Skip to main content
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 1998 Jan;15(1):27–31. doi: 10.1023/A:1022574221115

Impact of Varying Stages of Endometriosis on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization–Embryo Transfer

Lubna Pal 1,, Jan L Shifren 2, Keith B Isaacson 1, YuChiao Chang 2, Lucy Leykin 1, Thomas L Toth 1
PMCID: PMC3468198  PMID: 9493063

Abstract

Purpose:The impact of severity of endometriosis on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) was analyzed in an uncontrolled, retrospective study in an academic IVF program.

Methods:Sixty-one patients with a primary diagnosis of endometriosis undergoing 85 cycles of IVF were included in the study. Patients were divided according to the severity of disease based on the revised American Fertility Society (AFS) classification into groups A (stages I/II, or minimal/mild) and B (stages III/IV, or moderate/severe). Group A included 32 patients undergoing 45 IVF-embryo transfer (ET) cycles; group B included 29 patients undergoing 40 IVF cycles. Exclusion criteria were age older than 40 years, basal day 3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) greater than 20 IU/L, male-factor infertility, assisted hatching, and gamete intrafallopian transfer cases. Stimulation for IVF cycles was standard using pituitary down-regulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in a midluteal protocol. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) was achieved using a combination of FSH and human menopausal gonadotropin. Outcomes assessed included response to COH and number, maturity, and quality of oocytes retrieved. Fertilization, implantation, and pregnancy rates after IVF-ET were also analyzed.

Results:The response to COH and the number, maturity, and quality of the oocytes was comparable between patients with varying severity of endometriosis. Fertilization rates for oocytes of patients in group B (stages III/IV) were significantly impaired compared to those in group A (stages I/II) (P = 0,004). The rates for implantation, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions:The reduced fertilization potential of the oocytes obtained from patients with severe endometriosis in the absence of male-factor infertility suggests an adverse biological impact of the advanced disease on the oocytes. The outcome of IVF-ET, however, is unaffected by increasing severity of endometriosis. This suggests that IVF may compensate for or overcome this reduction in the biological potential of the oocytes associated with severe disease, thus accounting for a comparable outcome irrespective of the severity of endometriosis.

Keywords: endometriosis, staging, American Fertility Society classification, in vitro fertilization

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (483.6 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.American Fertility Society Revised American Fertility Society Classification for Endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1985;43:351–352. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48430-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oehninger S, Acosta AA, Kreiner D, Muasher SJ, Jones HW, Rosenwaks Z. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET): An established and successful endometriosis. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1988;5(5):249–256. doi: 10.1007/BF01132172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dmowski WP, Rana N, Michalowska J, Friberg J, Papierniak C, El-Roeiy A. The effect of endometriosis, its stage and activity, and of autoantibodies on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer success rates. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(3):555–562. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57425-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Matson PL, Yovich JL. The treatment of infertility associated with endometriosis by in vitro fertilization. Fert Steril. 1986;46(3):432–434. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49581-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Inoue M, Kobayashi Y, Honda I, Awaji H, Fujii A. The impact of endometriosis on the reproductive outcome of infertile patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:278–282. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91675-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tummon IS, Colwell KA, MacKinnon CE, Nisker JA, Yuzpe AA. Abbreviated endometriosis associated infertility correlates with in vitro fertilization success. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1991;8:149–153. doi: 10.1007/BF01131705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Geber S, Paraschos T, Atkinson G, Margara R, Winston RML. Results of IVF in patients with endometriosis: the severity of the disease does not affect the outcome or the incidence of miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(6):1507–1511. doi: 10.1093/humrep/10.6.1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oliveness F, Feldberg D, Liu HC, Cohen J, Moy F, Rosenwaks Z. Endometriosis: A stage by stage analysis-the role of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(2):392–398. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57740-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arici A, Oral E, Bukulmez O, Duleba A, Olive DL, Jones EE. The effect of endometriosis on implantation: Results from the Yale University in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(3):603–607. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58162-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Simon C, Gutiérrez A, Vidal A, Santos MJ, Tarin JJ, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: Results from in-vitro fertilization and oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:725–729. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yovich JL, Matson PL. The influence of infertility etiology on the outcome of IVF-ET and GIFT treatments. Int J Fertil. 1990;35(1):22–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chillik CF, Acosta AA, Garcia JE, Perera S, Van Uem JFHM, Rosenwaks Z, Jones HW. The role of in vitro fertilization in infertile patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1985;44(1):56–61. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48677-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cohen J, Alikani M, Trowbridge J, Rozenwaks Z. Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:685–691. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Racowsky C, Folkers MF, Klasener SO, Hutchinson-Cole H, Nelson-White T, Lewis A, Cui H, Gelety TJ: Abstracts of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Fertility Society, April 17–21, 1996
  • 15.Yovich JL, Yovich JM, Tuvik AI, Matson PL, Wilcox DL. In vitro fertilization for endometriosis. Lancet. 1985;2:552. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90485-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wardle PG, McLaughlin EA, McDermott A, Mitchell JD, Ray BD, Hull MGR: Endometriosis and ovulatory disorder: Reduced fertilization in vitro compared with tubal and unexplained infertility. Lancet 1985;236–239 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Weed JC, Arguembourg PC. Endometriosis: Can it produce an autoimmune response resulting in infertility? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980;23:885–893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lessey BA, Castlebaum AJ, Sawin SW, Buck CA, Schinnar R, Bilker W, Strom BL. Aberrant Integrin expression in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79:643–649. doi: 10.1210/jcem.79.2.7519194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES