Abstract
Purpose: Our purpose was to verify whether the blood flow impedance of the ovarian stromal artery in transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography can predict the in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF–ET) outcomes.
Methods: Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonographic examinations were performed in 99 patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for IVF–ET. The pulsatility index (PI) was evaluated in the bilateral ovarian stromal arteries on the starting day of COH (PI1) and the day of hCG administration (PI2). The patients were classified into three groups by the mean PI1, PI2, and ΔPI (PI1 − PI2), respectively, and the IVF–ET outcomes were analyzed and compared.
Results: There were no significant differences in the duration of COH, the total dosage of gonadotropins used for COH, the serum E2 concentration on day of hCG administration, the number of follicles on the day of hCG administration, the number of oocytes retrieved or fertilized in vitro, and the number of embryos transferred between their respective PI1, PI2, and ΔPI values. However, the pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the higher PI1 and PI2 groups than in the lower groups (p < 0.05, p < 0.05). Significant positive correlations were also found between PI1 and PI2 and the total dosage of gonadotropins for COH (Y = 0.483 X + 27.1, r = 0.052, p < 0.05; Y = 0.877 X + 26.6, r = 0.075, p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Our results showed that the lower PI in the ovarian stromal artery during COH is associated with the higher the pregnancy rate and the smaller amount of gonadotropins used for effective COH. This study suggests that the color Doppler ultrasonographic index (PI) of the ovarian stromal artery during COH may be useful for predicting the success of IVF–ET in infertile patients.
Keywords: Color Doppler ultrasonography, COH, IVF–ET, ovary, stromal artery
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (730.6 KB).
REFERENCES
- 1.Brinsden PR. A Textbook of In Vitro Fertilization and Assisted Reproduction. 2nd edn. New York: Parthenon Publishing; 1999. pp. 91–92. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Speroff L, Glass RH, Kase NG. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 6th edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999. pp. 1135–1136. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Taylor KJ, Burns PN, Wells PN, Conway DI, Hull MG. Ultrasound Doppler flow studies of the ovarian and uterine arteries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92:240–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Strizhakov AN, Medvedev MV, Davydov AI, Bunin I, Podzolkova NN. Possibilities of Doppler ultrasonics in the study of blood flow in the iliac and ovarian arteries in healthy women. Akush Ginekol (Mosk) 1989;7:28–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Scholtes MC, Wladimiroff JW, van Rijen HJ, Hop WC. Uterine and ovarian flow velocity waveforms in the normal menstrual cycle: A transvaginal Doppler study. Fertil Steril. 1989;52:981–985. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53162-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hata K, Hata T, Senoh D, Makihara K, Aoki S, Kitao M. Transition of ovarian arterial compliance during the human menstrual cycle, assessed by Doppler ultrasound—correlation with serum hormone levels. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1990;42:662–666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kurjak A, Kupesic-Urek S, Schulman H, Zalud I. Transvaginal color flow Doppler in the assessment of ovarian and uterine blood flow in infertile women. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:870–873. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54657-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kupesic S, Kurjak A. Uterine and ovarian perfusion during the periovulatory period assessed by transvaginal color Doppler. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:439–443. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56157-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tekay A, Jouppila P. Intraobserver reproducibility of transvaginal Doppler measurements in uterine and intraovarian arteries in regularly menstruating women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7:129–134. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07020129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Engmann L, Sladkevicius P, Agrawal R, Bekir J, Campbell S, Tan SL. The pattern of changes in ovarian stromal and uterine artery blood flow velocities during in vitro fertilization treatment and its relationship with outcome of the cycle. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;13:26–33. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13010026.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Weiner Z, Thaler I, Levron J, Lewit N, Itskovitz-Eldor J. Assessment of ovarian and uterine blood flow by transvaginal color Doppler in ovarian-stimulated women: Correlation with the number of follicles and steroid hormone levels. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:743–749. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55853-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schurz B, Schon HJ, Wenzl R, Eppel W, Huber J, Reinold E. Endovaginal doppler flow measurements of the ovarian artery in patients with a normal menstrual cycle and with polycystic ovary syndrome during in vitro fertilization. J Clin Ultrasound. 1993;21:19–24. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870210105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tekay A, Martikainen H, Jouppila P. Blood flow changes in uterine and ovarian vasculature, and predictive value of transvaginal pulsed colour Doppler ultrasonography in an invitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:688–693. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bhal PS, Pugh ND, Chui DK, Gregory L, Walker SM, Shaw RW. The use of transvaginal power Doppler ultrasonography to evaluate the relationship between perifollicular vascularity and outcome in in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles. HumReprod. 1999;14:939–945. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.4.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pirhonen J, Pulkkinen M. The effect of nimesulide and naproxen on the uterine and ovarian arterial blood flow velocity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74:549–553. doi: 10.3109/00016349509024388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Geber S, Caetano JP. Doppler colour flow analysis of uterine and ovarian arteries prior to and after surgery for tubal sterilization: A prospective study. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1195–1198. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.La Torre R, Montanino-Oliva M, Marchiani E, Boninfante M, Montanino G, Cosmi EV. Ovarian blood flow before and after conservative laparoscopic treatment for endometrioma. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1998;25:12–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Farquhar CM, Rae T, Thomas DC, Wadsworth J, Beard RW. Doppler ultrasound in the nonpregnant pelvis. J Ultrasound Med. 1989;8:451–457. doi: 10.7863/jum.1989.8.8.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zaidi J, Collins W, Campbell S, Pittrof R, Tan SL. Blood flow changes in the intraovarian arteries during the periovulatory period: Relationship to the time of day. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7:135–140. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07020135.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tinkanen H, Kujansuu E, Laippala P. Vascular resistance in uterine and ovarian arteries: Its association with infertility and the prognosis of infertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994;57:111–115. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90052-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Contart P, Baruffi RL, Coelho J, Mauri AL, Petersen C, Franco Junior JG. Power Doppler endometrial evaluation as a method for the prognosis of embryo implantation in an ICSI program. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17:329–334. doi: 10.1023/A:1009405128160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schild RL, Knobloch C, Dorn C, Fimmers R, van der Ven H, Hansmann M. Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:361–366. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01695-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]