Skip to main content
Radiology and Oncology logoLink to Radiology and Oncology
. 2012 Jul 24;46(3):207–212. doi: 10.2478/v10019-012-0040-0

Cathepsin X in serum from patients with colorectal cancer: relation to prognosis

Tjasa Vizin 1, Ib Jarle Christensen 2, Hans Jørgen Nielsen 3,4, Janko Kos 1,5,
PMCID: PMC3472949  PMID: 23077459

Abstract

Background

Up-regulation of lysosomal cysteine protease cathepsin X (Cat X) is associated with disorders of the immune system and neurodegenerative diseases, while its role in the development and progression of cancer is less understood. Enhanced secretion of pro-Cat X was observed in malignant processes, and therefore, the level of total serum Cat X rather than the active enzyme may better reflect the tumour status.

Patients and methods

Seventy-seven patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) were included in a retrospective study. Blood samples were collected prior to therapy. Using ELISA, the values of total Cat X were measured in serum. Groups of healthy persons (n=77), patients with adenomas (n=77) and patients with non-neoplastic findings (n=77) were included.

Results

Significant differences between the group of colorectal patients and the groups of healthy persons, adenoma patients and patients with non-malignant findings could not be shown (p=0.89). Within the group of CRC, higher levels of total Cat X significantly correlated to shorter overall survival (HR=2.08, 95% CI:1.07–4.05, p=0.028).

Conclusions

Total serum Cat X could be a useful prognostic indicator for determining survival of patients with CRC. Increased serum levels of total Cat X may reflect more aggressive tumour cell phenotypes and suggest the involvement of Cat X in processes involved in later stages of tumour progression.

Keywords: cysteine cathepsins; cathepsin X; colorectal cancer, prognosis; serum biomarker

Introduction

Cysteine cathepsins have been reported as biomolecules that are involved in development and progression of cancer. The molecules may provide additional diagnostic and prognostic information for cancer patients.13 In particular, increased activity, protein concentration and secretion of cathepsins B and L have been associated with poor patient outcome in various cancer types, including colorectal cancer (CRC).4 Other cysteine cathepsins, including Cat X have been studied far less in cancer and their role in malignant processes is not clear. Cat X expression is restricted to various cells of the immune system, such as monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells.5 It is involved in immune response regulations, such as signal transduction, growth, maturation, adhesion, cell-cell communication, proliferation and migration of immune cells and in phagocytosis.68 By proteolytic cleavage of C-terminal amino acids, Cat X regulates β2 integrin functions9, impairs neurotrophic activity of gamma-enolase10 and the role of chemokine CXCL-12 in adhesion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to osteoblasts.11 Up-regulation of Cat X was associated also with the inflammatory processes in patients infected with Helicobacter pylori12, those with multiple trauma13, inflammatory related neurodegenerative disorders10, tuberculosis14 and Huntington’s disease.15

Several studies support the involvement of Cat X in cancer. First, the gene encoding Cat X is localized on chromosome 20 in region q13, which is frequently amplified in several types of cancer.16,17 Increased expression of the pro-Cat X and active Cat X was found in tumour and immune cells of prostate cancer18, gastric cancer12 and in the most aggressive phenotypes of human malignant melanoma.19 In immunohistochemical analysis of lung tumours Cat X revealed very faint staining in tumour cells, but positive staining in infiltrated immune cells.5 Sevenich et al. showed that Cat X-deficient and PymT-induced breast cancer transgenic mice had a prolonged tumour-free period for breast cancer compared to Cat X-expressing mice.20 Furthermore, it was demonstrated that Cat X deficiency leads to accelerated cellular senescence, a powerful tumour suppressor mechanism.21

Only few clinical studies related the levels of Cat X with clinico-pathological parameters in cancer patients. As shown by our group, significantly lower levels of active Cat X were found in serum of patients with inflammatory breast cancer compared to non-inflammatory breast cancer.22 In cyst fluid from epithelial ovarian cancer we did not find a significant correlation of the levels of active Cat X with any clinico-pathological parameter.23 On the other hand, increased mRNA levels of Cat X in hepatocellular carcinomas significantly correlated with advanced tumour stage.24

The aim of the present study was to determine the protein levels of total Cat X (pro-form and active mature form) in serum from patients with CRC in comparison to adenoma patients, patients with non-malignant findings and a group of healthy persons. Further, Cat X levels were related with clinico-pathological parameters, considering especially the correlation with overall survival of the patients.

Materials and methods

Patients

From October 2003 through December 2005, subjects were included in a multi-centre cross sectional study conducted at six Danish hospitals. Eligible for inclusion were subjects (aged 18+ years) undergoing endoscopy following symptoms related to CRC. Subjects previously diagnosed with CRC and subjects unable to give informed consent were excluded from the study. The Regional Ethical Committee and The Danish Data Protection Agency approved the study. Following oral and written consent according to the Helsinki II Declaration 5,165 individuals were included consecutively. Based on this study-population a case-control study was designed including 312 patients representing four diagnostic groups of subjects. The study population was selected in order to test the diagnostic potential of different promising serological markers in CRC. Primarily 77 subjects with pathologically verified colorectal adenocarcinomas (26% RC, n=20 and 74% CC, n=57) were selected at random. These patients underwent surgery and did not receive radio- or chemotherapy. For each of these, a subject with pathologically verified adenomas was randomly selected matching for age, gender and localisation of finding. Then subjects with other (non-malignant) findings were randomly selected and matched as described for the adenomas. Finally, subjects who had no findings at endoscopy and who reported no co-morbidity (healthy persons), were randomly selected and matched to the groups by age and gender. All pathological diagnoses were validated using the Danish National Registry on Pathological Examinations (www.patobank.dk). Patients who were diagnosed with cancer, but did not have the tumour removed were classified according to the clinical information available, and as a result exact tumour staging was not possible in few cases. Similarly for patients diagnosed with adenomas, the type of adenoma was not specified in all cases, either due to incompleteness of the pathological description available or due to loss of specimen during the examination. Previous cancer diagnoses were retrieved from the Danish Cancer Registry. One subject was shown to have a previous CRC and was excluded from the study together with the three matched subjects, leaving a study population of 308 subjects. Descriptive statistics for the matched subjects are given in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Subject characteristics

CRC patients Subjects, n (%)

Gender
  Female 37 (48.0)
  Male 40 (52.0)
Age Group
  40+ 3 (4)
  50+ 10 (13)
  60+ 17 (22)
  70+ 26 (34)
  80+ 21 (27)
Localisation
  Right colon 23 (29.9)
  Left colon 34 (44.2)
  Rectum 20 (26.0)
Cancer Stage
  I 9 (12.5)
  II 32 (44.4)
  III 16 (22.2)
  IV 15 (20.8)
  not specified 5 (6.5)

Adenomas

  tubular 45 (58.4)
  tubulovillous 16 (20.8)
  villous 1 (1.3)
  serrat 1 (1.3)
  not specified 14 (18.2)
Size
  < 1 cm 41 (53)
  > 1 cm 33 (42.8)
  not specified 3 (3.8)

Non-malignant finding

  Diverticulosis 72 (93.5)
  Haemorrhoids 4 (5.2)
  Inflammatory bowel disease 1 (1.3)

Healthy persons

77 (100)

Sampling

Blood samples were collected at the same day period prior to endoscopy in all subjects, following a standard operating procedure (SOP). At sample collection subjects were non-fasting. All subjects undergoing colonoscopy had completed a bowel preparation. Blood was collected at moderate tourniquet pressure, in 10 ml serum tubes (Vacutainer® Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, CA, USA), and spun for 10 minutes at 3000 g and 4°C within 1 hour following collection. Samples were immediately stored at −80°C and were thawed and refrozen once prior to analysis.

Determination of Cat X

Human total Cat X was analyzed using ELISA, as described.5 Briefly, microtiter plates (Nunc-IMMUNO™ MODULES, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with goat polyclonal antibody against human Cat X (R&D SYSTEMS®, Minneapolis, USA), which recognizes pro-form and mature Cat X (2 μg/mL in 100 μL of 1 mM Na2CO3, 35 mM NaHCO3, 15 mM NaN3, pH 9.6). Following incubation over night at 4°C, the plates were washed three times with the washing buffer (0.15 Mm NaCl, 7.5 mM Na2HPO4 X 2H2O, 2.5 mM NaH2PO4 X 2H2O, 0.05% Tween® 20 (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany), pH 7.2), and blocked with 2% BSA in washing buffer for 1 h. The wells were filled with Cat X standards or serum samples and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Finally, after washing, 100 μL of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated mouse 3B10 mAb, recognizing the pro-form and mature Cat X (1:1000 dilution) was applied. After 2 h incubation at 37°C, 200 μL of TMB (3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) Liquid Substrate System, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide was added. After 20 minutes the reaction was stopped with 50 μL of 2 M H2SO4. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured with a microplate reader (TECAN Saphyre 2, Männedorf, Switzerland) and corrected for the absorbance of controls. Pro-Cat X used as a standard, was prepared and characterized as described.25 The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variance (CV) were 9.8% and 11.0%, respectively. To determine the linearity of ELISA, serum samples were serially diluted to the levels encompassing the range of the assay. Finally, the samples in a 1:2 dilution were added to the wells of microtiter plate. Detection limit of the assay was 2.0 ng/ml.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using SAS (v9.2, SAS Institute, Cary, N.C., USA). To identify a diagnostic value of total Cat X, a linear model comparing the level of total Cat X between the four groups was used. Cat X concentrations were log transformed for statistical analysis. P-values less than 5% were considered significant.

For survival analysis, the Kaplan-Meier methods, dichotomizing the values using their respective medians, and Cox regression analysis with the total Cat X values entered as continuous variables in the log scale (base 2), were used. The hazard ratio (HR) for the latter was for a two-fold difference in marker levels.

Results and discussion

CRC is the second most frequent malignant disease in the developed countries.26,27 Besides carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), several other serum tumour markers have been suggested for early detection of the disease and for prediction of prognosis2831, however, none of them has reached the regular clinical use yet. The levels of serum Cat X, evaluated in this pilot study, revealed no significant difference between CRC patients and control groups, however, higher levels in CRC patients correlated with shorter overall survival and may provide prognostic information.

The levels of total Cat X in the CRC group, adenoma patients, patients with non-malignant findings and the group of healthy persons are shown in Table 2. The results show that there is no significant statistical difference in Cat X levels between the groups (p=0.89).

TABLE 2.

Descriptive statistics for total Cat X concentrations. Values of total Cat X in sera of the colorectal cancer, adenoma, non-malignant findings and the control group of healthy persons.

group N median (ng/mL) minimum (ng/mL) maximum (ng/mL) mean (ng/mL) SD (ng/mL)
colorectal carcinoma 77 16.3 5.9 40.4 17.4 7.0
adenoma 77 17.1 4.1 40.0 17.8 6.5
non-malignant findings 77 17.4 2.0 61.5 18.5 8.7
healthy persons 77 17.1 5.4 99.5 18.8 11.4

The survival analysis (Figure 1) shows an association between total Cat X serum concentrations and overall survival of CRC patients. The log rank statistics show that patients with higher serum levels of total Cat X have shorter survival than the patients with lower total Cat X serum levels (p=0.028; HR=2.08 (95% CI: 1.07–4.05)). On the continuous scale the difference was not significant (p=0.19; HR=1.48 (95% CI: 0.83–2.64)).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Survival analysis of cathepsin X in serum from patients with CRC. The Kaplan-Meier curve dichotomizing by the median shows the association between total Cat X serum concentrations and patient overall survival. Red colour represents a group of patients with high Cat X levels (≥ to median), blue colour represents a group of patients with low Cat X levels (< to median).

In immune cells Cat X localizes in lysosomes predominantly as a pro-enzyme. After cell activation, Cat X containing vesicles translocate towards the plasma membrane and Cat X can be secreted into the extracellular space.32 The similar behaviour was demonstrated also in tumour cells.5,18 During this process, pro-Cat X can be activated by the other cysteine protease cathepsin L.33 Enhanced secretion of pro-Cat X rather than the active form seems to be typical for malignant processes, and therefore, the level of total serum Cat X may better reflect the tumour status than the level of the active Cat X alone.13,22

The question whether tumour cells or activated immune cells contribute to increased extracellular levels of Cat X remains open. The same holds for the role of Cat X in malignant progression, which cannot be the degradation of extracellular matrix, an event, typical for some other cysteine cathepsins since Cat X acts solely as carboxypeptidase and not as endopeptidase. Based on the results on single and double knock-out mice, Cat X was suggested to compensate the malignant potential of cathepsin B20,34 enhancing cell adhesion, changing the migration mode6 or inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tumour cells.24 Its increased serum levels may reflect more aggressive tumour cell phenotype which is related to higher risk for relapse and shorter survival of cancer patients.

Our results show that higher levels of total Cat X in serum from CRC patients significantly correlate to shorter overall survival, suggesting the involvement of total Cat X in the late stages of the malignant process. This is in contrast to the results of Sevenich et al.20, which show that in breast cancer transgenic mice model Cat X was associated primarily with the initial stages of the malignant process and less with the tumour progression and metastasis. The authors showed that Cat X deficient mice had a prolonged tumour-free period compared to Cat X-expressing mice, however, only a trend toward reduced metastatic burden was observed. Only a combined loss of cathepsin B and Cat X led to additive effects including a reduction in the number and size of lung metastases. On the other hand, the study by Hidaka et al. showed that amplification of the region 20q13.2 correlated with the metastatic potential and tumour progression of CRC16, suggesting the involvement of Cat X in the later stages of cancer. The latter was proposed also by Wang et al., demonstrating that an upregulation of Cat X expression strongly correlated with advanced clinical stage, shorter overall survival and induced metastatic potential of hepatocellular carcinoma.24 Moreover, a recent study by Lines et al. showed that in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Cat X expression is downregulated by over-expressed S100P-binding protein, which results in decreased cell adhesion, correlating with lower metastatic potential of pancreatic cancer cells.35

Several molecular targets have been proposed either for pro-Cat X or active Cat X which may contribute to progression of cancer. Pro-Cat X binds integrin receptors by RGD motif36,37 and interacts with heparane sulphate proteoglycans8 modulating cell adhesion and motility. Active Cat X was shown to cleave C-terminal amino acids of chemokine CXCL-1211 and beta-2 chain of integrin receptors6 regulating chemotaxis and a wide range of beta-2 integrin functions, including cell adhesion, proliferation and migration. Active Cat X also cleaves the C-terminal amino acids of gamma-enolase (neuronal specific enolase - NSE)10, a tumour associated protein, used as a marker for prognosis and response to therapy in lung cancer and neuroblastoma. As shown in our recent studies38,39, un-cleaved NSE regulates proliferation and survival of neuronal cells, whereas the presence of active Cat X significantly impairs the tropic function of gamma-enolase. However, the same effect has not been demonstrated in tumour cells. We may hypothesize that pro-Cat X and active Cat X have the opposite role in malignant progression and the ratio between the pro-Cat X and active Cat X could direct tumour promotive or suppressive action.

To summarize, total serum Cat X could be a useful prognostic indicator to determine overall survival of patients with CRC, serving to optimize therapy and patient care. However, our study based on 77 CRC patients is a preliminary one and a larger group of patients needs to be analysed in a multivariable model to confirm our results.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Research Agency of the Republic of Slovenia [grant n. P4-0127 and J4-4123 (to J.K.)]

References

  • 1.Turk V, Kos J, Turk B. Cysteine cathepsins (proteases)-on the main stage of cancer? Cancer Cell. 2004;5:409–10. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(04)00117-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Strojan P. Cysteine cathepsins and stefins in head and neck cancer: an update of clinical studies. Radiol Oncol. 2008;42:69–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ardebili SY, Zajc I, Gole B, Campos B, Herold-Mende C, Drmota S, et al. CD133/prominin1 is prognostic for GBM patient’s survival, but inversely correlated with cysteine cathepsins’ expression in glioblastoma derived spheroids. Radiol Oncol. 2011;45:102–15. doi: 10.2478/v10019-011-0015-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kos J, Lah TT. Cysteine proteinases and their endogenous inhibitors: target proteins for prognosis, diagnosis and therapy in cancer (review) Oncol Rep. 1998;5:1349–61. doi: 10.3892/or.5.6.1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kos J, Sekirnik A, Premzl A, Zavašnik Bergant V, Langerholc T, Turk B, et al. Carboxypeptidases cathepsins X and B display distinct protein profile in human cells and tissues. Exp Cell Res. 2005;306:103–13. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kos J, Jevnikar Z, Obermajer N. The role of cathepsin X in cell signalling. Cell Adh Migr. 2009;3:164–6. doi: 10.4161/cam.3.2.7403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Obermajer N, Jevnikar Z, Doljak B, Sadaghiani AM, Bogyo M, Kos J. Cathepsin X-mediated β2-integrin activation results in nanotube outgrowth. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:1126–34. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-8829-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nascimento FD, Rizzi CC, Nantes IL, Stefe I, Turk B, Carmona AK, et al. Cathepsin X binds to cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2005;436:323–32. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2005.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Obermajer N, Repnik U, Jevnikar Z, Turk B, Kreft M, Kos J. Cysteine protease cathepsin X modulates immune response via activation of β2 integrins. Immunology. 2008;124:76–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02740.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Obermajer N, Doljak B, Jamnik P, Fonovič UP, Kos J. Cathepsin X cleaves the C-terminal dipeptide of alpha- and gamma-enolase and impairs survival and neuritogenesis of neuronal cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41:1685–96. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Staudt DN, Aicher KW, Kalbacher H, Stevanovic S, Carmona KA, Bogyo M, et al. Cathepsin X is secreted by human osteoblasts, digests CXCL-12 and impairs adhesion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to osteoblasts. Haematol. 2010;95:1452–60. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.018671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krueger S, Kalinski T, Hundertmark T, Wex T, Küster D, Peitz U, et al. Up-regulation of cathepsin X in Helicobacter pylori gastritis and gastric cancer. J Pathol. 2005;207:32–42. doi: 10.1002/path.1820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nägler DK, Lechner AM, Oettl A, Kozaczynska K, Scheuber HP, Gippner-Steppert C, et al. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for human cathepsin X, a potential new inflamatory marker. J Immunol Methods. 2006;308:241–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2005.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Baker AR, Zalwango S, Malone LL, Igo RP, Jr, Qiu F, Nsereko M, et al. Genetic susceptibility to tuberculosis associated with cathepsin Z haplotype in a Ugandan household contact study. Hum Immunol. 2011;72:426–30. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2011.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ratovitski T, Chiqhladze E, Waldron E, Hirschhorn RR, Ross CA. Cysteine proteases bleomycin hydrolase and cathepsin Z mediate N-terminal proteolysis and toxicity of mutant huntingtin. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:12578–89. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.185348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hidaka S, Yasutake T, Takeshita H, Kondo M, Tsuji T, Nanashima A, et al. Differences in 20q13.2 Copy Number between Colorectal Cancers with and without liver metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:2712–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bar-Shira A, Pinthus HJ, Rozovsky U, Goldstein M, Sellers RW, Yaron Y, et al. Multiple genes in human 20q13 chromosomal region are involved in an advanced prostate cancer xenograft. Cancer Res. 2002;62:6803–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nägler DK, Krüger S, Kellner A, Ziomek E, Menard R, Buhtz P, et al. Up-regulation of Cathepsin X in prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Prostate. 2004;60:109–19. doi: 10.1002/pros.20046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rumpler G, Becker B, Hafner C, McClelland M, Stolz W, Landthaler M, et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes in models of melanoma progression by cDNA array analysis: SPARC, MIF and a novel cathepsin pro-tease characterize aggressive phenotypes. Exp Dermatol. 2003;12:761–71. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-6705.2003.00082.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sevenich L, Schurigt U, Sachse K, Gajda M, Werner F, Müller S, et al. Synergistic antitumor effects of combined cathepsin B and cathepsin Z deficiencies on breast cancer progression and metastasis in mice. PNAS. 2010;107:2497–502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907240107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kraus S, Bunsen T, Schuster S, Cichoń MA, Tacke M, Reinheckel T, et al. Cellular senescence induced by cathepsin X downregulation. Eur J Cell Biol. 2011;90:678–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2011.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Decock J, Obermajer N, Vozelj S, Hendrickx W, Paridaens R, Kos J. Cathepsin B, cathepsin H, cathepsin X and cystatin C in sera of patients with early-stage and inflammatory breast cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2008;23:161–8. doi: 10.1177/172460080802300305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kolwijck E, Kos J, Obermajer N, Span PN, Thomas CM, Massuger LF, et al. The balance between extracellular cathepsins and cystatin C is of importance for ovarian cancer. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010;40:591–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang J, Chen L, Li Y, Guan XY. Overexpression of Cathepsin Z contributes to tumor metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition of hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fonovic PU, Kos J. Efficient removal of Cathepsin L from active Cathepsin X using immunoprecipitation technique. Acta Chim. 2009;56:985–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brenner H, Bouvier AM, Foschi R, Hackl M, Larsen IK, Lemmens V, et al. Progress in colorectal cancer survival in Europe from the late 1980s to the early 21st century: The EUROCARE study. Int J Cancer. 2011 doi: 10.1002/ijc.26192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Velenik V. Post-treatment surveillance in colorectal cancer. Radiol Oncol. 2010;44:135–41. doi: 10.2478/v10019-010-0018-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zavoral M, Suchanek S, Zavada F, Dusek L, Muzik J, Seifert B, et al. Colorectal cancer screening in Europe. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:5907–15. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Booth RA. Minimally invasive biomarkers for detection and staging of colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 2007;249:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nielsen HJ, Brünner N, Frederiksen C, Lomholt AF, King D, Jørgensen LN, et al. Plasma tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1): a novel biological marker in the detection of primary colorectal cancer. Protocol outlines of the Danish-Australian endoscopy study group on colorectal cancer detection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:242–8. doi: 10.1080/00365520701523439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nielsen HJ, Christensen IJ, Brünner N. A novel prognostic index in colorectal cancer defined by serum carcinoembryonic antigen and plasma tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:200–7. doi: 10.3109/00365520903429406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Obermajer N, Premzl A, Zavašnik Bergant T, Turk B, Kos J. Carboxypeptidase cathepsin X mediates β2-integrin-dependent adhesion of differentiated U-937 cells. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312:2515–27. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nägler DK, Zhang R, Tam W, Sulea T, Purisima EO, Ménard R. Human cathepsin X: A cysteine protease with unique carboxypeptidase activity. Biochemistry. 1999;38:12648–54. doi: 10.1021/bi991371z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vasiljeva O, Papazoglou A, Krüger A, Brodoefel H, Korovin M, Deussing J, et al. Tumor cell-derived and macrophage-derived cathepsin B promotes progression and lung metastasis of mammary cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:5242–50. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lines KE, Chelala C, Dmitrovic B, Wijesuriya N, Kocher HM, Marshall JF, et al. S100P-binding protein, S100PBP, mediates adhesion through regulation of cathepsin Z in pancreatic cancer cells. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:1485–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nägler DK, Mènard R. Human cathepsin X: a novel cysteine protease of the papain family with a very short proregion and unique insertions. FEBS Lett. 1998;434:135–9. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00964-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Santamaría I, Velasco G, Pendás AM, Fueyo A, López-Otín C. Cathepsin Z, a novel human cysteine proteinase with a short propeptide domain and unique chromosomal location. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:16816–23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.27.16816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hafner A, Obermajer N, Kos J. γ-1-syntrophin mediates trafficking of γ-enolase towards the plasma membrane and enhances its neurotrophic activity. Neurosignals. 2010;18:246–58. doi: 10.1159/000324292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hafner A, Obermajer N, Kos J. γ-Enolase C-terminal peptide promotes cell survival and neurite ougrowth by activation of PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signalling pathways. Biochem J. 2012;443:439–50. doi: 10.1042/BJ20111351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Radiology and Oncology are provided here courtesy of De Gruyter

RESOURCES