Abstract
Large bowel volvulus is a rare condition that can occur in patients who present with acute abdominal pain. Radiologists should be able to recognise its appearance on multidetector CT (MDCT) images so that the correct diagnosis can be made and catastrophic consequences can be avoided. In this article, we discuss and illustrate the MDCT and three-dimensional appearance of the various forms of large bowel volvulus. As MDCT allows the precise diagnosis of topography, mechanism and severity, this technique can provide an accurate assessment of large bowel volvulus.
A large bowel volvulus (LBV) is a twist of the bowel along its own mesentery, often resulting in a closed-loop obstruction. LBV accounts for 5% of all organic large-bowel obstructions and are most common among patients aged between 50 and 60 in North America and Western Europe [1, 2]. The reported incidence of the various forms of LBV in the urban Australian population is 59% for sigmoid volvulus (SV), 39% for cecal volvulus (CV) and 2% for transverse colon volvulus [2]. Other rare forms account for less than 1% of cases. In our review of the radiology archives at our institution from August 2004 to August 2008, we encountered 23 LBVs: 13 cases of SV (57%), six cases of CV (26%), and four cases of other rare forms of the condition (17%).
The diagnosis of LBV can be challenging because its clinical presentation has low specificity compared with other non-traumatic abdominal pain. Abdominal radiographs have been shown to have insufficient sensitivity for the assessment of adult patients who report to the emergency room with non-traumatic abdominal pain [3, 4]; hence a multidetector CT (MDCT) scan is increasingly performed as a first diagnostic step. Consequently, knowledge of the features of LBV on MDCT is important for accurate diagnosis.
Pathophysiology and epidemiology
Most LBVs are the result of a closed-loop obstruction around a fulcrum point. Genesis of an LBV requires the twist of a mobile loop around a fulcrum point, this typically occurs when there is a mobile loop with an elongated mesocolon and a narrowed base, and hence both ends of the loop are close together [5]. Mobile segments that can be involved include the sigmoid, transverse colon and even caecum, which is mobile in 11–25% of the general population [6]. Figure 1 shows the main types of LBV illustrated as schematic drawings.
The severity and duration of the intestinal and mesenteric obstructive process determines the potential development of complications. During LBV, strangulation of the vascular supply within the twisted mesentery leads to a decreased blood flow and ischemia of the bowel wall. The consequences of ischemia include mesenteric haemorrhage, intramural haematoma, lack of peristalsis and distension, finally leading to infarction with perforation.
Predisposing factors include congenital or acquired anatomical variations, such as a mobile caecum, a long redundant sigmoid with an elongated mesentery, a history of abdominal surgery, late-pregnancy and patient history factors, such as mental retardation, a high-fibre diet, chronic constipation and coincidental disease [1, 5].
Multidetector CT technique
The CT protocol routinely used in our institution for non-traumatic acute abdomen was performed in each case. Rectal administration of contrast enema was performed whenever a colonic obstruction was suspected.
Our protocol for a 64 MDCT scan includes an initial unenhanced low-dose scan of the abdomen and pelvis to exclude pneumoperitoneum (collimation 2.5 mm). Stabilised patients then received rectal administration of contrast material, and a second scan with intravenous injection of 120 mL of contrast material (Iomeron 350, Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy) delivered at the rate of 2–4 mL/s using a power injector was performed at portal phase. Enhanced images were obtained with 0.625 mm collimation and were reconstructed with a soft-tissue algorithm. The mean total dose-length product (DLP) was 750 mGy cm. The mean duration of a complete MDCT exam was fewer than 10 min. Images were analysed using stack mode and multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) in the coronal and sagittal planes. On-demand three-dimensional reconstructions of selected patients were performed to help the referring physician understand the topography and mechanism involved in the most complex situations.
Diagnosis and severity signs
When demonstrating an LBV the diagnosis criterion is an abrupt transition between a normal and dilated bowel combined with the observation of convergence of both ends of the dilated loop towards the fulcrum point, creating the closed-loop obstruction. An important sign to look for is the “whirl sign”, which was first described by Fisher [7]. This is a whirlpool pattern of concentric structures including twisted intestinal loops, vessels and mesenteric fat that is highly suggestive of a torsion mechanism (Figure 2). The whirl sign is visible, however, only if the view plane is orthogonal to the axis of rotation. If the axis of the whirl were in the cranio-caudal axis, for example, the whirl sign would be best visualised in the axial plane. Therefore, we always review our exams using MPR. When administered, the contrast enema does not go beyond the obstruction site and the abrupt interruption appears as a “beak sign”.
MDCT helps radiologists to assess the severity of the condition by analyzing the twisted loop wall and the mesentery [8]. Spontaneous increased attenuation of the large bowel wall (which is related to transmural haemorrhagic necrosis), the absence or decreased enhancement of the large bowel wall, pneumatosis intestinalis (i.e. gas in the bowel wall) or thickening of the large bowel wall each suggest ischemia [6, 9] (Figure 4a, 7a,b, 9a,b and 10a). MDCT readily demonstrates perforation by showing even small pneumoperitoneum.
CT signs with low specificity for severe forms of LBV are the presence of ascites or haemorrhage, or the absence of vessel enhancement within the twisted loop mesentery [6, 9].
Prompt recognition of these findings and quick diagnosis of LBV is mandatory given the high rate of potentially lethal complications [5].
Sigmoid volvulus
Typical cases of SV (Figures 1f, 3 and 4) present as closed loop obstructions. The loop twists around its mesenteric axis resulting in a “mesenterico axial volvulus”. Both limbs of the twisted loop converge towards a fulcrum point, which appears as a whirl sign when the view plane is orthogonal to the rotation axis of the loop. In most cases, the whirl sign is found in the lower left part of the abdomen with a cranio-caudal axis. The rectum and the upstream colon are usually flat whereas the twisted loop is highly distended and located in the anterior part of the abdomen.
An alternative form of SV is the organo-axial volvulus (Figures 1e, 3 and 5) [10]. In these cases, there is no closed-loop obstruction because only one transition point is seen. Torsion occurs around the long axis of the loop and there is no more than one complete turn in the organo-axial volvulus.
Ileosigmoid knotting, or compound volvulus, is a rare mechanism of SV associated with small bowel volvulus (Figure 6). It is more frequently found in Africa, Asia and the Middle East, at an average age of 40 years [11]. The twist involves a sigmoid loop as well as ileal loops. Four limbs converge to the fulcrum point and the whirl sign is larger and located higher in the abdomen [12]. This diagnosis requires emergency surgery because ileal ischemia is prone to quick perforation and leads to a poor outcome.
The initial treatment of SV is generally accepted to be endoscopic decompression by either rigid or flexible sigmoidoscopy [2]. Urgent laparotomy is indicated in the presence of clinical signs of peritonitis or CT signs of bowel ischemia or perforation.
Cecal volvulus
CV is the torsion of a mobile caecum around its own mesentery, which often results in a closed-loop obstruction and a distended caecum. The terminal ileum is usually twisted along with the caecum. In most cases of CV, the whirl sign is found in the right part of the abdomen with a lateral or an anteroposterior axis.
Three forms of CV have been described: axial-type CV, loop-type CV and cecal bascule [6, 9]. The axial type (Figures 1c and 7), in which the caecum rotates along its vertical axis, accounts for 45% of CV cases. In this type of CV, the distended caecum remains in the lower part of the abdomen, near the right side, which may lead to misdiagnosis on plain radiographs.
The loop type (Figures 1b and 8) also accounts for 45% of CV cases. In these cases, the cecal rotation is associated with an inversion secondary to an anterior displacement. Furthermore, the distended caecum is found in the upper part of the abdomen, near the left side. Finally, the cecal bascule (Figures 1a and 9) is encountered in 10% of CV cases. No twist occurs in this case, but anterior folding of the caecum, without rotation, is observed and there is no whirl sign in any axis. The distended caecum is found in the upper part of the abdomen, but it remains on the right side.
Management of CV requires surgical intervention because endoscopic exsufflation is highly unpredictable [13].
Uncommon volvulus
A volvulus may involve a fixed part of the colon which, in theory, cannot move owing to its retroperitoneal location, fixation by various ligaments or a broad base of mesenteric attachment. These segments include the right colon, the transverse colon, the splenic flexure [14] or even the descending colon [15]. Volvulus of the right hemicolon (Figure 10) is exceptional, requiring a persistent mesocolon. To the best of our knowledge, this type of LBV has never been described in the radiological literature. Although the transverse colon is a mobile loop, a volvulus in this region of colon (Figures 1d and 11) is very unusual because its base is spread widely from splenic to hepatic flexure.
Conclusion
Volvulus formation is a rare but severe cause of organic obstruction of the large bowel. By establishing a precise diagnosis including topography, mechanism and severity, MDCT allows accurate assessment of large bowel volvuli. Radiologists should be able to recognise their appearance so that the proper diagnosis can be made and catastrophic consequences can be avoided.
Bibliography
- 1.Jones DJ. ABC of colorectal diseases. Large bowel volvulus. BMJ 1992;305:358–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lau KC, Miller BJ, Schache DJ, Cohen JR. A study of large-bowel volvulus in urban Australia. Can J Surg 2006;49:203–7 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ahn SH, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy BL, Reinert SE, Cronan JJ. Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology 2002;225:159–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kellow ZS, MacInnes M, Kurzencwyg D, Rawal S, Jaffer R, Kovacina B, et al. The role of abdominal radiography in the evaluation of the nontrauma emergency patient. Radiology 2008;248:887–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Madiba TE, Thomson SR. The management of cecal volvulus. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:264–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moore CJ, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT of cecal volvulus: unraveling the image. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:95–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fisher JK. Computed tomographic diagnosis of volvulus in intestinal malrotation. Radiology 1981;140:145–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Catalano O. Computed tomographic appearance of sigmoid volvulus. Abdom Imaging 1996;21:314–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Delabrousse E, Sarlieve P, Sailley N, Aubry S, Kastler BA. Cecal volvulus: CT findings and correlation with pathophysiology. Emerg Radiol 2007;14:411–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Janzen DL, Heap SW. Organo-axial volvulus of the sigmoid colon. Australas Radiol 1992;36:332–3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kotisso B, Bekele A. Ilio-sigmoid knotting in Addis Ababa: a three-year comprehensive retrospective analysis. Ethiop Med J 2006;44:377–83 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee SH, Park YH, Won YS. The ileosigmoid knot: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:685–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Habre J, Sautot-Vial N, Marcotte C, Benchimol D. Caecal volvulus. Am J Surg 2008;196:e48–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mittal R, Samarasam I, Chandran S, Mathew G. Primary splenic flexure volvulus. Singapore Med J 2007;48:e87–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen A, Yang FS, Shih SL, Sheu CY. Case report. CT diagnosis of volvulus of the descending colon with persistent mesocolon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1003–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]