Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2012 Jul 6;69(6):10.1002/mrm.24386. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24386

In Vitro and In Vivo Studies of 17O NMR Sensitivity at 9.4 and 16.4 Tesla

Ming Lu 1, Yi Zhang 1, Kamil Ugurbil 1, Wei Chen 1, Xiao-Hong Zhu 1,*
PMCID: PMC3470764  NIHMSID: NIHMS383377  PMID: 22777729

Abstract

In vivo 17O magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) has been successfully applied for imaging the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (CMRO2) through the detection of metabolically produced H217O from the inhaled 17O-labeled oxygen in animals at high field. In this study, we compared the 17O sensitivity for detecting natural abundance H217O signals from a phantom solution and rat brains at 9.4 and 16.4 Tesla. The 17O signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measured at 16.4T was 2.9- and 2.7~2.8-fold higher than that at 9.4T for the phantom and rat brain studies, respectively. Similarly, three-dimensional 17O MRS imaging data showed a more than 2.7-fold higher SNR in the central rat brain region at 16.4T than that at 9.4T. The substantial 17O SNR gain at ultrahigh field significantly improved the reliability for imaging CMRO2, and will provide an opportunity for in vivo assessment of altered oxidative metabolism associated with brain functions and neurological diseases.

Keywords: In vivo17O MRS, CMRO2, SNR, sensitivity, high field

INTRODUCTION

The rate of oxygen utilization in the mitochondrial respiratory chain serves as an important index of the cellular metabolic status. However, the lack of non-destructive and robust in vivo imaging approaches for the investigation of cellular oxidative metabolism has limited our understanding of the mechanism underlying metabolic alteration between normal and diseased tissues. Although 15O positron emission tomography (PET) has been the standard imaging modality for the measurements of oxygen consumption rate for more than 20 years, its application has been limited to research because of the complex experimental procedures, data interpretation and compartmental modeling requirement (1,2). In contrast, 17O magnetic resonance spectroscopy/imaging (MRS/I) provides the specificity by direct detection of the dynamics of metabolic H217O production from the reduction of 17O-labeled oxygen molecules (17O2) but without confounding signal from 17O2, thus, allows more straightforward measurement and quantification of the cellular oxygen consumption rate in vivo (3).

Recently, in vivo 17O MRS approaches for the measurement of the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (CMRO2) (411) and the myocardial oxygen consumption rate (MVO2) (1214) have been developed in animals and human subjects. In comparison with the indirect detection of H217O via 17O-induced changes in the proton T or T2, the direct 17O MRS/I has the advantages of being highly specific to the tissue H217O and the availability of using natural abundance H217O signal as an internal reference for quantification of tissue H217O concentration. In addition, the direct 17O MRS/I detection approach may avoid the challenges encountered by the indirect method, i.e., the complicated quantification of H217O concentration due to the sensitivity of the proton relaxation time to biochemical and physiological changes in tissues, such as pH (15). However, the efforts of direct monitoring and imaging the accumulation rate of H217O during an inhalation of 17O2 have been suffered from the low sensitivity of 17O detectionbecause of its low gyromagnetic ratio and low H217O content in nature.

It is known that the optimal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the detection of magnetic resonance signal depends on magnetic field strength (B0), longitudinal relaxation time (T1), T2* and the RF coil quality factor (Q) according to the following relationship:

SNRB0βQT2T1 [1]

where, the constant β was suggested to be close to the value of 7/4~2 for 17O spins (16,17). Obviously, increasing B0 is one efficient way to improve the SNR. Two previous studies have compared the in vitro and in vivo 17O sensitivity between 4.7T and 9.4T, and between 4.7T and 11T, respectively (16,17), suggesting great advantages of high field. The unique NMR properties of 17O, i.e., the independence of 17O relaxation times (T1 and T2) on the field strength (16,17) and extremely short T1 for more signal averaging, also contribute to a large gain of 17O detection sensitivity at high/ultrahigh field (3).

In this study, 17O sensitivity was measured and compared using the natural abundance H217O signals in a phantom solution and rat brains at 9.4T and 16.4T, without and with spatial localization, to quantify the possible SNR gain for in vivo 17O MRS/I application using the newly developed large-bore animal scanner with ultrahigh field strength of 16.4T.

MATERIALS and METHODS

Phantom and Animal Preparation

A 6-mm-diameter glass sphere filled with natural abundance 17O distilled water was prepared for all phantom studies at 9.4T and 16.4T. For in vivo studies, following the initial induction with 5% isoflurane and oral intubation, male Sprague Dawley rats (250~300 g body weight) were anesthetized with 2% (v/v) isoflurane in a mixture of O2 and N2O gases (~2:3) during surgery and experiment. To monitor physiological parameters and obtain blood samples, the femoral artery and vein were catheterized during the surgery. Rectal temperature was maintained at 37±1°C using heated circulating water. Blood gases were sampled for monitoring physiological conditions. The arterial blood pressure and heart rate were monitored during the experiment. The animals were maintained under physiological conditions during all the measurements.

Ten rats (five for each field strength) were used in this study to measure the global and localized SNR at both fields from the natural abundance brain H217O signals. One 17O2 inhalation experiment was performed on another rat under alpha-chloralose anesthesia (20) at 16.4T and using 17O-labeled O2 (74.8% enrichment, ISOTEC) with N2O gases (~2:3) to imaging and quantify CMRO2 from the metabolically generated H217O signal in the brain. During the sequential acquisitions of localized 17O MRS imaging, the respiration gas was switched from the normal gas mixture with 16O2 to the 17O-labeled oxygen gas mixture. After 2.75 minutes of 17O2 inhalation, the gas line was switched back to the normal gas mixture for ~15 minutes until the completion of data acquisition.

All animal surgical procedures and experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Minnesota.

In vitro and In vivo 17O MRS Imaging

All measurements were performed on either a 9.4T/31cm or a 16.4T/26cm horizontal bore magnet (Magnex Scientific) interfaced to VNMRJ consoles (Varian, CA). For in vitro studies, one 17O radiofrequency (RF) probe consisting of an oval shaped (18mm×13mm) surface coil was designed and constructed. Its resonance frequency can be tuned to either 54.25 MHz for 9.4T or 94.65 MHz for 16.4T application. The glass sphere phantom was fixed on the RF probe for all phantom studies at both fields. For in vivo studies, two passively decoupled dual-coil RF probes with identical geometry were constructed and placed over the rat brain to obtain optimum in vivo sensitivity for both 9.4T and 16.4T experiments. Each RF probe included an oval shaped single-loop 17O surface-coil (10mm×20mm) for acquiring in vivo 17O MRS/MRSI and a butterfly shaped 1H surface-coil for shimming and acquiring anatomical images.

A single-pulse-acquire sequence was applied to obtain the optimal 17O SNR with a nominal 90° RF excitation pulse and following acquisition parameters: 20 kHz spectral width (SW), 1024 number of points (NP) for each FID, 50 ms repetition time (TR) with the number of signal averages (NT)=128 for phantom measurements and NT=512, 128 or 16 for in vivo studies. The spatial localization of 17O MRS was achieved by using the three-dimensional (3D) Fourier series window MRS imaging technique (11,1820) with 15 ms TR, 0.41 ms echo time (TE), 512 NP, 20 kHz SW, 928 total NT, 9×9×5 3D phase encodes and 30×30×30 mm3 field of view (FOV).

For the 17O2 inhalation experiment at 16.4T, an identical set of 3D 17O MRS imaging acquisition parameters as previously reported for rat brain applications at 9.4T (20) was used in this study. The FIDs were processed by exponential filtering with a line broadening of 100 Hz to enhance the SNR, followed by Fourier transformation.

The 17O sensitivity was evaluated using the SNR of H217O resonance peak calculated by dividing peak intensity by the standard deviation of the noise. In addition to the SNR gain at higher field, the relative fluctuation of 17O signals among repeated measurements at a given magnetic field is also an important factor for the evaluation of dynamic studies using direct 17O MRS/I approaches. Therefore, the relative fluctuation of 17O signals was also assessed by the variance from both the phantom and rat brain measurements by computing the standard deviation of the global natural abundance H217O signals from 10 repetitions of data acquisition at 9.4T and 16.4T. All results presented in this study were shown as mean ± standard deviation.

RESULTS

Table 1 summarizes the SNR and measurement variance results of global 17O signals measured in the rat brain and phantom at 9.4T and 16.4T. The average 17O SNR at 16.4T was 2.9- and 2.7~2.8-fold higher than that at 9.4T for the phantom and rat brain studies, respectively. In contrast, the 17O signal variance was 2–4-fold smaller at 16.4T than 9.4T. The overall results clearly demonstrate excellent sensitivity and small variance (i.e. high signal stability) at both fields for obtaining the 17O signals of natural abundance H217O from either the phantom or rat brains. Nevertheless, the 16.4T scanner offers striking improvements of several folds in both sensitivity and stability.

Table 1.

17O SNR and signal stability comparisons between 9.4T and 16.4T (n=5)

Sphere Phantom (NT=128) Rat Brain (NT=16) Rat Brain (NT=128) Rat Brain (NT=512)
SNR9.4T 36.8±3.5 35.6±2.1 97.5±10.4 197.1±21.8
SNR16.4T 108.4±11.3 96.4±8.8 269.2±28.9 531.3±51.9
SNR16.4T/SNR9.4T 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.7
Variance at 9.4T 2.19% 2.16% 0.90% 0.47%
Variance at 16.4T 0.53% 1.01% 0.33% 0.14%

The 1D 17O SNR profiles along an axis parallel to the RF coil plane obtained from the central slides of 3D 17O MRS images in rat brains at both 9.4T and 16.4T were demonstrated in Fig. 1a. As shown in Fig. 1b, significantly improved 17O sensitivity, i.e., an averaged more than 2.5-fold SNR gain was observed from the natural abundance H217O in the rat brain at 16.4T compared to that at 9.4T. Similarly, the 2D 17O MRS images of natural abundance H217O in the rat brain taken from the central slides of 3D 17O MRS imaging data also indicated a more than 2.7-fold higher SNR in the central brain voxels at 16.4T than that at 9.4T (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

One-dimensional 17O SNR profiles along an axis parallel to the RF coil plane obtained from the central slides of 3D 17O MRS imaging in rat brains at 9.4T and 16.4T, respectively (a), and their SNR comparison (b). The vertical dashed lines present the anatomical edges of the rat brain.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Representative anatomical image and the corresponding 2D 17O spectral image of natural abundance H217O of the rat brain obtained at 9.4T and 16.4T, respectively (a). The spectra of central brain voxel acquired at 9.4T and 16.4T were shown in (b) for comparison.

The large sensitivity improvement at ultrahigh field indicated the potential of 17O MRS imaging for the quantification of regional CMRO2 from detecting the dynamic changes of the metabolic H217O in small animal brains during a short inhalation of 17O2. Figure 3a shows the stacked plots of H217O spectra from one representative voxel with the voxel size of ~0.1 ml, located near the center of the 17O RF coil-sensitive region inside the rat brain before, during and after a 2.75-minute inhalation of 17O2. The time course of 17O signal intensity of brain H217O in the representative rat shows three distinct phases: constant baseline (from natural abundance H217O); approximately linear increasing during 17O2 inhalation; and decreasing exponentially after the cessation of inhalation until reaching a new steady state. Figure 3a also illustrates the excellent sensitivity and small variance of the brain 17O signal measurements, which were important for detecting the dynamic change of the metabolic H217O content in the rat brain during and after 17O2 inhalation. The linear fitting of the metabolic H217O concentration change in the same voxel during 17O2 inhalation was shown in Fig. 3b. Based on the simplified quantification model (20,21), the CMRO2 value in this particular voxel was calculated with linear regression method (=2.1 μmol/g/min), which was consistent with those reported in the previous studies under the same physiological condition (11,20).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Stacked plots of brain H217O spectra from a representative voxel (~0.1 ml voxel size and located near the center of 17O coil-sensitive region inside the rat brain) of 3D 17O MRS imaging data acquired before, during and after 2.75 minutes 17O2 inhalation in a rat brain at 16.4T (a), and the linear fitting of the metabolic H217O concentration in this voxel during the 17O2 inhalation for determining the CMRO2 value (b).

As a further proof of the independent 17O relaxation times on the field strength, we measured T1 value of natural abundance H217O in the rat brain at fully relaxed condition using the inversion recovery pulse sequence at 16.4T. The in vivo T2* value of natural abundance H217O was also evaluated from the line width, i.e., full width at half maximum (Δν1/2), of the H217O resonance peak without line broadening. As a result, the measured T1 (5.3±0.4 ms), Δν1/2 (174±5 Hz) and calculated T2* (1.83±0.05 ms) values for rat brains at 16.4T were consistent with those previously reported at 11T, 9.4T and 4.7T (16,17).

DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION

In the present study, we examined the in vitro and in vivo 17O sensitivity at two high field strengths. The results demonstrate an approximated 2.5~2.9-fold SNR gain at 16.4T compared to 9.4T for the phantom and rat brain studies, which indicated an approximated square power (β=2) dependence of 17O SNR on B0. This finding of quadratic SNR gain over the field strength was consistent with the previous studies (16,17,22) and close to the theoretical prediction of 7/4 (23). Also shown in Table 1, a smaller measurement variance (2~4-fold reduction) was obtained at 16.4T as compared with that of 9.4T indicated an improved signal stability at 16.4T. All of these improvements suggest the significant advantage provided by high/ultrahigh magnetic fields, and more reliable measurements of CMRO2 are expected from the direct detection of small dynamic changes of metabolically generated H217O signal during a brief 17O2 inhalation at high/ultrahigh magnetic fields.

Compare to the 9.4T, a larger error in inter-subject measurements at 16.4T were observed (see Figure 1a and Table 1). Two possible explanations for this observation: a larger SNR variation among different subjects measured at 16.4T; and the non-uniform sensitivity profile for detecting the 17O NMR signal due to inhomogeneous RF (B1) field of the surface coil applied in this study. Therefore, the measured 17O signal and SNR were sensitive to a number of factors such as the relative position between the sample and RF coil, sample loading factor, RF coil tuning and matching performance etc. Nevertheless, both SNR and the variance between repeated measurements were much improved at 16.4T than that at 9.4T, which are most crucial for in vivo 17O MR application.

Interestingly, the results summarized in Table 1 also indicate that the variance was inversely proportional to NT at both 9.4T and 16.4T. This observation was consistent with a positive linear relationship between SNR and NT (see Table 1). They collectively suggest an inverse relationship between variance and SNR, and the white noise is the dominant noise source of the in vivo 17O MRS signal measured in the rat brain.

The measured 17O T1 and T2* values for the natural abundance H217O in the rat brain were similar between 16.4T and 9.4T, which provide further evidence of the independence of 17O relaxation times on the field strength. Moreover, the short 17O T1 value makes it possible for much faster data acquisition and more signal averages, and consequently, contributes to the improvement of SNR per unit of sampling time, which is essential for the success of CMRO2 measurement and quantification. Owing to the unique field independent 17O relaxivity, Eq. [1] can be further simplified to Eq. [2],

SNRk·B0β [2]

where k is a constant. Figure 4 displays the relationship between the relative 17O SNR, which was the SNR of the rat brain normalized to the SNR value measured at 9.4T, and the field strength (B0) across a wide range up to 16.4T. The relative SNR value of 2.75 at 16.4T was obtained in the present study (averaged from the 2.7 and 2.8 values listed in Table 1). The relative SNR value of 0.238 at 4.7T was obtained from a previous rat brain study (17). The zero SNR value at zero field strength was based on the NMR principle/theory. The solid line in Fig. 4 is the fitting curve according to the function expressed by Eq. [2]. The regression results k=0.015 and β =1.9 for a wide field strength range from zero to 16.4T. The high β power value suggests that compared to in vivo 1H, 31P and 13C MRS, the in vivo 17O MRS can benefit the most from the sensitivity gain at high/ultrahigh field.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Field dependence of the relative 17O SNR measured in the rat brain and normalized to the SNR value measured at 9.4. The solid line shows the fitting curve according to Eq. [2], covering the field strength from zero to 16.4T.

In conclusion, the significant SNR improvements achievable at 16.4T could benefit the 3D CMRO2 imaging based on the 17O MRS/I methods, which should provide an opportunity for detecting altered oxidative metabolism associated with brain function and neurological diseases with improved spatial and temporal resolutions.

Acknowledgments

Grant sponsor: National Institute of Health; Grant numbers: NS041262, NS057560, NS070839, P41 RR008079, P41 EB015894 and P30 NS057091, S10 RR025031; and the Keck foundation.

References

  • 1.Mintun MA, Raichle ME, Martin WR, Herscovitch P. Brain oxygen utilization measured with O-15 radiotracers and positron emission tomography. J Nucl Med. 1984;25:177–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peterson LR, Gropler RJ. Radionuclide imaging of myocardial metabolism. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:211–222. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.860593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhu XH, Chen W. In vivo oxygen-17 NMR for imaging brain oxygen metabolism at high field. Progress in NMR Spectroscopy. 2011;59:319–335. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2011.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mateescu GD, LaManna JC, Lust DW, Mars L, Tseng J. Oxygen-17 magnetic resonance: in vivo determination of nascent mitochondrial water in animals breathing 17O-enrihed air. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of SMRM; San Francisco, California, USA. 1991. p. 1031. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pekar J, Ligeti L, Ruttner Z, Lyon RC, Sinnwell TM, van Gelderen P, Fiat D, Moonen CT, McLaughlin AC. In vivo measurement of cerebral oxygen consumption and blood flow using 17O magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1991;21:313–319. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910210217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Arai T, Mori K, Nakao S, Watanabe K, Kito K, Aoki M, Mori H, Morikawa S, Inubushi T. In vivo oxygen-17 nuclear magnetic resonance for the estimation of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;179:954–961. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(91)91911-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Atkinson IC, Thulborn KR. Feasibility of mapping the tissue mass corrected bioscale of cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption using 17-oxygen and 23-sodium MR imaging in a human brain at 9. 4 T. Neuroimage. 2010;51:723–733. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fiat D, Ligeti L, Lyon RC, Ruttner Z, Pekar J, Moonen CT, McLaughlin AC. In vivo 17O NMR study of rat brain during 17O2 inhalation. Magn Reson Med. 1992;24:370–374. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910240218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mellon EA, Beesam RS, Baumgardner JE, Borthakur A, Witschey WR, 2nd, Reddy R. Estimation of the regional cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption with proton detected 17O MRI during precision 17O2 inhalation in swine. J Neurosci Methods. 2009;179:29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tailor DR, Baumgardner JE, Regatte RR, Leigh JS, Reddy R. Proton MRI of metabolically produced H217O using an efficient 17O2 delivery system. Neuroimage. 2004;22:611–618. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhu XH, Zhang Y, Tian RX, Lei H, Zhang N, Zhang X, Merkle H, Ugurbil K, Chen W. Development of 17O NMR approach for fast imaging of cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen in rat brain at high field. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:13194–13199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202471399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McCommis KS, He X, Abendschein DR, Gupte PM, Gropler RJ, Zheng J. Cardiac 17O MRI: toward direct quantification of myocardial oxygen consumption. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63:1442–1447. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rogers WJ, Gupte PM, Piccione EA, Kramer CM, Vido DA, Reichek N. T2 imaging using O-17 for detection of viability in myocardial infarction. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of ISMRM; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 1999. p. 309. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhu XH, Zhang Y, Chen W. In vivo 17O MRS imaging for assessing myocardial oxygen metabolism in rat heart at 9.4 T. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of ISMRM; Stockholm, Sweden. 2010. p. 172. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu XH, Zhang N, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Ugurbil K, Chen W. In vivo 17O NMR approaches for brain study at high field. NMR Biomed. 2005;18:83–103. doi: 10.1002/nbm.930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thelwall PE, Blackband SJ, Chen W. Field dependence of 17O T1, T2 and SNR - in vitro and in vivo studies at 4.7, 11 and 17.6 Tesla. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of ISMRM; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2003. p. 504. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhu XH, Merkle H, Kwag JH, Ugurbil K, Chen W. 17O relaxation time and NMR sensitivity of cerebral water and their field dependence. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:543–549. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Garwood M, Schleich T, Bendall MR, Pegg DT. Improved Fourier-Series Windows for Localization in In vivo Nmr-Spectroscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 1985;65:510–515. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hendrich K, Hu XP, Menon RS, Merkle H, Camarata P, Heros R, Ugurbil K. Spectroscopic Imaging of Circular Voxels with a 2-Dimensional Fourier-Series Window Technique. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series B. 1994;105:225–232. doi: 10.1006/jmrb.1994.1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhu XH, Zhang Y, Zhang N, Ugurbil K, Chen W. Noninvasive and three-dimensional imaging of CMRO2 in rats at 9. 4 T: reproducibility test and normothermia/hypothermia comparison study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1225–1234. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang N, Zhu XH, Lei H, Ugurbil K, Chen W. Simplified methods for calculating cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen based on 17O magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging measurement during a short 17O2 inhalation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24:840–848. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000125885.54676.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wen H, Chesnick AS, Balaban RS. The Design and Test of a New Volume Coil for High-Field Imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1994;32:492–498. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910320411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hoult DI, Richards RE. Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Nuclear Magnetic-Resonance Experiment. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 1976;24:71–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES