Abstract
Purpose
The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is emerging as a critical factor for the progression and metastasis of carcinomas, as well as drug resistance. The T-box transcription factor Brachyury has been recently characterized as a driver of EMT in human carcinoma cells. The purpose of this study was to characterize Brachyury as a potential target for lung cancer therapy.
Experimental Design
The expression of Brachyury was evaluated by PCR and by immunohistochemistry in human lung tumors and adult normal tissues. Brachyury gene copy number and promoter methylation status were analyzed in tumor tissues with various levels of Brachyury expression. Lung carcinoma cells’ susceptibility to T-cell lysis and EGFR kinase inhibition were also evaluated relative to the levels of Brachyury.
Results
Our results demonstrated Brachyury protein expression in 41% of primary lung carcinomas, including 48% of adenocarcinomas and 25% of squamous cell carcinomas. With the exception of normal testis and some thyroid tissues, the majority of normal tissues evaluated in this study were negative for the expression of Brachyury protein. Brachyury-specific T cells could lyse Brachyury positive tumors and the level of Brachyury corresponded to resistance of tumor cells to EGFR kinase inhibition.
Conclusion
We hypothesize that the elimination of Brachyury-positive tumor cells may be able to prevent and/or diminish tumor dissemination and the establishment of metastases. The ability of Brachyury-specific T-cell lines to lyse Brachyury-positive tumor cells, in vitro, supports the development of Brachyury-based immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of lung cancer.
Keywords: lung cancer, tumor antigen, EMT, transcription factor, cancer vaccines
Introduction
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1). Depending on the type and stage of disease, current therapeutic options for lung cancer patients involve surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and more recently developed targeted therapies against, for example, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (2, 3). Despite advances in therapeutic interventions, the overall 5-year survival rate for all lung cancer stages combined remains at only 16%; the rate of tumor recurrence is high even in the group of patients with early stage lung cancer (Stage I), where the recurrence rate is approximately 50% within 5 years from the time of diagnosis (4). Complicating the outcome of chemotherapy or targeted therapies for the management of lung cancer, drug resistance mechanisms are often exhibited by the tumor cells, either as an intrinsic property or one that is acquired along with treatment (5). Ideally, a novel therapeutic intervention against lung cancer should address tumor recurrence while simultaneously minimizing tumor resistance for improved response to therapy.
The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has recently emerged as a process of relevance during carcinoma progression and metastasis (6–8). During tumor EMT, epithelial tumor cells lose the expression of proteins involved in cell-to-cell adhesion, such as E-cadherin, and gain expression of proteins typically associated with mesenchymal cells, including Fibronectin, N-cadherin, and Vimentin (9, 10). The phenotypic switch also results in enhanced tumor cell motility and invasiveness and, as a consequence, tumor cells undergoing EMT are thought to be able to detach from the primary tumor and to initiate the cascade of events leading to the establishment of metastases (11). Several recent studies have also demonstrated yet another interesting aspect of tumor EMT, which involves the acquisition of cancer stem-like features by the tumor cells (12), including tumor resistance to a range of therapeutic interventions (13–17).
We recently characterized the T-box transcription factor Brachyury as a driver of EMT in human carcinoma cells (18–21). Brachyury was demonstrated to induce the expression of molecules associated with the mesenchymal phenotype, tumor cell motility and invasiveness in vitro, as well as metastatic propensity in xenograft models of lung cancer (19). We also showed that multiple human tumor tissues and carcinoma cell lines have elevated levels of Brachyury mRNA, in contrast to most human normal tissues where Brachyury mRNA is rarely detected (18, 19). The expression of Brachyury mRNA was also demonstrated in primary lung tumor tissues, predominantly in tumors of higher stages (Stages II–IV) than among those of Stage I or histologically normal lung. In the present study, we sought to characterize Brachyury as a potential target for lung cancer therapy by analyzing its protein expression levels in primary lung tumors and various human normal tissues. By utilizing a Brachyury-specific, murine monoclonal antibody (MAb), we demonstrate for the first time Brachyury protein expression in human lung tumors, including adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas. Additionally, genetic and epigenetic processes that may contribute to the expression of Brachyury in human tumor tissues were evaluated. It is also reported here for the first time that overexpression of Brachyury in human lung carcinoma lines positively correlates with resistance to EGFR kinase inhibition. Moreover, we show that Brachyury-positive lung cancer cells can be effectively lysed by Brachyury-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes, further supporting the development of Brachyury-based cancer vaccine approaches for the treatment of human lung cancer.
Materials and Methods
Patient information and tissue collection
Thirty-nine patients with histologically diagnosed primary lung cancer were enrolled in the Interinstitutional Multidisciplinary BioBank (BioBIM) of the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Advanced Biotechnologies, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy, in collaboration with the Surgical and Pathology Department of San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital and Medical Oncology Unit of the “Tor Vergata” Clinical Center, Rome, Italy. Lung tumor tissue samples were collected at the time of surgery (Tables 1A, B). Twenty-four histologically normal lung tissues adjacent to tumors were also obtained from lung cancer patients. No patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy previous to surgery and tissue collection. Additionally, 34 samples corresponding to 11 types of normal tissues obtained from non-cancer subjects have been evaluated in the present study. Informed consent was obtained from each participating subject; the study was performed under the appropriate institutional ethics approvals and in accordance with the principles embodied in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Table 1.
|
A. Brachyury protein expression analyzed by IHC in human primary lung carcinoma tissues. | |
|---|---|
| Lung tumor tissues | Brachyury positive (%) |
| Adenocarcinoma | 10/21 (48%) |
| Squamous carcinoma | 3/12 (25%) |
| Undifferentiated carcinoma | 2/4 (50%) |
| Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) | 1/1 (100%) |
| Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) | 0/1 (0%) |
| Total | 16/39 (41%) |
|
B. Lung tumor tissues positive for Brachyury protein expression analyzed by IHC. | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor cells |
|||||||||
| # | Histology | Grade | Stage | Nuclear | Cytoplasmic | Adjacent tissue | |||
| % positive | intensity | % positive | intensity | % positive | intensity | ||||
| 1 | Adenocarcinoma | G2 | pT2N0 | 85 | +++ | 85 | + | neg | neg |
| 2 | Adenocarcinoma | G3 | pT2N2 | 80 | +++ | 80 | + | 30 | +++ |
| 3 | Adenocarcinoma | G2 | pT1aN0 | 80 | ++ | 80 | + | 10 | + |
| 4 | Adenocarcinoma | G2 | pT1aN0 | 60 | ++ | 60 | + | neg | neg |
| 5 | Adenocarcinoma | G3 | pT2N1 | 60 | + | 60 | + | 50 | + |
| 6 | Adenocarcinoma | G2 | pT2N0 | 40 | ++ | 20 | + | neg | neg |
| 7 | Adenocarcinoma | G3 | pT2N0 | 30 | + | 30 | + | neg | neg |
| 8 | Adenocarcinoma | G2 | pT1bN0 | 30 | + | neg | neg | neg | neg |
| 9 | Adenocarcinoma | G2 | pT2N0 | 10 | ++ | 10 | ++ | 30 | +++ |
| 10 | Adenocarcinoma | G2 | pT2N1 | 10 | + | 10 | + | neg | neg |
| 11 | Squamous cell carcinoma | G2 | pT3N0 | 80 | ++ | neg | neg | neg | neg |
| 12 | Squamous cell carcinoma | G1 | pT3N0 | 50 | ++ | neg | neg | 40 | + |
| 13 | Squamous cell carcinoma | −− | rec | 10 | + | 10 | + | neg | neg |
| 14 | Undifferentiated carcinoma | G3 | pT2N1 | 80 | ++ | 60 | + | 10 | + |
| 15 | Undifferentiated carcinoma | G3 | pT2N1 | 25 | + | 15 | + | 50 | + |
| 16 | Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma | G1 | pT1bN0 | 90 | ++ | 90 | + | neg | neg |
rec = recurrence; neg = negative
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Sections of paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues were tested for Brachyury (Brachyury homolog, T) antigen expression using the avidin-biotin complex method as previously described (22). Briefly, tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in a series of graded ethanol, and treated with 0.3% H2O2 in methanol to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Microwave-citrate buffer antigen retrieval method was performed to unmask the antigen. The sections were blocked in 10% horse serum (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 1 hour at room temperature and then incubated overnight at 4°C with a mouse anti-Brachyury MAb (ab57480, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) at a 1:100 dilution. In addition, a positive control antibody (mouse anti-Cytokeratin MAb, BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and an isotype matched mouse MAb (MOPC 21, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were used to verify accurate staining method. Antibodies specific for E-cadherin and Vimentin were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Immunostaining was carried out using the Vectastaining ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions; color was developed with DAB peroxidase substrate (Vector, Burlingame, CA). Sections were counterstained with haematoxylin, dehydrated in ethanol, cleared in xylene, and mounted under a coverslip using Permount (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ).
Scoring Method
Two pathologists independently evaluated the tumor and normal tissue samples in a blinded, randomized way. For each slide, three to five random fields were evaluated; for each field, the percentage of DAB-positive-tumor cells was calculated as: [(number of DAB-positive tumor cells/total number of tumor cells) × 100], and the relative staining intensity was scored as weak (+) for pale brown intensity, moderate (++) for intermediate brown intensity, and strong (+++) for intense, dark brown immunoprecipitate. For normal tissues, the percentage of reactivity was individually evaluated for each cell type and calculated as: [(number of DAB-positive cells/total number of cells of the same type) × 100]. Staining was recorded as negative if <5% of the tumor or parenchymal cells from normal tissues stained positive for Brachyury expression.
Tumor cell lines
The human lung cancer cell lines utilized in this study were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Gaithersburg, MD) and propagated in RPMI 1640 medium with 2mM glutamine, 1X solution of penicillin/streptomycin (Mediatech, Inc., Herndon, VA) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen). H460 cells were stably transfected with a control shRNA- or a Brachyury-specific shRNA-encoding vector; A549 cells were stably transfected with a control pCMV or a vector encoding for the full length human Brachyury protein (pBrachyury), as previously described (19).
Brachyury expression analysis by western blot
For detection of Brachyury in human tumor tissues, total protein extracts from frozen tissues were prepared in lysis buffer: 10mM Hepes pH=8.0, 350mM NaCl, 0.1mM EDTA pH=8.0, Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). For separation of cytoplasmic and nuclear protein fractions, tissues were lysed in a hypotonic buffer (10mM Hepes pH=8.0, 50mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA pH=8.0, 0.2% Triton X-100, 500mM Sucrose, Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail) followed by 30 sec centrifugation at 16,000g at 4°C. Soluble, cytosolic proteins were collected; nuclear proteins were extracted in lysis buffer from the pellet fractions. Protein extracts (total, cytoplasmic, and nuclear) were purified by precipitation with cloroform/methanol, followed by resuspension in PBS/Tween 0.05% buffer. For immunoblotting, 30μg of tissue protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, and subsequently incubated with primary anti-Brachyury (Abcam) and anti-Actin (C-2, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) MAbs. A secondary HRP-conjugated anti-mouse Ab was subsequently used; chemiluminescent signal was detected with an ECL kit (EuroClone, Siziano, Italy).
Real-time PCR
Commercially available normal and tumor lung tissue cDNA panels were analyzed (TissueScan Lung Cancer qPCR Arrays I and II, Origene Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD) by using the Gene Expression Master Mix and the following Taqman Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA): Brachyury (Hs00610080), Twist 1 (Hs00361186), Snail (Hs00195591), PAP (Hs00173475_m1), CEACAM5 (Hs00944023_m1), and GAPDH (4326317E). PCR was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations on the 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Mean Ct values for target genes were normalized to mean Ct values for the endogenous control GAPDH (-ΔCt = Ct(GAPDH) – Ct (target gene)). The ratio of mRNA expression of target gene vs. GAPDH was defined as 2−ΔCt.
Invasion assay
In vitro invasion assays were conducted as previously described (19). Cells on the bottom side of the filters were counted in 5 random X100 microscope objective fields.
Brachyury gene copy number analysis
Real-time PCR reactions were carried out with 5ng of genomic DNA using a Taqman Copy Number Assay (Hs01038891_cn) with the reference assay for RNase P (Applied Biosystems). Copy numbers were calculated using the CopyCaller software (Applied Biosystems).
Brachyury promoter methylation
The Brachyury promoter (−2000 to +500) was analyzed for the presence of CpG islands and suitable restriction sites. Methylation status of an identified CpG island was evaluated by using the Promoter Methylation PCR kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Briefly, genomic DNA (3µg) was digested with the StuI restriction enzyme, followed by purification of methylated DNA fragments by binding to the methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2, also designated as MBP). Eluted DNA was subjected to PCR amplification using the following primers: forward 5' TCAGGAGGGTCCGGCGTCAG 3' and reverse 5' GCACACCTCGCCCATTCGCT 3'. PCR products (expected size: 581bp) were resolved on 1.5% agarose gels; the presence of a band on the gel indicates methylation of the Brachyury promoter in the genomic DNA sample.
Susceptibility to EGFR inhibition
Indicated tumor cells were seeded in 96-well plates, allowed to attach overnight and treated with various doses (1–50µM) of AG1478 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 days. Viable cells in culture were assayed by the MTT (3–(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay as previously described (19). Assays were performed in triplicate; data shown are representative averages, with standard error. Survival for treated wells was calculated as a percentage of the values representing wells of untreated cells.
Cytotoxic assay
Brachyury-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes were generated from the blood of a normal donor (designated as CTL line I) or two different prostate cancer patients post-vaccination with a PSA-TRICOM-based vaccine (designated as CTL lines II and III) as previously described (18). No Brachyury-specific T cells could be detected in these patients prior to vaccination. Tumor cells (lung H226, H441 and H1703, and pancreatic ASPC1) were labeled with 50μCi of 111Indium-labeled oxyquinoline and subsequently incubated with Brachyury-specific CTLs at the indicated effector-to-target ratios. For cold target inhibition assays, unlabeled K562 cells transfected with A2.1 were added to the labeled targets (10X) either unpulsed or pulsed with 20µg/ml of the Brachyury peptide. Following a 16-h incubation, 111In released was measured by gamma counting and the percent specific lysis was calculated as previously described (18).
Results
Detection of Brachyury protein in tumor cells
The specificity of a murine MAb directed against the human Brachyury protein was first demonstrated by its ability to specifically recognize the 48.2 KDa recombinant His6-Brachyury protein purified from baculovirus-directed overexpression in insect cells (Figure 1A). To determine the ability of the MAb to recognize the Brachyury protein in whole-cell protein lysates obtained from human lung carcinoma cells, a tumor cell pair was utilized consisting of H460 cells that were stably transfected with a control shRNA- or a Brachyury-specific shRNA-encoding vector. Evaluation of the Brachyury protein by immunoblotting with the anti-Brachyury MAb demonstrated a single protein band of expected molecular weight in the H460 control.shRNA cells (Figure 1B) with reduced intensity (~70% reduction) in H460 cells stably inhibited for Brachyury expression. These results confirmed the specificity of the MAb and its ability to selectively detect Brachyury protein in human tumor cells.
Figure 1. Detection of Brachyury protein in lung tumor cells and tissues.
Western blot analysis employing anti-Brachyury MAb for detection of (A) recombinant His6-Brachyury fusion protein derived from insect cells versus purified human serum albumin (HSA, Sigma-Aldrich), or (B) Brachyury protein in H460 lung carcinoma cells stably transfected with a control- or a Brachyury-specific shRNA-encoding vector. β-actin was used as protein loading control; shown in the graph is the ratio Brachyury/β-actin. (C) Representative tissue sections stained with anti-Brachyury MAb corresponding to a Grade 3 adenocarcinoma, patient 2 (i); a Grade 1 squamous carcinoma, patient 12 (ii); and a Grade 1 bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), mucinous type, patient 16 (iii). Tumor cells positive for Brachyury expression are indicated with (t); positive cells in the stroma adjacent to the tumor are indicated with (s). (iv) Staining of a Grade 2 lung adenocarcinoma (patient 10) showing Brachyury-positive tumor cells invading a blood vessel. Arrows indicate endothelial cells. (v) Staining of a Grade 2 adenocarcinoma (patient 9) demonstrating Brachyury-positivity in a fraction of tumor cells (t), and cells in the stroma directly adjacent to the tumor (s). Indicated with (n) are tumor cells negative for Brachyury expression. (Magnification 20X: panels i, ii; 40X: panels, iii–v.) (D) Western blot analysis of Brachyury expression in nuclear protein lysates prepared from primary lung tumor tissue (tumor) and corresponding normal lung adjacent to the tumor from patients 7 and 17.
Brachyury is overexpressed in human primary lung tumors
Brachyury protein expression was detected in 16/39 (41%) of primary lung tumor tissues analyzed, including 10/21 adenocarcinomas (48%) and 3/12 (25%) squamous carcinomas (Table 1A). For each of the 16 lung tumor tissue samples that were positive for Brachyury expression in this study, Table 1B indicates the tumor grade, TNM stage, and the positivity observed in tumor cells as well as in the histologically normal lung tissue adjacent to the tumor, in terms of percentage of Brachyury positive cells as well as the intensity of the staining (see Materials and Methods for a description of the scoring method employed). Moreover, staining of tumor cells in the nuclear versus cytoplasmic compartment is indicated. As shown, the percentage of lung tumor cells that stained positive with the anti-Brachyury MAb ranged from 10 to 90%; in all cases, staining was localized in the nuclear compartment although cytoplasmic staining was also observed in 13 out of 16 positive tissues. While the intensity of the nuclear staining ranged from weak (+) to intense (+++), the cytosolic staining was scored as weak (+) in all but one case. Similar staining pattern has been reported for the Twist protein in the cytosol and nuclei of gastric carcinoma cells (23). Representative images of lung tumor sections positive for Brachyury protein expression, corresponding to an adenocarcinoma (patient 2, Figure 1C-i), a squamous carcinoma (patient 12, Figure 1C-ii), and a bronchioloalveolar carcinoma, mucinous type (patient 16, Figure 1C-iii) demonstrate the intense staining of Brachyury protein in the nucleus of tumor cells, and the weak, more diffuse pattern of cytoplasmic staining in the same cells. Intense Brachyury staining was also observed in the cytosol, but not the nuclei, of tumor cells invading into blood vessels (patient 10, Figure 1C-iv). No data is available at this time with regard to the mechanism that promotes cytosolic compartmentalization of Brachyury or the biological significance, if any, of this observation. A previous report (24) has demonstrated that the activity of the EMT driver Snail is downregulated by phosphorylation-mediated cytosolic localization, a phenomenon that will be further investigated in the context of Brachyury.
Brachyury positive cells are detected in lung tissue adjacent to the tumor
In all 16 cases evaluated, no stromal cells stained positive for Brachyury expression in the lung tissue distal to the Brachyury-positive tumor mass. However, microscopic evaluation of the 16 cases of lung tumors that were positive for Brachyury expression demonstrated the presence of Brachyury positive cells in the stroma adjacent to the tumor in 7 out of the 16 cases (Table 1B and Figure 1C-v). Detection of Brachyury positive cells in the tissue adjacent to the tumor appeared to be independent of the level of Brachyury positivity observed at the tumor site. For example, Brachyury positive cells have been observed in the stroma adjacent to tumor from patients 2 and 3, where 80% of the tumor cells scored strongly positive for Brachyury, as well as in patient 9 where only 10% of the cells in the tumor were Brachyury positive (Table 1B). Figure 1C-v shows a representative image of an area of transition between tumor and stroma for patient 9, demonstrating a focal area of strong positivity for Brachyury expression in the tumor mass and in the stroma adjacent to the tumor. The anti-Brachyury MAb was also tested for its ability to detect Brachyury protein in lysates derived from human lung tumor tissues. While no reactivity was observed with cytosolic protein fractions (data not shown), a single band at the expected molecular weight was observed in nuclear fractions derived from the primary tumor of two lung cancer patients evaluated (patients 7 and 17, Figure 1D). Additionally, histologically normal lung tissue adjacent to the tumor obtained from patient 17 demonstrated intense Brachyury positivity in western blot (Figure 1D). The potential explanations as to why tissue directly adjacent to lung cancer cells is positive in some cases while distal tissue and lung tissue from non-cancer patients are always negative will be discussed below. There were also four cases (patients 5, 7, 9 and 10) where strong but focal staining of a minority of chondrocytes in distal bronchial cartilage was detected with the anti-Brachyury MAb (data not shown).
Expression of EMT markers in primary lung tumor tissues
In order to evaluate whether the expression of Brachyury correlates with expression of EMT-related proteins in vivo, four cases of lung cancer with various levels of Brachyury were evaluated for the expression of epithelial E-cadherin and mesenchymal Vimentin by immunohistochemistry in serial tissue sections. Two representative cases are shown in Figure 2A. In one example (adenocarcinoma patient 2, upper panels), the epithelial tumor compartment (indicated with white arrowheads) demonstrated intense expression of Brachyury, and simultaneous expression of epithelial E-cadherin and mesenchymal Vimentin. Another example of an adenocarcinoma (patient 6, bottom panels) demonstrated expression of Brachyury in the epithelial tumor compartment (white arrowheads), with weak expression of E-cadherin and no expression of Vimentin in the tumor cells. In both cases, single disseminated cells within the adjacent stroma (indicated with black arrowheads), stained positive for Brachyury but negative for E-cadherin. These results thus indicated that the pattern of expression of Brachyury and the EMT markers, E-cadherin and Vimentin, is not necessarily consistent among various lung tumor specimens and points out at a potentially complex connection between these markers in lung cancer.
Figure 2. Expression of EMT markers and mechanism of Brachyury over-expression.
Representative tissue sections stained for Brachyury, E-cadherin and Vimentin. In one example (adenocarcinoma patient 2, upper panels), the epithelial tumor compartment (indicated with white arrowheads) demonstrated intense expression of Brachyury, and simultaneous expression of epithelial E-cadherin and mesenchymal Vimentin. Another example of an adenocarcinoma (patient 6, bottom panels) demonstrated expression of Brachyury in the epithelial tumor compartment (white arrowheads), with weak expression of E-cadherin and no expression of Vimentin in the tumor cells. In both cases, single disseminated cells within the adjacent stroma (indicated with black arrowheads), stained positive for Brachyury but negative for E-cadherin. (Magnification 20X.) (B) Results of qPCR analysis for Brachyury copy number in indicated tumor specimens. Pos=positive control reaction with genomic DNA; neg=negative control reaction without DNA. SM=size marker.
Brachyury up-regulation in tumor tissues and cell lines
To investigate if a genomic rearrangement could account for the enhanced expression of Brachyury in lung tumors, a qPCR-based method was used to evaluate Brachyury gene copy number variations (CNV) in Brachyury positive versus negative lung tumor tissues. Five out of five Brachyury negative and 4/5 Brachyury positive tumors revealed a normal diploid status for the Brachyury gene; anomalous Brachyury gene copy number (three copies) was only detected in one Brachyury-positive case (Supplementary Table 1). These results would rule out gene amplification as a mechanism responsible for Brachyury upregulation in lung tumors.
The methylation status of a specific CpG island on the Brachyury promoter was also investigated. As shown in Figure 2B and Supplementary Table 1, the Brachyury promoter was methylated in 2/5 Brachyury positive tumors and 1/5 Brachyury negative tumors, which demonstrated a PCR amplification product at the expected size (Figure 2B). These results suggested that methylation of this particular region of the Brachyury promoter is unlikely to be involved in the regulation of Brachyury expression in lung cancer.
Brachyury expression in human normal tissues
The expression of Brachyury protein was also evaluated in a set of human normal tissues obtained from adult non-cancer subjects. Expression of Brachyury was negative among most normal tissues analyzed, including lung, heart, brain, liver, kidney, spleen, skeletal muscle, adrenal gland and skin, with the major exception of testis that was positive in 3 out of 3 cases, and normal thyroid that appeared positive in 4 out of 6 cases evaluated (Supplementary Table 2). In testis, cells in the germinal epithelium of the seminiferous tubules stained weakly positive for the Brachyury protein (Figure 3A-i). The staining was prevalently nuclear although weak cytoplasmic staining was also observed in the same cells. The expression of Brachyury protein in normal testis was in agreement with our previous studies demonstrating Brachyury mRNA in cDNA samples prepared from human normal testis (18). Here we also report for the first time the expression of Brachyury protein in some biopsies of human normal thyroid tissues. As shown in Figure 3A-ii, follicular cells stained strongly positive for Brachyury expression in the nucleus and, to a lesser extent, the cytoplasmic compartment. In contrast, as depicted in representative images in Figure 3A, all other human normal tissues evaluated were negative for Brachyury expression in all cell types, including normal lung (Figures 3A-iii, iv), normal spleen (Figure 3A-v) and normal skeletal muscle (Figure 3A-vi).
Figure 3. Expression of Brachyury in human normal tissues.
(A) Representative pictures of normal (i) positive testis, (ii) positive thyroid, (iii) negative lung alveoli, (iv) negative lung bronchioles, (v) negative spleen, and (vi) negative skeletal muscle. (Magnification 40X.) (B) Real-time PCR analysis of Brachyury, Snail, and Twist mRNA expression in commercial panels of cDNA [*, normal tissue adjacent to tumor]. (C) Western blot analysis of Brachyury, Snail, and Twist protein expression in commercially available whole-tissue protein lysates obtained from normal testis and normal lung. The following antibodies were used: Snail clone H-130, Twist clone H-81, GAPDH clone 0411 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). (D) Real-time PCR analysis of Brachyury, PAP and CEA mRNA expression in cDNA from normal testis and thyroid tissues.
Examples of other previously characterized transcription factors able to drive EMT in various tumor models include the zinc finger protein Snail (25, 26) and the helix-loop-helix (HLH) transcription factor Twist (27, 28). Using a commercial panel of cDNAs obtained from 40 lung tumor tissues and eight histologically normal lung tissues obtained from lung cancer patients, we comparatively evaluated the expression of mRNA encoding for Brachyury, Snail, and Twist. As shown in Figure 3B, while the expression of Brachyury mRNA was selectively enhanced in lung tumor tissues (21/40 positive, 52.5%) versus normal lung obtained from lung cancer patients (1/8 positive, 12.5%), the expression of Snail or Twist mRNA was equally elevated in lung normal or tumor tissues and, in the case of Snail, the average expression among normal lung tissues was ~10-fold higher than that of lung tumors. Similar results were obtained at the protein level; all three molecules were detected in protein lysates from normal testis, used as a positive control, while the expression of Snail and Twist, but not Brachyury, was also detected in lysates from human normal lung (Figure 3C).
We have also compared the expression of Brachyury mRNA in normal testis and thyroid tissues to that of two tumor-associated antigens that have been extensively evaluated in clinical studies without any evidence of autoimmunity. As shown in Figure 3D, mRNA expression levels of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are higher to those of Brachyury in normal thyroid.
Brachyury mRNA expression in tumor cell lines
The expression of Brachyury mRNA was comparatively evaluated by real-time PCR in multiple human primary lung tumors and various lung carcinoma cell lines. As shown in Figure 4A and Supplementary Table 3, 42/80 lung tumors (52.5%) and 7/10 lung cancer cell lines (70%) evaluated were positive for Brachyury mRNA. Interestingly, when comparing the levels of expression in the lung tumor samples and the various lung carcinoma lines used for experimental preclinical studies, a comparable range of Brachyury mRNA expression can be observed that spans a 4-log range, suggesting that available human tumor cell line models reflect the heterogeneity seen in patients and may be useful in developing strategies attempting to target the EMT process.
Figure 4. Brachyury and susceptibility to EGFR inhibition.
(A) Real-time PCR analysis of Brachyury mRNA in human primary lung tumors and lung carcinoma lines. (B) A549 and H460 lung carcinoma cell pairs were treated with various doses (µM) of the EGFR kinase inhibitor AG1478 for two days and assayed for survival by the MTT assay. (C) Real-time PCR analysis of Brachyury expression in A549 cells grown for 2 weeks in the presence of control DMSO- or 1µM AG1478-containing medium. (D) Extracellular matrix invasion assay of A549 cells untreated (parental) or treated as indicated for 2-weeks in culture [*p<0.05, ***p<0.005].
Brachyury overexpression confers resistance to EGFR kinase inhibitors
EGFR kinase inhibitors are commonly utilized for the management of lung cancer. We next investigated whether expression of Brachyury in lung carcinoma lines could have a significant impact on their ability to withstand EGFR inhibition mediated by Tyrphostin AG1478, a cell-permeable, reversible, ATP-competitive inhibitor of the EGFR tyrosine kinase. Two human lung carcinoma line pairs with high vs. low levels of Brachyury expression were generated by stable transfection of (a) A549 cells with a control pCMV or a pBrachyury vector, or (b) H460 cells with a control.shRNA vs. a Brachyury.shRNA. As shown in Figure 4B, A549 pBrachyury cells had a survival advantage compared to control A549 pCMV cells in response to treatment with various doses of the EGFR inhibitor, AG1478. Similarly, H460 cells inhibited for the expression of Brachyury were found to be more susceptible to treatment with various doses of inhibitor, as compared to control cells. To further characterize the role of Brachyury on the resistance of lung carcinoma cells to EGFR inhibition, Brachyury-low A549 cells were exposed in culture to a non-lethal concentration (1µM) of AG1478. Long-term exposure of A549 to AG1478 markedly induced (>3-log) the expression of Brachyury mRNA above the level found in DMSO-treated cells (Figure 4C). Additionally, A549 tumor cells that survived exposure to AG1478 had significantly enhanced invasive capacity in vitro, compared to DMSO-treated or untreated cells (Figure 4D).
Brachyury as target for immunotherapeutic interventions against lung cancer
We have previously demonstrated that human CD8+ Brachyury-specific T-cells could be expanded in vitro from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of cancer patients and normal donors by using a 9-mer peptide of Brachyury that specifically binds to the HLA-A2 molecule (18). Here, various Brachyury-specific T-cell lines have been employed to lyse, in vitro, H226, H441, and H1703 lung carcinoma cells. As shown in Figure 5A, normal donor-derived Brachyury-specific T cells were able to lyse H441 tumor cells that express Brachyury and are HLA-A2 positive, but not H226 cells which express elevated levels of Brachyury but lack the appropriate MHC-class I expression. Utilizing a different Brachyury-specific T-cell line derived from a prostate cancer patient, a cold target inhibition assay with H441 tumor cells using peptide-pulsed K562-A2.1 cells as competitors demonstrated the epitope-specificity of the lysis (Figure 5B). Utilizing tetramer-isolated, CD8+ Brachyury-specific T cells derived from a different prostate cancer patient, a high level of specific lysis was observed with H441 and H1703 lung carcinoma cells (both Brachyury positive/HLA-A2 positive), as compared to the control HLA-A2 negative ASPC1 cells (Figure 5C).
Figure 5. Brachyury as a target for anti-tumor interventions.
(A) CTL-mediated lysis of H226 and H441 lung carcinoma cells with a normal donor-derived Brachyury-specific T-cell line I (25:1 effector-to-target ratio). (B) Lysis of H441 tumor cells with a Brachyury-specific T-cell line II derived from a prostate cancer patient in the presence of cold, competitor K562 A2.1 cells unpulsed or pulsed with the specific Brachyury peptide (Bra pep). (C) Lysis of H441 and H1703 lung carcinoma and control ASPC1 cells by tetramer-isolated, CD8+ Brachyury-specific T-cell line III derived from a different prostate cancer patient.
Discussion
In this study we have demonstrated for the first time the expression of Brachyury protein, a transcriptional regulator of human carcinoma EMT, in 41% of primary lung carcinomas, including adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas, which together account for ~80% of all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnoses. Brachyury positivity varied from 10–90% of the tumor cells and, in a fraction of cases, staining was also seen in scattered cells localized in the stroma adjacent (but not distant) to the tumor. These studies were performed by immunohistochemistry and confirmed by western blot analysis employing a MAb against Brachyury. We have also contrasted here for the first time the highly tumor-associated pattern of Brachyury expression, compared to Snail and Twist, two previously described drivers of EMT, which were expressed at equally high levels in normal and lung cancer tissues. It is also demonstrated here for the first time a negative association between Brachyury expression in lung cancer cell lines and their susceptibility to EGFR inhibition. In addition, data are presented on the analysis of copy number and promoter methylation status of the Brachyury gene, in multiple lung tumor specimens.
The presence of Brachyury positive tumor cells in human lung cancer tissues could be indicative of tumor cells undergoing EMT in vivo, which are expected to have enhanced migratory and invasive potential, and greater drug resistance. It is important to emphasize, however, that the process of EMT is one of plasticity in which epithelial tumor cells can be rendered mesenchymal-like by a number of tumor environmental factors, such as IL-8 (21) and TGF-β (9, 29), leading to greater migration and invasion. Thus, one cannot predict when analyzing a primary tumor by IHC or PCR, which reflects the state of individual tumor cells at only one point in time, whether a subpopulation of cells had previously undergone the EMT process and had already metastasized. Our results indicated no simple association between the expression of Brachyury and the EMT markers E-cadherin and Vimentin in lung tumors. It should be pointed out that EMT is a dynamic process and that immunohistochemistry depicts only one point in time of this process. The clinical relevance of Brachyury expression in lung cancer is unknown at this time and further studies need to define if its expression has any impact on lung cancer progression or survival. In support of Brachyury’s role in human carcinoma progression, for example, the expression of Brachyury has been recently identified as a poor prognostic factor in early stage (T1-2N0M0, Dukes A) colon cancer (30).
The identification of tumor cells undergoing EMT in vivo has been reported, for example, in colon cancer where tumor cells with features indicative of EMT have been observed as dissociated tumor cells at the invasive front (31, 32). In this study, we have demonstrated that Brachyury positive, single disseminated cells can be detected in the lung stroma adjacent to the tumor in a fraction of cases analyzed, while no cellular components reacted with the anti-Brachyury MAb in the normal stroma distal to the tumor. Although further studies are needed in order to characterize the origin of these Brachyury-positive cells in the transition tumor-stroma, one possibility is that they correspond to invasive cells that detached from the tumor mass and invaded the surrounding tissue. Another possibility is that soluble mediators secreted by the tumor such as IL-8 (21) are able to induce normal cellular components of the adjacent stroma to upregulate the expression of Brachyury.
From a clinical point of view, identification of the mechanisms that control the expression of Brachyury in lung cancer could lead to improved therapeutic options for patients with Brachyury-positive tumors. Unlike with chordomas, where duplication of the Brachyury gene is commonly observed (33), most lung tumors analyzed showed no deviations from the normal diploid status. Moreover, epigenetic control mediated by methylation of the Brachyury promoter was also ruled out, as no correlation was observed between Brachyury levels and methylation of its promoter. These results indicate that the expression of Brachyury in lung cancer might result from a diverse mutational or epigenetic mechanism, or via signaling initiated in the extracellular compartment by components of the tumor microenvironment.
It is important to point out that a previous study employing a polyclonal Ab against Brachyury has reported that a variety of human carcinomas were negative for Brachyury protein expression, including lung carcinomas (34). In our study, we have used a MAb that was extensively evaluated by immunohistochemistry and western blot, demonstrating its ability to (a) specifically react with purified Brachyury protein, (b) react with a band at the expected molecular weight in lysates from lung carcinoma cell lines, (c) react with a band at the expected molecular weight in lysates from lung tumor tissues, and (d) be able to stain lung tumors by immunohistochemistry. Differences in epitope specificity as well as in the avidity of the employed antibodies could potentially explain the difference in results between these studies. Additionally, the presence of Brachyury protein in lung tumor cell lines was demonstrated here by utilizing Brachyury-specific T-cell lines that were able to lyse, in an MHC-restricted manner, human lung carcinoma lines in vitro.
The present report also reinforces the tumor-associated character of Brachyury. Expression of Brachyury protein was undetectable in most human normal tissues analyzed here, with the exception of testis that was previously reported to be positive at the mRNA (18) and protein levels (34) and, for the first time, in normal thyroid tissue (4/6, 67%). As the testis is known to be immune-privileged, it is anticipated that the expression of Brachyury protein in this organ will not pose a problem in the context of a Brachyury-based immunotherapeutic approach. Regarding the expression of Brachyury in normal thyroid tissue, we have demonstrated here that the tumor-associated antigens PAP and CEA, which have been investigated extensively in clinical studies with no evidence of thyroid dysfunction, are expressed at higher levels in thyroid tissue compared to the expression of Brachyury mRNA.
In addition to its role as a driver of EMT, we have recently characterized another important function of Brachyury in human carcinoma cells. Brachyury expression positively correlates with the acquisition of tumor stemness features, including the ability to self-renew and to withstand treatment with various chemotherapy agents as well as radiation (35). In the present study, we have demonstrated for the first time the effect of Brachyury expression on resistance to EGFR inhibition. EGFR is over-expressed in approximately 60% of lung cancers, and activation of this receptor has been shown to associate with poor clinical outcome (36). Pharmacological inhibition of EGFR is being explored as a therapeutic option for lung cancer patients, with two EGFR kinase small molecule inhibitors, erlotinib and gefitinib, currently approved for use in the clinic (36). Unfortunately, despite an initial response, most treated patients develop resistance to EGFR kinase inhibition (37). As demonstrated here for the first time, overexpression of Brachyury in lung carcinoma cells also associates with resistance to cell death mediated by EGFR kinase inhibition. Both lung cancer lines used in our study, A549 and H460, express wild-type EGFR and harbor a K-Ras mutation; however, their sensitivity to EGFR inhibition was different. While H460 cells with high Brachyury levels were resistant to EGFR inhibition with AG1478, Brachyury low A549 cells were more responsive to the same treatment. Another interesting observation was the acquisition of an EMT-like phenotype by A549 cells exposed to AG1478 for an extended period of time. In view of these data, it is possible that Brachyury-mediated EMT could be a major factor contributing to the development of resistance to EGFR kinase inhibitors.
One strategy to eliminate mesenchymal-like, Brachyury-positive tumor cells is via immune targeting with Brachyury-based cancer vaccines. The Brachyury protein is shown here to fulfill a fundamental requisite as a target for vaccine strategies against the tumor, owing to its highly-tumor associated pattern of expression. Moreover, we have demonstrated that Brachyury-specific T cells can be expanded from the blood of cancer patients (18) and as we have shown here, those T cells can lyse, in vitro, Brachyury-positive lung carcinoma cells in an MHC-restricted manner. A Phase I clinical study with a Brachyury vaccine has now been initiated in patients with carcinomas. The results presented here support the inclusion of lung cancer patients in this Phase I clinical study as well as in future Phase II clinical studies employing Brachyury-based vaccines.
Supplementary Material
Statement of Translational Relevance.
The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has recently emerged as a process of relevance during carcinoma progression and metastasis and drug resistance. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time the expression of the Brachyury protein, a driver of human carcinoma EMT, in 41% of primary lung carcinomas, and its ability to confer resistance to EGFR kinase inhibition. We also demonstrate that Brachyury-specific T cells expanded from the blood of cancer patients can lyse Brachyury-positive lung carcinoma cells in vitro, in an MHC-restricted manner. These results support the use of Brachyury as a novel target for therapeutic interventions against lung cancer. It could be hypothesized that, if utilized at early stages of the disease, a Brachyury-based cancer vaccine approach could prevent or diminish the establishment of metastatic disease in lung cancer patients, and potentially alleviate resistance to therapy.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Margie Duberstein for technical assistance, and Debra Weingarten for editorial assistance.
Grant support: Intramural Research Program of the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH. Partially supported by Italian Ministry of Instruction, University and Research (MIUR): MERIT, grant code B11J10000180008.
Bibliography
- 1.U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics, 1999–2007 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. 2010 Available from: www.cdc.gov/uscs.
- 2.Hoffman PC, Mauer AM, Vokes EE. Lung cancer. Lancet. 2000;355(9202):479–485. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)82038-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pal SK, Figlin RA, Reckamp K. Targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer: an evolving landscape. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9(7):1931–1944. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):277–300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.d'Amato TA, Landreneau RJ, McKenna RJ, Santos RS, Parker RJ. Prevalence of in vitro extreme chemotherapy resistance in resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(2):440–446. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Thiery JP. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(6):442–454. doi: 10.1038/nrc822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang J, Weinberg RA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. Dev Cell. 2008;14(6):818–829. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(6):1420–1428. doi: 10.1172/JCI39104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thiery JP, Sleeman JP. Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(2):131–142. doi: 10.1038/nrm1835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Savagner P. Leaving the neighborhood: molecular mechanisms involved during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Bioessays. 2001;23(10):912–923. doi: 10.1002/bies.1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 144(5):646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Polyak K, Weinberg RA. Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(4):265–273. doi: 10.1038/nrc2620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Terauchi M, Yamashita M, Ino K, Nawa A, et al. Chemoresistance to paclitaxel induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and enhances metastatic potential for epithelial ovarian carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2007;31(2):277–283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang AD, Fan F, Camp ER, van Buren G, Liu W, Somcio R, et al. Chronic oxaliplatin resistance induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer cell lines. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(14 Pt 1):4147–4153. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arumugam T, Ramachandran V, Fournier KF, Wang H, Marquis L, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition contributes to drug resistance in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69(14):5820–5828. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Thomson S, Buck E, Petti F, Griffin G, Brown E, Ramnarine N, et al. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition is a determinant of sensitivity of non-small-cell lung carcinoma cell lines and xenografts to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition. Cancer Res. 2005;65(20):9455–9462. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thomson S, Petti F, Sujka-Kwok I, Epstein D, Haley JD. Kinase switching in mesenchymal-like non-small cell lung cancer lines contributes to EGFR inhibitor resistance through pathway redundancy. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2008;25(8):843–854. doi: 10.1007/s10585-008-9200-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Palena C, Polev DE, Tsang KY, Fernando RI, Litzinger M, Krukovskaya LL, et al. The human T-box mesodermal transcription factor Brachyury is a candidate target for T-cell-mediated cancer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(8):2471–2478. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fernando RI, Litzinger M, Trono P, Hamilton DH, Schlom J, Palena C. The T-box transcription factor Brachyury promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human tumor cells. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(2):533–544. doi: 10.1172/JCI38379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Palena C, Fernando RI, Litzinger MT, Hamilton DH, Huang B, Schlom J. Strategies to target molecules that control the acquisition of a mesenchymal-like phenotype by carcinoma cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 236(5):537–545. doi: 10.1258/ebm.2011.010367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fernando RI, Castillo MD, Litzinger M, Hamilton DH, Palena C. IL-8 signaling plays a critical role in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of human carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2011;71(15):5296–5306. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H. Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem. 1981;29(4):577–580. doi: 10.1177/29.4.6166661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yan-Qi Z, Xue-Yan G, Shuang H, Yu C, Fu-Lin G, Fei-Hu B, et al. Expression and significance of TWIST basic helix-loop-helix protein over-expression in gastric cancer. Pathology. 2007;39(5):470–475. doi: 10.1080/00313020701570053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dominguez D, Montserrat-Sentis B, Virgos-Soler A, Guaita S, Grueso J, Porta M, et al. Phosphorylation regulates the subcellular location and activity of the snail transcriptional repressor. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(14):5078–5089. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.14.5078-5089.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cano A, Perez-Moreno MA, Rodrigo I, Locascio A, Blanco MJ, del Barrio MG, et al. The transcription factor snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2(2):76–83. doi: 10.1038/35000025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Blanco MJ, Moreno-Bueno G, Sarrio D, Locascio A, Cano A, Palacios J, et al. Correlation of Snail expression with histological grade and lymph node status in breast carcinomas. Oncogene. 2002;21(20):3241–3246. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yang J, Mani SA, Donaher JL, Ramaswamy S, Itzykson RA, Come C, et al. Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor metastasis. Cell. 2004;117(7):927–939. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kwok WK, Ling MT, Lee TW, Lau TC, Zhou C, Zhang X, et al. Up-regulation of TWIST in prostate cancer and its implication as a therapeutic target. Cancer Res. 2005;65(12):5153–5162. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Singh A, Settleman J. EMT, cancer stem cells and drug resistance: an emerging axis of evil in the war on cancer. Oncogene. 29(34):4741–4751. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kilic N, Feldhaus S, Kilic E, Tennstedt P, Wicklein D, Wasielewski R, et al. Brachyury expression predicts poor prognosis at early stages of colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 47(7):1080–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brabletz T, Hlubek F, Spaderna S, Schmalhofer O, Hiendlmeyer E, Jung A, et al. Invasion and metastasis in colorectal cancer: epithelial-mesenchymal transition, mesenchymal-epithelial transition, stem cells and beta-catenin. Cells Tissues Organs. 2005;179(1–2):56–65. doi: 10.1159/000084509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jung A, Schrauder M, Oswald U, Knoll C, Sellberg P, Palmqvist R, et al. The invasion front of human colorectal adenocarcinomas shows co-localization of nuclear beta-catenin, cyclin D1, and p16INK4A and is a region of low proliferation. Am J Pathol. 2001;159(5):1613–1617. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63007-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang XR, Ng D, Alcorta DA, Liebsch NJ, Sheridan E, Li S, et al. T (brachyury) gene duplication confers major susceptibility to familial chordoma. Nat Genet. 2009;41(11):1176–1178. doi: 10.1038/ng.454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tirabosco R, Mangham DC, Rosenberg AE, Vujovic S, Bousdras K, Pizzolitto S, et al. Brachyury expression in extra-axial skeletal and soft tissue chordomas: a marker that distinguishes chordoma from mixed tumor/myoepithelioma/parachordoma in soft tissue. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(4):572–580. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31815b693a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huang B, Cohen JR, Litzinger MT, Fernando RI, Hamilton DH, Hodge JW, et al. Brachyury, a driver of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, imparts tumor stemness and resistance to conventional therapies to human carcinoma cells. Manuscript in preparation. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Stella GM, Luisetti M, Inghilleri S, Cemmi F, Scabini R, Zorzetto M, et al. Targeting EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer: lessons, experiences, strategies. Respir Med. 2011;106(2):173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Engelman JA, Janne PA. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(10):2895–2899. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-2248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





