Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Hematology & Blood Transfusion logoLink to Indian Journal of Hematology & Blood Transfusion
. 2009 Jan 11;24(4):170–172. doi: 10.1007/s12288-008-0041-8

HemoCue photometer: a better alternative of hemoglobin estimation in blood donors?

Kafil Akhtar 1,, Rana K Sherwani 1, Khaliqur Rahman 1, Jaseem Hasan 1, Mohd Shahid 1
PMCID: PMC3475424  PMID: 23100957

Abstract

Purpose of study

To find out the prevalence of anemia in potential blood donors and to compare the direct cynmethemoglobin and HemoCue methods for assessing hemoglobin concentration.

Material and methods

The study group included 540 potential blood donors; who were tested for their hemoglobin concentration in capillary blood samples by direct cynmethemoglobin and HemoCue methods.

Results

Average age of the potential donors was 39.2 year, with 505 males and 35 females. Mean hemoglobin concentration using the HemoCue was 13.2 ± 2.4 g/dl and 12.8 ± 2.3 g/dl with the direct cynmethemoglobin method (Table 1). The prevalence of anemia was slightly higher when using the direct cynmethemoglobin method (14.1%) as compared to HemoCue method (13.6%). The sensitivity and specificity for the HemoCue assessment was 94.1% and 95.2% respectively as compared to 90.1% and 94.2% respectively for the direct cynmethemoglobin method.

Conclusion

Photometric hemoglobin determination (HemoCue) combines the convenience of onsite testing with sufficient accuracy and rapidity. We feel this is a better method for evaluating potential blood donors.

Keywords: Anemia, Blood donors, Cynmethemoglobin method, HemoCue

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (469.2 KB).

References

  • 1.Dallmen P.R. In: Iron — Present Knowledge in Nutrition. Brown M., editor. Washington DC: Nutrition Foundation; 1990. pp. 241–250. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Second Report on the World Nutrition Situation: Global and Regional Results, Geneva, United Nations. ACC Sub-Committee on Nutrition 1992 1:92–93
  • 3.National Family Health Survey II (NFHS-II) Delhi: Anemia Among Women and Children, Mumbai International Institute for Population Sciences 2002, 141–157
  • 4.Stoltzfus R.J. Rethinking Anemia Surveillance. Lancet. 1997;349:1764–1766. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)12355-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yip R. Iron Deficiency — Contemporary scientific issues and international programmatic issues. Journal of Nutrition. 1994;124:1479–1490. doi: 10.1093/jn/124.suppl_8.1479S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anaemia detection in health services: guidelines for program managers. Seattle, WA, Program for appropriate technology in Health 1996; 2:23–28
  • 7.Hainline A., Jr . Hemoglobin. In: Seligson D., editor. Standard Methods of Clinical Chemistry. New York: Academic Press; 1958. pp. 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schenck H., Falkensson M., Lundberg B. Evaluation of “HemoCue” — A New Device for Determining Hemoglobin. Clinical Chemistry. 1986;32:526–529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Assendelft O.W. Photometry and the standardized method for the determination of hemoglobin. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1971;101:1649–1652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Healy T. Hemoglobin Analysis — Diagnostics in Africa. Clin Chemistry. 1994;27:2–4. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Hematology & Blood Transfusion are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES