Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1982 Jun;79(11):3575–3578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.11.3575

Evolution of interference competition by individual, family, and group selection

Michael J Wade 1
PMCID: PMC346464  PMID: 16578763

Abstract

The necessary conditions for the evolution of social behaviors in a population with three levels of biological organization are derived by using a population genetic model (one locus, two alleles, random mating, discrete generations). Total selection on the behavior, Δq, is partitioned into the sum of three components: (i) ΔqI, selection between individuals within families; (ii) ΔqF, selection between families within groups; and (iii) ΔqG, selection between groups of families. I show that any level of selection can be made to operate in concert with or in opposition to any other, depending upon the fitness effects of the behavior. The implications of the model are discussed in relation to those adaptive explanations of phenotypic traits that generally consider selection to operate only between individuals.

Keywords: population structure, levels of selection, behavior

Full text

PDF
3575

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hamilton W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hamilton W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hamilton W. D. The play by nature. Science. 1977 May 13;196(4291):757–759. doi: 10.1126/science.196.4291.757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Trivers R. L., Hare H. Haploidploidy and the evolution of the social insect. Science. 1976 Jan 23;191(4224):249–263. doi: 10.1126/science.1108197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wade M. J. Kin selection: A classical approach and a general solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Dec;75(12):6154–6158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.12.6154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wade M. J. Kin selection: its components. Science. 1980 Nov 7;210(4470):665–667. doi: 10.1126/science.210.4470.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES