Abstract
The purpose of this longterm follow-up was (1) to investigate disc changes in the olisthetic segment in patients treated conservatively, (2) to compare disc changes above the slipped vertebra in conservatively treated patients with those in operatively treated patients, and (3) to establish possible relations of disc changes to the degree of the slip and to subjective back pain symptoms of the patients. The subjects were 227 patients with isthmic L5 olisthesis diagnosed under 20 years of age (mean 13.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 15.4 (range 5–30) years. Of these, 145 patients had been treated with segmental fusion and 82 had been treated conservatively. At follow-up, standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs as well as flexion/extension views of the lumbar spine were taken. Disc degeneration was graded semiquantitatively: 0 = normal disc height, 1 = decrease of disc height < 50%, 2 = decrease ≥50%, and 3 = obliteration of the disc. In the conservatively treated patients degeneration of the olisthetic disc was distributed by grade as follows: 0:n = 38, 1:n = 24, 2:n = 14, 3:n = 6. No motion at all was observed in the olisthetic segment in 40 patients (48%) with a mean slip of 30%,, segmental motion of 4°–18° was found in 42 patients with a mean slip of 14%. There was a statistically significant association of the degree of slip to the severity of disc degeneration and non-mobility of the segment. Grade 1 degeneration of the L4/5 disc occurred in 25.6% of the conservatively treated patients and in 32% of 48 patients treated with L5-S1 fusion. This correlated with the severity of the slip, but not with pain symptoms or pathologic segmental mobility at the time of follow-up. Out of 84 patients with L4-S1 fusion, in 17% grade 1 degeneration of the L3/4 disc was observed, and 3 out of 13 patients (23%) with L3-S1 fusion had grade 1 degeneration of the disc above the fusion. The disc changes had no correlation with subjective pain symptoms. It is concluded that the natural course of isthmic spondylolisthesis is associated with disc degeneration and spontaneous stabilization of the olisthetic segment. Fusion operations do not significantly increase the rate of disc degeneration in the adjacent disc above the fusion after a mean postoperative follow-up of 13.8 years. No correlation between the number of degenerated discs or the degree of degeneration and subjective low back pain symptoms was found.
Key words: Spondylolisthesis, Conservative treatment, Spinal fusion, Disc degeneration, Low back pain
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (479.9 KB).
References
- 1.Anderson CE. Spondyloschisis following spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1956;38:1142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Andersson GBJ, Schultz A, Nathan A, Irstam L. Roentgenographic measurement of lumbar intervertebral disc height. Spine. 1981;6:154–158. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198103000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Battié MC, Videman T, Gibbons LE, Fisher LD, Manninen H, Gill K. Determinants of lumbar disc degeneration. Spine. 1995;20:2601–2612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Harris RI, Wiley JJ. Acquired spondylolysis as a sequel to spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1963;45:1159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hayes MA, Howard TC, Gruel CR, Kopta JA. Roentgenographic evaluation of lumbar spine flexion-extension in asymptomatic individuals. Spine. 1989;14:327–331. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198903000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hensinger RN. Current concepts review. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1989;71:1098–1107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kirkaldy-Willis WH. The pathology and pathogenesis of low back pain. In: Kirkaldy-Willis WH, editor. Managing low back pain. New York Edinburgh London: Churchill Livingstone; 1983. pp. 23–43. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Laurent LE, Einola S. Spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Acta Orthop Scand. 1961;31:45. doi: 10.3109/17453676108989297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Penning L, Blickman JR. Instability in lumbar spondylolisthesis. A radiologic study of several concepts. Am J Roentgenol. 1980;134:293–301. doi: 10.2214/ajr.134.2.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Saraste H. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Stockholm: University of Stockholm; 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schlenzka D, Poussa M, Seitsalo S, Österman K. Intervertebral disc changes in adolescents with isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord. 1991;4:344–352. doi: 10.1097/00002517-199109000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S, Poussa M, Österman K. Premature disc degeneration: source of pain in isthmic spondylolisthesis in adolescents? J Pediatr Orthop [B] 1993;1:153–157. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Seitsalo S. Operative and conservative treatment of moderate spondylolisthesis in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1990;72:908–913. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B5.2211782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tertti MO, Salminen JJ, Paajanen HEK, Terho PH, Kormano MJ. Low-back pain and disc degeneration in children: a case-control MR imaging study. Radiology. 1991;180:503. doi: 10.1148/radiology.180.2.1829844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Unander-Scharin L (1950) On lowback pain with special reference to the value of operative treatment with fusion. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 5
- 16.White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1990. pp. 561–565. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wiltse LL. Spondylolisthesis in children. Clin Orthop. 1961;21:156–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zippel H. Wirbelgleiten in Lendenbereich. Leipzig: Barth; 1980. [Google Scholar]