Abstract
Background
The objective of the present research was to determine the frequency of Toxocara spp. eggs in soil samples of public parks, in the city of Tehran, Iran.
Methods
A total of 600 soil samples were taken from 120 parks between Aprils to November, 2008. Soil samples were collected from 5 distinct sites in the parks. The samples were washed with saline solution and the collected sediment from each park were equally divided and examined by floatation and Petri dish methods for Toxocara eggs.
Results
Ten percent were contaminated with Toxocara spp. eggs. The number of observed Toxocara eggs in each microscopic field was varied from 1-3. No significant differences were observed between floatation and Petri dish methods.
Conclusion
Our public parks showed a high risk of toxocariasis and the need for preventive studies.
Keywords: Toxocara, Iran, Public parks, Soil contamination
Introduction
Toxocara canis and T. cati are common intestinal parasites of dogs and cats. The soil contamination with eggs of these parasites is an important etiological factor in Toxocara infection of people.
Human beings become infected by ingesting infective eggs (1–2). Human infection with toxocariasis is mostly asymptomatic in the most individuals. However, the immune system unable to control larvae migration into liver, in these cases, otherwise involvement of central nervous system and/or eye can be occurring. Among children, the age groups most affected by severe clinical symptoms of larva migrant's syndrome are toddlers 1-3 years (3). The prevalence of Toxocara eggs infected soil is reported from 0.8% in Costa Rica to 97.5% in Greece (6, 7). There are few studies in Iran on the prevalence of Toxocara eggs in public parks. The purpose of this study was to point out the prevalence of contamination public parks with Toxocara spp. eggs in Tehran.
Materials and Methods
From April to November 2008, 120 parks were selected from 19 different zones of Tehran and soil samples were taken. Five soil samples, each 100g were collected (from north, south, west, east and central of each park). After pooling the samples of each park, a 500g sample was washed with saline solution into buckets through a set of 2 sieves having pore widths of 250µm and 150µm.
The water collected in the bucket was left to sediment for 1-2 hours. The sediment from each park were equally divided and examined by floatation method with saturated salt solution (8) and Petri dish plate for Toxocara eggs. The sediment in petri dishes were diluted in saline and examined under stereomicroscope for the presence of Toxocara eggs.
Results
We studied 120 parks in Tehran for Toxocara eggs contamination. Results are seen in Table 1.
Table 1.
Zone | Number of studied park | Number of infected park |
---|---|---|
1 | 11 | 7 |
2 | 11 | 3 |
3 | 4 | 1 |
4 | 16 | 1 |
5 | 8 | 1 |
6 | 3 | 0 |
7 | 3 | 0 |
8 | 6 | 1 |
9 | 8 | 2 |
10 | 5 | 0 |
12 | 2 | 1 |
13 | 3 | 0 |
14 | 11 | 3 |
15 | 9 | 1 |
16 | 2 | 0 |
17 | 7 | 0 |
18 | 6 | 0 |
19 | 3 | 1 |
20 | 2 | 0 |
Total | 120 | 22 |
The prevalence of contamination was 18.3% and 10% for ascarid eggs and Toxocara eggs respectively. Toxocara spp. eggs (Figs. 1 and 2) were prevalent parasite (51.92%), followed by Toxascaris leonina (40.39%) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Kind of parasite | No. of parasite in parks | Infection (%) |
---|---|---|
Toxocara eggs | 27 | 51.92 |
Toxascaris eggs | 21 | 40.39 |
Ancylostomatidae eggs | 2 | 3.85 |
Isospora oocyst | 1 | 1.92 |
Eimeria oocyst | 1 | 1.92 |
Total | 52 | 100 |
As shown in Table 3, no significant differences were found between methods of salt saturated solution and Petri dish for eggs detection.
Table 3.
Floatation | |||
---|---|---|---|
Petri dish | + | - | Total |
+ | 2 | 3 | 5 |
- | 17 | 98 | 115 |
Total | 19 | 101 | 120 |
Discussion
Toxocara spp. is the most common nematodes in dogs and cats. Human Toxocariasis develops by ingesting of embryonated eggs in contaminated soil. All individuals are susceptible to contamination; however, children play in the parks more than the adults.
We found eggs of Toxocara spp. from 12(10%) out of the 120 public parks researched by the laboratorial techniques.
The contamination found in Tehran is lower than from many cities in world as: Thessalonki/Greece (97.5%), Franfurt/Germany (87.1%), Tokushma/Japan (63.3%), Khorramabad/Iran (63.3%), Sao Paulo /Brazil(60%), Petaling jaya/Malaysia (54.5%), Havana/Cuba(42.2%), Ankra/Turkey(30.6%), Konya/Turkey(25%), Kansas/USA(20.6%) and Aydin/Turkey(18.9%) (7, 9–18).
The contamination in our study was higher than the contamination found in Buenos Aires/Argentina (7.2%), London/UK (6.3%), Shiraz /Iran (6.3%), Dublin/Ireland (5.6%), Urmia/Iran (3.9%), Resistencia /Argentina (1.3%) and Muracia/Spain (1.2%) (19–25).
All these results are different because many factors can be effective on this topic, from socio cultural to geographical parameters and examination methods. Therefore, we can not exactly compare all such studies. Toxocariasis infection in dogs and cats in Iran were reported from 10-51.6% (4–5) and 13-52.7%, respectively (26, 27).
In four serodiagnosis studies of toxocariasis in Iranian children have been shown as, 10 cases in Iran, 25.6% from Shiraz, south of Iran, 5.3% in west of Iran and 2.7% from northwest of Iran, respectively (5, 28–30).
In spite of the light contamination rate and low number of eggs found in this study it should be kept in mind that children always take a risk of visceral larva migrants while playing in contaminated playgrounds. For this reason, preventive measures should be implemented. These could include health education of the public health, good personal hygiene practice, control of stray dogs and cats.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Vice-Dean of Research, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for financial support. We would like to thank the municipality of Tehran for its corporation. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
References
- 1.Urquhart GM, Armour AJ, Duncan JL, Dunn AM, Jennings FW. England: Longman Sci Tech Essex; 1987. Veterinary parasitology. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Soulsby EJL. Textbook of veterinary clinical parasitology. Vol. 1. Oxford: Helminths.Blackwell Sci. Pub.; 1965. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Overgaauw PAM. Aspects of Toxocara epidemiology: human toxocariasis. Crit Rev Microb. 1997;23:215–231. doi: 10.3109/10408419709115137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eslami A. Veterinary Helminthology. Vol. 3. Iran: University of Tehran; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fallah M, Azimi A, Taherkhani H. Seroprevalence of toxocariasis in children aged 1-9 years in western Islamic Republic of Iran. East Med Health J. 2007;13:1073–1077. doi: 10.26719/2007.13.5.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Paquet-Durand I, Hernandes J, Dolz G, Romero zuniga JJ, Schnieder T, Epe C. Prevalence of Toxocara spp., Toxascaris leonina and Ancylostomidae in public parks and beaches in different climate zone of Costa Rica. Acta Tropica. 2007;104:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Himons C, Antoniadou-Sotiriadou K, Frydas S. Research survey on the prevalence of Toxocara ova in the soil of public parks in Thessaloniki. Helliniki-Tatriki. 1992;58(5):333–339. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Eslami A. Recovery of cestods eggs from the village courtyard soil in Iran. Vet Parasitol. 1996;10:95–96. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Duvell D. The prevalence of Toxocara eggs in the sand in children's playgrounds in Frankfurt/M. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1984;78(6):633–636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shimizu T. Prevalence of Toxocara eggs in sandpits in Tokushima city and its outskirts. Vet Med Sci. 1993;55(5):807–811. doi: 10.1292/jvms.55.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Santarem VA, Sartor IF, Bergamo FMM. Contamination by Toxocara spp. eggs in public parks and squares in Botucata, Sao paulo state. Brasil Rev Soc Brasileira Med Trop. 1993;31(6):529–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Loh AG, Israf DA. Test on the centrifugal flotation technique and its use in estimating the prevalence of Toxocara in soil samples from urban and suburban areas of Malaysia. J Helminthol. 1998;72(1):39–42. doi: 10.1017/s0022149x0000095x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zamora K, Garcia DR, Dark Vicente Diaz L. Toxocara spp. in parks and public zones of city of Havana 1995. Cuba Rev Hig Epidemiol. 2000;38(2):112–116. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oge S, Oge H. Prevalence of Toxocara spp. eggs in the soil of public parks in Ankara, Turkey. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2000;92:75–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Güclu F, Aydenizoz M. Cocuk park larindaki kumlari kopek ve kedi helminti yumurtalari ile kontaminasyonunu tespiti. T Parazitol Derg. 1998;22(2):194–198. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dada BJO, Lindquist WD. Prevalence of Toxocara spp. eggs in some public grounds and highway rest areas in Kansas. J Helminthol. 1979;53(2):145–146. doi: 10.1017/s0022149x00005885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Güre FS, Ertug S, Okyay P. Prevalence of Toxocara spp. eggs in public parks of the city of Aydin, Turkey. Turkiye parazitologi Dergist. 2005;29(3):177–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zibaei M, Abdollahpour F, Birjandi M, Firoozeh F. Soil contamination with Toxocara spp. Eggs in public parks from three areas of Khorram Abad, Iran. Nepal Med Coll J. 2010;12(2):63–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sommerfelt I, Degregorio O, Barrera M, Gallo G. Presence of Toxocara eggs in public parks of the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Rev Med Vet Buenos Aires. 1992;73(2):70–74. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gillespie SH, Pereira M, Ramsay A. The prevalence of Toxocara canis ova in soil samples from parks and gardens in the London areas. Public Health. 1991;105:335–359. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80219-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Holland C, Ơconnor P, Taylor MR, Hughes G, Girdwood RW, Smith H. Families, parks, gardens and Toxocariasis. Scand J Infect Dis. 1991;23(2):225–231. doi: 10.3109/00365549109023405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tavassoli M, Hadian M, Charesaz S, Javadi S. Toxocara spp.eggs in public parks of Urmia city,west Azerbaijan province Iran. Iranian J Parasitol. 2008;3(3):24–29. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alanso JM, Stein M, Chamorro MC, Bojanich MV. Contamination of soil with eggs of Toxocara in a subtropical city Argentina. J Helminthol. 2001;75(2):165–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Motazedian H, Mehrabani D, Tabatabaee SH, Pakniat A, Tavalali M. Prevalence of helminths ova in soil samples from public places in Shiraz, Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12(5):562–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ruis de ybanez MR, Garijo MM, Alonso FD. Prevalence and viability of eggs of Toxocara spp.and Toxascaris leonina in public parks in eastern Spain. J Helminthol. 2001;75(2):169–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jamshidi S, Meshgi B, Toghani M. A study of helminthic infection of gastrointestinal tract in stray cats at urban areas in Isfahan. J Fac Vet Med Unvi Tehran. 2002;57:25–27. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meshgi B, Jamshidi S, Saadati D, Hooshyar H, Bokaie S. An overview of Toxocara cati infection in stray cats in the metropolitan region of Tehran, Iran, and a comparison of two diagnostic methods. Int J Vet RES. 2010;4(1):53–56. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rokni MB, Massoud J, Mowlawi Gh. Report of 10 cases of visceral larva migrans in Iran. Iranian J Publ Health. 2000;29:61–66. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sadjjadi SM, Khosravi M, Mehrabani D, Oryan A. Seroprevalence of Toxocara infection in school children in Shiraz, southern Iran. J Trop Pediatr. 2000;46:327–330. doi: 10.1093/tropej/46.6.327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nourian A, Amiri M, Ataeian A, Haniloo A, Mosavinasab SN, Badali H. Seroepidemiological study for Toxocariasis among children in Zanjan, northwest of Iran. Pak J Biological Sci. 2008;11(14):1844–1847. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.1844.1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]