Abstract
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was recently identified as a factor produced by multiple myeloma (MM) cells, which may contribute to bone resorption and disease progression in MM, though the molecular mechanism of this process is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of BDNF on bone disease and growth of MM cells both in vitro and in vivo. Co- and triple-culture systems were implemented. The in vitro results demonstrate that BDNF augmented receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) expression in human bone marrow stromal cells, thus contributing to osteoclast formation. To further clarify the effect of BDNF on myeloma bone disease in vivo, ARH-77 cells were stably transfected with an antisense construct to BDNF (AS-ARH) or empty vector (EV-ARH) to test their capacity to induce MM bone disease in SCID–rab mice. Mice treated with AS-ARH cells were preserved, exhibited no radiologically identifiable lytic lesions and, unlike the controls treated with EV-ARH cells, lived longer and showed reduced tumor burden. Consistently, bones harboring AS-ARH cells showed marked reductions of RANKL expression and osteoclast density compared to the controls harboring EV-ARH cells. These results provide further support for the potential osteoclastogenic effects of BDNF, which may mediate stromal–MM cell interactions to upregulate RANKL secretion, in myeloma bone diseases.
Introduction
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy characterized by clonal expansion of plasma cells within the bone marrow and the development of destructive bone disease. The principal cellular mechanism involved in the development of myeloma bone disease is increased osteoclastic bone resorption that is not accompanied by proportional osteoblastic bone formation [1]. Bone resorption in MM is a local event that occurs adjacent to myeloma cells and is correlated with tumor burden, suggesting the capacity of myeloma cells to induce osteolytic bone destruction in the bone marrow (BM) milieu. The pathophysiology of MM-induced osteoclastogenesis involves direct production of osteoclast-activating factors (OAFs) by myeloma cells, as well as indirect interactions between myeloma cells and the bone marrow microenvironment [2]. Consistent with this theory, bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), one of the most pivotal cell types in the BM milieu, provide various OAFs via stroma-myeloma interactions to enhance osteoclast formation in MM. Osteoclastogenic factors involved in this process include receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), interleukin-11 (IL-11), and stromal-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) [3], [4], [5], [6].
RANKL, a factor mainly produced by stromal/osteoblast cells in the BM milieu, is one of the most important factors in the regulation of osteoclastogenesis [7]. RANKL directly induces osteoclast formation and inhibits osteoclast apoptosis by binding to its specific receptor (RANK) on osteoclast-lineage cells [8]. RANKL/RANK signaling is both necessary and sufficient for the complete differentiation of osteoclast precursors into mature osteoclasts in vitro [7]. Mice deficient in RANKL show decreased osteoclast activity and develop osteopetrosis, indicating the critical role of RANKL in normal osteoclast biology [9]. RANKL expression in stromal/osteoblast cells is abnormally upregulated in osteolytic bone lesions of myeloma patients [10], [11], suggesting that some factors derived from myeloma cells may increase RANKL expression in bone marrow to promote osteolytic bone disease.
In recent years, numerous studies have revealed the important role of BDNF in the pathogenesis of both neuronal and non-neuronal tumors, including multiple myeloma [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. The critical roles of BDNF in MM pathophysiology are evidenced by its over-expression in malignant plasma cells and myeloma cell lines, as well as its potential ability to promote the growth of MM cells in vitro [20], [21]. Recently, BDNF was identified as a potential osteoclastogenic factor in multiple myeloma, and its serum level correlated positively with that of soluble RANKL [22]. However, the mechanism by which osteoclastogenesis is promoted by BDNF in MM has not yet been clearly elucidated. Because several studies have confirmed that both BMSCs and osteoblasts express tyrosine receptor kinase B (TrkB), the high-affinity receptor of BDNF on their surface [23], [24], these findings suggest that osteoclastogenesis in myeloma may be promoted by BDNF partially through myeloma-stroma interactions that induce RANKL secretion in the BM microenvironment.
The primary purpose of this study was to clarify the capacity of MM-derived BDNF to enhance RANKL expression and osteoclast formation in a co-culture system and a novel triple-culture system. Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether silencing of BDNF in ARH-77 cells with specific short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) blocked in vivo tumorigenesis and osteoclastogenesis and prolonged survival in the SCID-rab model of myeloma bone diseases.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statements
All of experiments involving human participants were approved by the ethics committee of Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology and complied with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All animal experiments were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Permit Number: S227). All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
Reagents and kits
Human recombinant BDNF (PeproTech, Princeton, NJ, USA), TrkB-specific inhibitor K252-a (Sigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany), OPG and a neutralizing antibody to BDNF (PeproTech, Princeton, NJ, USA) were obtained and reconstituted according to the manufacturers' specifications. Antihuman BDNF and antihuman RANKL antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Anti-phospho ERK1/2, anti-ERK1/2, anti-phospho Akt, anti-Akt, and anti-IκB antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA). Recombinant human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and RANKL were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). A leukocyte acid phosphatase kit for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining was purchased from SIGMA (St. Louis, MO, USA). U0126 and LY204002 were purchased from Promega (Southampton, Hants, UK). The transwell inserts with 0.4 µm pores were obtained from Costar (Corning, NY, USA).
Cell culture
The human MM cell lines (HMCLs) ARH77 and RPMI-8226 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Multiple myeloma plasma cells (MMPCs) were obtained from 3 independent MM patients as previously described [25]. Marrow plasma samples were collected from 22 patients who gave written informed consent. Basal levels of BDNF and RANKL in these marrow plasma were measured using Human BDNF Quantikine ELISA kit and Human RANKL Quantikine ELISA kit from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Human primary BMSCs and pre-osteoclasts were prepared and identified as previously described [22], [26]. Then a series of co- and triple- culture systems (MM-BMSCs, BMSCs-preOCs, MM-BMSCs-preOCs) were implemented and treated with various conditions. Additional details are shown in the Supporting information.
Stable transfection of shRNA/eGFP in MM cell lines by lentiviral vectors
To directly identify the biological effects of BDNF on MM, an antisense construct to BDNF (short-hairpin RNA, shRNA) was designed as previously described [26]. The sequences of the two strands were the following: 5′- CCGGCCGGCATTGGAACTCCCAGTGTTCAAGACGCACTGGGAGTTCCAATGCCTTTTTTG -3′ and 5′-AATTCAAAAAAGGCATTGGAACTCCCAGTGCGTCTTGAACACTGGGAGTTCCAATGCCGG -3′. An eGFP reporter gene was also used. ARH-77 cells were transfected with BDNF antisense shRNA/eGFP (AS-ARH) or empty-vector shRNA/eGFP (EV-ARH) by replication-incompetent lentiviral vectors. The expression of eGFP was detected by an LSR II flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and analyzed by BD FACSDiva software. Then, the eGFP-positive cells were sorted on a FACSDiva (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Down-regulation of BDNF protein expression was confirmed by western blotting. The detailed characteristics of AS-ARH, EV-ARH and WT- ARH cells are shown in the Supporting information.
SCID-rab-MM mouse model and in vivo treatments
Six-week-old male NOD/SCID mice were obtained from Beijing Hua Fukang Bioscience Company, and 3-week-old New Zealand rabbits were from the Wuhan Centers for Disease Prevention & Control. Rabbits were deeply anesthetized to excise the femora and tibiae, which were then cut into two pieces, with the proximal and distal ends kept closed. Rabbit bone grafts were subcutaneously implanted into NOD/SCID mice (SCID-rab mice) as previously described [25]. Four weeks following bone implantation, AS-ARH, EV-ARH, and wild-type ARH77 (WT-ARH) cells (1.0×106 cells/mouse) in 25 µl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were injected directly into the implanted bone (n = 12 per group). Because ARH-77 cells release soluble human IgG, we used IgG as a quantifiable indicator of MM growth and tumor burden in SCID-rab mice. Blood samples were collected periodically, and murine sera were analyzed for human IgG by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; R&D Systems). Radiographs were taken with an AXR Minishot-100 beryllium source instrument (Associated X-Ray Imaging Corp, Haverhill, MA, USA). Changes in the bone mineral density (BMD) of the rabbit bone grafts were measured by a PIXImus dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) device (GE Medical Systems LUNAR, Madison, WI, USA). The fluorescence intensity of SCID-rab mice was monitored periodically using the Lumazone FA 2048 system (Roper Scientific, USA), following a cutaneous shave of the tumor area. Images were analyzed using MAG Biosystems software. At the end of the experiment, mice were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital and euthanized by cervical dislocation. Rabbit bone grafts were fixed, decalcified, and embedded for sectioning. Then, the sections were stained with Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining or TRAP staining. For ELISA analysis, marrow plasma of the implanted bones was obtained by flushing the bones repeatedly with 1 ml of PBS. Then, RANKL levels in bone marrow plasma were measured. For immunohistochemistry analysis, sections were reacted with 1∶1000 diluted RANKL monoclonal antibodies and corresponding secondary antibodies.
Real time-polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and an aliquot (1 µg) of purified total RNA was subjected to reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen). cDNAs were used as templates in real time-polymerase chain reaction with the SYBR Green RT-PCR Kit (TAKARA). DNA was amplified under the following typical cycling conditions: denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 60°C for 30 seconds, extension at 72°C for 30 seconds. The samples were amplified for 35 cycles. GAPDH was used as an internal control. The following primers were used: for RANKL, forward primer 5′-CAA GAG GAC AGA CTC ACT TTA T -3′, reverse primer 5′–TAT CGT TGG ATC ACA GCA C-3′; for GAPDH, forward primer 5′-GAC ATC AAG AAG GTG GTG AA-3′, reverse primer 5′-TGT CAT ACC AGG AAA TGA GC-3′. Then, the PCR products were mixed with bromophenol blue-loaded buffer, electrophoretically separated in a 2% agarose gel in TAE buffer, and photographed.
Western blotting
Cells exposed to various conditions were lysed using lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaF, 1% NP40, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml antipain, 1 mM PMSF), and extracted for 20 min on ice. Whole-cell extract protein (30 µg) was resolved on 10% SDS- PAGE gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Amersham), blotted with antibodies and then detected using the ECL Plus detection system.
Immunofluorescence of p65 localization
To examine the translocation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), BMSCs were plated onto glass coverslips and treated with DMEM alone or DMEM containing 25 ng/ml BDNF (PeproTech) for 15, 30 or 60 min. Following fixation, NF-κB p65 localization was evaluated by incubating BMSCs with rabbit anti-human monoclonal NF-κB p65 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen). Coverslips were then treated with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Invitrogen).
Statistical analysis
In vitro experiments for all assays were performed in triplicate, and the results are reported as the means ± SEMs. Statistical analysis of the treatment groups compared with their respective control groups was performed using ANOVA, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The significance of differences in overall survival between each group was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests.
Results
BDNF increases RANKL mRNA and protein levels in human BMSCs
Human BMSCs were isolated from healthy donors and stimulated by BDNF. As shown in Figure 1A, stimulation of BMSCs with BDNF promoted RANKL mRNA expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner. RANKL mRNA began to increase 1 h after exposure to 25 ng/ml BDNF; the increase became notable at 2 h and persisted for several hours. Similar results were obtained for RANKL protein (Figure 1B): RANKL expression distinctly increased in BMSCs treated with 25 ng/ml BDNF for 48 h. In addition, K252a, a specific Trk family inhibitor, was added to BMSCs at concentrations of 10, 50, and 100 nM. As shown in Figure 1C, K252a (100 nM for 48 h) significantly diminished RANKL secretion in the supernatants of BMSCs compared to PBS-treated controls (P<0.01).
BDNF induces RANKL expression in BMSCs through ERK and AKT signaling pathways, not NF-κB
To identify the downstream signaling molecules of the receptor activated by BDNF in BMSCs, we analyzed the phosphorylation of MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT by western blot. Cells were stimulated with 25 ng/ml BDNF for different time periods. As shown in Figure 2A, the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was detected as early as 5 min, with a peak signal at 15 minutes and a diminished signal at 30 minutes. As shown in Figure 2B, the phosphorylation of AKT showed a peak signal at 5 min, which gradually attenuated but still existed at 15 min. The total levels of these proteins remained unchanged. However, no obvious change in phosphorylation of IκB was detected up to 60 min (Figure 2C). To confirm the lack of NF-κB activation by BDNF stimulation, BMSCs were treated with 25 ng/ml BDNF for different time periods and analyzed by immunofluorescence for nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65. Consistently, no obvious nuclear translocation of the NF-κB p65 subunit was noted when compared to the untreated control (Figure 2D). To further investigate the roles of ERK1/2 and AKT signaling in the BDNF induction of RANKL production, BMSCs were pre-incubated with MEK/ERK inhibitor U0126 and or AKT inhibitor LY204002 for 1 hour and exposed to 25 ng/ml of BDNF for 24 hours. As shown in Figure 2E, BMSCs pre-treated with U0126 showed a 49.75% decrease in BDNF-stimulated RANKL secretion compared with BDNF stimulation alone (P<0.05). Treatment of BMSCs with LY204002 partially inhibited BDNF-stimulated RANKL secretion but with no statistical significance (P = 0.069). These findings indicate that MEK/ERK are the main downstream mediators of BDNF-induced RANKL secretion in BMSCs.
MM-derived BDNF increases RANKL expression and osteoclast formation in co- and triple-culture systems
First, we detected the basal levels of soluble BDNF in cultures of MM cells alone with ELISA analysis, and consistent with previous studies [19], [27], our results demonstrated the secretion of BDNF by MM cells (28.75±1.21 ng/ml for ARH-77 cells, 15.31±0.78 ng/ml for RPMI-8226 cells and 21.52±1.33 ng/ml for MMPCs). Then a series of co-cultures was performed in a non-contact transwell system to investigate the potential effect of MM-derived BDNF on RANKL expression in human BMSCs. BDNF secretion levels significantly increased in co-culture systems of both MM-BMSCs and MM-preOCs compared to BMSCs or preOCs cultured alone (Figure 3A). As shown in Figure 3B, RANKL mRNA levels were significantly higher than control (BMSCs cultured alone) when BMSCs were co-cultured with ARH-77, RPMI-8226, or MMPCs from 3 independent myeloma patients. The stimulatory effect was more pronounced in ARH-77 than RPMI-8226 cells. Pretreatment with K252a completely abolished the enhancement of RANKL expression induced by MM cells. Bone marrow plasma from 22 MM patients with or without bone lesions was added to BMSCs culture systems. Basal levels of BDNF and RANKL from these bone marrow plasma were measured by ELISA. Results demonstrated a positive correlation between bone marrow plasma BDNF levels and bone marrow plasma RANKL levels (r = 0.63, p<0.01). Then we investigate the relationship of BDNF levels in patient bone marrow plasma and marrow plasma-induced RANKL secretion by BMSCs. As shown in Figure 3C, the relative level of RANKL secretion in BMSCs induced by MM bone marrow correlated positively with BDNF level in each marrow plasma sample (correlation coefficient = 0.35). Bone marrow plasma from MM patients with higher levels of BDNF had a greater ability to induce RANKL secretion in BMSCs. We next investigated the effects of BDNF on osteoclast differentiation in our co- and triple-culture systems. Representative images of TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclast-like cells (OCLs) are shown in Figure 3D. As shown in Figure 3E, a marked increase of osteoclast number was detected when pre-OCs were co-cultured with MM cells or triple-cultured with human BMSCs and MM cells. Importantly, these effects were partially reversed by neutralizing antibody to BDNF and completely abolished by OPG, indicating the potential effects of MM-derived BDNF on osteoclast formation.
Stable knockdown of BDNF in ARH77 cells restrains bone destruction in SCID-rab model
AS-, EV-, and WT-ARH cells were injected into rabbit bone grafts to investigate the effect of BDNF on bone destruction in vivo. Radiographic analysis of the engrafted bones (Figure 4A) showed that as predicted, bones harboring AS-ARH cells, which expressed low levels of endogenous human BDNF, had a lower incidence of osteolytic lesions compared to the EV-ARH group (n = 12 per group, P = 0.02). Bones in the EV-ARH group were severely resorbed, and in some representative cases (Figure 4B), tumors broke through the bone cortex and extended to the outer surface of the implanted bones. In contrast, bones harboring AS-ARH cells had relatively normal bone structures and continuous cortexes, and tumor cells were restricted to bones. Changes in BMD in the implanted rabbit bones were analyzed to better quantify the osteolytic burden. As shown in Figure 4C, the osteolytic burden of rabbit bones from the AS group was significantly lower than that from the EV-ARH group. The BMD of bones injected with EV-ARH cells was reduced by 68%±5% compared to pretreatment BMD, whereas in the AS-ARH group, BMD was decreased by 15%±8% (EV-ARH vs. AS-ARH, n = 12 per group, P<0.05). WT-ARH cells (n = 12) were not used for this because of the similarity of their clinical characteristics to those of the EV-ARH group. Then we detected RANKL levels in our in vivo model with ELISA kits. As shown in figure 4D, bones harboring AS-ARH cells, which expressed low levels of endogenous human BDNF, had a significantly reduced level of RANKL compared to the EV-ARH group (P<0.01).
Stable knockdown of BDNF attenuates RANKL expression and osteoclastogenesis in myelomatous bones
Myeloma osteolytic lesions are thought to result from increased osteoclastogenesis induced by the MM-related microenvironment. As shown in Figure 5A, TRAP-positive multinucleated OCLs in rabbit bone implants from the AS-ARH group were less numerous than those from the EV-ARH group. Histomorphometric analysis was utilized to better quantify the osteoclast activity. As shown in Figure 5B, OCL number per square millimeter of trabecular bone surface in the AS-ARH group was significantly reduced in comparison with the EV-ARH group. To investigate the molecular mechanism by which antisense inhibition of BDNF reduces osteoclast formation in SCID-rab mice, RANKL, the final and critical osteoclastogenic factor primarily expressed by stromal/osteoblast cells, was detected by western blot analysis. Result in Figure 5C showed significantly lower expression of RANKL and BDNF in AS-ARH-infiltrated bone. Consistent with this result, the number of RANKL-positive cells in bone sections from the AS-ARH group was markedly decreased compared to the EV-ARH group when detected by immunohistochemistry analysis (Figure 5D). Together, these findings indicate that silencing BDNF activity in ARH77 cells decreased RANKL expression in the bone marrow microenvironment and resulted in attenuated osteoclastogenesis in vivo.
Stable knockdown of BDNF inhibits tumor growth and prolongs survival in SCID-rab mice
SCID-rab mice were monitored periodically by real-time fluorescence imaging as an indicator of in vivo MM tumor growth. As shown in Figure 6A, the fluorescence intensity in the AS-ARH group was much weaker than those in the EV-ARH groups. Because ARH cells produce human IgG, tumor burden was also assessed based on changes in human immunoglobulin light chains in blood serum. AS-, EV- and WT-ARH cells were first confirmed to secrete equal amounts of human IgG (data not shown), and then all mice were injected with the same number of cells. Three weeks after inoculation, circulating hIgG in blood serum from the AS-ARH group (n = 12) was significantly lower than in the EV-ARH (n = 12) and WT-ARH (n = 12) groups (P<0.05 for both) (Figure 6B). Moreover, Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank analysis showed significantly prolonged overall survival of the mice in the AS-ARH group compared with EV-ARH and WT-ARH (P<0.05 for both) (Figure 6C).
Discussion
The current study demonstrates that MM-derived BDNF promotes osteoclast formation via upregulation of RANKL expression in vitro, and antisense inhibition of BDNF in ARH-77 cells blocks osteolytic bone destruction and tumor growth in SCID-rab mice. These results suggest that BDNF may be an important factor in the bone-destructive process and disease progression in MM.
In this study, we found that BDNF promoted the secretion of RANKL in human BMSCs to further amplify osteoclast formation in vitro. Co- and triple-culture systems mimicking the marrow microenvironment revealed that MM-induced osteoclast formation was partially blocked by BDNF-neutralizing antibody and was nearly completely blocked by OPG, revealing that the significant effects of MM-derived BDNF on osteoclastogenesis may occur through MM-stromal interactions that upregulate RANKL expression. RANKL is the dominant and final mediator of osteoclast formation. An abnormally increased level of RANKL was found in the MM-related bone marrow microenvironment, which contributes to osteolytic bone destruction and disease progression [10], [11]. RANKL expression is promoted by several factors produced or induced by MM cells, such as TNF-α, MIP-1α, IL-1, IL-6, and PTH [4]. Combined with our previous observation that serum RANKL level in MM patients correlated positively with that of soluble BDNF, these results suggest that BDNF may be an important contributing factor to the RANKL pool in bone, thus promoting osteoclast formation and bone destruction in MM. RANKL is produced by not only BMSCs and osteoblasts but also MM cells themselves in the BM milieu [28], [29]. Because the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway is involved in many biological activities of MM cells, these results raise the possibility that BDNF may also influence RANKL expression in MM cells through an autocrine pathway, which needs to be investigated in the future.
BDNF stimulation activates the MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways in neurons and neural stem cells [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. Moreover, the MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways have been implicated in regulating RANKL secretion in bone marrow stromal/osteoblastic cells [3], [35], [36]. These observations are in agreement with the results of our study, which showed the MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways are involved in the promotion of RANKL expression. NGF activates the NF-κB pathway in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells [37]. However, no obvious phosphorylation of IκB or nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 was detected in this study. Further investigation is required to characterize the relationship between NF-κB activation and RANKL up-regulation in BMSCs in detail.
The stable knockdown of BDNF in ARH77 cells decreased bone destruction in SCID-rab mice. There are several possible explanations for these results. The first is that blocking BDNF activity suppresses RANKL expression by BMSCs in the BM milieu, as further confirmed by ELISA, western bolt, and immunohistochemical analysis in the present study. Second, antisense inhibition of BDNF in MM cells blocks VEGF secretion by BMSCs [26]. VEGF, an angiogenic factor, also participates in a vicious cycle between angiogenesis and osteoclastogenesis in MM [38]. Third, BDNF promotes survival and blocks apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells [21], [39]. MM cells play an important role in promoting osteoclastogenesis both by directly contacting osteoclasts and by indirectly producing osteoclast-activating factors, such as MIP-1α [40], to induce osteoclast formation. Therefore, inhibition of BDNF activity may block MM survival, resulting in an attenuated osteoclastic effect by MM cells.
Antisense inhibition of BDNF activity in ARH cells also decreased tumor burden and prolonged survival in SCID-rab mice. One explanation for this result is that BDNF is required for the growth of myeloma cells. The direct effect of BDNF to improve MM growth and migration has been demonstrated before [21], [39]. Our previous study also demonstrated that inhibition of BDNF in RPMI8226 could decrease tumor burden in SCID mice subcutaneously injected with MM cells [26]. Thus it is possible that antisense inhibition of BDNF abolished the direct promotion of BDNF on tumor growth. Moreover, BDNF may induce factors produced by marrow stromal cells to enhance the growth and survival of myeloma cells in the marrow. In support of this possibility are the results of Rezaee et al. [41], who showed that neurotrophins, including BDNF, regulate the expression of IL-6, a crucial factor in MM survival. Other factors induced by this process need to be identified by further research. Finally, osteoclasts produce a variety of factors to support myeloma cell growth, thereby creating a vicious cycle between OCs and MM cells [42]. Therefore, we suppose that silencing of MM-derived BDNF also attenuates RANKL expression and decreases OC activity in the BM milieu, resulting in blockage of this vicious cycle, which could promote tumor growth in MM.
Taken together, our results demonstrate that myeloma-derived BDNF can promote RANKL secretion by bone marrow stromal cells in the BM milieu through ERK pathway, and that antisense inhibition of endogenous BDNF in MM cells inhibits both osteoclastogenesis and tumor growth in vivo. These findings suggest targeting BDNF as a new therapeutic strategy to improve outcome of MM patients.
Supporting Information
Funding Statement
This study was supported by a grant from National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar (No. 30825018 to YH) and a grant from National Natural Sciences Foundation of People's Republic of China (No. 30700331 to C-YS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Roodman GD (2010) Pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease. J Cell Biochem 109: 283–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Basak GW, Srivastava AS, Malhotra R, Carrier E (2009) Multiple myeloma bone marrow niche. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 10: 345–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Tsubaki M, Kato C, Manno M, Ogaki M, Satou T, et al. (2007) Macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha (MIP-1alpha) enhances a receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL) expression in mouse bone marrow stromal cells and osteoblasts through MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways. Mol Cell Biochem 304: 53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kwan Tat S, Padrines M, Theoleyre S, Heymann D, Fortun Y (2004) IL-6, RANKL, TNF-alpha/IL-1: interrelations in bone resorption pathophysiology. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 15: 49–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Zannettino AC, Farrugia AN, Kortesidis A, Manavis J, To LB, et al. (2005) Elevated serum levels of stromal-derived factor-1alpha are associated with increased osteoclast activity and osteolytic bone disease in multiple myeloma patients. Cancer Res 65: 1700–1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hjertner O, Torgersen ML, Seidel C, Hjorth-Hansen H, Waage A, et al. (1999) Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) induces interleukin-11 secretion from osteoblasts: a possible role for HGF in myeloma-associated osteolytic bone disease. Blood 94: 3883–3888. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Khosla S (2001) Minireview: the OPG/RANKL/RANK system. Endocrinology 142: 5050–5055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Christoulas D, Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA (2009) Pathogenesis and management of myeloma bone disease. Expert Rev Hematol 2: 385–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kim N, Odgren PR, Kim DK, Marks SC Jr, Choi Y (2000) Diverse roles of the tumor necrosis factor family member TRANCE in skeletal physiology revealed by TRANCE deficiency and partial rescue by a lymphocyte-expressed TRANCE transgene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 10905–10910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pearse RN, Sordillo EM, Yaccoby S, Wong BR, Liau DF, et al. (2001) Multiple myeloma disrupts the TRANCE/osteoprotegerin cytokine axis to trigger bone destruction and promote tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 11581–11586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Giuliani N, Bataille R, Mancini C, Lazzaretti M, Barille S (2001) Myeloma cells induce imbalance in the osteoprotegerin/osteoprotegerin ligand system in the human bone marrow environment. Blood 98: 3527–3533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Feng X, Jiang H, Baik JC, Edgar C, Eide FF (2001) BDNF dependence in neuroblastoma. J Neurosci Res 64: 355–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Satoh F, Mimata H, Nomura T, Fujita Y, Shin T, et al. (2001) Autocrine expression of neurotrophins and their receptors in prostate cancer. Int J Urol 8: S28–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sakamoto Y, Kitajima Y, Edakuni G, Sasatomi E, Mori M, et al. (2001) Expression of Trk tyrosine kinase receptor is a biologic marker for cell proliferation and perineural invasion of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncol Rep 8: 477–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kowalski PJ, Paulino AF (2002) Perineural invasion in adenoid cystic carcinoma: Its causation/promotion by brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Hum Pathol 33: 933–936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Au CW, Siu MK, Liao X, Wong ES, Ngan HY, et al. (2009) Tyrosine kinase B receptor and BDNF expression in ovarian cancers - Effect on cell migration, angiogenesis and clinical outcome. Cancer Lett 281: 151–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Patani N, Jiang WG, Mokbel K (2011) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression predicts adverse pathological & clinical outcomes in human breast cancer. Cancer Cell Int 11: 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Desmet CJ, Peeper DS (2006) The neurotrophic receptor TrkB: a drug target in anti-cancer therapy? Cell Mol Life Sci 63: 755–759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Pearse RN, Swendeman SL, Li Y, Rafii D, Hempstead BL (2005) A neurotrophin axis in myeloma: TrkB and BDNF promote tumor-cell survival. Blood 105: 4429–4436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sun CY, Hu Y, Huang J, Chu ZB, Zhang L, et al. (2010) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor induces proliferation, migration, and VEGF secretion in human multiple myeloma cells via activation of MEK-ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling. Tumour Biol 31: 121–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Fauchais AL, Lalloue F, Lise MC, Boumediene A, Preud'homme JL, et al. (2008) Role of endogenous brain-derived neurotrophic factor and sortilin in B cell survival. J Immunol 181: 3027–3038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sun CY, Chu ZB, She XM, Zhang L, Chen L, et al. (2012) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is a potential osteoclast stimulating factor in multiple myeloma. Int J Cancer 130: 827–836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Labouyrie E, Dubus P, Groppi A, Mahon FX, Ferrer J, et al. (1999) Expression of neurotrophins and their receptors in human bone marrow. Am J Pathol 154: 405–415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Yaghoobi MM, Mowla SJ (2006) Differential gene expression pattern of neurotrophins and their receptors during neuronal differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells. Neurosci Lett 397: 149–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Yata K, Yaccoby S (2004) The SCID-rab model: a novel in vivo system for primary human myeloma demonstrating growth of CD138-expressing malignant cells. Leukemia 18: 1891–1897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zhang L, Hu Y, Sun CY, Li J, Guo T, et al. (2010) Lentiviral shRNA silencing of BDNF inhibits in vivo multiple myeloma growth and angiogenesis via down-regulated stroma-derived VEGF expression in the bone marrow milieu. Cancer Sci 101: 1117–1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hu Y, Wang YD, Guo T, Wei WN, Sun CY, et al. (2007) Identification of brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a novel angiogenic protein in multiple myeloma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 178: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Farrugia AN, Atkins GJ, To LB, Pan B, Horvath N, et al. (2003) Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand expression by human myeloma cells mediates osteoclast formation in vitro and correlates with bone destruction in vivo. Cancer Res 63: 5438–5445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lai FP, Cole-Sinclair M, Cheng WJ, Quinn JM, Gillespie MT, et al. (2004) Myeloma cells can directly contribute to the pool of RANKL in bone bypassing the classic stromal and osteoblast pathway of osteoclast stimulation. Br J Haematol 126: 192–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Han BH, Holtzman DM (2000) BDNF protects the neonatal brain from hypoxic-ischemic injury in vivo via the ERK pathway. J Neurosci 20: 5775–5781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kumamaru E, Numakawa T, Adachi N, Kunugi H (2011) Glucocorticoid suppresses BDNF-stimulated MAPK/ERK pathway via inhibiting interaction of Shp2 with TrkB. FEBS Lett 585: 3224–3228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Nguyen N, Lee SB, Lee YS, Lee KH, Ahn JY (2009) Neuroprotection by NGF and BDNF against neurotoxin-exerted apoptotic death in neural stem cells are mediated through Trk receptors, activating PI3-kinase and MAPK pathways. Neurochem Res 34: 942–951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Johnson-Farley NN, Patel K, Kim D, Cowen DS (2007) Interaction of FGF-2 with IGF-1 and BDNF in stimulating Akt, ERK, and neuronal survival in hippocampal cultures. Brain Res 1154: 40–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Islam O, Loo TX, Heese K (2009) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has proliferative effects on neural stem cells through the truncated TRK-B receptor, MAP kinase, AKT, and STAT-3 signaling pathways. Curr Neurovasc Res 6: 42–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Takami M, Cho ES, Lee SY, Kamijo R, Yim M (2005) Phosphodiesterase inhibitors stimulate osteoclast formation via TRANCE/RANKL expression in osteoblasts: possible involvement of ERK and p38 MAPK pathways. FEBS Lett 579: 832–838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Li F, Chung H, Reddy SV, Lu G, Kurihara N, et al. (2005) Annexin II stimulates RANKL expression through MAPK. J Bone Miner Res 20: 1161–1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Wooten MW, Seibenhener ML, Zhou G, Vandenplas ML, Tan TH (1999) Overexpression of atypical PKC in PC12 cells enhances NGF-responsiveness and survival through an NF-kappaB dependent pathway. Cell Death Differ 6: 753–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Tanaka Y, Abe M, Hiasa M, Oda A, Amou H, et al. (2007) Myeloma cell-osteoclast interaction enhances angiogenesis together with bone resorption: a role for vascular endothelial cell growth factor and osteopontin. Clin Cancer Res 13: 816–823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hu Y, Sun CY, Wang HF, Guo T, Wei WN, et al. (2006) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes growth and migration of multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 169: 12–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Choi SJ, Cruz JC, Craig F, Chung H, Devlin RD, et al. (2000) Macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha is a potential osteoclast stimulatory factor in multiple myeloma. Blood 96: 671–675. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Rezaee F, Rellick SL, Piedimonte G, Akers SM, O'Leary HA, et al. (2010) Neurotrophins regulate bone marrow stromal cell IL-6 expression through the MAPK pathway. PLoS One 5: e9690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Abe M, Hiura K, Wilde J, Shioyasono A, Moriyama K, et al. (2004) Osteoclasts enhance myeloma cell growth and survival via cell-cell contact: a vicious cycle between bone destruction and myeloma expansion. Blood 104: 2484–2491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.