Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Sep 8;68(Pt 10):m1246. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812037579

Diaqua­bis­(1H-imidazole-4-carboxyl­ato-κ2 N 3,O)cobalt(II)

Wen-Sen Chen a,*
PMCID: PMC3470135  PMID: 23125579

Abstract

In the title compound, [Co(C4H3N2O2)2(H2O)2], the CoII ion is located on a twofold rotation axis and shows a distorted octa­hedral coordination configuration, defined by two N,O-bidentate 1H-imidazole-4-carboxyl­ate ligands in the equatorial plane and two water mol­ecules in the axial positions. In the crystal, O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into a three-dimensional supra­molecular network. π–π stacking inter­actions between the imidazole rings [centroid–centroid distances = 3.4914 (15) and 3.6167 (15) Å] further stabilize the crystal structure.

Related literature  

For related structures, see: Cai et al. (2012 ▶); Gryz et al. (2007 ▶); Haggag (2005 ▶); Shuai et al. (2011 ▶); Starosta & Leciejewicz (2006 ▶); Yin et al. (2009 ▶); Zheng et al. (2011 ▶).graphic file with name e-68-m1246-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • [Co(C4H3N2O2)2(H2O)2]

  • M r = 317.13

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.1216 (18) Å

  • b = 11.780 (3) Å

  • c = 13.536 (3) Å

  • V = 1135.6 (5) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.54 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.35 × 0.33 × 0.30 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.614, T max = 0.655

  • 6171 measured reflections

  • 1238 independent reflections

  • 1050 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.024

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.027

  • wR(F 2) = 0.073

  • S = 1.08

  • 1238 reflections

  • 87 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.25 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812037579/hy2579sup1.cif

e-68-m1246-sup1.cif (14.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812037579/hy2579Isup2.hkl

e-68-m1246-Isup2.hkl (61.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O1W—H1WA⋯O2i 0.87 1.99 2.827 (2) 162
O1W—H1WB⋯O2ii 0.86 1.93 2.771 (2) 166
N2—H2⋯O2iii 0.86 1.92 2.771 (2) 173

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges South China Normal University for supporting this work.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

There is currently much interest in adopting heterocyclic carboxylic acids as multidentate ligands to prepare new metal coordination polymers. The main reason is that they have versatile coordination behaviors and can form high-dimensional polymers via hydrogen-bonding interactions in the process of self-assembly. 1H-Imidazole-4-carboxylic acid (H2imc), containing two N atoms of an imidazole group and one carboxylate group, is an excellent candidate for the construction of new coordination polymers. Up to this date, one-, two- and three-dimensional coordination polymers based on the H2imc ligand have been documented (Cai et al., 2012; Haggag, 2005; Gryz et al., 2007; Shuai et al., 2011; Starosta & Leciejewicz, 2006; Yin et al., 2009; Zheng et al., 2011). For example, the mononuclear complexes [Cd(Himc)2(H2O)2] and [Zn(Himc)2(H2O)2] have been reported by Yin et al. (2009) and Shuai et al. (2011), repectively. In this work, we report a Co(II) coordination polymer, [Co(Himc)2(H2O)2], which is isomorphous with the Cd(II) and Zn(II) analogs.

The asymmetric unit of the title compound contains a half of CoII ion, lying on a twofold rotation axis, one Himc anion and one coordinated water molecule. As illustrated in Fig. 1, the CoII ion is six-coordinated by two N and two O atoms from two cis-oriented N,O-bidentate Himc ligands in the equatorial plane, and two water molecules in the axial positions, forming a slightly distorted octahedral geometry. The Co—N bond length is 2.0786 (16) Å and the Co—O distances are 2.1088 (15) and 2.1793 (14) Å, which are comparable to those of the CdII and ZnII analogs. In the crystal structure, a pairs of intermolecular O—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) involving the coordinated water (O1W) and the carboxylate O atom (O2) link the molecules into a two-dimensional network in the ab plane (Fig. 2). In addition, there exist strong π–π stacking interactions between the imidazole rings in the layer, with a centroid–centroid distatance of 3.4914 (15) Å. These layers are further connected by N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) involving the imidazole N atom (N2) and the carboxylate O atom (O2), generating a three-dimensional supramolecular network. Another type of π–π stacking interactions with a centroid–centroid distatance of 3.6167 (15) Å also can be observed between the neighbouring layers (Fig. 3).

Experimental

A mixture of CoCl2.6H2O (0.20 mmol), H2imc (0.20 mmol) and 6 ml EtOH/H2O (v/v 1:1) was sealed into a 10 ml sample bottle reactor and heated at 373 K for 48 h under autogenous pressure, and then slowly cooled to room temperature at a rate of 2 K/h. Red block crystals of the title compound were isolated, washed with distilled water, and dried in air (yield: 45%).

Refinement

C- and N-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with C—H = 0.93 and N—H = 0.86 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C, N). H atoms of the water molecule were located from a difference Fourier map and refined as riding, with O—H bond lenghts restrained to 0.86 Å.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level. [Symmetry code: (i) -x+3/2, -y+1/2, z.]

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The crystal packing of the title compound, showing the two-dimensional network. Hydrogen bonds and π–π staking interactions are shown as dashed lines.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The crystal packing of the title compound, showing the three-dimensional supramolecular network. Hydrogen bonds and π–π staking interactions are shown as dashed lines.

Crystal data

[Co(C4H3N2O2)2(H2O)2] F(000) = 644
Mr = 317.13 Dx = 1.855 Mg m−3
Orthorhombic, Pccn Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ab 2ac Cell parameters from 2075 reflections
a = 7.1216 (18) Å θ = 3.0–27.3°
b = 11.780 (3) Å µ = 1.54 mm−1
c = 13.536 (3) Å T = 298 K
V = 1135.6 (5) Å3 Block, red
Z = 4 0.35 × 0.33 × 0.30 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 1238 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1050 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.024
φ and ω scans θmax = 27.0°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001) h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.614, Tmax = 0.655 k = −12→15
6171 measured reflections l = −17→16

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.073 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0317P)2 + 0.7299P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1238 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
87 parameters Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.25 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Co1 0.7500 0.2500 0.13193 (2) 0.02397 (14)
O1 0.95746 (19) 0.17187 (13) 0.22880 (10) 0.0305 (3)
O1W 0.8973 (2) 0.40251 (13) 0.15738 (11) 0.0351 (4)
O2 1.23719 (18) 0.08486 (12) 0.22678 (10) 0.0302 (3)
N1 0.9449 (2) 0.18857 (14) 0.03090 (11) 0.0270 (4)
C3 1.2150 (3) 0.09661 (18) 0.00537 (15) 0.0304 (4)
H3 1.3262 0.0569 0.0155 0.036*
C1 1.0961 (3) 0.12982 (16) 0.18488 (14) 0.0243 (4)
C2 1.0934 (3) 0.13421 (16) 0.07551 (14) 0.0235 (4)
C4 0.9791 (3) 0.18410 (18) −0.06466 (14) 0.0314 (5)
H4 0.9018 0.2150 −0.1131 0.038*
N2 1.1403 (2) 0.12911 (15) −0.08276 (12) 0.0327 (4)
H2 1.1882 0.1166 −0.1401 0.039*
H1WA 0.8364 0.4481 0.1962 0.039*
H1WB 1.0072 0.3950 0.1833 0.039*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Co1 0.0206 (2) 0.0304 (2) 0.0209 (2) 0.00483 (15) 0.000 0.000
O1 0.0258 (8) 0.0427 (8) 0.0230 (7) 0.0060 (6) 0.0011 (6) −0.0005 (6)
O1W 0.0241 (8) 0.0367 (8) 0.0445 (9) 0.0039 (6) −0.0032 (6) −0.0095 (7)
O2 0.0225 (7) 0.0413 (8) 0.0267 (7) 0.0027 (6) −0.0034 (6) 0.0047 (6)
N1 0.0252 (9) 0.0331 (9) 0.0226 (8) 0.0046 (7) 0.0017 (6) 0.0016 (7)
C3 0.0258 (10) 0.0356 (11) 0.0297 (10) 0.0038 (8) 0.0005 (8) −0.0026 (9)
C1 0.0233 (10) 0.0246 (9) 0.0251 (9) −0.0032 (7) −0.0019 (8) 0.0010 (8)
C2 0.0218 (10) 0.0251 (9) 0.0237 (9) 0.0005 (7) −0.0002 (7) 0.0007 (7)
C4 0.0303 (11) 0.0408 (12) 0.0230 (10) 0.0041 (9) 0.0004 (8) 0.0031 (9)
N2 0.0327 (10) 0.0424 (10) 0.0231 (8) 0.0023 (8) 0.0073 (7) −0.0015 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Co1—N1 2.0786 (16) N1—C2 1.376 (2)
Co1—O1W 2.1088 (15) C3—C2 1.359 (3)
Co1—O1 2.1793 (14) C3—N2 1.361 (3)
O1—C1 1.254 (2) C3—H3 0.9300
O1W—H1WA 0.87 C1—C2 1.482 (3)
O1W—H1WB 0.86 C4—N2 1.341 (3)
O2—C1 1.269 (2) C4—H4 0.9300
N1—C4 1.317 (2) N2—H2 0.8600
N1i—Co1—N1 97.72 (9) C4—N1—C2 105.69 (16)
N1i—Co1—O1W 98.23 (6) C4—N1—Co1 141.57 (14)
N1—Co1—O1W 94.12 (6) C2—N1—Co1 112.73 (12)
N1i—Co1—O1Wi 94.12 (6) C2—C3—N2 105.76 (18)
N1—Co1—O1Wi 98.23 (6) C2—C3—H3 127.1
O1W—Co1—O1Wi 161.19 (9) N2—C3—H3 127.1
N1i—Co1—O1 174.63 (6) O1—C1—O2 125.17 (18)
N1—Co1—O1 78.23 (6) O1—C1—C2 116.70 (16)
O1W—Co1—O1 85.65 (6) O2—C1—C2 118.13 (17)
O1Wi—Co1—O1 83.06 (6) C3—C2—N1 109.55 (17)
N1i—Co1—O1i 78.23 (6) C3—C2—C1 132.70 (18)
N1—Co1—O1i 174.63 (6) N1—C2—C1 117.72 (16)
O1W—Co1—O1i 83.06 (6) N1—C4—N2 110.91 (18)
O1Wi—Co1—O1i 85.65 (6) N1—C4—H4 124.5
O1—Co1—O1i 106.02 (7) N2—C4—H4 124.5
C1—O1—Co1 114.54 (12) C4—N2—C3 108.07 (17)
Co1—O1W—H1WA 112.2 C4—N2—H2 126.0
Co1—O1W—H1WB 115.5 C3—N2—H2 126.0
H1WA—O1W—H1WB 105.7
N1—Co1—O1—C1 1.74 (14) N2—C3—C2—N1 0.4 (2)
O1W—Co1—O1—C1 −93.39 (14) N2—C3—C2—C1 −177.63 (19)
O1Wi—Co1—O1—C1 101.68 (14) C4—N1—C2—C3 −0.5 (2)
O1i—Co1—O1—C1 −174.89 (15) Co1—N1—C2—C3 −179.88 (13)
N1i—Co1—N1—C4 4.6 (2) C4—N1—C2—C1 177.83 (17)
O1W—Co1—N1—C4 −94.3 (2) Co1—N1—C2—C1 −1.5 (2)
O1Wi—Co1—N1—C4 99.9 (2) O1—C1—C2—C3 −179.0 (2)
O1—Co1—N1—C4 −179.0 (2) O2—C1—C2—C3 1.4 (3)
N1i—Co1—N1—C2 −176.42 (16) O1—C1—C2—N1 3.1 (2)
O1W—Co1—N1—C2 84.68 (14) O2—C1—C2—N1 −176.53 (17)
O1Wi—Co1—N1—C2 −81.10 (14) C2—N1—C4—N2 0.5 (2)
O1—Co1—N1—C2 0.00 (13) Co1—N1—C4—N2 179.49 (16)
Co1—O1—C1—O2 176.63 (15) N1—C4—N2—C3 −0.2 (2)
Co1—O1—C1—C2 −3.0 (2) C2—C3—N2—C4 −0.1 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+3/2, −y+1/2, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1W—H1WA···O2ii 0.87 1.99 2.827 (2) 162
O1W—H1WB···O2iii 0.86 1.93 2.771 (2) 166
N2—H2···O2iv 0.86 1.92 2.771 (2) 173

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −x+5/2, −y+1/2, z; (iv) −x+5/2, y, z−1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HY2579).

References

  1. Bruker (2001). SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Bruker (2007). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Burnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1996). ORTEPIII. Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.
  4. Cai, S.-L., Pan, M., Zheng, S.-R., Tan, J.-B., Fan, J. & Zhang, W.-G. (2012). CrystEngComm, 14, 2308–2315.
  5. Gryz, M., Starosta, W. & Leciejewicz, J. (2007). J. Coord. Chem. 60, 539–546.
  6. Haggag, S. S. (2005). Egypt. J. Chem. 48, 27–41.
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Shuai, W., Cai, S. & Zheng, S. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, m897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Starosta, W. & Leciejewicz, J. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, m2648–m2650.
  11. Yin, W.-P., Li, Y.-G., Mei, X.-L. & Yao, J.-C. (2009). Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 28, 1155–1159.
  12. Zheng, S., Cai, S., Fan, J. & Zhang, W. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, m865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812037579/hy2579sup1.cif

e-68-m1246-sup1.cif (14.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812037579/hy2579Isup2.hkl

e-68-m1246-Isup2.hkl (61.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES