RNA interference (RNAi) is a ubiquitous and highly effective biological mechanism to control gene expression. Over the last few years it has been established that synthetic double-stranded, small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules can be applied as therapeutics that potently harness RNAi in humans and animal models, by demonstrating silencing of target mRNA transcripts in rodents and non-human primates (NHP).[1] Because of their high molecular weight and polyanionic nature, synthetic siRNAs fail to cross biological membranes by passive diffusion and therefore, generally require transmembrane drug delivery technologies to access the cytoplasm of target cells.[2, 3] Once in the cytoplasm, however, siRNAs readily load into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and direct sequence-specific cleavage of target mRNA. The resulting reduction in expression of protein, for example, can be profound and durable, lasting several weeks after administration of a single dose.[4] This new class of therapeutics, with its unique mechanism of action and ability to specifically inhibit previously “undruggable” disease-causing proteins, has prompted research into intracellular delivery technologies suitable for parenteral administration.
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) containing ionizable amino lipids that self-assemble into approximately 100 nm particles when mixed with polyanionic oligonucleotides, represent the most advanced delivery platforms for systemic administration of RNAi therapeutics. Substantial progress has been made in recent years to maximize efficacy and to achieve a favorable therapeutic index for human applications.[2, 4] The ionizable amino lipid plays a dual role in the drug delivery process. First, through electrostatic interaction with polyanionic nucleic acids, it promotes the self-assembly of formulation components into macromolecular nanoparticles encapsulating the siRNA. Second, following endocytosis of LNPs by target cells, it enables siRNA to escape the endosomal compartment and access the cell cytoplasm. In a recently published analysis of the structure–activity relationship of cationic lipid molecules we noted that permanently charged quaternary amine moieties in the hydrophilic head group region were consistently less effective in RNAi-mediated gene knockdown in vivo as compared to ionizable lipids.[5]
Herein, we report on a detailed study aimed at further investigating the role of the amine head group in the delivery of siRNA in vivo. Through systematic structural modifications to the hydrophilic head group we have modulated the apparent acid dissociation constant (pKa) of the ionizable amino lipids present in the LNPs and investigated the relationship between the pKa value and activity, that is, the ability of the LNPs to deliver functionally active siRNAs into hepatocytes for eliciting gene silencing in vivo.
Amino lipid 2,2-dilinoleyl-4-dimethylaminoethyl-[1,3]-dioxolane (DLin-KC2-DMA, 1), has been identified as a highly potent cationic lipid (Figure 1, Table 1)[5] when incorporated into LNPs encapsulating siRNA to target murine clotting factor VII (FVII) mRNA.[6] The hydrophobic dilinoleyl chain is known to be optimal for activity,[5, 7] hence this unsaturated alkyl chain configuration was maintained in all the lipids investigated herein and structural modifications were added to the head group region of the molecule. The formulations were prepared by a preformed vesicle method, as described in the Supporting Information (page 38), with the following lipid composition: amino lipid, distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC), cholesterol and (R)-2,3-bis(octadecyloxy)propyl-1-(methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)2000)propylcarbamate (PEG-lipid) in the molar ratio 40/10/40/10, respectively, and a FVII siRNA/total lipid ratio of approximately 0.05 (w/w).[5] To ensure a narrow particle size distribution in the range of 70–90 nm and a low polydispersity index of 0.11±0.04 (n=56), the particles were extruded up to three times through 80 nm membranes prior to adding the siRNA.[5] Amino lipid pKa values were determined for each LNP by measuring the fluorescence of 2-(p-toluidino)-6-napthalene sulfonic acid (TNS) during titration from pH 3 to 10 in increments of 0.5 pH units (Supporting Information, page 40).[8–10] The anionic TNS molecule fluoresces when associated with the surface of positively charged membranes, but is not fluorescent when free in solution, and this property has been used extensively to probe positive charge at membrane surfaces.[8–10]
Table 1.
From the resulting fluorescence titration curve a pH value, at which the charge on the LNP is 50 % of maximum (pKa), can be calculated using curve-fit analysis (Figure 2). Importantly, this method enables a pKa determination of amino lipids in situ, which accounts for potential influences of membrane structure and neighboring lipids on the dissociation properties of the amino group. Similar pKa values were obtained for select formulations using zeta potential measurements over the same pH titration range, but TNS was found to be the more sensitive method (data not shown).
The hydrophilic head-group region of 1 was extensively modified, producing 53 novel amino lipids with pKa values ranging from 4.17 to 8.12 (Table 1; see the Supporting Information for full experimental details on lipid synthesis). Lipids 1, 3, and 53 have been reported earlier and were used as references in this study.[5],[7] The structural modifications introduced were sufficient to affect the pKa value without significantly altering the molecular dimensions of the hydrophilic region. This is important because having a small head group is a characteristic that enables amino lipids to adopt inverted, non-bilayer structures, which are hypothesized to be responsible for destabilizing the endosomal membrane, resulting in efficient release of siRNA into the cytoplasm of target cells.[5, 11]
A plot of pKa value versus ED50 (median effective dose for FVII gene silencing in female C57BL/6 mice by i.v. administration) for all 56 amino lipids tested reveals a strong correlation between the in vivo activity and the acid dissociation constant of the amine, with a pKa optimum seen between 6.2 and 6.5, on either side of which LNP potency rapidly decreases (Figure 3). On the other hand, significant potency differences were found for lipids with similar pKa values. These results indicate that an optimal pKa value is a necessary but not sufficient requirement for good in vivo activity and other structural features, such as the nature of the linker between the head group and the lipid tails, can also contribute substantially to the in vivo activity.
To further investigate the pKa–activity relationship, a selected group of lipids were studied in more detail. These novel lipids were designed around the structure of dilinoleylmethyl-4-dimethylaminobutyrate (16, ED50=0.03 mg kg−1, pKa=6.44) also referred to as DLin-MC3-DMA (Figure 4), one of the most active cationic lipids from the group of 56 lipids. In the first group of lipids (31, 30, 38, and 37), the distance between ester and amine is maintained at three methylene units and the substitution on the N-atom altered to create a pKa range between 5.44 and 7.62.
In the second group (14, 15, 17, and 18), the dimethylamino moiety is maintained but the distance between the ester and the amine is varied from one to five methylene units to generate lipids with pKa values ranging from 4.17 to 7.16. The plot of ED50 as a function of pKa value shows that the highest potency is achieved at a pKa of 6.44 for the siRNA LNP formulation containing lipid 16 (Figure 5, blue line). Activity substantially decreases as the pKa value shifts to either the acidic or basic side, underlining the importance of the ionization behavior of LNPs in the functional delivery of siRNA to hepatocytes in mice.
The surprisingly sharp pKa value dependence of LNP activity provides more insight into the complex in vivo mechanism for this highly potent class of LNPs for siRNA delivery. In brief, it has been proposed that intravenous administration of LNPs with low to zero surface charge will minimize nonspecific binding of LNPs to tissues and proteins thus increasing the likelihood of particles reaching hepatocytes.[5] In addition, we recently demonstrated that uptake of ionizable LNPs by hepatocytes in vitro and in vivo is mediated by apolipoprotein E (ApoE),[12] which is also known to preferentially associate with neutral membrane surfaces.[13]
On the other hand, LNPs must acquire sufficient positive surface charge following endocytosis to promote an electrostatic interaction with the negative surface of the endosome lumen. The resulting close proximity of LNP and membrane allows lipid mixing to occur, leading to the formation of ion pairs between the exogenous amphipathic amine and endogenous anionic membrane lipids.[11, 14] The ion pairs prefer to adopt inverted, non-bilayer configurations that disrupt the integrity of the endosome membrane and the siRNA is subsequently released into the cytoplasm.[5] The ED50–pKa profile may, therefore, represent a balance between two opposing delivery requirements, namely minimum charge at pH 7.4 to maximize hepatocyte uptake by ApoE-mediated endocytosis and maximum positive charge in the acidified lumen of endosomes to promote membrane disruption.
If potency differences of structurally similar lipids are predominantly a function of pKa value, we hypothesized that the activity of LNPs containing two or more cationic lipids should reflect the average pKa of the particle and not the average activity measured for the individual amino lipids. To test this, LNP formulations encapsulating FVII siRNA were prepared in which the 40 mole % amino lipid component consisted of different ratios of lipids 15, 16, and 17 thus producing LNPs with average surface pKa values that increased incrementally from 5.64 (15) to 6.93 (17). The measured pKa value for mixed lipid LNPs was shown to be the same (within experimental error) as that calculated from the mole ratio of the mixed amino lipids (Supporting Information, page 41). Each LNP was administered at the same dose (0.1 mg kg−1 siRNA) and the concentration of murine plasma FVII protein was determined 24 h later and expressed as a percentage of that measured in a saline-treated control (Figure 6).
As the average pKa value increases from 5.64 (15) or decreases from 6.93 (17) by mixing with 16, LNP activity increases. We did not identify a mixture with greater activity than 16 alone, but importantly, LNPs containing an equimolar mixture of 15 (ED50=0.6) and 17 (ED50=0.15), lipids that individually are 20- and 5-fold less potent than 16, respectively, showed an average apparent pKa value similar to 16 and equivalent activity. These data further confirm that for amino lipids of similar structure, in vivo hepatic gene silencing is driven by pKa rather than specific head group structure or linker length (the distance between the ester and the amine). We have subsequently shown this to be true for mixtures of other cationic lipids with different head group structures (data not shown).
The pH-dependent surface charge for each LNP in the blood or endosomal compartment can be calculated from their pKa, using the Henderson–Hasselbach equation, assuming blood pH 7.4 and acidified endosome pH 5.5.[15] The amount of fully or partially charged LNPs carrying positive charge for each chosen lipid (14–18, 30, 31, 37, and 38) is expressed as a fraction of charged amino lipids plotted red in Figure 5 along with the fraction of amino lipids that would be uncharged at pH 5.5 in the endosome, plotted green. This demonstrates that the optimal pKa value for in vivo hepatic gene silencing coincides with the pKa giving rise to LNPs that exhibit minimum surface charge in the blood at pH 7.4 and maximum charge in acidified endosomes at pH 5.5. It should be noted, however, that the pKa-value trend found for this class of ionizable lipids with apoE-dependent hepatic delivery may not apply to other cationic and potentially ApoE-independent delivery systems.[6, 12]
To identify potent and safe siRNA delivery systems for clinical development, it is important that the potency in mice translates to non-human primates. For the following experiments LNPs containing the highly potent amino lipid 16 were used, in which the molar ratio of the four lipid components 16, DSPC, cholesterol and PEG-lipid (50/10/38.5/1.5) had been further optimized to enhance in vivo activity. In the murine FVII model, an ED50 of 0.005 mg kg−1 siRNA was achieved in the optimized composition, which represented a sixfold improvement relative to the 40/10/40/10 molar ratio composition (Figure 7, inset). The same lipid composition was administered to cynomolgus monkeys but with an encapsulated siRNA targeting hepatic transthyretin (TTR), a gene of therapeutic interest in the treatment of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy.[16] Animals received a 15 min intravenous infusion at siRNA doses of 0.03, 0.1, or 0.3 mg kg−1 and from the dose response curve an ED50 less than 0.03 mg kg−1 was obtained (Figure 7).
In conclusion, we have identified the lipid pKa value as an important molecular characteristic of amino lipids, which determines their ability to mediate potent hepatic gene silencing in vivo. Combined with our current understanding of the optimal hydrocarbon chain length, lipid-chain unsaturation and linker chemistry for these molecules, the tight correlation between activity and ionization behavior, with a sharp pKa optimum between 6.2–6.5, serves as a guide for the design of LNPs for efficient delivery of therapeutic siRNAs. In fact, a LNP formulation based on DLin-MC3-DMA (16), one of the most potent lipids identified in this work, is currently being utilized in a clinical trial for treating hypercholesterolemia; the target is PCSK9 and the data (not shown) indicate decreases in LDL-C after a single low dose.[17, 18]
Supplementary material
Detailed facts of importance to specialist readers are published as ”Supporting Information”. Such documents are peer-reviewed, but not copy-edited or typeset. They are made available as submitted by the authors.
References
- 1.De Fougerolles A, Vornlocher HP, Maraganore J, Lieberman J. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. 2007;6:443–453. doi: 10.1038/nrd2310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Akhtar S, Benter IF. J. Clin. Invest. 2007;117:3623–3632. doi: 10.1172/JCI33494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Whitehead KA, Langer R, Anderson DG. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. 2009;8:129–138. doi: 10.1038/nrd2742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zimmermann TS, et al. Nature. 2006;441:111–114. doi: 10.1038/nature04688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Semple SC, et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010;28:172–176. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Akinc A, Goldberg M, Qin J, Dorkin JR, Gamba-Vitalo C, Maier M, Jayaprakash KN, Jayaraman M, Rajeev KG, Manoharan M, Koteliansky V, Rohl I, Leshchiner ES, Langer R. Mol. Ther. 2009;17:872–879. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Heyes J, Palmer L, Bremner K, MacLachlan I. J. Controlled Release. 2005;107:276–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bailey AL, Cullis PR. Biochemistry. 1994;33:12573–12580. doi: 10.1021/bi00208a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Eastman SJ, Hope MJ, Cullis PR. Biochemistry. 1991;30:1740–1745. doi: 10.1021/bi00221a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang J, Fan H, Levorse DA, Crocker LS. Langmuir. 2011;27:1907–1914. doi: 10.1021/la104590k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hafez IM, Maurer N, Cullis PR. Gene Ther. 2001;8:1188–1196. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Akinc A, et al. Mol. Ther. 2010;18:1357–1364. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yan X, Kuipers F, Havekes LM, Havinga R, Dontje B, Poelstra K, Scherphof GL, Kamps JA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;328:57–62. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zelphati O, Szoka FC., Jr J. Liposome Res. 1997;7:31–49. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Demaurex N. News Physiol. Sci. 2002;17:1–5. doi: 10.1152/physiologyonline.2002.17.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kurosawa T, Igarashi S, Nishizawa M, Onodera O. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;337:1012–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.09.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Trial to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of ALN-PCS02 in Subjects With Elevated LDL-Cholesterol (LDL-C). (Registry of Federally and Privately Supported Clinical Trials, U.S. National Institutes of Health, 2011)
- 18.Simon A. Phase I Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Results for ALN-PCS, Preliminary Study Results. (Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc, 2012)
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.