Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1982 Nov;79(21):6698–6702. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.21.6698

Antagonism between steady light and phosphodiesterase inhibitors on the kinetics of rod photoresponses.

M Capovilla, L Cervetto, V Torre
PMCID: PMC347196  PMID: 6183667

Abstract

Treatment of toad rods with phosphodiesterase inhibitors (3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, caffeine, theophylline, papaverine, and RO 20-1724) modifies the properties of the intracellular voltage responses to dim flashes of light. 3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine at 1-20 microM causes an increase in flash sensitivity and a slowing down of the kinetics of the photoresponses. When the drug concentration is greater than 20 microM, rods also show supralinear behavior, whereby doubling the intensity of a dim flash may increase the response by greater than 2-fold. Sensitivity, kinetics, and supralinear behavior can be restored to normal by steady background illumination while still in the presence of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine. However, the intensity of the steady light needed to restore the sensitivity to control levels is not sufficient to accelerate the kinetics back to control values. The antagonism between the effects of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine and the effects of background illumination is explained by assuming that: (i) the length of time to peak voltage responses to dim flashes of light is inversely proportional to the rate of a chemical reaction; (ii) the rate of this reaction is controlled by an enzyme that is inhibited competitively by 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine with a Ki of 3 x 10(-6) M; and (iii) the concentration of a cofactor of this reaction increases proportionally with the intensity of the background illumination.

Full text

PDF
6698

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Attwell D., Wilson M. Behaviour of the rod network in the tiger salamander retina mediated by membrane properties of individual rods. J Physiol. 1980 Dec;309:287–315. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bastian B. L., Fain G. L. Light adaptation in toad rods: requirement for an internal messenger which is not calcium. J Physiol. 1979 Dec;297(0):493–520. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp013053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baylor D. A., Hodgkin A. L. Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors. J Physiol. 1974 Nov;242(3):729–758. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baylor D. A., Hodgkin A. L., Lamb T. D. The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light. J Physiol. 1974 Nov;242(3):685–727. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baylor D. A., Matthews G., Yau K. W. Two components of electrical dark noise in toad retinal rod outer segments. J Physiol. 1980 Dec;309:591–621. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertrand D., Fuortes M. G., Pochobradsky J. Actions of EGTA and high calcium on the cones in the turtle retina. J Physiol. 1978 Feb;275:419–437. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borsellino A., Fuortes M. G., Smith T. G. Visual responses in Limulus. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1965;30:429–443. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Capovilla M., Cervetto L., Torre V. Effects of changing external potassium and chloride concentrations on the photoresponses of Bufo bufo rods. J Physiol. 1980 Oct;307:529–551. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cervetto L., Pasino E., Torre V. Electrical responses of rods in the retina of Bufo marinus. J Physiol. 1977 May;267(1):17–51. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Detwiler P. B., Hodgkin A. L., McNaughton P. A. Temporal and spatial characteristics of the voltage response of rods in the retina of the snapping turtle. J Physiol. 1980 Mar;300:213–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. FUORTES M. G., HODGKIN A. L. CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS. J Physiol. 1964 Aug;172:239–263. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hagins W. A., Yoshikami S. Proceedings: A role for Ca2+ in excitation of retinal rods and cones. Exp Eye Res. 1974 Mar;18(3):299–305. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(74)90157-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hubbell W. L., Bownds M. D. Visual transduction in vertebrate photoreceptors. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1979;2:17–34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.02.030179.000313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kilbride P., Ebrey T. G. Light-initiated changes of cyclic guanosine monophosphate levels in the frog retina measured with quick-freezing techniques. J Gen Physiol. 1979 Sep;74(3):415–426. doi: 10.1085/jgp.74.3.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Klee C. B., Crouch T. H., Richman P. G. Calmodulin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1980;49:489–515. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.49.070180.002421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lipton S. A., Rasmussen H., Dowling J. E. Electrical and adaptive properties of rod photoreceptors in Bufo marinus. II. Effects of cyclic nucleotides and prostaglandins. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Dec;70(6):771–791. doi: 10.1085/jgp.70.6.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Miki N., Keirns J. J., Marcus F. R., Freeman J., Bitensky M. W. Regulation of cyclic nucleotide concentrations in photoreceptors: an ATP-dependent stimulation of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase by light. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3820–3824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pober J. S., Bitensky M. W. Light-regulated enzymes of vertebrate retinal rods. Adv Cyclic Nucleotide Res. 1979;11:265–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Woodruff M. L., Bownds M. D. Amplitude, kinetics, and reversibility of a light-induced decrease in guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate in frog photoreceptor membranes. J Gen Physiol. 1979 May;73(5):629–653. doi: 10.1085/jgp.73.5.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yau K. W., McNaughton P. A., Hodgkin A. L. Effect of ions on the light-sensitive current in retinal rods. Nature. 1981 Aug 6;292(5823):502–505. doi: 10.1038/292502a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yee R., Liebman P. A. Light-activated phosphodiesterase of the rod outer segment. Kinetics and parameters of activation and deactivation. J Biol Chem. 1978 Dec 25;253(24):8902–8909. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES