxicity have not yet been elucidated. Protein-mediated events are likely to be the basis for the cellular effects of psychosine, but biophysical effects may also contribute.[3] The receptors for psychosine have not yet been identified. TDAG8, a G protein-coupled receptor, was postulated to be a receptor for psycho-sine,[4] but later reports indicated that TDAG8 is instead a proton-sensing receptor.[4b,5] The identification of putative protein targets of psychosine is hindered by the lack of psycho-sine analogues that can interact covalently with the binding sites of its targets.

Photoactivatable probes have been utilized to identify lipid-binding proteins.[6] Benzophenones tethered covalently to various ligands are widely used to form crosslinks with receptors graphic file with name nihms-387636-f0001.jpg because they can readily insert into C–H bonds of amino acid residues.[7] The present study describes the synthesis of a benzophenone-linked analogue of psychosine (1). To demonstrate the potential use of this photoprobe in the identification of the psychosine receptor(s) in intact cells, we report the ability of 1 to elicit Ca2+ release from U937 cells at 10 and 30 μm.

As cross-metathesis reactions have been used for the preparation of the sphingosine backbone,[8] we used this approach to prepare a glycosphingolipid conjugate bearing a terminal bromide. First, we synthesized a β-galactoside bearing a truncated sphingosine head group with a terminal alkene, as outlined in Scheme 1. Addition of vinylmagnesium bromide to commercially available (S)-Garner aldehyde (2)[9] in THF at −78°C afforded erythro allylic alcohol 3 in 62% yield after separation from the threo by-product (10%) by chromatography. The pivaloyl group was selected for the protection of the secondary alcohol because it is less likely to undergo ester migration than other esters (e.g., acetyl or benzoyl) from the C-3 to C-1 position under basic conditions.[10] Pivaloyl-protected compound 4 was heated in ethanolic hydrochloric acid to provide crude (S)-2-amino-3-O-pivaloyl-4-penten-1-ol, which was used in a diazotransfer reaction[11] with trifyl azide and CuSO4 to prepare azide 5. With perbenzoyl α-d-galactosyl trichloroacetimidate (6)[12] as the donor, 4-pentenyl aglycone 5 as the acceptor, and a catalytic amount of BF3·Et2O and molecular sieves (MS), we obtained β-d-galactoside 7 in 71% yield. 2-Azidosphingo-sine derivates have been utilized as the acceptor in previous glycosidation reactions with protected glycosyl-1-trichloroacetimidates.[13] Staudinger reduction of the azide[13c–e] followed by protection of the resulting amine in situ with Boc anhydride afforded N-Boc derivative 8 in 79% yield.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of pentenyl-β-d-galactosides 7 and 8. Reagents and conditions: a) CH2=CHMgBr, THF, −78°C, 2 h, 62%; b) tBuC(O)Cl, cat DMAP/Et3N, CH2Cl2, 0°C→RT, 93 %; c) 1. HCl (2m)/EtOH (1:4), 70–80 °C, 3 h; 2. TfN3 in CH2Cl2, K2CO3, CuSO4·H2O (0.01 equiv), MeOH, H2O, 5 h, 70% (two steps); d) BF3·Et2O, dry CH2Cl2, 4 Å MS, RT, 4 h, 71%; e) 1. Ph3P, C6H6, H2O (1 drop), overnight; 2. (Boc)2O, Et3N, CH2Cl2, RT, overnight, 79% (two steps). Abbreviations: Piv, pivaloyl; DMAP, (4-dimethylamino)pyridine; Boc, tert-butyloxycarbonyl; TfN3, trifyl azide; MS, molecular sieves; (Boc)2O, di-tert-butyl dicarbonate.

Our initial attempts to carry out a cross metathesis reaction with an excess of 10-bromo-1-decene (prepared from 9-decen-1-ol; see Experimental Section) and azide 7 using Grubbs' second generation catalyst resulted in the formation of undesired products. However, cross metathesis of N-Boc derivative 8 with 10-bromo-1-decene proceeded smoothly. Metathesis product 9 was obtained with exclusive E selectivity (δ 5.34 ppm, J=15.7 Hz) after heating at reflux in dichloromethane for 16 h (Scheme 2). We found that the SN2 reaction of bromide 9 with 4-hydroxybenzophenone in DMF using potassium carbonate as the base was sluggish even at temperatures above 100°C. When microwave conditions were used for this substitution reaction in DMF, compound 10 was obtained in 1.5 h and in 85% yield. Deprotection of the benzoyl and pivaloyl ester groups using NaOMe in methanol provided N-Boc compound 11. The final step was the deprotection of the carbamate group of 11 using hydrochloric acid in acetic acid at room temperature to afford the benzophenone-linked psycho-sine derivative 1 without any by-products resulting from cleavage of the sugar under these acidic conditions.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of psychosine analogue 1 by olefin metathesis. Reagents and conditions: a) 10-bromo-1-decene (4 equiv), Grubbs' second generation catalyst (0.3 equiv), CH2Cl2, reflux, 16 h, 63%; b) 4-hydroxybenzophenone, K2CO3, DMF, microwave, 120 °C, 1.5 h, 85 %; c) NaOMe in MeOH, THF, RT, 2 d, 90%; d) HCl (1m) in 90 % HOAc, CH2Cl2, RT, 35 min, 94%. Abbreviations: O-BP, 4-O-benzophenone.

To assess the biological activity of 1, we carried out intracellular calcium concentration determinations in living cells with a fluorescent reporter assay. We chose the myelomonocyte cell line U937 because of its reported high sensitivity to psycho-sine.[2a] We recorded the endogenous receptor-mediated responses in U937 cells to psychosine and 1, applied at several concentrations between 1 and 30 μm, as well as to 1 mm ATP for comparison. Both psychosine and analogue 1 elicited robust Ca2+-dependent fluorescence intensity increases consistent with the activation of endogenous receptors. In Ca2+-free buffer, the threshold concentrations for intracellular Ca2+ mobilization of psychosine and analogue 1 were 3 and 10 μm, respectively, while in Ca2+-containing buffer the corresponding values were 1 and 3 μm, respectively. Overall, the responses in both conditions were similar, except that in the presence of Ca2+ the fluorescence increases proceeded more rapidly and were more robust. Figure 1 shows that the intracellular Ca2+ responses, measured in Ca2+-free buffer, were very similar for 10 μm psychosine and 30 μm 1, except that the initial rise proceeded a little slower. These results indicate that analogue 1 exhibits only approximately a threefold lower potency compared with psychosine. Therefore, analogue 1 may be a useful tool in identifying its cognate receptor.[14]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization by 1 and psychosine in U937 human leukemia cells. a) Time course of Ca2+ mobilization by 1 (–––) and psychosine (—) measured in Ca2+-free buffer. Cells were loaded with Fluo-4 AM, washed, and the fluorescence intensity was recorded in a cuvette. The compounds were added to the cell suspensions at the time indicated by the arrow. For comparison, the response to ATP (–•–•) by endogenous purinergic receptors was also examined. b) The average response of U937 cells to 1 (30 μm) and psychosine (10 μm) at 60 s after addition of the compounds. Fluo-4 fluorescence intensities were read from similar traces shown in panel a. Data represent the mean ±SEM of three independent determinations.

In conclusion, the first synthesis of a photoreactive analogue of the lipid mediator psychosine has been accomplished. An E-selective olefin cross-metathesis reaction between 10-bromo-1-decene and protected pentenyl-β-d-galactoside 8 and a microwave-assisted displacement of the terminal bromide in meta-thesis product 9 with 4-hydroxybenzophenone were the key steps in the synthesis of the photoreactive psychosine derivative 1. Measurements of Ca2+ flux in U937 cells treated with psychosine or analogue 1 revealed a similar potency of receptor activation, since the photoreactive derivative was only approximately threefold less active than psychosine. Thus this photoactivatable psychosine analogue may be useful for identifying the molecular target of psychosine after photoactivation and crosslinking.

Experimental Section

Chemistry

General methods

The solvents were dried as follows: Et3N, CH2Cl2 and DMF were distilled over CaH2; THF was refluxed over sodium benzophenone ketyl; MeOH was refluxed over Mg. Silica gel 60 F254 aluminum TLC plates of 0.2 mm thickness (Dynamic Adsorbents, Norcross, USA) were used to monitor the reactions; TLC plates were visualized by short wavelength ultraviolet light or by charring with 15% sulfuric acid. Flash chromatography was carried out with silica gel 60 (230–400 ASTM mesh; SiliCycle, Quebec, Canada). 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 400 and 500 MHz and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 100 MHz on Bruker Avance I and III spectrometers; the chemical shifts (δ) are given in parts per million (ppm). HRMS was performed on an Agilent Technologies G6520A Q-TOF mass spectrometer using electrospray ionization (ESI).

(S)-tert-Butyl-4-((R)-1-hydroxyallyl)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine-3-carboxylate (3)

A solution of (S)-Garner aldehyde (2, 7.0 g, 30.5 mmol) in dry THF (50 mL) under N2 at 78°C was slowly treated via cannula with CH2=CHMgBr (92 mL, 92 mmol, 1m in THF). After the cloudy yellow solution was stirred for 2 h at –78°C, the reaction was warmed to 0°C and quenched with saturated aq NH4Cl (60 mL). The product was extracted with Et2O (2×60 mL), and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (60 mL), dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The erythro and threo diastereomers were separated by gravity column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, 5:1) to afford 3 (4.8 g, 62%) and its C3-epimer (0.8 g, 10.2%) as colorless liquids. Compound 3: [α]20D=–37.7 (c=1.8 in CHCl3); Rf=0.26 (EtOAc/hexane, 1:3); 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=1.48 (s, 3H), 1.50 (s, 9H), 1.58 (s, 3H), 3.91 (m, 2H), 3.98 (m, 1H), 4.25 (m, 1H), 4.39 (m, 1H), 5.24 (m, 1H), 5.38 (m, 1H), 5.85 ppm (m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ=24.2, 26.3, 28.3, 61.8, 64.4, 73.3, 81.4, 94.4, 116.1, 117.8, 137.6, 155.0 ppm; HRMS: m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C13H23NO4Na: 280.1525, found: 280.1519.

tert-Butyl-(2S,3R)-1-hydroxy-3-(pivaloyl)pent-4-en-2-yl-carbamate (4)

A solution of alcohol 3 (2.7 g, 10.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (25 mL) was treated with Et3N (4.4 mL, 31.5 mmol), PivCl (2 mL, 15.8 mmol) and DMAP (250 mg, 2.1 mmol) at 0°C. After 10 min, the cooling bath was removed and the reaction mixture was stirred overnight at RT. The reaction was diluted with saturated aq NH4Cl (60 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×50 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by vacuum distillation; the fraction boiling at 120–125°C (4 mm of Hg) was collected to afford pivaloyl-protected alcohol 4 as a colorless liquid (3.35 g, 93%): Rf=0.45 (EtOAc/ hexane, 1:2); 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=1.23 (s, 9H), 1.46–1.58 (m, 15H), 3.96 (m, 2H), 4.14 (m, 1H), 5.20 (m, 1H), 5.28 (m, 1H), 5.57 (m, 1H), 5.75 ppm (m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ=26.4, 27.2, 28.3, 38.8, 59.3, 63.6, 73.2, 80.3, 93.9, 117.4, 134.0, 151.8, 177.2, 185.0 ppm; HRMS: m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C18H31NO5Na: 364.2100, found: 364.2101.

(2S,3R,4E)-2-Azido-3-O-pivaloyl-pent-4-ene (5)

Azido compound 5 was prepared by first treating pivalate 4 (760 mg, 2.22 mmol) with 2m HCl/EtOH (1:4, 10 mL) at 70°C to hydrolyze the acetonide and N-Boc groups. After 3 h, the solution was concentrated and H2O (10 mL) was added. The amine hydrochloride salt was extracted with CHCl3/MeOH (7:1), dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was used in the next step (diazo transfer reaction) without purification. Triflyl azide (TfN3) was prepared just prior to the reaction.[11] A solution of the amine hydrochloride salt in H2O (1.5 mL) was treated with K2CO3 (16.5 mg, 0.12 mmol) and CuSO4·H2O (0.3 mg, 1.2 μmol). After TfN3 in CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was added to the reaction mixture, MeOH (5 mL) was added slowly along the walls of the reaction flask. After 5 h, when TLC indicated completion of the reaction, the solution was concentrated and purified by chromatography (EtOAc/hexane, 1:3), affording azide 5 as a white solid (352 mg, 70%): [α]D20 =−29.4 (c=3.7 in CHCl3); Rf =0.31 (EtOAc/hexane, 1:3); 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=1.23 (s, 9H), 3.05 (br s, 1H), 3.57 (m, 1H), 3.71 (m, 2H), 5.31–5.42 (m, 3H), 5.86 ppm (m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ=27.0, 39.0, 61.4, 65.6, 73.4, 119.2, 131.8, 177.4 ppm; HRMS: m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C10H17N3O3Na: 250.1168, found: 250.1161.

2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-benzoyl-α-d-galactopyranosyl trichloroacetimi-date (6)

A solution of d-galactose (1.8 g, 10.0 mmol) in pyridine (10 mL) was treated with BzCl (6.2 mL, 53 mmol) and stirred overnight at RT. The reaction was quenched with H2O (30 mL), extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×30 mL), dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/hexane, 1:2) to afford perbenzoyl d-galactose as a crystalline solid (85%): 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=4.67–4.85 (m, 3H), 5.82–5.92 (m, 2H), 6.31 (m, 1H), 6.86 (d, 1H, J=4.8 Hz), 7.10–8.18 ppm (m, 25H). A solution of the protected d-galactose (6.2 g, 8.8 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was treated with HBr (57.2 mmol, 10 mL, 33% in HOAc) and Ac2O (0.2 mL, 2.2 mmol). After the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h at RT, the mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 (30 mL) and cold H2O (20 mL). Saturated aq NaHCO3 (30 mL) was added slowly and the product was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×30 mL), dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. A solution of the crude perbenzoyl-β-d-galactosyl bromide in acetone/H2O (4:1, 20 mL) was treated with Ag2CO3 (7.4 g, 27 mmol) and stirred for 3 h at RT. The mixture was filtered through a Celite pad and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. A solution of the resulting hemiacetal (3.0 g, 5.0 mmol) and Cl3CCN (3.5 mL, 35 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) at 0°C was treated with 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) (0.9 mL, 6.0 mmol) under N2, and stirring was continued at this temperature for 3 h. The mixture was concentrated and purified by flash chromatography (CHCl3) to provide 6 (2.8 g, 76%) as a crystalline solid: Rf=0.28 (EtOAc/hexane, 1:2). The NMR spectra are in agreement with the reported spectra.[12]

(2S,3R,4E)-2-Azido-3-O-pivaloyl-1-O′-(2′,3′,4′,6′-tetra-O-benzoyl-β-d-galactopyranosy1)-4-pentene (7)

A solution of azide 5 (285 mg, 1.25 mmol) and galactosyl donor 6 (1.40 g, 1.87 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was stirred for 1 h at RT in the presence of 4 Å molecular sieves. A solution of BF3·Et2O (0.1m, 0.23 mL, 0.023 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 was added slowly to the reaction mixture. After 4 h, TLC indicated the completion of reaction. The reaction was quenched with saturated aq NaHCO3 (15 mL) and the product was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×15 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL), dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/hexane, 1:4) to afford 7 as a white solid (720 mg, 71%): [α]D20 =+77.2 (c=0.86 in CHCl3); Rf=0.19 (EtOAc/hexane, 1:3); 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=1.19 (s, 9H), 3.70 (dd, 1H, J=5.5, 10.4 Hz), 3.82 (m, 1H), 4.00 (dd, 1H, J=7.3, 10.4 Hz), 4.34 (m, 1H), 4.43 (m, 1H), 4.68 (dd, 1H, J=6.6, 11.2 Hz), 4.88 (d, 1H, J=7.8 Hz), 5.19 (m, 2H), 5.35 (m, 1H), 5.60 (dd, 1H, J=3.7, 10.6 Hz), 5.73 (m, 1H), 5.81 (dd, 1H, J= 8.0, 10.4 Hz), 6.00 (d, 1H, J=3.5 Hz), 7.21–8.03 ppm (m, 20H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ=27.1, 38.9, 61.9, 63.1, 67.9, 69.5, 71.6, 73.1, 73.7, 101.2, 119.1, 119.9, 128.3, 130.0, 131.5, 132.5–133.6, 165.1–166.0, 176.8 ppm; HRMS: m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C44H43N3O12Na: 828.2744, found: 828.2743.

(2S,3R,4E)-2-tert-Butoxycarbonylamino-3-O-pivaloyl-1-O-(2′,3′,4′,6′-tetra-O-benzoyl-β-d-galactopyranosy1)-4-pentene (8)

A solution of azide 7 (290 mg, 0.36 mmol) in 10 mL of benzene with H2O (1 drop) was treated with Ph3P (236 mg, 0.90 mmol) and stirred overnight at RT. After TLC indicated the complete conversion of the azide to the amine, the reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo. The residue was redissolved in CH2Cl2 (5 mL), treated with Boc2O (196 mg, 0.90 mmol) and Et3N (150 μL, 1.0 mmol), and stirred overnight at RT. The reaction was quenched with saturated aq NH4Cl (10 mL) and the product was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2×10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, 6:1) gave N-Boc-protected compound 8 as a white solid (250 mg, 79%): [α]D20 =+62.4 (c=1.14 in CHCl3); Rf=0.18 (EtOAc/hexane, 1:3); 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=1.20 (s, 9H), 1.32 (s, 9H), 3.67 (dd, 1H, J=4.3, 9.8 Hz), 4.00 (m, 1H), 4.13 (dd, 1H, J=3.3, 9.8 Hz), 4.34 (m, 1H), 4.41 (dd, 1H, J=6.7, 11.4 Hz), 4.63 (dd, 1H, J=6.6, 11.2 Hz), 4.80 (m, 1H), 4.83 (d, 1H, J=7.8 Hz), 5.20 (m, 2H), 5.35 (t, 1H, J=6.2 Hz), 5.63 (dd, 1H, J=3.4, 10.4 Hz), 5.76 (m, 2H), 6.00 (d, 1H, J=3.4 Hz), 7.21–8.12 ppm (m, 20H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ=27.1, 28.3, 38.8, 52.2, 62.0, 67.9, 69.9, 71.5, 73.4, 79.4, 101.4, 118.3, 128.3–130.0, 133.3, 133.6, 155.3, 165.2–166.0, 176.9 ppm; HRMS: m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C49H53NO14Na: 902.3364, found: 902.3354.

10-Bromo-1-decene:[15]

A solution of 9-decen-1-ol (5.0 g, 32.4 mmol) and Ph3P (11.0 g, 42.1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) was cooled to 0°C and treated in small portions with N-bromosuccinimide (7.5 g, 42.1 mmol) over a period of 1 h at 0°C. The mixture was filtered through a silica gel pad, washed with CH2Cl2 (50 mL), concentrated, and purified by vacuum distillation. The product boiling at 30–35°C (2 mm Hg) was collected, providing 10-bromo-1-decene as a colorless liquid (5.8 g, 83%): Rf=0.71 (EtOAc/hexane, 1:5); 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=1.30 (m, 10H), 1.85 (p, 2H, J=7.2 Hz), 2.03 (q, 2H, J=7.0 Hz), 3.40 (t, 2H, J=7.0 Hz), 4.96 (m, 2H), 5.81 ppm (m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ=28.2, 28.8, 28.9, 29.0, 29.2, 29.3, 32.8, 33.6, 33.8, 34.0, 114.2, 138.9 ppm.

(2S,3R,4E)-2-tert-Butoxycarbonylamino-3-O-pivaloyl-13-bromo-1-O-(2′,3′,4′,6′-tetra-O-benzoyl-β-d-galactopyranosy1)-4-tridecene (9)

10-Bromo-1-decene (183 mg, 0.84 mmol) was added to a solution of alkene 8 (185 mg, 0.21 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (8 mL) and the solution was flushed twice with N2 (10 min each time). The reaction mixture was treated with Grubbs' second generation catalyst (53.6 mg, 0.063 mmol) at RT under N2 and stirred for 16 h at reflux. The reaction was cooled to RT and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, 4:1) gave 9 as a white solid (142 mg, 63%): [α]D20 =+41.5 (c=0.67 in CHCl3); Rf=0.68 (EtOAc/hexane, 1:2); 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=1.17–1.39 (m, 28H), 1.83 (p, 2H, J=7.0 Hz), 1.94 (q, 2H, J=6.9 Hz), 3.39 (t, 2H, J=6.9 Hz), 3.67 (dd, 1H, J=3.9, 9.8 Hz), 3.97 (m, 1H), 4.13 (dd, 1H, J=3.3, 10.0 Hz), 4.34 (m, 1H), 4.39 (dd, 1H, J=6.8, 11.0 Hz), 4.63 (dd, 1H, J=6.2, 11.0 Hz), 4.76 (m, 1H), 4.80 (d, 1H, J=8.0 Hz), 5.25 (m, 1H), 5.34 (dd, 1H, J=7.5, 15.7 Hz), 5.62 (dd, 1H, J=3.6, 10.4 Hz), 5.68 (m, 1H), 5.74 (dd, 1H, J=8.0, 10.5 Hz), 5.98 (d, 1H, J=2.8 Hz), 7.21–8.12 ppm (m, 20H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ=27.1, 28.2, 28.3, 28.7, 28.8, 29.0, 29.2, 32.8, 34.0, 38.8, 52.2, 61.9, 67.9, 69.9, 71.5, 73.3, 79.3, 101.4, 124.9, 128.3–130.0, 133.3, 133.6, 136.5, 155.3, 165.3–166.0, 176.9 ppm; HRMS: m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C57H68BrNO14Na: 1092.3721, found: 1092.3723.

(2S,3R,4E)-2-tert-Butoxycarbonylamino-3-O-pivaloyl-13-O-(4″-benzoylphenyl)-1-O-(2′,3′,4′,6′-tetra-O-benzoyl-β-d-galactopyranosy1)-4-tridecene (10)

A solution of bromide 9 (35 mg, 0.033 mmol), 4-hydroxybenzophenone (10 mg, 0.049 mmol) and K2CO3 (7.0 mg, 0.049 mmol) in dry DMF (3.5 mL) was heated in a Smith Creator microwave reactor at 120°C for 1.5 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated aq NH4Cl (10 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (2×10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, 4:1) afforded benzophenone-linked product 10 as a white solid (33 mg, 85%): [α]D20 =+46.71 (c=1.55 in CHCl3); Rf=0.48 (EtOAc/hexane, 1:2); 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ=1.16–1.48 (m, 28H), 1.81 (m, 2H), 1.97 (q, 2H, J=7.2 Hz), 3.68 (dd, 1H, J=4.0, 9.5 Hz), 4.00 (m, 1H), 4.04 (t, 2H, J=7.2 Hz), 4.14 (m, 1H), 4.35 (t, 1H, J=6.8 Hz), 4.42 (dd, 1H, J=6.8, 11.2 Hz), 4.66 (dd, 1H, J=7.5, 12.3 Hz), 4.80 (m, 1H), 4.83 (d, 1H, J=8.0 Hz), 5.28 (m, 1H), 5.38 (dd, 1H, J=7.5, 15.0 Hz), 5.65 (dd, 1H, J=3.4, 10.2 Hz), 5.72 (m, 1H), 5.78 (dd, 1H, J=7.8, 10.2 Hz), 6.01 (d, 1H, J=3.0 Hz), 6.97 (d, 2H, J=9.2 Hz), 7.25–8.13 ppm (m, 27H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ=26.0, 27.1, 28.3, 28.3, 28.8, 29.0, 29.1, 29.3, 29.4, 29.6, 32.2, 38.8, 52.3, 61.9, 64.8, 68.0, 68.3, 69.9, 71.3, 71.6, 73.4, 79.3, 101.4, 114.0, 126.2, 127.9–133.6, 136.6, 138.4, 155.3, 162.9, 165.3–166.0, 176.9, 195.6 ppm; HRMS: m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C70H77NO16Na: 1210.5140, found: 1210.5141.

(2S,3R,4E)-2-tert-Butoxycarbonylamino-3-hydroxy-13-O-(4′-benzoylphenyl)-1-O-β-d-galactopyranosy1-4-tridecene (11)

Na(s) (5 mg) was dissolved in dry MeOH (3 mL) and added to a solution of 10 in dry MeOH/THF (5:1, 6 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 d at RT. Dowex 50W-X8 resin (prewashed thoroughly with MeOH) was added to neutralize the reaction mixture, which was then filtered and concentrated. Purification by chromatography (CHCl3/MeOH, 10:1) gave 11 as a white solid (15.6 mg, 90%): [α]D20 =−1.05 (c=0.76 in CHCl3/MeOH, 3:1); Rf=0.4 (CHCl3/MeOH, 3:1); 1H NMR (CDCl3/CD3OD, 20:1): δ=1.27–1.47 (m, 19H), 1.80 (p, 2H, J=6.6 Hz), 2.01 (q, 2H, J=6.4 Hz), 3.55 (m, 1H), 3.62 (m, 2H), 3.70 (m, 2H), 3.82 (m, 2H), 3.91 (m, 1H), 4.02 (t, 2H, J=6.4 Hz), 4.05 (m, 1H), 4.16 (m, 1H), 4.28 (d, 1H, J=7.8 Hz), 5.48 (dd, 1H, J= 6.9, 15.2 Hz), 5.73 (dt, 1H, J=6.7, 14.0 Hz), 6.94 (d, 2H, J=8.8 Hz), 7.37–8.07 ppm (m, 7H); 13C NMR (CDCl3/CD3OD 20:1): δ=26.0, 28.4, 29.1, 29.2, 29.3, 29.4, 32.4, 54.6, 61.3, 64.8, 67.9, 68.2, 68.9, 69.4, 71.0, 72.5, 73.3, 74.6, 79.6, 103.8, 114.0, 126.2, 127.5–132.6, 138.2, 156.3, 162.9, 195.8 ppm; HRMS: m/z [M+Na]+ calcd for C37H53NO11Na: 710.3516, found: 710.3515.

(2S,3R,4E)-2-Amino-3-hydroxy-13-O-(4′-benzoylphenyl)-1-O-β-d-galactopyranosy1-4-tridecene (1)

A mixture of compound 11 (12 mg, 0.017 mmol) and 1m HCl in 90% aqueous HOAc (50 μL) was stirred at RT in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) for 35 min. After concentration, the residue was diluted with MeOH (5 mL) and again concentrated to afford the hydrochloride salt of 1 as a white solid (10.2 mg, 94%): [a]20D=−6.22 (c=0.45 in CHCl3/MeOH, 4:1); Rf=0.08 (CHCl3/MeOH, 3:1); 1H NMR (CDCl3/CD3OD, 20:1): δ=1.24–1.39 (m, 10H), 1.72 (p, 2H, J=6.6 Hz), 2.01 (q, 2H, J=6.9 Hz), 3.27 (m, 1H), 3.35 (m, 1H), 3.48 (m, 2H), 3.66 (m, 2H), 3.74 (m, 1H), 3.81 (m, 1H), 3.87 (m, 1H), 3.95 (t, 2H, J=6.6 Hz), 4.21 (m, 1H), 4.37 (m, 1H), 5.34 (dd, 1H, J=5.6, 15.3 Hz), 5.73 (dt, 1H, J=6.6, 14.3 Hz), 6.86 (d, 2H, J= 8.8 Hz), 7.35–7.96 ppm (m, 7H); 13C NMR (CDCl3/CD3OD 20:1): δ= 21.8, 29.8, 32.8, 32.9, 33.1, 33.2, 33.5, 36.2, 61.6, 65.5, 69.5, 72.2, 73.0, 73.4, 74.9, 76.9, 78.9, 106.9, 117.9, 130.2, 132.1, 133.5, 133.6, 135.9, 136.6, 139.4, 142.0, 166.9, 200.3 ppm; HRMS: m/z [M+Na]+calcd for C32H45NO9Na: 610.2992, found: 610.2997.

Biology

Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization measurements

The permanent human leukemia cell line U937 was cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with HEPES containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mm gluta-mate, and a penicillin-streptomycin solution (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) in a humidified air/CO2 (19:1) atmosphere. Cells were diluted to 5×105 mL−1 density, and on the next day the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mm NaCl, 16 mm Na2HPO4, 6.4 mm KH2PO4, pH 7.2). Cells were loaded with 2.5 μm Fluo-4 AM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) mixed with 0.02% pluronic acid (final concentrations) for 45 min at 37°C/5% CO2, and then washed with either Ca2+-free Krebs ringer solution (120 mm NaCl, 5 mm KCl, 0.62 mm MgSO4, 10 mm HEPES, 6 mm glucose, 50 μm EDTA, pH 7.4) or Ca2+-containing Krebs ringer solution (120 mm NaCl, 5 mm KCl, 0.62 mm MgSO4, 1.8 mm CaCl2, 10 mm HEPES, 6 mm glucose, pH 7.4). The dye-loaded cells were kept in the dark. Fluo-4 fluorescence was detected in a Jobin Yvon FluoroMax-3 spectrofluorometer with excitation at 485 nm and emission at 525 nm in a thermo-stated cuvette at 37°C. After the cell density was adjusted to 2.5×106 mL−1, the baseline was recorded for 30 s, and psychosine or 1 was added from 1 mm stock solutions in methanol. After gentle mixing, the signal was recorded for 5 min. In agreement with published data,[2a] neither psychosine nor 1 was directly cytotoxic to U937 cells up to 30 μm, the highest concentration applied.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (grant HL 083187 to RB) and the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund OTKA (grant 61501 to KL).

References

  • [1].Meyer zu Heringdorf D, Jakobs KH. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1768:923–940. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].a) Kanazawa T, Nakamura S, Momoi M, Yamaji T, Takematsu H, Yano H, Sabe H, Yamamoto A, Kawasaki T, Kozutsumi Y. J. Cell Biol. 2000;149:943–950. doi: 10.1083/jcb.149.4.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Kozutsumi Y, Kanazawa T, Sun Y, Yamaji T, Yamamoto H, Takematsu H. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2002;1582:138–143. doi: 10.1016/s1388-1981(02)00148-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Nilsson O, Svennerholm L. J. Neurochem. 1982;39:709–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1982.tb07950.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Suzuki S. Neurochem. Res. 1998;23:251–259. doi: 10.1023/a:1022436928925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Sakai N. Brain Dev. 2009;31:485–487. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2009.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Pastores GM. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009;47(Suppl. 1):S75–81. doi: 10.5414/cpp47075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].White AB, Givogri MI, Lopez-Rosas A, Cao H, van Breenen R, Thinakaran G, Bongarzone ER. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:6068–6077. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5597-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].a) Im DS, Heise CE, Nguyen T, O'Dowd BF, Lynch KR. J. Cell Biol. 2001;153:429–434. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.2.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wang JQ, Kon J, Mogi C, Tobo M, Damirin A, Sato K, Komachi M, Malchinkhuu E, Murata N, Kimura T, Kuwabara A, Wakamatsu K, Koizumi H, Uede T, Tsujimoto G, Kurose H, Sato T, Harada A, Misawa N, Tomura H, Okajima F. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:45626–45633. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406966200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Tomura H, Mogi C, Sato K, Okajima F. Cell. Signalling. 2005;17:1466–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].a) Ludwig MG, Vanek M, Guerini D, Gasser JA, Jones CE, Junker U, Hofstetter H, Wolf RM, Seuwen K. Nature. 2003;425:93–98. doi: 10.1038/nature01905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Murakami N, Yokomizo T, Okuno T, Shimizu T. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:42484–42491. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406561200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].a) Hagiwara K, Wada A, Katadae M, Ito M, Ohya Y, Casey PJ, Fukada Y. Biochemistry. 2004;43:300–309. doi: 10.1021/bi0351514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Haberkant P, Schmitt O, Contreras F-X, Thiele C, Hanada K, Sprong H, Reinhard C. J. Lipid Res. 2008;49:251–262. doi: 10.1194/jlr.D700023-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Haberkant P, van Meer G. Biol. Chem. 2009;390:795–803. doi: 10.1515/BC.2009.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].a) Dormán G, Prestwich GD. Biochemistry. 1994;33:5661–5673. doi: 10.1021/bi00185a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Völkert M, Uwai K, Tebbe A, Popkirova B, Wagner M, Kuhlmann J, Waldman H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:12749–12758. doi: 10.1021/ja036178d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Lu X, Bittman R. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:4746–4750. doi: 10.1021/jo050513u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Ponthieux S, Cabot J, Mouillac B, Seyer R, Barberis C, Carnazzi E. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:3379–3388. doi: 10.1021/jm040871+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].a) Torssell S, Somfai P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004;2:1643–1646. doi: 10.1039/b403568b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Yamamoto T, Hasegawa H, Hakogi T, Katsumura S. Org. Lett. 2006;8:5569–5572. doi: 10.1021/ol062258l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Peters C, Billich A, Ghobrial M, Högenauer K, Ullrich T, Nussbaumer P. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:1842–1845. doi: 10.1021/jo062347b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Ullrich T, Ghobrial M, Peters C, Billich A, Guerini D, Nussbaumer P. ChemMedChem. 2008;3:356–360. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.200700285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Garner P, Park JM. J. Org. Chem. 1988;53:2979–2984. [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Peterson MA, Polt R. J. Org. Chem. 1993;58:4309–4314. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Nyffeler PT, Liang C-H, Koeller KM, Wong C-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:10773–10778. doi: 10.1021/ja0264605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].a) Mbadugha BNA, Menger FM. Org. Lett. 2003;5:4041–4044. doi: 10.1021/ol030084r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Cheng H, Cao X, Xian M, Fang L, Cai TB, Ji JJ, Tunac JB, Sun D, Wang PG. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:645–652. doi: 10.1021/jm049693a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].a) Zimmermann P, Bommer R, Bär T, Schmidt RR. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1988;7:435–452. [Google Scholar]; b) Bittman R. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 2004;129:111–131. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2004.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Liu Y, Bittman R. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 2006;142:58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2006.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Singh RD, Puri V, Valiyaveettil JT, Marks DL, Bittman R, Pagano RE. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2003;14:3254–3265. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-12-0809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Singh RD, Liu Y, Wheatley CL, Holicky EL, Makino A, Marks DL, Kobayashi T, Subramaniam G, Bittman R, Pagano RE. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:30660–30668. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606194200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Elsen L, Betz R, Schwarzmann G, Sandhoff K, van Echten-Deckert G. Neurochem. Res. 2002;27:717–727. doi: 10.1023/a:1020288403626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Barton DHR, MacKinnon J, Perchet RN, Tse C-L. Org. Synth. 1998;75:124–126. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES