Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1982 Sep;79(17):5117–5121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.17.5117

Adaptive resynthesis of O6-methylguanine-accepting protein can explain the differences between mammalian cells proficient and deficient in methyl excision repair

E A Waldstein 1,*, E-H Cao 1,†, R B Setlow 1
PMCID: PMC346845  PMID: 6957853

Abstract

Mammalian cells have been classified as proficient (Mer+) or deficient (Mer-) in methyl excision repair in terms of their cytotoxic reactions to agents that form O6-alkylguanine and their abilities to reactivate alkylated adenoviruses. O6-Methylguanine (O6MeGua) is considered to be a lethal, mutagenic, and carcinogenic lesion. We measured the abilities of cell extracts to transfer the methyl group from an exogenous DNA containing O6MeGua to acceptor protein. The constitutive level of acceptor activity was independent of the Mer phenotype and was ≈ 100,000 acceptor sites per cell. Treatment of cells with N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) results in a dose-dependent decrease in the acceptor activity in extracts because the rapid reaction between endogenous O6MeGua and acceptor protein makes the latter unavailable for further reaction. Treatment of cells with 1 μM MNNG for 15 min or 2 μM for ≈2 min uses up >95% of the constitutive activity. However, Mer+ cells, which are resistant to MNNG, rapidly resynthesize new acceptor protein, and the activity returns to the basal level in ≈90 min. In Mer- tumor cells and Chinese hamster cells, which are sensitive to MNNG, resynthesis is not detectable in 90 min. Mer- simian virus 40-transformed fibroblasts, known to have an intermediate sensitivity to MNNG, have an intermediate resynthesis rate. Treatment of cells with multiple low doses of MNNG results in the enhanced production of O6MeGua-accepting protein in levels 2.5-fold above the constitutive values for Mer+ tumor cells and to ≈ 1.5-fold for Mer+ fibroblasts or Mer- simian virus 40-transformed cells. Such treatments reduce the activities in Mer- tumor cells and Chinese hamster cells. We conclude: (i) estimates of O6MeGua in cellular DNA shortly after treatment may be seriously in error because of the rapid repair of this lesion, and (ii) the adaptive resynthesis of acceptor protein, not its constitutive level, is the important correlate of cell resistance to methylating agents.

Keywords: adaptation, cell survival, DNA repair, N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

Full text

PDF
5117

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bogden J. M., Eastman A., Bresnick E. A system in mouse liver for the repair of O6-methylguanine lesions in methylated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jul 10;9(13):3089–3103. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.13.3089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Day R. S., 3rd, Ziolkowski C. H. MNNG-pretreatment of a human kidney carcinoma cell strain decreases its ability to repair MNNG-treated adenovirus 5. Carcinogenesis. 1981;2(3):213–218. doi: 10.1093/carcin/2.3.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Day R. S., 3rd, Ziolkowski C. H., Scudiero D. A., Meyer S. A., Lubiniecki A. S., Girardi A. J., Galloway S. M., Bynum G. D. Defective repair of alkylated DNA by human tumour and SV40-transformed human cell strains. Nature. 1980 Dec 25;288(5792):724–727. doi: 10.1038/288724a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Foote R. S., Mitra S., Pal B. C. Demethylation of O6-methylguanine in a synthetic DNA polymer by an inducible activity in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1980 Nov 28;97(2):654–659. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(80)90314-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goth-Goldstein R. Inability of Chinese hamster ovary cells to excise O6-alkylguanine. Cancer Res. 1980 Jul;40(7):2623–2624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jeggo P. Isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli K-12 mutants unable to induce the adaptive response to simple alkylating agents. J Bacteriol. 1979 Sep;139(3):783–791. doi: 10.1128/jb.139.3.783-791.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Karran P., Lindahl T., Griffin B. Adaptive response to alkylating agents involves alteration in situ of O6-methylguanine residues in DNA. Nature. 1979 Jul 5;280(5717):76–77. doi: 10.1038/280076a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mehta J. R., Ludlum D. B., Renard A., Verly W. G. Repair of O6-ethylguanine in DNA by a chromatin fraction from rat liver: transfer of the ethyl group to an acceptor protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):6766–6770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.6766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Montesano R., Brésil H., Margison G. P. Increased excision of O6-methylguanine from rat liver DNA after chronic administration of dimethylnitrosamine. Cancer Res. 1979 May;39(5):1798–1802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Olsson M., Lindahl T. Repair of alkylated DNA in Escherichia coli. Methyl group transfer from O6-methylguanine to a protein cysteine residue. J Biol Chem. 1980 Nov 25;255(22):10569–10571. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pegg A. E., Perry W., Bennett R. A. Effect of partial hepatectomy on removal of O6-methylguanine from alkylated DNA by rat liver extracts. Biochem J. 1981 Jul 1;197(1):195–201. doi: 10.1042/bj1970195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Robins P., Cairns J. Quantitation of the adaptive response to alkylating agents. Nature. 1979 Jul 5;280(5717):74–76. doi: 10.1038/280074a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Samson L., Cairns J. A new pathway for DNA repair in Escherichia coli. Nature. 1977 May 19;267(5608):281–283. doi: 10.1038/267281a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shiloh Y., Becker Y. Kinetics of O6-methylguanine repair in human normal and ataxia telangiectasia cell lines and correlation of repair capacity with cellular sensitivity to methylating agents. Cancer Res. 1981 Dec;41(12 Pt 1):5114–5120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Singer B. N-nitroso alkylating agents: formation and persistence of alkyl derivatives in mammalian nucleic acids as contributing factors in carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979 Jun;62(6):1329–1339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sklar R., Strauss B. Removal of O6-methylguanine from DNA of normal and xeroderma pigmentosum-derived lymphoblastoid lines. Nature. 1981 Jan 29;289(5796):417–420. doi: 10.1038/289417a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Warren W., Crathorn A. R., Shooter K. V. The stability of methylated purines and of methylphosphotriesters in the DNA of V79 cells after treatment with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Jun 20;563(1):82–88. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(79)90009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES