Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1982 Nov;79(22):6757–6761. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.22.6757

Activation and desensitization of Torpedo acetylcholine receptor: evidence for separate binding sites.

S M Dunn, M A Raftery
PMCID: PMC347212  PMID: 6960348

Abstract

The acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica was labeled by reaction with the fluorescent probe 4-[N-(iodoacetoxy)ethyl-N-methyl]amino-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole without apparent effect on its in vitro ligand binding and functional properties. Addition of acetylcholine or carbamoylcholine to the labeled-receptor preparations enhanced the fluorescence of the bound probe, and this effect was specific for agonists and inhibited by prior incubation with excess alpha-bungarotoxin. Equilibrium fluorescence titrations gave apparent dissociation constants of 0.86 +/- 0.14 mM for carbamoylcholine and 79 +/- 11 microM for acetylcholine, in good agreement with the dissociation constants measured for the permeability response of the receptor. Stopped-flow experiments showed that the fluorescence change was a single exponential process whose rate increased with ligand concentration, reaching a saturating value for carbamoylcholine of approximately 400 s-1. The equilibrium binding of carbamoylcholine was not significantly affected by prior incubation of the receptor with d-tubocurarine or histrionicotoxin and the dissociation constant was only slightly increased in the presence of lidocaine. These inhibitory ligands do not, therefore, compete directly with agonists for this low-affinity binding site, suggesting that their mode of action may be indirect.

Full text

PDF
6757

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. R. Acetylcholine receptor kinetics. J Membr Biol. 1981 Feb 28;58(3):161–174. doi: 10.1007/BF01870902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams P. R. An analysis of the dose-response curve at voltage-clamped frog-endplates. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Oct 28;360(2):145–153. doi: 10.1007/BF00580537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albuquerque E. X., Barnard E. A., Chiu T. H., Lapa A. J., Dolly J. O., Jansson S. E., Daly J., Witkop B. Acetylcholine receptor and ion conductance modulator sites at the murine neuromuscular junction: evidence from specific toxin reactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Mar;70(3):949–953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrantes F. J. Intrinsic fluorescence of the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor: its quenching by suberyldicholine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976 Sep 20;72(2):479–488. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(76)80067-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonner R., Barrantes F. J., Jovin T. M. Kinetics of agonist-induced intrinsic fluorescence changes in membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor. Nature. 1976 Sep 30;263(5576):429–431. doi: 10.1038/263429a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang R. S., Potter L. T., Smith D. S. Postsynaptic membranes in the electric tissue of Narcine: IV. Isolation and characterization of the nicotinic receptor protein. Tissue Cell. 1977;9(4):623–644. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(77)90031-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Colquhoun D., Dreyer F., Sheridan R. E. The actions of tubocurarine at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1979 Aug;293:247–284. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Damle V. N., McLaughlin M., Karlin A. Bromoacetylcholine as an affinity label of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Oct 30;84(4):845–851. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(78)91661-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dionne V. E., Steinbach J. H., Stevens C. F. An analysis of the dose-response relationship at voltage-clamped frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:421–444. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dolly J. O., Albuquerque E. X., Sarvey J., Mallick B., Barnard E. A. Binding of perhydro-histrionicotoxin to the postsynaptic membrane of skeletal muscle in relation to its blockage of acetylcholine-induced depolarization. Mol Pharmacol. 1977 Jan;13(1):1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dreyer F., Peper K., Sterz R. Determination of dose-response curves by quantitative ionophoresis at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:395–419. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dunn S. M., Blanchard S. G., Raftery M. A. Effects of local anesthetics and histrionicotoxin on the binding of carbamoylcholine to membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor. Biochemistry. 1981 Sep 15;20(19):5617–5624. doi: 10.1021/bi00522a041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunn S. M., Blanchard S. G., Raftery M. A. Kinetics of carbamylcholine binding to membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor monitored by fluorescence changes of a covalently bound probe. Biochemistry. 1980 Nov 25;19(24):5645–5652. doi: 10.1021/bi00565a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. ELLMAN G. L., COURTNEY K. D., ANDRES V., Jr, FEATHER-STONE R. M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol. 1961 Jul;7:88–95. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elliott J., Blanchard S. G., Wu W., Miller J., Strader C. D., Hartig P., Moore H. P., Racs J., Raftery M. A. Purification of Torpedo californica post-synaptic membranes and fractionation of their constituent proteins. Biochem J. 1980 Mar 1;185(3):667–677. doi: 10.1042/bj1850667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghosh P. B., Whitehouse M. W. 7-chloro-4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole: a new fluorigenic reagent for amino acids and other amines. Biochem J. 1968 Jun;108(1):155–156. doi: 10.1042/bj1080155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grünhagen H. H., Changeux J. P. Studies on the electrogenic action of acetylcholine with Torpedo marmorata electric organ. IV. Quinacrine: a fluorescent probe for the conformational transitions of the cholinergic receptor protein in its membrane-bound state. J Mol Biol. 1976 Sep 25;106(3):497–516. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90249-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Grünhagen H. H., Iwatsubo M., Changeux J. P. Fast kinetic studies on the interaction of cholinergic agonists with the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata as revealed by quinacrine fluorescence. Eur J Biochem. 1977 Oct 17;80(1):225–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grünhagen H. H., Iwatsubo M., Changeux J. Changements rapides d'intensité de fluorescence observés en présence d'agoniste cholinergique avec des fragments de membranes riches en récepteur cholinergique de Torpedo marmorata marqués avec la quinacrine. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1976 Oct 18;283(9):1105–1108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Haugland R. P. Myosin structure. Proximity measurements by fluorescence energy transfer. J Supramol Struct. 1975;3(4):338–347. doi: 10.1002/jss.400030405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heidmann T., Changeux J. P. Fast kinetic studies on the interaction of a fluorescent agonist with the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata. Eur J Biochem. 1979 Feb 15;94(1):255–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb12893.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Heidmann T., Changeux J. P. Interaction of a fluorescent agonist with the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata in the millisecond time range: resolution of an "intermediate" conformational transition and evidence for positive cooperative effects. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1980 Dec 16;97(3):889–896. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(80)91460-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hess G. P., Cash D. J., Aoshima H. Acetylcholine receptor-controlled ion fluxes in membrane vesicles investigated by fast reaction techniques. Nature. 1979 Nov 15;282(5736):329–331. doi: 10.1038/282329a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hill A. V. The Combinations of Haemoglobin with Oxygen and with Carbon Monoxide. I. Biochem J. 1913 Oct;7(5):471–480. doi: 10.1042/bj0070471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hucho F., Layer P., Kiefer H. R., Bandini G. Photoaffinity labeling and quaternary structure of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Aug;73(8):2624–2628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.8.2624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. KATZ B., THESLEFF S. A study of the desensitization produced by acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 29;138(1):63–80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee T., Witzemann V., Schimerlik M., Raftery M. A. Cholinergic ligand-induced affinity changes in Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1977 Sep;183(1):57–63. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(77)90418-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lester H. A., Changeux J. P., Sheridan R. E. Conductance increases produced by bath application of cholinergic agonists to Electrophorus electroplaques. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Jun;65(6):797–816. doi: 10.1085/jgp.65.6.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lyddiatt A., Sumikawa K., Wolosin J. M., Dolly J. O., Barnard E. A. Affinity labelling by bromoacetylcholine of a characteristic subunit in the acetylcholine receptor from muscle and Torpedo electric organ. FEBS Lett. 1979 Dec 1;108(1):20–24. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)81169-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. A quantitative description of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):173–197. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Moore H. P., Hartig P. R., Raftery M. A. Correlation of polypeptide composition with functional events in acetylcholine receptor-enriched membranes from Torpedo californica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Dec;76(12):6265–6269. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Moore H. P., Raftery M. A. Direct spectroscopic studies of cation translocation by Torpedo acetylcholine receptor on a time scale of physiological relevance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):4509–4513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Moore H. P., Raftery M. A. Studies of reversible and irreversible interactions of an alkylating agonist with Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor in membrane-bound and purified states. Biochemistry. 1979 May 15;18(10):1862–1867. doi: 10.1021/bi00577a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Neubig R. R., Cohen J. B. Permeability control by cholinergic receptors in Torpedo postsynaptic membranes: agonist dose-response relations measured at second and millisecond times. Biochemistry. 1980 Jun 10;19(12):2770–2779. doi: 10.1021/bi00553a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Quast U., Schimerlik M. I., Raftery M. A. Ligand-induced changes in membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor observed by ethidium fluorescence. 2. Stopped-flow studies with agonists and antagonists. Biochemistry. 1979 May 15;18(10):1891–1901. doi: 10.1021/bi00577a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Quast U., Schimerlik M., Lee T., Witzemann T. L., Blanchard S., Raftery M. A. Ligand-induced conformation changes in Torpedo californica membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor. Biochemistry. 1978 Jun 13;17(12):2405–2414. doi: 10.1021/bi00605a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Quast U., Schimerlik M., Raftery M. A. Stopped flow kinetics of carbamylcholine binding to membrane bound acetylcholine receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Apr 14;81(3):955–964. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(78)91444-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Raftery M. A., Hunkapiller M. W., Strader C. D., Hood L. E. Acetylcholine receptor: complex of homologous subunits. Science. 1980 Jun 27;208(4451):1454–1456. doi: 10.1126/science.7384786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sine S. M., Taylor P. The relationship between agonist occupation and the permeability response of the cholinergic receptor revealed by bound cobra alpha-toxin. J Biol Chem. 1980 Nov 10;255(21):10144–10156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sine S., Taylor P. Functional consequences of agonist-mediated state transitions in the cholinergic receptor. Studies in cultured muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1979 May 10;254(9):3315–3325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Weber M., David-Pfeuty T., Changeux J. P. Regulation of binding properties of the nicotinic receptor protein by cholinergic ligands in membrane fragments from Torpedo marmorata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Sep;72(9):3443–3447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Weiland G., Georgia B., Lappi S., Chignell C. F., Taylor P. Kinetics of agonist-mediated transitions in state of the cholinergic receptor. J Biol Chem. 1977 Nov 10;252(21):7648–7656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Weiland G., Georgia B., Wee V. T., Chignell C. F., Taylor P. Ligand interactions with cholinergic receptor-enriched membranes from Torpedo: influence of agonist exposure on receptor properties. Mol Pharmacol. 1976 Nov;12(6):1091–1105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Witzemann V., Raftery M. A. Selective photoaffinity labeling of acetylcholine receptor using a cholinergic analogue. Biochemistry. 1977 Dec 27;16(26):5862–5868. doi: 10.1021/bi00645a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wolosin J. M., Lyddiatt A., Dolly J. O., Barnard E. A. Stoichiometry of the ligand-binding sites in the acetylcholine-receptor oligomer from muscle and from electric organ. Measurement by affinity alkylation with bromoacetylcholine. Eur J Biochem. 1980 Aug;109(2):495–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb04821.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu W. C., Moore H. P., Raftery M. A. Quantitation of cation transport by reconstituted membrane vesicles containing purified acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Feb;78(2):775–779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES