Hydrogenase enzymes have caught the attention of the chemistry community for a number of reasons. First, they catalyze the interconversion of protons and H2, a carbon-free energy-storing molecule. Unlike most synthetic catalysts for H2 formation, hydrogenases are composed of Earth-abundant materials, are biodegradable, and give extremely rapid catalysis.[1] Second, hydrogenases show how natural systems perform multielectron catalysis while avoiding unstable intermediates. Third, hydrogenases have metal-carbonyl cofactors that link classical organometallic chemistry (which usually uses strong-field ligands like CO and CN−) and bioinorganic chemistry (which is dominated by weak-field ligands). Now, recent back-to-back crystallographic papers in Nature by Fritsch, Scheerer et al. and by Shomura et al. describe another surprising discovery in hydrogenases: a new kind of iron-sulfide cluster.[2] These new results have important implications for electron control in enzymes, and will help chemists to understand the structural basis of O2 tolerance in one class of hydrogenases.
A difficulty with handling hydrogenases has been their oxygen sensitivity. The majority of known hydrogenases are poisoned by even small amounts of O2 to give inactive forms, only some of which can be re-activated upon reduction with H2.[3] Interestingly, membrane-bound hydrogenases (MBH) in the bacteria Ralstonia eutropha, Ralstonia metallidurans, Hydrogenovibrio marinus, and Aquifex aeolicus tolerate limited amounts of oxygen (though they can be overwhelmed by high enough amounts of O2).[4] However, the question of how the MBH enzymes can resist O2 has been difficult to answer. All hydrogenases have iron-sulfide clusters that serve as a relay to transfer electrons to and from the active site, which in the MBH enzymes is a heterobimetallic bridged nickel-iron cofactor. Both the nickel-iron active site and the iron-sulfide clusters are inherently O2-sensitive, and so it is surprising that the MBH enzymes resist the potentially destructive effects of O2. Initial hypotheses focused on the iron-nickel active site, but recent spectroscopic studies and the new crystal structures show that the Ni-Fe bimetallic active sites of the MBH enzymes have no significant differences from those in O2-sensitive nickel-iron hydrogenases.[5] Another hypothesis was that the width of the H2-transporting channel in MBH enzymes is narrow enough to exclude O2, but the recent crystal structures do not support this idea.[1a, 4, 5c, 6]
The most distinctive and relevant feature of the MBH enzymes has turned out to be in one of the iron-sulfide clusters. Iron-sulfide clusters are widespread electron-transfer sites in metalloproteins, and their constitution is typically specified through delineation of the number of iron atoms n and number of sulfides m in the core as [nFe-mS]. The air-sensitive nickel-iron hydrogenases have a chain of three clusters, and the proximal one (closest to the Ni-Fe site) is a normal [4Fe-4S] cuboidal cluster (Figure 1A). However, the new crystal structures of the O2-tolerant MBH in its reduced form show that the proximal iron-sulfur cluster is [4Fe-3S], where one of the sulfides is replaced with a bridging thiolate from a cysteine residue (Figure 1B). Another iron atom has an additional terminal cysteine that replaces a site vacated by the missing sulfide. As a result of replacing one triply bridging sulfide with a bridging cysteine thiolate and a terminal cysteine thiolate, the cluster coordinates a total of six cysteine side-chains rather than the usual four. This unique structure explains the unusual spectroscopic features of the MBH enzymes.[7] This cluster shape has not yet been observed in small-molecule iron-sulfide compounds, and this will pose an exciting challenge to the synthetic modeling community.
Figure 1.
Comparison of traditional [4Fe-4S] cluster to new [4Fe-3S]clusters. Each is shown as a perspective viewof the crystal structureon the topand as a picture of the bonding below. Changes are highlighted in red. A: normal [4Fe-4S] cluster (PDB 1H2R)[1b]; B: reduced [4Fe-3S] cluster fromMBH (PDB 3AYX)[2b]; C: oxidized [4Fe-3S] cluster from MBH (PDB 3AYZ)[2b].
How does the unusual [4Fe-3S] cluster contribute to the oxygen tolerance of the MBH enzymes? The answer is provided by one of the new crystallographic studies, which shows changes in the cluster coordination at different redox potentials.[2b] Under oxidizing conditions, the structure shifts to a form in which the backbone amide of Cys26 of the smaller subunit becomes deprotonated and displaces the bridging cysteine from one of the iron atoms; as a result, this thiolate is attached in the more typical terminal binding mode (Figure 1C, indicated in red). The additional negative charge from the deprotonated amide stabilizes the oxidized form (i.e., lowers the redox potential). As a result, the [4Fe-3S] cluster can transfer two electrons in a narrow potential window of only 0.2 V, and is stable at three different oxidation levels.[7b] It is proposed that the ability to transfer multiple electrons increases MBH’s oxygen tolerance by enabling the enzyme to reduce O2 rapidly, converting the dioxygen into harmless water before it can damage the protein.[5c, 8]
The synergism of amide deprotonation and cluster oxidation is an example of proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET), in which protons and electrons are moved simultaneously in order to avoid a high activation barrier from charge buildup. No detailed studies of proton-coupled electron transfer with iron-sulfide clusters have been reported, and the new structures will certainly inspire future work in both protein and small-molecule chemistry. Additionally, the amide coordination in the oxidized form of the new [4Fe-3S] cluster may act as a “redox switch” between the two reactivity modes of the enzyme, oxidation of H2 and reduction of O2. The redox-dependent conformational change in the [4Fe-3S] cluster is reminiscent of previously characterized changes in the P cluster of nitrogenase. Coordination of the amide in the oxidized cluster (Figure 1D) enables multielectron redox processes.[9] Thus, the new crystal structures may point toward a general strategy for rapid electron-transfer cascades in multielectron redox enzymes. In this way, it is anticipated that further study of “shape-shifting” iron-sulfide clusters will help chemists to better understand how electron flow is controlled in proteins.
Figure 2.
Comparison of new [4Fe-3S] clusters to the P cluster of iron-molybdenum nitrogenase. Each is shown as a perspective view of the crystal structure on the top and as a picture of the bonding below. A: reduced [4Fe-3S] cluster fromMBH (PDB 3AYX)[2b]; B: oxidized [4Fe-3S] cluster from MBH (PDB 3AYZ)[2b]; C: reducedP cluster from nitrogenase (PDB 3U7Q).[9] D:oxidized P cluster from nitrogenase (PDB 2MIN).[9]
Footnotes
Financial support of the authors’ iron-sulfide cluster work by the National Institutes of Health (GM065313) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank John Peters for helpful comments on the manuscript.
References
- 1.a) Vincent KA, Parkin A, Armstrong FA. Chem Rev. 2007;107:4366–4413. doi: 10.1021/cr050191u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ogata H, Lubitz W, Higuchi Y. Dalton Trans. 2009:7577–7587. doi: 10.1039/b903840j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.a) Fritsch J, Scheerer P, Frielingsdorf S, Kroschinsky S, Friedrich B, Lenz O, Spahn CMT. Nature. 2011;479:249–252. doi: 10.1038/nature10505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Shomura Y, Yoon KS, Nishihara H, Higuchi Y. Nature. 2011;479:253–256. doi: 10.1038/nature10504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.De Lacey AL, Fernández VM, Rousset M, Cammack R. Chem Rev. 2007;107:4304–4330. doi: 10.1021/cr0501947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ludwig M, Cracknell JA, Vincent KA, Armstrong FA, Lenz O. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:465–477. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803676200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.a) Horch M, Lauterbach L, Saggu M, Hildebrandt P, Lendzian F, Bittl R, Lenz O, Zebger I. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49:8026–8029. doi: 10.1002/anie.201002197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Horch M, Lauterbach L, Saggu M, Hildebrandt P, Lendzian F, Bittl R, Lenz O, Zebger I. Angew Chem. 2010;122:8200–8203. doi: 10.1002/anie.201002197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Pandelia ME, Fourmond V, Tron-Infossi P, Lojou E, Bertrand P, Léger C, Giudici-Orticoni MT, Lubitz W. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:6991–7004. doi: 10.1021/ja910838d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liebgott PP, de Lacey AL, Burlat B, Cournac L, Richaud P, Brugna M, Fernandez VM, Guigliarelli B, Rousset M, Léger C, Dementin S. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;133:986–997. doi: 10.1021/ja108787s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.a) Fritsch J, Löscher S, Sanganas O, Siebert E, Zebger I, Stein M, Ludwig M, De Lacey AL, Dau H, Friedrich B, Lenz O, Haumann M. Biochemistry. 2011;50:585869. doi: 10.1021/bi200367u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Pandelia ME, Nitschke W, Infossi P, Giudici-Orticoni MT, Bill E, Lubitz W. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:6097–6102. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100610108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a) Goris T, Wait AF, Saggu M, Fritsch J, Heidary N, Stein M, Zebger I, Lendzian F, Armstrong FA, Friedrich B, Lenz O. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:648–648. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Lukey MJ, Roessler MM, Parkin A, Evans RM, Davies RA, Lenz O, Friedrich B, Sargent F, Armstrong FA. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:16881–16892. doi: 10.1021/ja205393w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Peters JW, Stowell MH, Soltis SM, Finnegan MG, Johnson MK, Rees DC. Biochemistry. 1997;36:1181–1187. doi: 10.1021/bi9626665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


